Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Flexible Approach for Classifying EMG Signals for Rehabilitation Applications

  • Published:
Neurophysiology Aims and scope

Generally, the system used for recording and analysis of surface electromyography (sEMG) signals consists of an acquisition card (data), a preamplifier, and a software code for signal acquisition and signal conditioning at different stages (e.g., utilization of wavelet transform) before feeding to statistical evaluation. In our study, basically, two independent muscle locations (m.m. biceps and triceps of the human upper limb) were selected for the recording of data with multiple motion activities; analysis of the recorded data was carried out based on the extracted parameters. Further, a computational tool of analysis of variance (ANOVA) algorithm and wavelet decomposition db2 were implemented and consequently used for identifying the best mechanism for dual-channel muscle positions in the course of independent arm movements. The respective procedures are described; the results obtained are analyzed from the aspect of the possibility of their use for the control of a robot arm and upper limb prostheses.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. S. Kumar, A. Chatterjee, and A. Kumar, “Design of a below elbow myoelectric arm with proportional grip force,” J. Sci. Ind. Res.,71, No. 4, 262–265 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  2. K. Veer and R. Agarwal, “Wavelet and short-time Fourier transform comparison-based analysis of myoelectric signals,” J. Appl. Stat., 42, No. 7, 1591–1601 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. K. Kazuo and H. Yoshiaki, “An EMG-based control for an upper-limb power-assist exoskeleton robot,” IEEE Trans. Syst., Man, Cybern., Part B (Cybernetics), 42, No. 4, 1064–1071 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. A. M. Simon, L. J. Hargrove, B. A. Lock, and T. A. Kuiken, “A decision-based velocity ramp for minimizing the effect of misclassifications during real-time pattern recognition control,” IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng., 58, No. 8, 2360–2368 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. E. J. Scheme, K. B. Englehart, and B. S. Hudgins, “Selective classification for improved robustness of myoelectric control under nonideal conditions,” IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng., 58, No. 6, 1698–1705 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. A. Siddiqi, S. P. Arjunan, and D. K. Kumar, “Ageassociated changes in the spectral and statistical parameters of surface electromyogram of tibialis anterior,” Biomed. Res. Int.,2016, 7159701 (2016), doi: https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/7159701.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. A. Wołczowski and M. Kurzyński, “Human–machine interface in bioprosthesis control using EMG signal classification,” Expert Syst.,27, 53–70 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. F. A. Mahdavi, S. A. Ahmad, M. H. Marhaban, and M.-R. Akbarzadeh-T, “Surface electromyography feature extraction based on wavelet transform,” Int. J. Integr. Eng.,4, No. 3, 1–7 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  9. J. C. Navarro, F. León-Vargas, and J. B. Pérez, “EMGbased system for basic hand movement recognition,” DYNA, 79, No. 171, 41–49 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  10. K. Veer, “Interpretation of surface electromyograms to characterize arm movement,” Instrum. Sci. Technol.,42, No. 5, 513–521 (2014).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. K. Veer, “Experimental study and characterization of SEMG signals for upper limbs,” Fluctuation Noise Lett., 14, No. 3, 150028 (1–18) (2015).

  12. J. R. Cram, G. S. Kasman, and J. Holtz, Introduction to Surface Electromyography, Aspen Publishers (1998).

  13. A. Phinyomark, C. Llimsakul, and P. Phukpattaranont, “Optimal wavelet functions in wavelet denoising for multifunction myoelectric control,” ECTI Trans. Electr. Eng. Electron. Commun.,8, 43–52 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  14. T. Sharma and K. Veer, “EMG classification using wavelet functions to determine muscle contraction,” J. Med. Eng. Technol., 40, 99–105 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. K. Veer, “A technique for classification and decomposition of muscle signal for control of myoelectric prostheses based on wavelet statistical classifier,” Measurement, 60, 283–291 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. N. Bu, M. Okamoto, and T. Tsuji, “A hybrid motion classification approach for EMG-based human–robot interfaces using Bayesian and neural networks,” IEEE Trans. Robotics, 25, No. 3, 502–511 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. A. J. Young, L. H. Smith, E. J. Rouse, and L. J. Hargrove, “Classification of simultaneous movements using surface EMG pattern recognition,” IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng., 60, No. 5, 1250–1258 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. S. W. Lee, K. M. Wilson, B. A. Lock, and D. G. Kamper, “Subject-specific myoelectric pattern classification of functional hand movements for stroke survivors,” IEEE Trans. Neural Syst. Rehabil. Eng., 19, No. 5, 558–566 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. L. Liu, P. Liu, E. A. Clancy, et al., “Electromyogram whitening for improved classification accuracy in upper limb prosthesis control,” IEEE Trans. Neural Syst. Rehabil. Eng., 21, No. 5, 767–774 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. D. Farina, N. Jiang, H. Rehbaum, et al., “The extraction of neural information from the surface EMG for the control of upper-limb prostheses: Emerging avenues and challenges,” IEEE Trans. Neural Syst. Rehabil. Eng., 22, No. 4, 797–809 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. J. Ma, N. V. Thakor, and F. Matsuno, “Hand and wrist movement control of myoelectric prosthesis based on synergy,” IEEE Trans. Human-Machine Syst., 45, No. 1, 74–83 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Y. Fang, D. Zhou, K. Li, and H. Liu, “Interface prostheses with classifier-feedback based user training,” IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng.,64, No. 11, 2575–2583 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to K. Veer.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Veer, K. Flexible Approach for Classifying EMG Signals for Rehabilitation Applications. Neurophysiology 52, 60–66 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11062-020-09851-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11062-020-09851-8

Keywords

Navigation