Skip to main content
Log in

Earl Miner: comparative poetics and the construction of world poetics

  • Published:
Neohelicon Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In current international comparative literature scholarship, Earl Miner’s significant contribution seems to be overlooked, although comparative poetics is still discussed periodically. To the author, Miner is not the first to shift critical attention from a traditional Eurocentric or West-centric mode to East-West comparative literature and theoretical studies. But he should, however, be regarded as having transcended what was achieved by his contemporaries such as René Étiemble, Douwe Fokkema and James Liu; and as having reached the level of general literary studies. His practice is close to current studies of world literature, although he seldom used this term. But the present discussion on the issue of world literature lacks the construction of world poetics. Inspired by Miner’s preliminary work, the author tries to continue his incomplete project and offer his own theoretical construction of such a world poetics as crossing the boundary of languages and cultures. To the author, even in today’s global cultural context, Miner’s legacy should still be considered important and pioneering in the construction of world literary theory.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. As for their efforts to combine studies of comparative literature with world literature or cultural studies, cf. Miller (2002), Saussy (2006), Culler (1997), Damrosch (2003).

  2. Cf. Abrams (1971), especially Chapter 1, pp. 8–29.

  3. Cf. Greenblatt (1989, pp. 1–14).

  4. Miner (1990, p. 238).

  5. Ibid., p. 7.

  6. Ibid., p. 20.

  7. Actually, the following books or articles have already touched upon some theoretical issues of world literature: Moretti (2000, pp. 54–68); Damrosch (2003); Wang (2010, pp. 1–14).

  8. Miner (1990, p. 216).

  9. Ibid., p. 214.

  10. In this regard, cf. Zhang (2011, pp. 319–327).

  11. Cf. Wang (2010, p. 4).

  12. Miller (2002, p. 33).

  13. Ibid.

  14. Miner (1990, p. 226).

  15. Greenblatt (1989, p. 12).

  16. Todorov (2007, pp. 16–17).

  17. Cf. Miller (2002), especially pp. 1–10.

  18. Said (1983), p. 226.

  19. Cf. Liu (1975).

  20. Miner (1990, pp. 230–231).

  21. Ibid., pp. 232–233.

  22. Ibid., p. 233.

  23. Ibid., p. 234.

  24. In this respect, cf. the special issue Comparative Literature: Towards a (Re)construction of World Literature I have edited for Neohelicon 38, 2(2011).

  25. In this respect, cf. Zhang (2011, pp. 319–327); and Zhao (2011, pp. 329–337). As for an early attempt, cf. Yue et al. (1993). But Cao’s (2012) ambitious four volumes are already close to a sort of world poetics although he does not use it as the title.

References

  • Abrams, M. H. (1971). The mirror and the lamp: Romantic theory and the critical tradition. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cao, S. (Ed.). (2012). Zhongwai wenlun shi (A history of Chinese and foreign literary theories), 4 vols. Chengdu: Ba Shu shushe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Culler, J. (1997). Literary theory: A very short introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Damrosch, D. (2003). What is world literature?. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenblatt, S. (1989). Towards a poetics of culture. In H. Aram Veeser (Ed.), The New Historicism (pp. 1–14). New York and London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu, J. (1975). Chinese theories of literature. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, J. H. (2002). On literature. London and New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miner, E. (1990). Comparative poetics: An intercultural essay on theories of literature. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moretti, F. (2000). Conjectures on world literature. New Left Review 1 (January–February), 54–68.

  • Said, E. (1983). Traveling theory. In E. Said (Ed.), The world, the text, and the critic (pp. 226–247). Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saussy, H. (Ed.). (2006). Comparative literature in an age of globalization. Baltimore & London: The Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Todorov, T. (2007). What is literature for? New Literary History, 38(1), 13–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, N. (2010). World literature and the dynamic function of translation. Modern Language Quarterly, 71(1), 1–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yue, D. et al. (Eds.) (1993). Shijie shixue da cidian [A dictionary of world poetics]. Changchun: Chunfeng wenyi chubanshe.

  • Zhang, L. (2011). Poetics and world literature. Neohelicon, 38(2), 319–327.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao, H. Y. (2011). The problem of time in a general narratology. Neohelicon, 38(2), 329–337.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ning Wang.

Additional information

The Second Sino-American Symposium on Comparative Literature was held in November 1987 in Princeton, Indiana and Stanford Universities; the third symposium was held at Tsinghua University in Beijing in August 2001; the fourth one was held at Duke University in October 2006; the fifth one was held at Shanghai Jiao Tong University in August 2010, and the sixth one was held at Purdue University in May 2013.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wang, N. Earl Miner: comparative poetics and the construction of world poetics. Neohelicon 41, 415–426 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11059-014-0255-8

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11059-014-0255-8

Keywords

Navigation