Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Neuropsychological Predictors of Outcome Following Traumatic Brain Injury in Adults: a Meta-Analysis

  • Review
  • Published:
Neuropsychology Review Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Several neuropsychological dimensions are correlated with functional outcome (e.g., ability to return to family and community roles) following traumatic brain injury (TBI). Commonly investigated neuropsychological dimensions include verbal memory, visuo-spatial construction, set-shifting, generativity, and processing speed. Unfortunately, small sample sizes across relevant studies have contributed to inconsistent results. Furthermore, no studies have concurrently measured all of the candidate neuropsychological predictors, most of which are known to be inter-correlated. Thus, the unique predictive effects associated with the candidate predictors in TBI recovery have never been investigated. Consequently, this study used both meta-analysis and multiple regression to statistically evaluate neuropsychological candidate predictors across two outcome variables (1) the Glasgow Outcome Scale-Extended (GOS-E) and (2) the Disability Rating Scale (DRS). Seven studies met inclusion criteria. Based on the meta-analyses, the following neuropsychological dimensions were found to be correlated with the GOS-E: immediate verbal memory (r = .43, 95% CI [.27, .58]), delayed verbal memory (r = .43, 95% CI [.21, .61]), visuo-spatial construction (r = .29, 95% CI [.15, .53]), set-shifting (r = −.31, 95% CI [−.45, −.15], and generativity (r = .44, 95% CI [.32, .54]). By contrast, only one neuropsychological dimension was found to be significantly related to the DRS (generativity: r = −.21, 95% CI [−.39, −.01]). Multiple regression on the GOS-E relevant meta-analytically derived correlation matrix determined that all neuropsychological dimensions were significant predictors of the GOS-E (multiple R 2 = .31) with the exception of immediate verbal memory or learning. However, due to analytic characteristics, these findings must be interpreted with caution. Results were consistent with the need to consider multiple neuropsychological abilities in recovery and rehabilitation following TBI.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. It is noted that the Maze Task has been classified as a measure of working memory in previous versions of the Wechsler intelligence tests. However, recent conceptualizations of executive functioning (e.g., Fisk and Sharp 2004) have included both working memory and fluid reasoning as dimensions of executive functioning and have classified maze tasks as measures of fluid reasoning (e.g., Lezak et al. 2004).

  2. As reported in the Results section, only one neuropsychological dimension was found to relate to the DRS in a statistically significant manner. Thus, it was not considered necessary to conduct a meta-analytic multiple regression for the DRS relevant data.

  3. The multiple regression was conducted upon data that reflected the correlations to three decimal places. This data is available upon request.

References

Studies Included in the Meta-Analyses are Denoted by an Asterisk

  • Ackerman, P. L., Beier, M. E., & Boyle, M. O. (2005). Working memory and intelligence: the same or different constructs? Psychological Bulletin, 131(1), 30–60. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.131.1.30.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Adrover-Roig, D., Sesé, A., Barceló, F., & Palmer, A. (2012). A latent variable approach to executive control in healthy ageing. Brain and Cognition, 78(3), 284–299. doi:10.1016/j.bandc.2012.01.005.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Atchison, T., Sander, A., Struchen, M., High, W., Roebuck, T., Contant, C., et al. (2004). Relationship between neuropsychological test performance and productivity at 1-year following traumatic brain injury. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 18(2), 249–265.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • *Bercaw, E. L., Hanks, R. A., Millis, S. R., & Gola, T. J. (2011). Changes in neuropsychological performance after traumatic brain injury from inpatient rehabilitation to 1-year follow-up in predicting 2-year functional outcomes. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 25(1), 72–89.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Boake, C., Millis, S. R., High Jr., W. M., Delmonico, R. L., Kreutzer, J. S., Rosenthal, M., et al. (2001). Using early neuropsychologic testing to predict long-term productivity outcome from traumatic brain injury. Archives of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, 82(6), 761–768.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Borenstein, M., Hedges, L., Higgins, J., & Rothstein, H. (2005). Comprehensive meta-analysis version 2 (p. 104). Englewood: Biostat.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bottari, C., Dassa, C., Rainville, C., & Dutil, E. (2009). The criterion-related validity of the IADL profile with measures of executive functions, indices of trauma severity and sociodemographic characteristics. Brain Injury, 23(4), 322–335.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, S. P., & Peterson, R. A. (1993). Antecedents and consequences of salesperson job satisfaction: meta-analysis and assessment of causal effects. Journal of Marketing Research, 30(1), 63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cheung, M. W. L., & Vijayakumar, R. (2016). A guide to conducting a meta-analysis. Neuropsychology Review, 26(2), 121–128. doi:10.1007/s11065-016-9319-z.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Choi, S. C., Marmarou, A., Bullock, R., Nichols, J. S., Wei, X., & Pitts, L. (1998). Primary end points in phase III clinical trials of severe head trauma: DRS versus GOS. Journal of Neurotrauma, 15(10), 771–776.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Curtiss, G., Klemz, S., & Vanderploeg, R. D. (2000). Acute impact of severe traumatic brain injury on family structure and coping responses. The Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation, 15(5), 1113–1122.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Davey, J., Turner, R. M., Clarke, M. J., & Higgins, J. P. (2011). Characteristics of meta-analyses and their component studies in the Cochrane database of systematic reviews: a cross-sectional, descriptive analysis. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 22(2).

  • Dawson, D. R., Schwartz, M. L., Winocur, G., & Stuss, D. T. (2007). Return to productivity following traumatic brain injury: cognitive, psychological, physical, spiritual, and environmental correlates. Disability & Rehabilitation, 29(4), 301–313.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Emmerik-van Oortmerssen, K., van de Glind, G., van den Brink, W., Smit, F., Crunelle, C. L., Swets, M., & Schoevers, R. A. (2012). Prevalence of attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder in substance use disorder patients: a meta-analysis and meta-regression analysis. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 122(1–2), 11–19. doi:10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2011.12.007.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Farace, E., & Alves, W. M. (2000). Do women fare worse: a metaanalysis of gender differences in traumatic brain injury outcome. Journal of Neurosurgery, 93(4), 539–545. doi:10.3171/jns.2000.93.4.0539.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fisk, J. E., & Sharp, C. A. (2004). Age-related impairment in executive functioning: updating, inhibition, shifting, and access. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 26(7), 874–890. doi:10.1080/13803390490510680.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fleming, J., Tooth, L., Hassell, M., & Chan, W. (1999). Prediction of community integration and vocational outcome 2-5 years after traumatic brain injury rehabilitation in Australia. Brain Injury, 13(6), 417–431.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gardner, M., & Altman, D. (1989). Statistics with confidence: confidence intervals and statistical guidelines. British Medical Journal, 28(33).

  • Gates, N. J., & March, E. G. (2016). A Neuropsychologist’s guide to undertaking a systematic review for publication: making the most of PRISMA guidelines. Neuropsychology Review, 26(2), 109–120. doi:10.1007/s11065-016-9318-0.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • *Gautschi, O. P., Huser, M. C., Smoll, N. R., Maedler, S., Bednarz, S., von Hessling, A., et al. (2013). Long-term neurological and neuropsychological outcome in patients with severe traumatic brain injury. Clinical Neurology and Neurosurgery, 115(12), 2482–2488. doi:10.1016/j.clineuro.2013.09.038.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gignac, G. E., & Szodorai, E. T. (2016). Effect size guidelines for individual differences researchers. Personality and Individual Differences, 102, 74–78. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2016.06.069.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Girard, D., Brown, J., Burnett-Stolnack, M., Hashimoto, N., Hier-Wellmer, S., Perlman, O., & Seigerman, C. (1996). The relationship of neuropsychological status and productive outcomes following traumatic brain injury. Brain Injury. doi:10.1080/026990596124089.

  • Gouvier, W. D., Blanton, P. D., LaPorte, K. K., & Nepomuceno, C. (1987). Reliability and validity of the disability rating scale and the levels of cognitive functioning scale in monitoring recovery from severe head injury. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 68(2), 94–97.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Green, S. B. (1991). How many subjects does it take to do a regression analysis. Multivariate behavioral research, 26(3), 499–510.

  • Hanks, R. A., Rapport, L. J., Millis, S. R., & Deshpande, S. A. (1999). Measures of executive functioning as predictors of functional ability and social integration in a rehabilitation sample. Archives of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, 80(9), 1030–1037.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hanlon, R. E., Demery, J. A., Martinovich, Z., & Kelly, J. P. (1999). Effects of acute injury characteristics on neuropsychological status and vocational outcome following mild traumatic brain injury. Brain Injury, 13(11), 873–887.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Heaton, R. K., Barth, J. T., Crosson, B. A., Larrabee, G. J., & Reynolds, C. R. (2002). Request for review papers on empirical support for areas of neuropsychological practice. Newsletter, 40(20), 1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Higgins, J., & Green, S. (Eds.). (2011). Meta-regression. In Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions (5.1.0). The Cochrane Collaboration. http://handbook.cochrane.org/chapter_9/9_6_4_meta_regression.htm.

  • Hoskin, K. M., Jackson, M., & Crowe, S. F. (2005). Money management after acquired brain dysfunction: The validity of neuropsychological assessment. Rehabilitation Psychology, 50(4), 355.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huedo-Medina, T. B., Sánchez-Meca, J., Marın-Martınez, F., & Botella, J. (2006). Assessing heterogeneity in meta-analysis: Q statistic or I 2 index? Psychological Methods, 11(2), 193–206.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hunter JE. (1983). A causal analysis of cognitive ability, job knowledge, job performance, and supervisor ratings. In Landy FJ, Zedeck S, Cleveland J (Eds.), Performance measurement and theory (pp. 257–266). New Jersey: Erlbaum

  • IBM Corporation. (2013a). IMB SPSS Amos. Meadville: Amos Development Corporation.

    Google Scholar 

  • IBM Corporation. (2013b). SPSS Statstics for windows. Armonk: IBM Corp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jennett, B., Snoek, J., Bond, M. R., & Brooks, N. (1981). Disability after severe head injury: observations on the use of the Glasgow outcome scale. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry, 44(4), 285–293.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kalechstein, A. D., Newton, T. F., & van Gorp, W. G. (2003). Neurocognitive functioning is associated ith employment status: a quantitative review. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology (Neuropsychology, Development and Cognition: Section A), 25(8), 1186–1191. doi:10.1076/jcen.25.8.1186.16723.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Krpan, K. M., Levine, B., Stuss, D. T., & Dawson, D. R. (2007). Executive function and coping at one-year post traumatic brain injury. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 29(1), 36–46.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lezak, M. D., Howieson, D.B., & Loring, D.W. (2004). Neuropsychological assessment. New York: Oxford University Press.

  • *Little, A. J., Templer, D. I., Persel, C. S., & Ashley, M. J. (1996). Feasibility of the neuropsychological spectrum in prediction of outcome following head injury. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 52(4), 455–460.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lu, J., Marmarou, A., Lapane, K., Turf, E., & Wilson, L. (2010). A method for reducing misclassification in the extended Glasgow outcome score. Journal of Neurotrauma, 27(5), 843–852.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Malec, J. F., Smigielski, J. S., DePompolo, R. W., Thompson, J. M., Malect, J. F., & Smigielski, J. S. (1993). Outcome evaluation and prediction in a comprehensive-integrated post-acute outpatient brain injury rehabilitation programme. Brain Injury, 7(1), 15–29.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Malec, J. F., Hammond, F. M., Giacino, J. T., Whyte, J., & Wright, J. (2012). Structured interview to improve the reliability and psychometric integrity of the disability rating scale. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 93(9), 1603–1608.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Meyers, J. E., & Meyers, K. R. (1995). Rey complex figure test and recognition trial: Professional manual. Odessa: Psychological Assessment Resources, Inc..

    Google Scholar 

  • Millis, S. R., Rosenthal, M., & Lourie, I. F. (1994). Predicting community integration after traumatic brain injury with neuropsychological measures. International Journal of Neuroscience. doi:10.3109/00207459408986077.

  • Miyake, A., Friedman, N. P., Emerson, M. J., Witzki, A. H., Howerter, A., Wager, T. D. (2000). The unity and diversity of executive functions and their contributions to complex “frontal lobe” tasks: a latent variable analysis. Cognitive psychology, 41(1), 49–100.

  • Mushkudiani, N. A., Engel, D. E., Steyerberg, E. W., Butcher, I., Lu, J., Marmarou, A., et al. (2007). Prognostic value of demographic characteristics in traumatic brain injury: results from the IMPACT study. Journal of Neurotrauma, 24(2), 259–269. doi:10.1089/neu.2006.0028.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nichol, A. D., Higgins, A. M., Gabbe, B. J., Murray, L., Cooper, D. J., & Cameron, P. A. (2011). Measuring functional and quality of life outcomes following major head injury: common scales and checklists. Injury, 42(3), 281–287.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pedhazur, E. L. (1997). Multiple regression in behavioral research (3rd ed.). South Melbourne: Wadsworth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pohjasvaara, T., Leskela, M., Vataja, R., Kalska, H., Ylikoski, R., Hietanen, M., et al. (2002). Post-stroke depression, executive dysfunction and functional outcome. European Journal of Neurology, 9(3), 269–275.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • *Ponsford, J., Draper, K., & Schonberger, M. (2008). Functional outcome 10 years after traumatic brain injury: its relationship with demographic, injury severity, and cognitive and emotional status. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 14(2), 233–242. doi:10.1017/S1355617708080272.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Prigatano, G. P. (1999). Principles of neuropsychological rehabilitation. New York: Oxford university press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rappaport, M., Hall, K. M., Hopkins, K., Belleza, T., & Cope, D. N. (1982). Disability rating scale for severe head trauma: coma to community. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 63(3), 118–123.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rassovsky, Y., Satz, P., Alfano, M. S., Light, R. K., Zaucha, K., McArthur, D. L., & Hovda, D. (2006). Functional outcome in TBI II: verbal memory and information processing speed mediators. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 28(4), 581–591. doi:10.1080/13803390500434474.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Reger, M. A., Welsh, R. K., Watson, G. S., Cholerton, B., Baker, L. D., & Craft, S. (2004). The relationship between neuropsychological functioning and driving ability in dementia: a meta-analysis. Neuropsychology, 18(1), 85–93. doi:10.1037/0894-4105.18.1.85.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Renison, B., Ponsford, J., Testa, R., & Richardson, B. (2012). The ecological and construct validity of a newly developed measure of executive function: the virtual library task. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 18(3), 440–450.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Resnik, L., & Plow, M. A. (2009). Measuring participation as defined by the International classification of functioning, disability and health: an evaluation of existing measures. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 90(5), 856–866.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Riley, R. D., Higgins, J. P. T., & Deeks, J. J. (2011). Interpretation of random effects meta-analyses. BMJ, 342, d549.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ross, S. R., Millis, S. R., & Rosenthal, M. (1997). Neuropsychological prediction of psychosocial outcome after traumatic brain injury. Applied Neuropsychology. doi:10.1207/s15324826an0403_4.

  • Sanderson, S., Tatt, I. D., & Higgins, J. P. (2007). Tools for assessing quality and susceptibility to bias in observational studies in epidemiology: a systematic review and annotated bibliography. International Journal of Epidemiology, 36(3), 666–676. doi:10.1093/ije/dym018.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Shukla, D., Devi, B. I., & Agrawal, A. (2011). Outcome measures for traumatic brain injury. Clinical Neurology and Neurosurgery, 113(6), 435–441. doi:10.1016/j.clineuro.2011.02.013.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Shum, D., Levin, H., & Chan, R. C. K. (2011). Prospective memory in patients with closed head injury: a review. Neuropsychologia, 49(8), 2156–2165. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2011.02.006.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • *Sigurdardottir, S., Andelic, N., Roe, C., & Schanke, A.-K. (2009). Cognitive recovery and predictors of functional outcome 1 year after traumatic brain injury. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society. doi:10.1017/S1355617709990452.

  • Spitz, G., Ponsford, J. L., Rudzki, D., & Maller, J. J. (2012). Association between cognitive performance and functional outcome following traumatic brain injury: A longitudinal multilevel examination. Neuropsychology, 26(5), 604–612. doi:10.1037/a0029239.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Strauss, E., Sherman, E. M. S., & Spreen, O. (2006a). A compendium of neuropsychological tests: Administration, norms, and commentary (3rd ed.). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strauss, E., Sherman, E. M. S., & Spreen, O. (2006b). Measurement Error. In E. Strauss, E. Sherman, & O. Spreen (Eds.), A compendium of neuropsychological tests: Administration, norms, and commentary (3rd ed., pp. 14–17). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Struchen, M. A., Clark, A. N., Sander, A. M., Mills, M. R., Evans, G., & Kurtz, D. (2008). Relation of executive functioning and social communication measures to functional outcomes following traumatic brain injury. NeuroRehabilitation, 23(2), 185–198.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Van Velzen, J. M., Van Bennekom, C. A. M., Edelaar, M. J. A., Sluiter, J. K., & Frings-Dresen, M. H. W. (2009). How many people return to work after acquired brain injury?: A systematic review. Brain Injury, 23(6), 473–488.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Viswesvaran, C., & Ones, D. S. (1995). Theory testing: combining psychometric meta-analysis and structural equations modeling. Personnel Psychology, 48(4), 865–885.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Von Hippel, P. T. (2015). The heterogeneity statistic I 2 can be biased in small meta-analyses. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 15(1), 1–8. doi:10.1186/s12874-015-0024-z.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • *Williams, M. W., Rapport, L. J., Hanks, R. A., Millis, S. R. Greene, H. A., (2013). Incremental validity of neuropsychological evaluations to computed tomography in predicting long-term outcomes after traumatic brain injury. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 27(3), 356–375. doi:10.1037/e708332011-001.

  • *Wilson, J. T. L., Pettigrew, L. E. L., & Teasdale, G. M. (2000). Emotional and cognitive consequences of head injury in relation to the Glasgow outcome scale. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry, 69(2), 204–209. doi:10.1136/jnnp.69.2.204.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, J. T. L., Edwards, P., Fiddes, H., Stewart, E., & Teasdale, G. M. (2002). Reliability of postal questionnaires for the Glasgow outcome scale. Journal of Neurotrauma, 19(9), 999–1005.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wood, R. L., & Rutterford, N. A. (2006). Demographic and cognitive predictors of long-term psychosocial outcome following traumatic brain injury. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 12(3), 350–358.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Brightwater Care Group who supported this study through a student scholarship.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Psychogical Science, University of Western Australia, M304, Perth, WA, 6009, Australia

    Fiona Allanson, Carmela Pestell, Gilles E. Gignac, Yong Xiang Yeo & Michael Weinborn

Authors
  1. Fiona Allanson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Carmela Pestell
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Gilles E. Gignac
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Yong Xiang Yeo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Michael Weinborn
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michael Weinborn.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Electronic supplementary material

ESM 1

(DOCX 116 kb)

ESM 2

(DOCX 31 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Allanson, F., Pestell, C., Gignac, G. et al. Neuropsychological Predictors of Outcome Following Traumatic Brain Injury in Adults: a Meta-Analysis. Neuropsychol Rev 27, 187–201 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11065-017-9353-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11065-017-9353-5

Keywords

Search

Navigation