Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Underwater Backscatter Recognition Using Deep Fuzzy Extreme Convolutional Neural Network Optimized via Hunger Games Search

  • Published:
Neural Processing Letters Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Although deep learning methods are accurate in underwater backscatter detection, identification, and classification, they suffer from long processing times, especially in the training phase. Therefore, a four-phase deep learning (DL) based approach is proposed for real-time underwater backscatter classification. First, a deep convolutional neural network (DCNN) is exploited as a feature extraction section. Secondly, in order to reduce training and testing time, the extreme learning machine (ELM) substitutes the fully connected layer. Using ELM in the last layer causes uncertainty and unreliability; therefore, in the third stage, the hunger games search (HGS) will be used to tackle this shortcoming. Finally, fuzzy systems are used to balance the relationship between the HGS’s exploration and exploitation phases. For evaluating the efficiency of the designed fuzzy HGS (FHGS), we first use 23 standard benchmark mathematical optimization functions. Subsequently, we employ three experimental sonar datasets to examine the efficiency of DCNN-ELM-FHGS in dealing with high-dimensional datasets. For a comprehensive investigation, we compare FHGS to the standard HGS, Whale Optimization Algorithm, Gray Wolf Optimizer, Kalman Filter, Henry Gas Solubility Optimization, Harris Hawks Optimization, Chimp Optimization Algorithm, Genetic Algorithm, and Particle Swarm Optimization, with respect to convergence rate, entrapment in local minima, and detection accuracy. The results demonstrate that the proposed strategy performs better in detecting underwater anomaly targets by an average of 2.11 percent compared to the best benchmark model.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Daihong J, Sai Z, Lei D, Yueming D (2022) Multi-scale generative adversarial network for image super-resolution. Soft Comput 26:3631–3641

    Google Scholar 

  2. Chen Z, Tang J, Zhang XY, So DKC, Jin S, Wong K-K (2021) Hybrid evolutionary-based sparse channel estimation for IRS-assisted mmWave MIMO systems. IEEE Trans Wirel Commun 21:1586–1601

    Google Scholar 

  3. Zheng W, Liu X, Yin L (2021) Research on image classification method based on improved multi-scale relational network. PeerJ Comput Sci 7:e613

    Google Scholar 

  4. Wang Y, Zou R, Liu F, Zhang L, Liu Q (2021) A review of wind speed and wind power forecasting with deep neural networks. Appl Energy 304:117766

    Google Scholar 

  5. He Y, Dai L, Zhang H (2020) Multi-branch deep residual learning for clustering and beamforming in user-centric network. IEEE Commun Lett 24:2221–2225

    Google Scholar 

  6. Li M, Chen S, Shen Y, Liu G, Tsang IW, Zhang Y (2022) Online multi-agent forecasting with interpretable collaborative graph neural networks. IEEE Trans Neural Netw Learn Syst

  7. Liu F, Zhang G, Lu J (2020) Heterogeneous domain adaptation: an unsupervised approach. IEEE Trans Neural Netw Learn Syst 31:5588–5602

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. Zheng W, Cheng J, Wu X, Sun R, Wang X, Sun X (2022) Domain knowledge-based security bug reports prediction. Knowl Based Syst 241:108293

    Google Scholar 

  9. Qin C, Shi G, Tao J, Yu H, Jin Y, Xiao D, Zhang Z, Liu C (2022) An adaptive hierarchical decomposition-based method for multi-step cutterhead torque forecast of shield machine. Mech Syst Signal Process 175:109148. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp.2022.109148

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Li B, Yang J, Yang Y, Li C, Zhang Y (2021) Sign language/gesture recognition based on cumulative distribution density features using UWB radar. IEEE Trans Instrum Meas 70:1–13

    Google Scholar 

  11. Gao N, Zhang Z, Deng J, Guo X, Cheng B, Hou H (2022) Acoustic metamaterials for noise reduction: a review. Adv Mater Technol 2100698

  12. Zhou G, Li C, Zhang D, Liu D, Zhou X, Zhan J (2021) Overview of underwater transmission characteristics of oceanic LiDAR. IEEE J Sel Top Appl Earth Obs Remote Sens 14:8144–8159

    Google Scholar 

  13. Yu J, Lu L, Chen Y, Zhu Y, Kong L (2019) An indirect eavesdropping attack of keystrokes on touch screen through acoustic sensing. IEEE Trans Mob Comput 20:337–351

    Google Scholar 

  14. Zhou W, Lv Y, Lei J, Yu L (2019) Global and local-contrast guides content-aware fusion for RGB-D saliency prediction. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern Syst 51:3641–3649

    Google Scholar 

  15. Gong X, Wang L, Mou Y, Wang H, Wei X, Zheng W, Yin L (2022) Improved four-channel PBTDPA control strategy using force feedback bilateral teleoperation system. Int J Control Autom Syst 20:1002–1017

    Google Scholar 

  16. Zhou G, Long S, Xu J, Zhou X, Song B, Deng R, Wang C (2021) Comparison analysis of five waveform decomposition algorithms for the airborne LiDAR echo signal. IEEE J Sel Top Appl Earth Obs Remote Sens 14:7869–7880

    Google Scholar 

  17. Liu H, Shi Z, Li J, Liu C, Meng X, Du Y, Chen J (2021) Detection of road cavities in urban cities by 3D ground-penetrating radar. Geophysics 86:WA25–WA33

    Google Scholar 

  18. Zhou G, Zhou X, Song Y, Xie D, Wang L, Yan G, Hu M, Liu B, Shang W, Gong C (2021) Design of supercontinuum laser hyperspectral light detection and ranging (LiDAR)(SCLaHS LiDAR). Int J Remote Sens 42:3731–3755

    Google Scholar 

  19. Ma Z, Zheng W, Chen X, Yin L (2021) Joint embedding VQA model based on dynamic word vector. PeerJ Comput Sci 7:e353

    Google Scholar 

  20. Khishe M, Mosavi MR, Kaveh M (2017) Improved migration models of biogeography-based optimization for sonar dataset classification by using neural network. Appl Acoust. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apacoust.2016.11.012

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Sun M, Yan L, Zhang L, Song L, Guo J, Zhang H (2019) New insights into the rapid formation of initial membrane fouling after in-situ cleaning in a membrane bioreactor. Process Biochem 78:108–113

    Google Scholar 

  22. Luo-Theilen X, Rung T (2019) Numerical analysis of the installation procedures of offshore structures. Ocean Eng 179:116–127

    Google Scholar 

  23. Qin C, Xiao D, Tao J, Yu H, Jin Y, Sun Y, Liu C (2022) Concentrated velocity synchronous linear chirplet transform with application to robotic drilling chatter monitoring. Measurement 194:111090

    Google Scholar 

  24. Zhao S, Li F, Li H, Lu R, Ren S, Bao H, Lin J-H, Han S (2020) Smart and practical privacy-preserving data aggregation for fog-based smart grids. IEEE Trans Inf Forensics Secur 16:521–536

    Google Scholar 

  25. Li A, Spano D, Krivochiza J, Domouchtsidis S, Tsinos CG, Masouros C, Chatzinotas S, Li Y, Vucetic B, Ottersten B (2020) A tutorial on interference exploitation via symbol-level precoding: overview, state-of-the-art and future directions. IEEE Commun Surv Tutor 22:796–839

    Google Scholar 

  26. Kong H, Lu L, Yu J, Chen Y, Tang F (2020) Continuous authentication through finger gesture interaction for smart homes using WiFi. IEEE Trans Mob Comput 20:3148–3162

    Google Scholar 

  27. Wu Z, Li C, Cao J, Ge Y (2020) On scalability of association-rule-based recommendation: a unified distributed-computing framework. ACM Trans Web 14:1–21

    Google Scholar 

  28. Zheng W, Shen T, Chen X, Deng P (2022) Interpretability application of the Just-in-Time software defect prediction model. J Syst Softw 188:111245

    Google Scholar 

  29. Li D, Ge SS, Lee TH (2020) Fixed-time-synchronized consensus control of multiagent systems. IEEE Trans Control Netw Syst 8:89–98

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  30. Liu M, Xue Z, Zhang H, Li Y (2021) Dual-channel membrane capacitive deionization based on asymmetric ion adsorption for continuous water desalination. Electrochem Commun 125:106974

    Google Scholar 

  31. Xu Q, Yang Y, Zhang C, Zhang L (2018) Deep convolutional neural network-based autonomous marine vehicle maneuver. Int J Fuzzy Syst 20:687–699

    Google Scholar 

  32. Jin Y, Zhang D, Li M, Wang Z, Chen Y (2019) A fuzzy support vector machine-enhanced convolutional neural network for recognition of glass defects. Int J Fuzzy Syst 21:1870–1881

    Google Scholar 

  33. Shen F-J, Chen J-H, Wang W-Y, Tsai D-L, Shen L-C, Tseng C-T (2020) A CNN-based human head detection algorithm implemented on edge AI chip. In: 2020 International conference on system science and engineering. IEEE, pp 1–5

  34. Hsu M-J, Chien Y-H, Wang W-Y, Hsu C-C (2020) A convolutional fuzzy neural network architecture for object classification with small training database. Int J Fuzzy Syst 22:1–10

    Google Scholar 

  35. Mosavi MR, Khishe M, Moridi A (2016) Classification of sonar target using hybrid particle swarm and gravitational search. IJMT 3:1–13

    Google Scholar 

  36. Mosavi MR, Kaveh M, Khishe M, Aghababaie M (2018) Design and implementation a sonar data set classifier using multi-layer perceptron neural network trained by elephant herding optimization. IJMT 5:1–12

    Google Scholar 

  37. Khishe M, Mohammadi H (2019) Passive sonar target classification using multi-layer perceptron trained by salp swarm algorithm. Ocean Eng. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2019.04.013

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Taghavi M, Khishe M (2019) A modified grey wolf optimizer by individual best memory and penalty factor for sonar and radar dataset classification

  39. Huang G-B, Zhu Q-Y, Siew C-K (2004) Extreme learning machine: a new learning scheme of feedforward neural networks. In: 2004 IEEE international joint conference on neural networks (IEEE Cat. No. 04CH37541), Ieee, pp 985–990

  40. Huang G-B, Zhu Q-Y, Siew C-K (2006) Extreme learning machine: theory and applications. Neurocomputing 70:489–501

    Google Scholar 

  41. Huang G-B, Zhou H, Ding X, Zhang R (2011) Extreme learning machine for regression and multiclass classification. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern Part B 42:513–529

    Google Scholar 

  42. Pao Y-H, Park G-H, Sobajic DJ (1994) Learning and generalization characteristics of the random vector functional-link net. Neurocomputing 6:163–180

    Google Scholar 

  43. Zhou Y, Peng J, Chen CLP (2014) Extreme learning machine with composite kernels for hyperspectral image classification. IEEE J Sel Top Appl Earth Obs Remote Sens 8:2351–2360

    Google Scholar 

  44. Hochba DS (1997) Approximation algorithms for NP-hard problems. ACM SIGACT News 28:40–52

    Google Scholar 

  45. Mosavi MR, Khishe M, Akbarisani M (2017) Neural network trained by biogeography-based optimizer with chaos for sonar data set classification. Wirel Pers Commun. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11277-017-4110-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Qiao W, Khishe M, Ravakhah S (2021) Underwater targets classification using local wavelet acoustic pattern and multi-layer perceptron neural network optimized by modified Whale Optimization Algorithm. Ocean Eng 219:108415. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2020.108415

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Khishe M, Safari A (2019) Classification of sonar targets using an MLP neural network trained by dragonfly algorithm. Wirel Pers Commun. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11277-019-06520-w

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Zhang H, Mo Z, Wang J, Miao Q (2020) Nonlinear-drifted fractional brownian motion with multiple hidden state variables for remaining useful life prediction of lithium-ion batteries. IEEE Trans Reliab. https://doi.org/10.1109/TR.2019.2896230

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Afrakhteh S, Mosavi MR, Khishe M, Ayatollahi A (2020) Accurate classification of EEG signals using neural networks trained by hybrid population-physic-based algorithm. Int J Autom Comput. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11633-018-1158-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Panchal G, Panchal D (2015) Solving np hard problems using genetic algorithm. Transportation (Amst) 106:2–6

    Google Scholar 

  51. Abdulrahman SM (2017) Using swarm intelligence for solving NP-hard problems. Acad J Nawroz Univ 6:46–50

    Google Scholar 

  52. Lin F-T, Kao C-Y, Hsu C-C (1993) Applying the genetic approach to simulated annealing in solving some NP-hard problems. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern 23:1752–1767

    Google Scholar 

  53. Yang XS (2010) A new metaheuristic Bat-inspired Algorithm. Stud Comput Intell. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-12538-6_6

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  54. Xu X, Rong H, Trovati M, Liptrott M, Bessis N (2018) CS-PSO: chaotic particle swarm optimization algorithm for solving combinatorial optimization problems. Soft Comput 22:783–795

    Google Scholar 

  55. Zhou J, Yao X (2017) Multi-objective hybrid artificial bee colony algorithm enhanced with Lévy flight and self-adaption for cloud manufacturing service composition. Appl Intell. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10489-017-0927-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Khishe M, Mosavi MR (2020) Chimp optimization algorithm. Expert Syst Appl. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2020.113338

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Wolpert DH, Macready WG (1997) No free lunch theorems for optimization. IEEE Trans Evol Comput 1:67–82. https://doi.org/10.1109/4235.585893

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Mousavi SM, Khisheh M, Hardani H (2015) Classification of sonar targets using OMKC. Iran J Mar Sci Technol 18:25–35

    Google Scholar 

  59. Jiang Y, Luo Q, Wei Y, Abualigah L (2021) An efficient binary Gradient-based optimizer for feature selection. Math Biosci Eng 18:3813–3854

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  60. Jiang Q, Shao F, Lin W, Gu K, Jiang G, Sun H (2017) Optimizing multistage discriminative dictionaries for blind image quality assessment. IEEE Trans Multimed 20:2035–2048

    Google Scholar 

  61. Sainath TN, Mohamed A, Kingsbury B, Ramabhadran B (2013) Deep convolutional neural networks for LVCSR. In: 2013 IEEE international conference on acoustics, speech, and signal processing. IEEE, pp 8614–8618

  62. Rawat W, Wang Z (2017) Deep convolutional neural networks for image classification: a comprehensive review. Neural Comput 29:2352–2449

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  63. LeCun Y (2015) LeNet-5, convolutional neural networks 20:14. Http//Yann.Lecun.Com/Exdb/Lenet

  64. Yang Y, Chen H, Heidari AA, Gandomi AH (2021) Hunger games search: visions, conception, implementation, deep analysis, perspectives, and towards performance shifts. Expert Syst Appl 177:114864

    Google Scholar 

  65. Li Q, Peng Q, Chen J, Yan C (2018) Improving image classification accuracy with ELM and CSIFT. Comput Sci Eng 21:26–34

    Google Scholar 

  66. Zhao X, Ma Z, Li B, Zhang Z, Liu H (2018) ELM-based convolutional neural networks making move prediction in Go. Soft Comput 22:3591–3601

    Google Scholar 

  67. Mosavi MR, Khishe M, Hatam Khani Y, Shabani M (2017) Training radial basis function neural network using stochastic fractal search algorithm to classify sonar dataset, Iran. J Electr Electron Eng. https://doi.org/10.22068/IJEEE.13.1.10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  68. Mosavi MR, Khishe M (2016) The use of radial basis function networks based on leader mass gravitational search algorithm for sonar dataset classification

  69. Saffari A, Zahiri SH, Khishe M, Mosavi SM (2020) Design of a fuzzy model of control parameters of chimp algorithm optimization for automatic sonar targets recognition. IJMT. http://ijmt.iranjournals.ir/article_241126.html

  70. Zhang H, Sun M, Song L, Guo J, Zhang L (2019) Fate of NaClO and membrane foulants during in-situ cleaning of membrane bioreactors: combined effect on thermodynamic properties of sludge. Biochem Eng J 147:146–152

    Google Scholar 

  71. Rey D, Neuhäuser M (2011) Wilcoxon-signed-rank test. In: International encyclopedia of statistical science. Springer, Berlin, pp 1658–1659

  72. Heidari AA, Mirjalili S, Faris H, Aljarah I, Mafarja M, Chen H (2019) Harris hawks optimization: algorithm and applications. Future Gener Comput Syst. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.future.2019.02.028

    Article  Google Scholar 

  73. Hashim FA, Houssein EH, Mabrouk MS, Al-Atabany W, Mirjalili S (2019) Henry gas solubility optimization: a novel physics-based algorithm. Future Gener Comput Syst. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.future.2019.07.015

    Article  Google Scholar 

  74. Ibrahim AA, Zhou H, Tan S, Zhang C, Duan J (2020) Regulated Kalman filter based training of an interval type-2 fuzzy system and its evaluation. Eng Appl Artif Intell. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engappai.2020.103867

    Article  Google Scholar 

  75. Mirjalili S, Mirjalili SM, Lewis A (2014) Grey wolf optimizer. Adv Eng Softw. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advengsoft.2013.12.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  76. Gorman RP, Sejnowski TJ (1988) Analysis of hidden units in a layered network trained to classify sonar targets. Neural Netw. https://doi.org/10.1016/0893-6080(88)90023-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  77. Gutiérrez F, Parada MA (2010) Numerical modeling of time-dependent fluid dynamics and differentiation of a shallow basaltic magma chamber. J Petrol 51:731–762

    Google Scholar 

  78. Khishe M, Mosavi M (2017) Active sonar dataset. https://doi.org/10.17632/fyxjjwzphf.1

  79. Mosavi MR, Khishe M (2017) Training a feed-forward neural network using particle swarm optimizer with autonomous groups for sonar target classification. J Circuits Syst Comput. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0218126617501857

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

The authors received no specific funding for this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Electrical Engineering, Imam Khomeini Marine Science University of Nowshahr, Nowshahr, Iran

    Mohammad Khishe & Ali Ramezani Varkani

  2. Department of Information Technology, College of Engineering and Computer Science, Lebanese French University, Kurdistan Region, Iraq

    Mokhtar Mohammadi

Authors
  1. Mohammad Khishe
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Mokhtar Mohammadi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Ali Ramezani Varkani
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mohammad Khishe.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Khishe, M., Mohammadi, M. & Ramezani Varkani, A. Underwater Backscatter Recognition Using Deep Fuzzy Extreme Convolutional Neural Network Optimized via Hunger Games Search. Neural Process Lett 55, 4843–4870 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11063-022-11068-1

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11063-022-11068-1

Keywords

Search

Navigation