Skip to main content
Log in

Autoidentification and Sensorimotor Rehearsal as Physiological Mechanisms of Consciousness

  • Published:
Neuroscience and Behavioral Physiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This article addresses the nature and neurophysiological mechanisms of sensory awareness, conscious perception, generation of thought, imagination, intuition, and discursive thought. Sensory awareness and thought generation have been shown to be based on high-frequency cyclic autoidentification processes. Imagination and discursive thought are based on cyclic processes of sensorimotor rehearsal. Rehearsal is a low-frequency process (3–6 Hz) and its content is accessible for review by high-frequency autoidentification processes (30–70 Hz). The succession mental images, words, or symbols is controlled by the motor system and is accessible for review by autoidentification processes. The interaction of sensorimotor rehearsal and autoidentification mechanisms allows us to form images, scenes, and dialogs, to observe and change them, creating a mobile and controlled world of conscious experience. The mechanisms of autoidentification and sensorimotor rehearsal explain the nature of a wide spectrum of the properties of conscious brain activity, including such still-cryptic phenomena as hypnosis and meditation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Baars, B. and Gage, N., Cognition, Brain, and Consciousness. An Introduction to Cognitive Neuroscience [Russian translation], BINOM, Knowledge Laboratory, Moscow (2014a), Part 1.

  • Baars, B. and Gage, N., Cognition, Brain, and Consciousness. An Introduction to Cognitive Neuroscience [Russian translation], BINOM, Knowledge Laboratory, Moscow (2014b), Part 2.

  • Barabanshchikov, V. A., Systems Genesis of Sensory Perception, Institute of Practical Psychology, Moscow (2000).

    Google Scholar 

  • Batuev, A. S., Neurophysiology of the Cerebral Cortex: Modular Principle of Organization, Leningrad State University, Leningrad (1984).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bul’, P., Hypnosis and Suggestion, Meditsina, Moscow (1975).

  • Bykov, K. M., Selected Works, Vol. 2, The Cerebral Cortex and the Internal Organs, State Medical Literature Press, Moscow (1954).

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, B. H., “The motor theory of voluntary thinking,” in: Consciousness and Self-Regulation, Davidson, R. J. et al. (eds.), Plenum Press, New York (1986), pp. 19–37.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Cowan, N., “What are the differences between long-term, short-term, and working memory?” Progr. Brain Res., 169, 323–338 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Creutzfeldt, O. D., “Generality of the functional structure of the neocortex,” Naturwissenschaften, 64, 507–517 (1977).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Crick, F. and Koch, C., “Some reflections on visual awareness,” Cold Spring Harb. Symp. Quant. Biol., LV, 953–962 (1990).

  • Edelman, G. M. and Tononi, G. A., The Universe of Consciousness, Basic Books, New York (2000).

    Google Scholar 

  • Edelman, G. M., “Group selection and phasic reentrant signaling: A theory of higher brain function,” in: The Mindful Brain, MIT Press, Cambridge (1978), pp. 50–100.

  • Edelman, G. M., The Remembered Present. A Biological Theory of Consciousness, Basic Books, New York (1989).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hadamard, J., An Essay on the Psychology of Invention in the Mathematical Field [Russian translation], Soviet Radio, Moscow (1970).

  • Halford, G. S., Cowan, N., and Andrews, G., “Separating cognitive capacity from knowledge: A new hypothesis,” Trends Cogn. Sci., 11, No. 6, 236–242 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hebb, D. O., The Organization of Behavior, Wiley, New York (1949).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hofman, I., Active Memory [Russian translation], Progress, Moscow (1986).

  • Hubel, D. H. and Wiesel, T. N., “Functional architecture of macaque monkey cortex,” Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. B, 198, 1–59 (1977).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hubel, D. H. and Wiesel, T. N., “Sequence, regularity and geometry of orientation columns in the monkey striate cortex,” J. Comp. Neurol., 158, 267–294 (1974).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ivanitskii, A. M., “Mental activity and the organization of cerebral processes,” Vestn. Akad. Med. Nauk SSSR, 8, 14–23 (1987).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ivanitskii, A. M., “The cerebral basis of subjective experience: an information synthesis hypothesis,” Zh. Vyssh. Nerv. Deyat., 46, No. 2, 241–252 (1996).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ivanitskii, A. M., “The problem of consciousness and the physiology of the brain,” in: The Consciousness Problem in Philosophy and Science, Dubrovskii, D. I. (ed.), Kanon ROOOI Rehabilitation, Moscow (2009), pp. 383–394.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ivanitskii, A. M., Cerebral Signal Evaluation Mechanisms, Meditsina, Moscow (1976).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ivanitskii, A. M., Strelets, B. V., and Korsakov, M. A., Information Processes in the Brain and Mental Activity, Nauka, Moscow (1984).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ivanitskii, G. A., Naumov, R. A., and Ivanitskii, A. M., “A technique for identifying the type of mental operations being performed in the mind from electroencephalogram patterns,” Tekhnol. Zhiv. Sist., 4, No. 5–6, 20–27 (2007).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ivanitskii, G. A., Naumov, R. A., Roik, A. O., and Ivanitskii, A. M., “How can we identify what the brain is doing from its electrical potentials? Stable EEG patterns on execution of cognitive tasks,” Vopr. Iskusst. Intel., 1, 93–102 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  • Katsuki, S., Zen Training [Russian translation], Ukraine Press, REFL Book, Kiev (1993).

  • Kihlstrom, J. F. and Hoyt, I. P., “Hypnosis and the Psychology of Delusions,” in: Delusional Beliefs, Oltmanns, T. F. (ed.), Wiley, New York (1988), Ch. 4, pp. 66–107.

  • Klatzky, R., Human Memory [Russian translation], Mir, Moscow (1978).

  • Koch, C. and Crick, F., “Some further ideas regarding the neuronal basis of awareness,” in: Large-Scale Neuronal Theories of the Brain, Koch, C. and Davis, J. (eds.), MIT Press, Cambridge, MA (1994), pp. 93–110.

    Google Scholar 

  • Konig, P., Engel, A. K., and Singer, W., “Integrator or coincidence detector? The role of the cortical neuron revisited,” Trends Neurosci., 19, 130–137 (1996).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kropotov, Yu. D., Quantitative EEG, Cognitive Event-Related Potentials in the Human Brain and Neurotherapy, Zaslavskii Press, Donetsk (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  • Luriya, A. R., Basic Neuropsychology, Academy Publishing Center, Moscow (2003).

    Google Scholar 

  • Mountcastle, V. B., “An organizing principle for cerebral function: the unit model and the distributed system,” in: the Mindful Brain, Edelman, G. M. and Mountcastle, V. B. (eds.), MIT Press, Cambridge, MA (1978), pp. 7–50.

  • Mountcastle, V. B., Perceptual Neuroscience: The Cerebral Cortex, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA (1998).

    Google Scholar 

  • Pascual-Leone, F. and Walsh, V., “Fast back projections from the motion to the primary visual area necessary for visual awareness,” Science, 292, No. 5516, 510–512 (2001).

  • Phillips, W. A., “Short-term visual memory,” Phil Trans Roy. Soc Lond. B., 302, 295–309 (1983).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pigarev, I. N., “A visceral theory of sleep,” Zh. Vyssh. Nerv. Deyat., 63, No. 1, 86–104 (2013).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Savel’ev, S. V., Emergence of the Human Brain, Vedi, Moscow (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  • Sergin, A. V. and Sergin, V. Ya., “Model of perception: The hierarchy of inclusive sensory characteristics and top-down cascade transfer of excitation,” Neural Network World, 18, No. 3, 227–244 (e2008).

  • Sergin, V. Ya. and Sergin, A. V., “A hierarchical model of perception without a combinatorial explosion,” Zh. Vyssh. Nerv. Deyat., 69, No. 5, 633–658 (r2019), https://doi.org/10.1134/S0044467719050113.

  • Sergin, V. Ya., “A biologically plausible model of visual perception: a hierarchy of inclusive sensory characteristics. Lecture to the IX All-Russian Scientific and Technical Conference Neuroinformatics-2007,” in: Lectures in Neuroinformatics, Yu. V. Tyumentsev (ed.), Moscow Engineering Physics Institute, Moscow (r2007), Pt. 2, pp. 77–120.

  • Sergin, V. Ya., “A global model of human mentality,” in: Cybernetics and Systems ‘92, World Scientific Publishing Co. (e1992), Vol 1. pp. 883–890.

  • Sergin, V. Ya., “Auto-identification of neuronal activity patterns as a physiological mechanism of awareness,” Neurosci. Behav. Physiol., 47, No. 7, 1–14 (2017), https://doi.org/10.1007/s11055-017-0462-7.

  • Sergin, V. Ya., “Autoidentification of patterns of neural activity as a physiological mechanism of consciousness,” Zh. Vyssh. Nerv. Deyat., 66, No. 2, 1–20 (r2016).

  • Sergin, V. Ya., “Consciousness as a data-processing system,” Neural Network World, 4, No. 5, 601–608 (e1994a).

  • Sergin, V. Ya., “Consciousness as a system of inner vision,” Zh. Vyssh. Nerv. Deyat., 44, No. 4–5, 627–639 (r1994b).

  • Sergin, V. Ya., “Nature of sensory awareness: the hypothesis of self-identification,” in: Complex Brain Function: Conceptual Advances in Russian Neurosciences, Miller, R. et al. (eds.), Harwood Academic Publishers (e2000), pp. 97–112.

  • Sergin, V. Ya., “Neural mechanisms of conscious perception: the autoidentification hypothesis. Lecture to the XI All-Russian Scientific and Technical Conference Neuroinformatics-2009,” in: Lectures in Neuroinformatics, Yu. V. Tyumentsev (ed.), Moscow Engineering Physics Institute, Moscow (r2009aa), Pt. 2, pp. 35–65.

  • Sergin, V. Ya., “Perceptual binding of sensory events: the hypothesis of inclusive characteristics,” Neurosci. Behav. Physiol., 33, No. 8, 753–761 (e2003).

  • Sergin, V. Ya., “Perceptual binding of sensory events: the inclusive characteristic hypothesis,” Zh. Vyssh. Nerv. Deyat., 52, No. 6, 645–655 (r2002).

  • Sergin, V. Ya., “Psychophysiological mechanisms of consciousness: the autoidentification hypothesis,” Zh. Vyssh. Nerv. Deyat., 48, No. 3, 558–571 (r1998).

  • Sergin, V. Ya., “Psychophysiological mechanisms of perception: the inclusive characteristic concept,” Usp. Fiziol. Nauk., 40, No. 4, 42–63 (r2009bb).

  • Sergin, V. Ya., “Self-identification and sensori-motor rehearsal as key mechanisms of consciousness,” Int. J. Comput. Anticipat. Syst., 4, 81–99 (e1999).

  • Sergin, V. Ya., “The brain as neurocomputer. The macrostructure of intelligence,” in: Neurocomputers and Attention Holden, A. V. and Kryukov, V. I. (eds.), Manchester University Press, Manchester (e1991), Vol. 2, pp. 771–781.

  • Shamis, A. L., Behavior, Perception, Thought, Editorial URSS, Moscow (2005).

  • Sil’kis, I. G., “A possible mechanism of the involvement of cortex-basal ganglia-thalamus-cortex circuits in the perception of time,” Usp. Fiziol. Nauk., 42, No. 2, 41–56 (2011).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sil’kis, I. G., “A unified neural mechanism for the effects of attention, emotions, and neurological diseases on the perception of subsecond time intervals (the role of the basal ganglia),” Usp. Fiziol. Nauk., 48, No. 4, 78–94 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  • Sil’kis, I. G., “The contribution of synaptic plasticity in the basal ganglia to visual information processing (a hypothetical mechanism),” Zh. Vyssh. Nerv. Deyat., 56, No. 6, 742–756 (2006).

    Google Scholar 

  • Simonov, P. V., The Motivated Brain, Nauka, Moscow (1987).

    Google Scholar 

  • Standring, S. (ed.) Gray’s Anatomy: The Anatomical Basis of Clinical Practice, Churchill Livingstone, Edinburgh (2005), 39th ed.

  • Szentagothai, J., “The ‘module-concept’ in cerebral cortex architecture,” Brain Res., 95, 475–496 (1975).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tarotin, I. V., Atanov, M. S., and Ivanitskii, G. A., “A prototype device for tracking cognitive activity in real time (The ‘Cognovisor’),” Zh. Vyssh. Nerv. Deyat., 67, No. 4, 493–503 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  • Walsh, V. and Cowey, A., “Transcranial magnetic stimulation and cognitive neuroscience,” Nat Rev. Neurosci., 1, 73–79 (2000).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • West, M., “Meditation and self-awareness: psychological and phenomenological approaches,” in: Aspects of Consciousness, Underwood, G. and Stevens, R. (eds.), Academic Press, London (1982); Vol. 3.

  • Zeki, S. M., A Vision of the Brain, Blackwell Scientific Publications (1993).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to V. Ya. Sergin.

Additional information

Translated from Zhurnal Vysshei Nervnoi Deyatel’nosti imeni I. P. Pavlova, Vol. 70, No. 5, pp. 696–720, September–October, 2020.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sergin, V.Y. Autoidentification and Sensorimotor Rehearsal as Physiological Mechanisms of Consciousness. Neurosci Behav Physi 51, 648–665 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11055-021-01118-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11055-021-01118-x

Keywords

Navigation