Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Mastication Patterns in Humans: Gender Differences

  • Published:
Neurophysiology Aims and scope

Nineteen young healthy subjects were offered a morsel of hard (walnut) and soft (cake) food, while surface EMG was recorded bilaterally from the masseter muscles. The duration of the entire sequence of chewing, chewing rate, number of chewing cycles, time/cycle ratio, and mean and maximum EMG amplitudes of the above muscles were compared in women and men (n = 12 and 7, respectively). The duration of the whole chewing sequence for the soft food and duration of a single chewing cycle for both food types were significantly longer in women (P = 0.000). The masticatory frequencies for both food types were significantly greater in men (soft food: 0.98 ± 0.18 and 1.79 ± 0.18 sec–1, hard food: 1.25 ± 0.29 and 2.03 ± 0.32 sec–1 in women and men, respectively; P = 0.000). The numbers of chewing cycles for both food types were statistically similar (P = 0.38 and P = 0.67). The mean and maximum EMG amplitude were found to be nearly similar in women and men, except that the mean amplitude of the right EMG at soft food chewing was significantly higher in men (P = 0.02). Thus, chewing in women occurs, in general, more slowly, while masseter muscle activities are rather similar. The food consistency exerts a mild overall influence on the gender differences of chewing.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. S. Kiliaridis, S. Karlsson, and H. Kjellberg, “Characteristics of masticatory mandibular movements and velocity in growing individuals and young adults.” J. Dent. Res., 70, No. 10, 1367-1370 (1991).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. E. G. Gisel, L. J. Lange, and C. W. Niman, “Chewing cycles in 4- and 5-year-old Down’s syndrome children: a comparison of eating efficacy with normals,” Am. J. Occup. Ther., 38, No. 10, 666-670 (1984).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. R. E. Youssef, G. S. Throckmorton, E. 3rd Ellis and D. P. Sinn, “Comparison of habitual masticatory patterns in men and women using a custom computer program,” J. Prosthet. Dent., 78, No. 2, 179-186 (1997).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. V. F. Ferrario and C. Sforza, “Coordinated electromyographic activity of the human masseter and temporalis anterior muscles during mastication,” Eur. J. Oral Sci., 104, Nos. 5–6, 511–517 (1996).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. D. J. Neill and P. G. Howell, “A study of mastication in dentate individuals,” Int. J. Prosthodont., 1, No. 1, 93-98 (1988).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. M. A. Peyron, O. Blanc, J. P. Lund, and A. Woda, “Influence of age on adaptability of human mastication,” J. Neurophysiol., 92, No. 2, 773-779 (2004).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. G. Berretin-Felix, K. F. Genaro, I. E. Trindade, and A. S. Trindade Jr., “Masticatory function in temporomandibular dysfunction patients: electromyographic evaluation,” J. Appl. Oral Sci., 13, No. 4, 360-365 (2005).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. A. Woda, K. Foster, A. Mishellany, and M. A. Peyron, “Adaptation of healthy mastication to factors pertaining to the individual or to the food,” Physiol. Behav., 89, No. 1, 28-35 (2006).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. E. G. Gisel, “Chewing cycles in 2- to 8-year-old normal children: a developmental profile,” Am. J. Occup. Ther., 42, No. 1, 40-46 (1988).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. J. M. Varela, N. B. Castro, B. M. Biedma, et al., “A comparison of the methods used to determine chewing preference,” J. Oral Rehabil., 30, No. 10, 990-994 (2003).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. J. Paphangkorakit, N. Thothongkam, and N. Supanont, “Chewing-side determination of three food textures,” J. Oral Rehabil., 33 No. 1, 2-7 (2006).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. P. B. James, C. M. David, and D. S. William, “Gender differences in risk taking: A meta-analysis,” Psychol. Bull., 125, No. 3, 367-383 (1999).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. A. Feingold, “Gender differences in personality: a metaanalysis,” Psychol. Bull., 116, No. 3, 429-456 (1994).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. A. Guyton and J. E. Hall, Textbook of Medical Physiology, Elsevier Saunders, Philadelphia (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  15. S. Calderon Pdos, E. M. Kogawa, J. R. Lauris, and P. C. Conti, “The influence of gender and bruxism on the human maximum bite force,” J. Appl. Oral Sci., 14, No. 6, 448-453 (2006).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. F. Cecere, S. Ruf, and H. Pancherz, “Is quantitative electromyography reliable?,” J. Orofac. Pain, 10, No. 1, 38-47 (1996).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. C. Hagberg, “Electromyography and bite force studies of muscular function and dysfunction in masticatory muscles,” Swed. Dent. J. Suppl., 37, 1-64 (1986).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. C. Hagberg, “The amplitude distribution of electromyographic activity of masticatory muscles during unilateral chewing,” J. Oral Rehabil., 13, No. 6, 567-574 (1986).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. C. Hagberg, “The amplitude distribution of electromyographic activity in painful masseter muscles during unilateral chewing,” J. Oral Rehabil, 14, No. 6, 531-540 (1987).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. L. V. Christensen and J. T. Radue, “Lateral preference in mastication: an electromyographic study,” J. Oral Rehabil., 12, No. 5, 429-434 (1985).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. M. Saifuddin, K. Miyamoto, H. M. Ueda, et al., “A quantitative electromyographic analysis of masticatory muscle activity in usual daily life,” Oral Dis., 7, No. 2, 94-100 (2001).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. M. J. Hoogmartens and M. A. Caubergh, “Chewing side preference in man correlated with handedness, footedness, eyedness and earedness,” Electromyogr. Clin. Neurophysiol., 27, No. 5, 293-300 (1987).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. H. P. Delport, A. de Laat, J. Nijs, and M. J. Hoogmartens, “Preference pattern of mastication during the first chewing cycle,” Electromyogr. Clin. Neurophysiol., 23, No. 6, 491-500 (1983).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. D. Giannitrapani, “Laterality preference, electrophysiology and the brain,” Electromyogr. Clin. Neurophysiol., 19, No. 1-2, 105-123 (1979).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. Zamanlu.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Khamnei, S., Zamanlu, M., Shakouri, S.K. et al. Mastication Patterns in Humans: Gender Differences. Neurophysiology 48, 375–379 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11062-017-9612-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11062-017-9612-3

Keywords

Navigation