Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Linear and Nonlinear EEG Synchronization in Alzheimer’s Disease

  • Published:
Neurophysiology Aims and scope

As is known, Alzheimer’s disease (AD) is associated with cognitive deficits due to significant neuronal loss. Reduced connectivity might be manifested as changes in the synchronization of electrical activity of collaborating parts of the brain. We used wavelet coherence to estimate linear/nonlinear synchronization between EEG samples recorded from different leads. Mutual information was applied to the complex wavelet coefficients in wavelet scales to estimate nonlinear synchronization. Synchronization rates for a group of 110 patients with moderate AD (MMSE score 10 to 19) and a group of 110 healthy control subjects were compared. The most significant decrease in mutual information in AD patients was observed on the third scale in the fronto-temporal area and for wavelet coherence within the same areas as for mutual information; these areas are preferentially affected by atrophy in AD. The new method used utilizes mutual information in wavelet scales and demonstrates larger discriminatory values in AD compared to wavelet coherence.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Z. Sankari, H. Adeli, and A. Adeli, “Wavelet coherence model for diagnosis of Alzheimer disease,” Clin. EEG Neurosci., 43, No. 4, 268-227 (2012).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. V. S. Afraimovich, N. N. Verichev, and M. I. Rabinovich, “Stochastic synchronization of oscillation in dissipative systems,” Radiophys. Quantium Electron., 29, No. 9, 795-803 (1986).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. M. G. Rosenblum, A. S. Pikovsky, and J. Kurths, “Phase synchronization of chaotic oscillators,” Phys. Rev. Lett., 76, No. 3-4, 1804-1807 (1996).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. J. Dauwels, F. Vialatte, and A. Cichocki, “Diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease from EEG signals: where are we standing?,” Curr. Alzheimer Res., 7, No. 6, 487-505 (2010).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. J. P. Lachaux, A. Lutz, D. Rudrauf, et al., “Estimating the time course of coherence between single-trial brain signals: an introduction to wavelet coherence,” Clin. Neurophys., 32, No. 3, 157–174 (2002).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. A. Klein, T. Sauer, A. Jedynak, and W. Skrandies, “Conventional and wavelet coherence applied to sensory-evoked electrical brain activity,” IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng., 53, No. 2, 266–272 (2006).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. V. Sakkalis, T. Oikonomou, E. Pachou, et al., “Time-significant wavelet coherence for the evaluation of schizophrenic brain activity using a graph theory approach,” 28th Annu. Int. Conf. IEEE, New York, EMBS’06 (2006).

  8. S. Aviyente, “A measure of mutual information on the time-frequency plane,” Proc. ICASSP, 2005, 481–484 (2005).

    Google Scholar 

  9. J. A. Gray, “Brain systems that mediate both emotion and cognition,” Cogn. Emot., 4, No. 3, 269–288 (1990).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. J. Jeong, J. C. Gore, and B. S. Peterson, “Mutual information analysis of the EEG in patients with Alzheimer’s disease,” Clin. Neurophys., 112, No. 5, 827-835 (2001).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. T. Schreiber and A. Schmitz, “Surrogate time series,” Physica D, 142, No. 3-4, 346–382 (2000).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. C. W. J. Granger, “Investigating causal relations by econometric models and cross-spectral methods,” Econometrica, 37, No. 3, 424-438 (1969).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. J. Arnhold, K. Lehnertz, P. Grassberger, and C. E. Elger, “A robust method for detecting interdependences: application to intracranially recorded EEG,” Physica D, 134, No 1, 419–430 (1999).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Y. He, Z. Chen, G. Gong, and A. Evans, “Neuronal networks in Alzheimer’s disease,” Neuroscientist, 15, No. 4, 333-350 (2009).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. J. H. Morrison, S. Scherr, D. A. Lewis, et al., “The laminar and regional distribution of neocortical somatostatin and neuritic plaques: implications for Alzheimer’s disease as a global neocortical disconnection syndrome,” In: A. B. Scheibel and A. F. Wechsler, eds., The Biological Substrates of Alzheimer’s Disease, Academic Press, Orlando, pp. 115–131 (1986).

    Google Scholar 

  16. C. J. Stam, B. F. Jones, G. Nolte, et al., “Small-world networks and functional connectivity in Alzheimer’s disease,” Cerebr. Cort., 17, No 1, 92–99 (2007).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. C. Sorg, V. Riedl, M. Muhlau, et al., “Selective changes of resting-state networks in individuals at risk for Alzheimer’s disease,” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 104, No 47, 18760–18765 (2007).

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Y. He, Z. Chen and A. Evans, “Structural insights into aberrant topological patterns of large-scale cortical networks in Alzheimer’s disease,” J. Neurosci., 18, No 28, 4756-4766 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to O. Vyšata.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Vyšata, O., Vališ, M., Procházka, A. et al. Linear and Nonlinear EEG Synchronization in Alzheimer’s Disease. Neurophysiology 47, 46–52 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11062-015-9496-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11062-015-9496-z

Keywords

Navigation