Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Effect of initial seedling size, understory competition, and overstory density on the survival and growth of Pinus echinata seedlings underplanted in hardwood forests for restoration

  • Published:
New Forests Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

There is interest in restoring shortleaf pine (Pinus echinata) in pine–oak woodlands where it once was abundant. Because of its shade intolerance and slow initial growth rate, shortleaf pine restoration has remained a challenge because competition from hardwoods exhibits greater initial growth following canopy removal but greater shade tolerance with canopy retention. The study objective was to examine the survival and growth of underplanted shortleaf pine seedlings relative to competing hardwoods as a function of initial seedling size, overstory density, and understory competition. In the Ozark Highlands of southeastern Missouri, USA, 48, 0.4-ha experimental units were each harvested from below to a uniform stocking level from 0 to 90 % and 30, 1–0 improved shortleaf pine seedlings were planted on a 3.7 × 7.3 m spacing. Linear or logistic regression was used to determine how shortleaf pine seedling (1) survival, (2) basal diameter growth, and (3) shoot growth were related to initial seedling size, overstory stocking, and understory competitor height during the first 5 years after underplanting. After five growing seasons, the survival rate of shortleaf pine seedlings was 50 % and was positively related to the initial basal diameter but was not related to overstory stocking or competitor height. Increasing overstory stocking decreased the basal diameter and height growth of shortleaf pine seedlings, explaining >51 % of the variation in basal diameter and 54 % of the variation in seedling height. Although competing hardwood seedlings were consistently taller than the shortleaf pine seedlings throughout the study, shortleaf pine seedlings maintained similar growth rates as competitors from the second to the fifth growing season. The eventual release of shortleaf pine is essential for recruitment, but releases can be delayed for several years after underplanting.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bailey RG (2009) Ecosystem geography: from ecoregions to sites, 2nd edn. Springer, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Barnett JP, Brissette JC (2004) Stock type affects performance of shortleaf pine planted in the Ouachita Mountains through 10 years. In: Connor KF (ed) Proceedings of the 12th biennial southern silvicultural research conference. Gen Tech Rep SRS-71. US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Southern Research Station, Asheville, NC, pp 420–422

  • Brandeis TJ, Newton M, Cole EC (2001) Underplanted conifer seedling survival and growth in thinned Douglas-fir stands. Can J For Res 31:302–312

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brandt L, He H, Iverson L et al (2014) Central hardwoods ecosystem vulnerability assessment and synthesis: a report from the central hardwoods climate change response framework project. Gen Tech Rep NRS-124. US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Northern Research Station, Newtown Square, PA, 245 pp

  • Brinkman KA, Liming FG (1961) Oak and pine reproduction responds to overhead release. J For 59:341–346

    Google Scholar 

  • Brinkman KA, Rogers NF (1967) Timber management guide for shortleaf pine and oak-pine types in Missouri. Res Pap NC-19. US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, North Central Forest Experiment Station, St. Paul, MN, 15 pp

  • Brinkman KA, Smith RC (1968) Managing shortleaf pine in Missouri. Univ Mo Agric Exp Stn Bull 875:35p

    Google Scholar 

  • Cain MD, Shelton MG (2000) Survival and growth of Pinus echinata and Quercus seedlings in response to simulated summer and winter prescribed burns. Can J For Res 30:1830–1836

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cain MD, Shelton MG (2002) Does prescribed burning have a place in regenerating uneven-aged loblolly-shortleaf pine stands? South J Appl For 26:117–123

    Google Scholar 

  • Churchill DJ, Larson AJ, Dahlgreen MC, Franklin JF, Hessburg PF, Lutz JA (2013) Restoring forest resilience: from reference spatial patterns to silvicultural prescriptions and monitoring. For Ecol Manag 291:442–457

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cunningham RJ (2007) Historical and social factors affecting pine management in the Ozarks during the late 1800 s through 1940. In: Kabrick JM, Dey DC, Gwaze D (eds) Shortleaf pine restoration and ecology in the Ozarks: proceedings of a symposium. Gen Tech Rep NRS-P-15. US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Northern Research Station, Newtown Square, PA, pp 1–7

  • Dey DC (2014) Sustaining oak forests in eastern North America: regeneration and recruitment, the pillars of sustainability. For Sci 60:926–942

    Google Scholar 

  • Dey DC, Hartmann G (2005) Returning fire to Ozark Highland forest ecosystems: effects on advance regeneration. For Ecol Manag 217:37–53

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dey DC, Gardiner ES, Schweitzer CJ, Kabrick JM, Jacobs DF (2012) Underplanting to sustain future stocking of oak (Quercus) in temperate deciduous forests. New For 43:955–978

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dwyer JP, Kabrick JM, Wetteroff J (2007) Do improvement harvests mitigate oak decline in Missouri Ozark forests? North J Appl For 24:123–128

    Google Scholar 

  • Fletcher PW, McDermott RE (1957) Influence of geologic parent material and climate on distribution of shortleaf pine in Missouri. Res Bull 625. University of Missouri, College of Agriculture, Agricultural Experiment Station. Columbia, MO, 42 pp

  • Franklin JF, Mitchell RJ, Palik BJ (2007) Natural disturbance and stand development principles for ecological forestry. Gen Tech Rep NRS-19. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Northern Research Station, Newtown Square, PA, 44 pp

  • Fulé PZ, Covington WW (1994) Fire-regime disruption and pine-oak forest structure in the Sierra Madre Occidental, Durango, Mexico. Restor Ecol 2:261–272

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fulé PZ, Laughlin DC, Covington WW (2005) Pine-oak forest dyanmics five years after ecological restoration treatments, Arizona, USA. For Ecol Manag 218:129–145

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gingrich SF (1967) Measuring and evaluating stocking and stand density in upland hardwood forests in the Central States. For Sci 13:38–53

    Google Scholar 

  • Guldin JM (2007) Restoration and management of shortleaf pine in pure and in mixed stands—science, empirical observations, and the wishful application of generalities. In: Kabrick JM, Dey DC, Gwaze D (eds) Shortleaf pine restoration and ecology in the Ozarks: Proceedings of a symposium. Gen Tech Rep NRS-P-15. US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Northern Research Station, Newtown Square, PA, pp 47–58

  • Gwaze D, Melich R, McClure L, Studyvin C, Messengale D (2007a) Effects of site preparation and prescribed burning on survival and growth of shortleaf pine in the Mark Twain National Forest: Results after 20 growing season. In: Kabrick JM, Dey DC, Gwaze D (eds) Shortleaf pine restoration and ecology in the Ozarks: proceedings of a symposium. Gen Tech Rep NRS-P-15. US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Northern Research Station, Newtown Square, PA, pp 129–133

  • Gwaze D, Myszewski J, Kabrick J (2007b) Performance of shortleaf pine provenances in Missouri. In: Kabrick JM, Dey DC, Gwaze D (eds) Shortleaf pine restoration and ecology in the Ozarks: proceedings of a symposium. Gen Tech Rep NRS-P-15. US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Northern Research Station, Newtown Square, PA, pp 89–94

  • Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change [IPCC] (2012) Fifth assessment report. http://www.ipcc.ch/. Date accessed 6 Oct 2014

  • Iverson LR, Prasad AM, Matthews SN, Peters M (2008) Estimating potential habitat for 134 eastern US tree species under six climate scenarios. For Ecol Manag 254:390–406

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jensen J, Smith C, Johanson J, Gwaze D (2007) Underplanting shortleaf pine in the Missouri Ozarks. In: Kabrick JM, Dey DC, Gwaze D (eds) Shortleaf pine restoration and ecology in the Ozarks: Proceedings of a symposium. Gen Tech Rep NRS-P-15. US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Northern Research Station, Newtown Square, PA, pp 112–116

  • Kabrick JM, Shifley SR, Jensen RG, Fan Z, Larsen DR (2004a) Factors associated with oak mortality in Missouri Ozark Forests. In: Yaussy DA, Hix DM, Long RP, Goebel PC (eds) Proceedings of the 14th Central Hardwood Forest Conference. Gen Tech Rep NE-316. US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Northeastern Research Station, Newtown Square, PA, pp 27–35

  • Kabrick JM, Shifley SR, Jensen RG, Larsen DR, Grabner JK (2004b) Oak forest composition, site quality, and dynamics in relation to site factors in the southeastern Missouri Ozarks. In: Spetich MA (ed) Upland oak ecology symposium: history, current conditions, and sustainability. Gen Tech Rep SRS-73. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Southern Research Station, Asheville, NC, pp 94–101

  • Kabrick JM, Dey DC, Gwaze D (eds) (2007) Shortleaf pine restoration and ecology in the Ozarks: proceedings of a symposium. Gen Tech Rep NRS-P-15. US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Northern Research Station, Newtown Square, PA, 215 pp

  • Kabrick JM, Dey DC, Jensen RG, Wallendorf M (2008) The role of environmental factors in oak decline and mortality in the Ozark Highlands. For Ecol Manag 255:1409–1417

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kabrick JM, Dey DC, Kinkead CO, Knapp BO, Leahy M, Olson M, Stambaugh MC, Stevenson A (2014) Silvicultural Considerations for Managing Fire-Dependent Oak Woodland Ecosystems. In: Groninger, Holzmueler, Rufner, Dey (eds) Proceedings of the 19th central hardwood forest conference. Gen Tech Rep NRS-P-142. US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Northern Research Station, Newtown Square, PA pp 2–15

  • Knapp BO, Wang GG, Van Lear HD, Walker JL (2006) Predicting root biomass of burned and unburned white oak advance reproduction from diameter and height. South J Appl For 30:40–45

    Google Scholar 

  • Knapp BO, Wang GG, Walker JL (2013) Effects of canopy structure and cultural treatments on the survival and growth of Pinus palustris Mill. seedlings underplanted in Pinus taeda L. stands. Ecol Eng 57:46–56

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lake PS (2013) Resistance, resilience and restoration. Ecol Manag Restor 14:20–24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Law JR, Melick R, Studyvin C, Steinman JR (2004) Oak decline in Missouri: History revisited. In: Spetich MA (ed) Upland oak ecology symposium: history, current conditions, and sustainability. Gen Tech Rep SRS-73. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Southern Research Station, Asheville, NC, pp 257–258

  • Lawson ER (1990) Shortleaf pine. In: Burns RM, Honkala BH (tech coord) Agric Hndbk 654. US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Washington DC, pp 316–326

  • Lilly CG, Will RE, Tauer CG, Guldin JM, Spetich M (2012) Factors affecting the sprouting of shortleaf pine rootstock following prescribed fire. For Ecol Manag 265:13–19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liming FG (1946) The range and distribution of shortleaf pine in Missouri. Tech Pap 106. US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Central States Experiment Station, Columbus, OH, 4 pp

  • Paquette A, Bouchard A, Cogliastro A (2006) Survival and growth of under-planted trees: a meta-analysis across four biomes. Ecol Appl 16:1575–1589

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ponder F Jr (2004) Soil compaction affects growth of you shortleaf pine following litter removal and weed control in the Missouri Ozarks. In: Yaussy D, Hix DM, Goebel PC, Long RP (eds) Proceedings of the 14th central hardwood forest conference. Gen Tech Rep NE-316. US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Northeastern Research Station, Newtown Square, PA, pp 225–264

  • Rodriquez-Trejo DA, Myers RL (2010) Using oak characteristics to guide fire regime restoration in Mexican pine-oak and oak forests. Ecol Restor 28:304–323

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rogers R (1983) Guides for thinning shortleaf pine. In: Jones EP Jr (ed) Proceedings of the second biennial southern silvicultural research conference. Gen Tech Rep SE-24. US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Southeastern Research Station, Asheville, NC, pp 217–225

  • Sander IL, Johnson PS, Rogers R (1984) Evaluating oak advance reproduction in the Missouri Ozarks. Res Pap NC-251. US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, North Central Forest Experiment Station, St. Paul, MN, 11 pp

  • Shelton MG, Cain MD (2000) Regenerating uneven-aged stands of loblolly and shortleaf pines: the current state of knowledge. For Ecol Manag 129:177–193

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shifley SR, Fan Z, Kabrick JM, Jensen RG (2006) Oak mortality risk factors and mortality estimation. For Ecol Manag 229:16–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stambaugh MC, Guyette RP, Dey DC (2007) What fire frequency is appropriate for shortleaf pine regeneration and survival? In: Kabrick JM, Dey DC, Gwaze D, eds (2007) Shortleaf pine restoration and ecology in the Ozarks: proceedings of a symposium. Gen Tech Rep NRS-P-15. US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Northern Research Station, Newtown Square, PA, pp 121–128

  • Struve DK, Joly RJ (1992) Transplanted red oak seedlings mediate transplant shock by reducing leaf surface area and altering carbon allocation. Can J For Res 22:1441–1448

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Studyvin C, Gwaze D (2007) Genetic improvement of shortleaf pine on the Mark Twain, Quachita, and Ozark national forests. In: Kabrick JM, Dey DC, Gwaze D (eds) Shortleaf pine restoration and ecology in the Ozarks: proceedings of a symposium. Gen Tech Rep NRS-P-15. US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Northern Research Station, Newtown Square, pp 84–88

  • Tuttle JG, Houf KJ (2007) Shortleaf pine natural community restoration on Peck Ranch Conservation Area. In: Kabrick JM, Dey DC, Gwaze D (eds) Shortleaf pine restoration and ecology in the Ozarks: proceedings of a symposium. Gen Tech Rep NRS-P-15. US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Northern Research Station, Newtown Square, pp 196–201

  • USDA Forest Service. 2012. National forest system land management planning. Federal register, Rules and Regulations 36 CFR Part 219 RIN 0596–AD02, vol 77, no 68

  • Walker B, Holling CS, Carpenter SR, Kinzig A (2004) Resilience, adaptability and transformability in social-ecological systems. Ecol Soc 92:5 [online]. http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol9/iss2/art5

  • Zald HSJ, Gray AN, North M, Kern RA (2008) Initial tree regeneration responses to fire and thinning treatments in a Sierra Nevada mixed-conifer forest, USA. For Ecol Manag 256:168–179

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang D, Huebschmann MM, Lynch TB, Guldin JM (2012) Growth projection and valuation of restoration of the shortleaf pine-bluestem grass ecosystem. For Policy Econ 20:10–15

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. USDA Forest Service, Northern Research Station, University of Missouri, 202 Anheuser-Busch Natural Resources Building, Columbia, MO, 65211, USA

    John M. Kabrick & Daniel C. Dey

  2. Forestry Department, University of Missouri, 203 Anheuser-Busch Natural Resources Building, Columbia, MO, 65211, USA

    Benjamin O. Knapp & David R. Larsen

Authors
  1. John M. Kabrick
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Benjamin O. Knapp
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Daniel C. Dey
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. David R. Larsen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to John M. Kabrick.

Appendix

Appendix

See Table 5.

Table 5 Pre-treatment, post-treatment, and post-storm basal area (m2 ha−1) and stocking (Gingrich 1967) by experimental unit
Full size table

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kabrick, J.M., Knapp, B.O., Dey, D.C. et al. Effect of initial seedling size, understory competition, and overstory density on the survival and growth of Pinus echinata seedlings underplanted in hardwood forests for restoration. New Forests 46, 897–918 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11056-015-9487-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11056-015-9487-3

Keywords

Search

Navigation