Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor (MPNST) in the spine: a retrospective analysis of clinical and molecular prognostic factors

  • Clinical Study
  • Published:
Journal of Neuro-Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Spinal malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors (MPNSTs) are relatively rare. There is little information published in the literature regarding this subject. The aim of this retrospective study was to evaluate factors that may affect the outcomes of patients with spinal MPNSTs by reviewing 43 patients with spinal MPNST who were treated in our hospital between 2001 and 2012. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify prognostic variables relative to patient and tumor characteristics, treatment modality and molecules. All 43 MPNST patients (25 men and 18 women; median age 49 years) underwent surgical resection, of whom 15 patients also underwent postoperative radiotherapy. Local recurrence was found in 21 (48.8 %) patients. Twenty-two (51.2 %) patients died during the follow-up periods with a median survival time of 49 months. The 5-year recurrence and survival rate was 53 and 44 % respectively. The statistical analyses suggested that high-grade malignancy and osteolytic destruction were closely associated with recurrence and death. A total of 38 cases accepted postoperative immunohistochemisty examine. S-100 was identified as an independent factor related to both recurrence and survival, adjusting for clinical factors. In conclusion, we confirmed that malignant grade and osteolytic destruction were the two independent factors for both recurrence and survival, while patients with S-100 protein negative had a higher recurrence rate and a lower survival rate.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Enzinger FM, Weiss SW (2001) Malignant tumours of peripheral nerves. In: Enzinger FM, Weiss SW (eds) Soft tissue tumors, vol 31. CV Mosby Company, St. Louis, pp 1209–1263

    Google Scholar 

  2. Fuchs B, Spinner RJ, Rock MG (2005) Malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors: an update. J Surg Orthop Adv 14:168–174

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Kleihues P, Cavenee WK (2000) World Health Organization classification of tumours: pathology and genetics: tumours of the nervous system, 2ndedn. Oxford University Press, USA

    Google Scholar 

  4. Sordillo PP, Helson L, Hajdu SI et al (1981) Malignant schwannoma—clinical characteristics, survival, and response to therapy. Cancer 47:2503–2509

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Gupta G, Maniker A (2007) Malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors. Neurosurg Focus 22:E12

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Fan Q, Yang J, Wang G (2014) Clinical and molecular prognostic predictors of malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor. Clin Transl Oncol 16:191–199

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Ducatman BS, Scheithauer BW, Piepgras DG, Reiman HM, Ilstrup DM (1986) Malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors. A clinicopathologic study of 120 cases. Cancer 57:2006–2021

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Zhu B, Liu X, Liu Z et al (2012) Malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumours of the spine: clinical manifestations, classification, treatment, and prognostic factors. Eur Spine J 21:897–904

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Wanebo JE, Malik JM, VandenBerg SR et al (1993) Malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors. A clinicopathologic study of 28 cases. Cancer 71:1247–1253

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Moretti VM, Crawford EA, Staddon AP, Lackman RD, Ogilvie CM (2011) Early outcomes for malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor treated with chemotherapy. Am J Clin Oncol 34:417–421

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Anghileri M, Miceli R, Fiore M et al (2006) Malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors: prognostic factors and survival in a series of patients treated at a single institution. Cancer 107:1065–1074

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Ma C, Ow A, Shan OH et al (2014) Malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumours in the head and neck region: retrospective analysis of clinicopathological features and treatment outcomes. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 43:924–932

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Nagasawa DT, Smith ZA, Cremer N et al (2011) Complications associated with the treatment for spinal ependymomas. Neurosurg Focus 31(4):E13

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Zou C, Smith KD, Liu J et al (2009) Clinical, pathological, and molecular variables predictive of malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor outcome. Ann Surg Oncol 249:1014–1022

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Grobmyer SR, Reith JD, Shahlaee A, Bush CH, Hochwald SN (2008) Malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor: molecular pathogenesis and current management considerations. J Surg Oncol 97:340–349

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Stucky CCH, Johnson KN, Gray RJ et al (2012) Malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors (MPNST): the Mayo Clinic experience. Ann Surg Oncol 19:878–885

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Brekke HR, Kolberg M, Skotheim RI et al (2009) Identification of p53 as a strong predictor of survival for patients with malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors. Neuro-oncology 11:514–528

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Watanabe T, Oda Y, Tamiya S et al (2001) Malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumours: high Ki67 labelling index is the significant prognostic indicator. Histopathology 39:187–197

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Frankel HL, Hancock DO, Hyslop G et al (1969) The value of postural reduction in the initial management of closed injuries of the spine with paraplegia and tetraplegia: I. Paraplegia 7:179–192

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Sridhar K, Ramamurthi R, Vasudevan MC, Ramamurthi B (2001) Giant invasive spinal schwannomas: definition and surgical management. J Neurosurg 94:210–215

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Xu W, Li X, Huang W et al (2013) Factors affecting prognosis of patients with giant cell tumors of the mobile spine: retrospective analysis of 102 patients in a single center. Ann Surg Oncol 20:804–810

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Kar M, Deo SV, Shukla NK et al (2006) Malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors (MPNST)—clinicopathological study and treatment outcome of twenty-four cases. World J Surg Oncol 4:1–8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Ren X, Wang J, Hu M et al (2013) Clinical, radiological, and pathological features of 26 intracranial and intraspinal malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors. J Neurosurg 119:695–708

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Valle-Giler EP, Garces J, Smith RD, Sulaiman WA (2014) One-stage resection of giant invasive thoracic schwannoma: case report and review of literature. Ochsner J 14:135–140

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Sahgal A, Ma L, Weinberg V et al (2012) Reirradiation human spinal cord tolerance for stereotactic body radiotherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 82:107–116

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Karamchandani JR, Nielsen TO, van de Rijn M, West RB (2012) Sox10 and S100 in the diagnosis of soft-tissue neoplasms. Appl Immunohistochem Mol Morphol 20:445–450

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Klijanienko J, Caillaud JM, Lagacé R, Vielh P (2002) Cytohistologic correlations of 24 malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor (MPNST) in 17 patients: the Institut Curie experience. Diagn Cytopathol 27:103–108

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Perry A, Roth KA, Banerjee R, Fuller CE, Gutmann DH (2001) NF1 deletions in S-100 protein-positive and negative cells of sporadic and neurofibromatosis 1 (NF1)-associated plexiform neurofibromas and malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors. Am J Pathol 159:57–61

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Tobin NP, Lindström LS, Carlson JW et al (2014) Multi-level gene expression signatures, but not binary, outperform Ki67 for the long term prognostication of breast cancer patients. Mol Oncol 8:741–752

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Nielsen PS, Riber-Hansen R, Jensen TO, Schmidt H, Steiniche T (2013) Proliferation indices of phosphohistone H3 and Ki67: strong prognostic markers in a consecutive cohort with stage I/II melanoma. Mod Pathol 26:404–413

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Simonetti S, Serrano C, Hernández-Losa C et al (2014) Schwannomas, benign tumors with a senescent phenotype. Histol Histopathol 29:721–730

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Pekmezci M, Reuss DE, Hirbe AC et al (2014) Morphologic and immunohistochemical features of malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors and cellular schwannomas. Mod Pathol. doi:10.1038/modpathol.2014.109

    Google Scholar 

  33. Dhanda J, Triantafyllou A, Liloglou T et al (2014) SERPINE1 and SMA expression at the invasive front predict extracapsular spread and survival in oral squamous cell carcinoma. Br J Cancer. doi:10.1038/bjc.2014.500

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Chaput N, Svrcek M, Aupérin A et al (2013) Tumour-infiltrating CD68 + and CD57 + cells predict patient outcome in stage II-III colorectal cancer. Br J Cancer 109:1013–1022

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Akagi J, Baba H (2008) Prognostic value of CD57(+) T lymphocytes in the peripheral blood of patients with advanced gastric cancer. Int J Clin Oncol 13:528–535

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no competing conflicts of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Wang Zhou or Jianru Xiao.

Additional information

Ting wang, Huabin Yin and Shuai Han contributed equally to this work, and all should be considered first author.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material. Supplemental Fig. 1 The S-100 IHC images and H&E images of three patients whose S-100 staining were negative (Case 3), weak positive (Case 35) and positive (Case 5) respectively.

Supplementary material 1 (PNG 26,608 kb)

Supplementary material 2 (DOCX 15 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wang, T., Yin, H., Han, S. et al. Malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor (MPNST) in the spine: a retrospective analysis of clinical and molecular prognostic factors. J Neurooncol 122, 349–355 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11060-015-1721-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11060-015-1721-5

Keywords

Navigation