Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Concepts and Approaches to the Study of Visual Spatial Attention

  • Published:
Neuroscience and Behavioral Physiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This review discusses the characteristics of the neural processes involved in different types of attention and their influences on sensory perception. The main approaches and methods for studying various types of attention are also presented. The review contains an analysis of the current body of knowledge on the theory of the three attention networks of Posner and Peterson, the work of Corbetta and Shulman, the premotor theory of attention, the frequency theory of attention, and the normalization model.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. N. N. Lebedeva, A. V. Vekhov, and E. D. Karimova, “Gender characteristics of reactions in various functional states during operator activity,” Biomed. Radioelektr., 2, 28–35 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  2. N. N. Lebedeva, E. D. Karimova, A. V. Vekhov, and G. B. Milovanova, “Changes in sensorimotor reactions in patients with various affective disorders,” Biomed. Radioelektr., 9, 31–38 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  3. N. N. Lebedeva, L. A. Maiorova, E. D. Karimova, and E. A. Kazimirova, “Connectomics: progress and prospects,” Usp. Fiziol. Nauk., 46, No. 3, 17–45 (2015).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. B. A. Anderson, H. Kuwabara, and D. F. Wong, “The role of dopamine in value-based attentional orienting,” Curr. Biol., 26, No. 4, 550–555 (2016).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. B. A. Anderson, P. A. Laurent, and S. Yantis, “Value-driven attentional priority signals in human basal ganglia and visual cortex,” Brain Res., 1587, 88–96 (2014).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. P. A. Antonov, R. Chakravarthi, and S. K. Andersen, “Too little, too late, and in the wrong place: Alpha band activity does not reflect an active mechanism of selective attention,” NeuroImage, 219, 117006 (2020).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. K. M. Armstrong, M. H. Chang, and T. Moore, “Selection and maintenance of spatial information by frontal eye field neurons,” J. Neurosci., 29, No. 50, 15621–15629 (2009).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. G. Aston-Jones and J. D. Cohen, “An integrative theory of locus coeruleus- norepinephrine function: Adaptive gain and optimal performance,” Annu. Rev. Neurosci., 28, No. 1, 403–450 (2005).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. A. M. Bastos, V. Litvak, and R. Moran, “A DCM study of spectral asymmetries in feedforward and feedback connections between visual areas V1 and V4 in the monkey,” NeuroImage, 108, 460–475 (2015).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. M. G. Baxter and D. J. Bucci, “Selective immunotoxic lesions of basal forebrain cholinergic neurons: Twenty years of research and new directions,” Behav. Neurosci, 127, No. 5, 611–618 (2013).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. M. Beane and R. T. Marrocco, “Norepinephrine and acetylcholine mediation of the components of reflexive attention: implications for attention deficit disorders,” Prog. Neurobiol., 74, No. 3, 167–181 (2004).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. N. P. Bichot, A. F. Rossi, and R. Desimone, “Parallel and serial neural mechanisms for visual search in macaque area V4,” Science, 308, No. 5721, 529–534 (2005).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. C. J. Bruce and M. E. Goldberg, “Primate frontal eye fields. I. Single neurons discharging before saccades,” J. Neurophysiol., 53, No. 3, 603–635 (1985).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. J. Burk and M. Sarter, “Dissociation between the attentional functions mediated via basal forebrain cholinergic and GABAergic neurons,” Neuroscience, 105, No. 4, 899–909 (2001).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. T. J. Buschman and E. K. Miller, “Top-down versus bottom-up control of attention in the prefrontal and posterior parietal cortices,” Science, 315, No. 5820, 1860–1862 (2007).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. G. Bush, P. Luu and M. I. Posner, “Cognitive and emotional influences in anterior cingulate cortex,” Trends Cogn. Sci., 4, No. 6, 215–222 (2000).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. P. Capotosto, C. Babiloni, G. L. Romani, and M. Corbetta, “Frontoparietal cortex controls spatial attention through modulation of anticipatory alpha rhythms,” J. Neurosci., 29, No. 18, 5863–5872 (2009).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. M. Carrasco, “Visual attention: The past 25 years,” Vision Res., 51, No. 13, 1484–1525 (2011).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. M. Carrasco, S. Ling, and S. Read, “Attention alters appearance,” Nat. Neurosci., 7, No. 3, 308–313 (2004).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. S. Casteau and D. T. Smith, “Associations and dissociations between oculomotor readiness and covert attention,” Vision (Basel), 3, No. 2, 17 (2019).

  21. E. C. Cieslik, I. Seidler, and A. R. Laird, “Different involvement of subregions within dorsal premotor and medial frontal cortex for proand antisaccades,” Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev., 68, 256–269 (2016).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. R. Cools and M. D’Esposito, “Inverted-U-shaped dopamine actions on human working memory and cognitive control,” Biol. Psychiatry, 69, No. 12, e113–e125 (2011).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. M. Corbetta, E. Akbudak, and T. E. Conturo, “A common network of functional areas for attention and eye movements,” Neuron, 21, No. 4, 761–773 (1998).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. M. Corbetta and G. L. Shulman, “Control of goal-directed and stimulus- driven attention in the brain,” Nat. Rev. Neurosci., 3, No. 3, 201–215 (2002).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. B. M. Crittenden, D. J. Mitchell, and J. Duncan, “Task encoding across the multiple demand cortex is consistent with a frontoparietal and cingulo-opercular dual networks distinction,” J. Neurosci., 36, No. 23, 6147–6155 (2016).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. M. C. Davidson and R. T. Marrocco, “Local infusion of scopolamine into intraparietal cortex slows covert orienting in rhesus monkeys,” J. Neurophysiol., 83, No. 3, 1536–1549 (2000).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. N. U. F. Dosenbach, D. A. Fair, and A. L. Cohen, “A dual-networks architecture of top-down control,” Trends Cogn. Sci., 12, No. 3, 99–105 (2008).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. N. U. F. Dosenbach, D. A. Fair, and F. M. Miezin, “Distinct brain networks for adaptive and stable task control in humans,” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 104, No. 26, 11,073–11,078 (2007).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. N. U. F. Dosenbach, K. M. Visscher, and E. D. Palmer, “A core system for the implementation of task sets,” Neuron, 50, No. 5, 799–812 (2006).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. J. Downar, A. P. Crawley, D. J. Mikulis, and K. D. Davis, “The effect of task relevance on the cortical response to changes in visual and auditory stimuli: An event-related fMRI study,” NeuroImage, 14, No. 6, 1256–1267 (2001).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. F. L. Engel, “Visual conspicuity, directed attention and retinal locus,” Vision Res., 11, No. 6, 563–575 (1971).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. B. J. Everitt and T. W. Robbins, “Central cholinergic systems and cognition,” Annu. Rev. Psychol., 48, No. 1, 649–684 (1997).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. J. Fan, B. D. McCandliss, and T. Sommer, “Testing the efficiency and independence of attentional networks,” J. Cogn. Neurosci., 14, No. 3, 340–347 (2002).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. I. C. Fiebelkorn and S. Kastner, “A rhythmic theory of attention,” Trends Cogn. Sci., 23, No. 2, 87–101 (2019).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. I. C. Fiebelkorn and S. Kastner, “Functional specialization in the attention network,” Annu. Rev. Psychol., 71, No. 1, 221–249 (2020).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. I. C. Fiebelkorn, M. A. Pinsk, and S. Kastner, “A dynamic interplay within the frontoparietal network underlies rhythmic spatial attention,” Neuron, 99, No. 4, 842–853.e8 (2018).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. J. J. Foxe, G. V. Simpson, and S. P. Ahlfors, “Parieto-occipital ~10 Hz activity reflects anticipatory state of visual attention mechanisms,” NeuroReport, 9, No. 17, 3929–3933 (1998).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. P. Fries, J. H. Reynolds, A. E. Rorie, and R. Desimone, “Modulation of oscillatory neuronal synchronization by selective visual attention,” Science, 291, No. 5508, 1560–1563 (2001).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. G. G. Gregoriou, S. J. Gotts, and R. Desimone, “Cell-type-specific synchronization of neural activity in FEF with V4 during attention,” Neuron, 73, No. 3, 581–594 (2012).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. H. J. Gritton, W. M. Howe, and C. S. Mallory, “Cortical cholinergic signaling controls the detection of cues,” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 113, No. 8, E1089–E1097 (2016).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. C. Gurvich and S. L. Rossell, “Dopamine and cognitive control: Sex-by-genotype interactions influence the capacity to switch attention,” Behav. Brain Res., 281, 96–101 (2015).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. S. Haegens, V. Nácher, and R. Luna, “α-Oscillations in the monkey sensorimotor network influence discrimination performance by rhythmical inhibition of neuronal spiking,” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 108, No. 48, 19377–19382 (2011).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. H. K. Hausman, C. Hardcastle, and A. Albizu, “Cingulo-opercular and frontoparietal control network connectivity and executive functioning in older adults,” Geroscience, 44, 847–866 (2021).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. R. F. Helfrich, I. C. Fiebelkorn, and S. M. Szczepanski, “Neural mechanisms of sustained attention are rhythmic,” Neuron, 99, No. 4, 854–865.e5 (2018).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. R. F. Helfrich, M. Huang, G. Wilson, and R. T. Knight, “Prefrontal cortex modulates posterior alpha oscillations during top-down guided visual perception,” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 114, No. 35, 9457–9462 (2017).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  46. H. L. Helmholtz and J. P. Southall, Treatise on Physiological Optics (1962).

  47. H. Hogendoorn, “Voluntary saccadic eye movements ride the attentional rhythm,” J. Cogn. Neurosci., 28, No. 10, 1625–1635 (2016).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. S. Kastner, M. A. Pinsk, and P. De Weerd, “Increased activity in human visual cortex during directed attention in the absence of visual stimulation,” Neuron, 22, No. 4, 751–761 (1999).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. S. P. Kelly, E. C. Lalor, R. B. Reilly, and J. J. Foxe, “Increases in alpha oscillatory power reflect an active retinotopic mechanism for distracter suppression during sustained visuospatial attention,” J. Neurophysiol., 95, No. 6, 3844–3851 (2006).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. R. M. Klein, “Inhibition of return,” Trends Cogn. Sci., 4, No. 4, 138–147 (2000).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. L. Koelewijn, A. N. Rich, S. D. Muthukumaraswamy, and K. D. Singh, “Spatial attention increases high-frequency gamma synchronisation in human medial visual cortex,” NeuroImage, 79, 295–303 (2013).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. R. J. Krauzlis, L. P. Lovejoy, and A. Zénon, “Superior colliculus and visual spatial attention,” Annu. Rev. Neurosci., 36, No. 1, 165–182 (2013).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. S. Lasaponara, A. B. Chica, and F. Lecce, “ERP evidence for selective drop in attentional costs in uncertain environments: Challenging a purely premotor account of covert orienting of attention,” Neuropsychologia, 49, No. 9, 2648–2657 (2011).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. J. A. Leonard, “Partial advance information in a choice reaction task,” Br. J. Psychol., 49, No. 2, 89–96 (1958).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. E. Lowet, B. Gomes, and K. Srinivasan, “Enhanced neural processing by covert attention only during microsaccades directed toward the attended stimulus,” Neuron, 99, No. 1, 207–214.e3 (2018).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  56. J. W. MacLeod, M. A. Lawrence, M. M. McConnell, et al., “Appraising the ANT: Psychometric and theoretical considerations of the attention network test,” Neuropsychology, 24, No. 5, 637–651 (2010).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. G. Manini, F. Botta, and E. Martín-Arévalo, “Attentional capture from inside vs. outside the attentional focus,” Front. Psychol., 12, 1–20 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  58. C. A. Marshall, Z. D. Brodnik, and O. V. Mortensen, “Selective activation of dopamine D3 receptors and norepinephrine transporter blockade enhances sustained attention,” Neuropharmacology, 148, 178–188 (2019).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  59. K. E. Mathewson, G. Gratton, and M. Fabiani, “To see or not to see: Prestimulus phase predicts visual awareness,” J. Neurosci., 29, No. 9, 2725–2732 (2009).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  60. K. McAlonan, J. Cavanaugh, and R. H. Wurtz, “Guarding the gateway to cortex with attention in visual thalamus,” Nature, 456, No. 7220, 391–394 (2008).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  61. T. Moore and M. Fallah, “Microstimulation of the frontal eye field and its effects on covert spatial attention,” J. Neurophysiol., 91, No. 1, 152–162 (2004).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. J. Muir, B. Everitt, and T. Robbins, “AMPA-induced excitotoxic lesions of the basal forebrain: a significant role for the cortical cholinergic system in attentional function,” J. Neurosci., 14, No. 4, 2313–2326 (1994).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  63. S. Niogi, P. Mukherjee, J. Ghajar, and B. D. McCandliss, “Individual differences in distinct components of attention are linked to anatomical variations in distinct white matter tracts,” Front. Neuroanat., 4, 2 (2010).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  64. E. M. Nomura, C. Gratton, and R. M. Visser, “Double dissociation of two cognitive control networks in patients with focal brain lesions,” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 107, No. 26, 12,017–12,022 (2010).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  65. S. E. Petersen, P. T. Fox, and M. I. Posner, “Positron emission tomographic studies of the cortical anatomy of single-word processing,” Nature, 331, No. 6157, 585–589 (1988).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. S. E. Petersen and M. I. Posner, “The attention system of the human brain: 20 years after,” Annu. Rev. Neurosci., 35, No. 1, 73–89 (2012).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  67. M. I. Posner and J. “Orienting of attention: Then and now,” Q. J. Exp. Psychol., 69, No. 10, 1864–1875 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  68. M. I. Posner, “Orienting of attention,” Q. J. Exp. Psychol., 32, No. 1, 3–25 (1980).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  69. M. I. Posner and S. E. Petersen, “The attention system of the human brain,” Annu. Rev. Neurosci., 13, No. 1, 25–42 (1990).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  70. D. J. Prime and L. M. Ward, “Inhibition of return from stimulus to response,” Psychol. Sci., 15, No. 4, 272–276 (2004).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  71. R. D. Rafal, P. A. Calabresi, C. W. Brennan, and T. K. Sciolto, “Saccade preparation inhibits reorienting to recently attended locations,” J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform., 15, No. 4, 673–685 (1989).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  72. A. Reeves and J. S. McLellan, “The ‘anti-shift’: Shifting attention opposite to a saccade,” Vision Res., 167, 31–38 (2020).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  73. R. A. Rensink, J. K. O’Regan, and J. J. Clark, “To see or not to see: The need for attention to perceive changes in scenes,” Psychol. Sci., 8, No. 5, 368–373 (1997).

    Google Scholar 

  74. J. H. Reynolds and D. J. Heeger, “The Normalization model of attention,” Neuron, 61, No. 2, 168–185 (2009).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  75. G. Rizzolatti, L. Riggio, I. Dascola, and C. Umiltá, “Reorienting attention across the horizontal and vertical meridians: Evidence in favor of a premotor theory of attention,” Neuropsychologia, 25, No. 1, 31–40 (1987).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  76. A. C. Roberts, T. W. Robbins, B. J. Everitt, and J. L. Muir, “A specific form of cognitive rigidity following excitotoxic lesions of the basal forebrain in marmosets,” Neuroscience, 47, No. 2, 251–264 (1992).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  77. M. K. Rothbart, B. E. Sheese, M. R. Rueda, and M. I. Posner, “Developing mechanisms of self-regulation in early life,” Emotion Rev., 3, No. 2, 207–213 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  78. F. Di Russo, “Source analysis of event-related cortical activity during visuo-spatial attention,” Cereb. Cortex, 13, No. 5, 486–499 (2003).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  79. Y. B. Saalmann, M. A. Pinsk, and L. Wang, “The pulvinar regulates information transmission between cortical areas based on attention demands,” Science, 337, No. 6095, 753–756 (2012).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  80. P. Sapountzis, “Neural signatures of attention insights from decoding population activity patterns,” Front. Biosci., 23, No. 1, 4588 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  81. T. R. Sato and J. D. Schall, “Effects of stimulus-response compatibility on neural selection in frontal eye field,” Neuron, 38, No. 4, 637–648 (2003).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  82. F. L. Schiffino, J. M. McNally, R. E. Brown, and R. E. Strecker, “Basal forebrain parvalbumin neurons modulate vigilant attention,” BioRxiv (2021), https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.04.19.440515.

  83. S. M. Sherman and R. W. Guillery, The MIT Press (2009), Vol. 8, pp. 1055–1060.

    Google Scholar 

  84. R. M. Shiffrin, D. P. McKay, and W. O. Shaffer, “Attending to forty-nine spatial positions at once,” J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform., 2, No. 1, 14–22 (1976).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  85. G. L. Shulman, J. M. Ollinger, and E. Akbudak, et al., “Areas involved in encoding and applying directional expectations to moving objects,” J. Neurosci., 19, No. 21, 9480–9496 (1999).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  86. D. T. Smith and T. Schenk, “The Premotor theory of attention: Time to move on?” Neuropsychologia, 50, No. 6, 1104–1114 (2012).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  87. E. Spaak, M. Bonnefond, and A. Maier, “Layer-specific entrainment of gamma-band neural activity by the alpha rhythm in monkey visual cortex,” Curr. Biol., 22, No. 24, 2313–2318 (2012).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  88. J. R. Stroop, “Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions,” J. Exp. Psychol., 18, No. 6, 643–662 (1935).

    Google Scholar 

  89. M. Suzuki and J. Gottlieb, “Distinct neural mechanisms of distractor suppression in the frontal and parietal lobe,” Nat. Neurosci., 16, No. 1, 98–104 (2013).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  90. K. G. Thompson, “Neuronal basis of covert spatial attention in the frontal eye field,” J. Neurosci., 25, No. 41, 9479–9487 (2005).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  91. Y. Tian, R. M. Klein, and J. Satel, “Electrophysiological explorations of the cause and effect of inhibition of return in a cue-target paradigm,” Brain Topogr., 24, No. 2, 164–182 (2011).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  92. A. M. Treisman and G. Gelade, “A feature-integration theory of attention,” Cogn. Psychol., 12, No. 1, 97–136 (1980).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  93. M. Voytko, D. Olton, and R. Richardson, “Basal forebrain lesions in monkeys disrupt attention but not learning and memory,” J. Neurosci., 14, No. 1, 167–186 (1994) [A published erratum appears in J. Neurosci., 15, No. 3 (1995) following the table of contents.]

  94. S. P. Wise, M. Weinrich, and K.-H. Mauritz, “Motor aspects of cuerelated neuronal activity in premotor cortex of the rhesus monkey,” Brain Res., 260, No. 2, 301–305 (1983).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  95. Y. Yeshurun and M. Carrasco, “Attention improves or impairs visual performance by enhancing spatial resolution,” Nature, 396, No. 6706, 72–75 (1998).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  96. F. Zappasodi, P. Croce, R. Di Matteo, and M. Brunetti, “Inhibition of return in time-lapse: Brain rhythms during grip force control for spatial attention,” Neuropsychologia, 163, 108068 (2021).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Institute of Higher Nervous Activity and Neurophysiology, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia

    A. S. Gulyaeva & E. D. Karimova

Authors
  1. A. S. Gulyaeva
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. E. D. Karimova
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. S. Gulyaeva.

Additional information

Translated from Uspekhi Fiziologicheskikh Nauk, Vol. 53, No. 4, pp. 71–90, October–December, 2022.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Gulyaeva, A.S., Karimova, E.D. Concepts and Approaches to the Study of Visual Spatial Attention. Neurosci Behav Physi 53, 416–431 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11055-023-01440-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11055-023-01440-6

Keywords

Search

Navigation