Skip to main content
Log in

Dynamics of the Motor Symptoms of Parkinson’s Disease on the Background of Chronic Bilateral Electrical Stimulation of the Subthalamic Nucleus Using Two Methods to Verify Target Structure

  • Published:
Neuroscience and Behavioral Physiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Objectives. To determine the efficacy of electrical stimulation of the subthalamic nucleus using different methods to verify target structure in patients with Parkinson’s disease based on assessment of the dynamics of motor symptoms. Materials and methods. A total of 60 patients with PD with chronic bilateral electrical stimulation of the subthalamic nucleus (ES of the STN) were studied. Multichannel microelectrode recording (MER) was performed during neurostimulation electrode implantation surgery in 30 cases. Intraoperative MER was not performed in 30 cases. The control group consisted of 30 patients with PD who received only conservative medication-based treatment. Patient investigations used the Hoehn and Yahr scale, the Tinetti Balance and Mobility Scale (TBMS), the Unifi ed Parkinson’s Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS), the PDQ-39 quality of life self-assessment scale for Parkinson’s disease, and the Schwab and England Activities of Daily Living (ADL) scale. The levodopa equivalent daily dose (LEDD) was determined individually for each patient. Results and conclusions. ES of the STN was found to be effective when used in combination with MER in terms of effects on the severity of the main motor symptoms, motor complications, gait, and measures of quality of life and the activities of daily living. On the background of ES of the STN, patients of both surgical groups attained significant reductions in LEDD with marked improvements in the control of the motor symptoms of PD; significant decreases in the severity of motor fluctuation (50%) and peak dose iatrogenic dyskinesias (51%) were seen. Measures of quality of life and the activities of daily living while off medication improved significantly in both groups of patients receiving ES of the STN independently of the intraoperative target selection technique (75–100%) as compared with the control group.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. G. Deuschl, M. Schüpbach, K. Knudsen, et al., “Stimulation of the subthalamic nucleus at an earlier disease stage of Parkinson’s disease: Concept and standards of the EARLYSTIM-study,” Parkinsonism Relat. Disord., 19, No. 1, 56–61 (2013), https://doi.org/10.1016/j. parkreldis.2012.07.004.

  2. A. Machado, M. Deogaonkar, and S. Cooper, “Deep brain stimulation for movement disorders: Patient selection and technical options,” Cleve. Clin. J. Med., 79, Suppl. 2, 19–24 (2012), https://doi. org/10.3949/ccjm.79.s2a.04.

  3. R. deSouza, E. Moro, A. Lang, and A. Schapira, “Timing of deep brain stimulation in Parkinson disease: A need for reappraisal?” Annals of Neurology 73, No. 5, 565–575 (2013), https://doi.org/10.1002/ana.23890.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. P. Starr and J. Ostrem, “Commentary on ‘Adaptive deep brain stimulation in advanced Parkinson disease,’” Ann. Neurol., 74, No. 3, 447–448 (2013), https://doi.org/10.1002/ana.23966.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. “Pallidal versus subthalamic deep-brain stimulation for Parkinson’s disease,” N. Engl. J. Med., 364, No. 9, 886 (2011), https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmx110012.

  6. A. Paffi , F. Camera, F. Apollonio, et al., “Numerical characterization of intraoperative and chronic electrodes in deep brain stimulation,” Front. Comput. Neurosci., 9 (2015), https://doi.org/ 10.3389/fncom. 2015.00002.

  7. V. A. Shabalov, A. A. Tomskii, E. V. Bril’, and N. V. Fedorova, “Electrical stimulation of the subthalamic nucleus in Parkinson’s disease,” Zh. Vopr. Neirokhir. No. 3, 14–17 (2006).

  8. C. Seifried, L. Weise, R. Hartmann, et al., “Intraoperative microelectrode recording for the delineation of subthalamic nucleus topography in Parkinson’s disease,” Brain Stimul., 5, No. 3, 378–387 (2012), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brs.2011.06.002.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. W. Gibb and A. Lees, “The relevance of the Lewy body to the pathogenesis of idiopathic Parkinson’s disease,” J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry, 51, No. 6, 745–752 (1988), https://doi.org/10.1136/jnnp.51.6.745.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. A. Hughes, Y. Ben-Shlomo, S. Daniel, and A. Lees, “What features improve the accuracy of clinical diagnosis in Parkinson’s disease: A clinicopathologic study,” Neurology, 42, No. 6, 1142–1142 (1992), https://doi.org/10.1212/wnl.42.6.1142.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. R. Postuma, D. Berg, M. Stern, et al., “MDS clinical diagnostic criteria for Parkinson’s disease,” Mov. Disord., 30, No. 12, 1591–1601 (2015), https://doi.org/10.1002/mds.26424.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. J. Langston, H. Widner, C. Goetz, et al., “Core assessment program for intracerebral transplantations (CAPIT),” Mov. Disord., 7, No. 1, 2–13 (1992), https://doi.org/10.1002/mds.870070103.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. N. Hoehn and M. Yahr, “Parkinsonism: onset, progression, and mortality,” Neurology, 17, No. 5, 427–427 (1967), https://doi.org/10. 1212/wnl.17.5.427.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. O. Lindvall, “Human fetal dopamine neurons grafted into the striatum in two patients with severe Parkinson’s disease,” Arch. Neurol., 46, No. 6, 615 (1989), https://doi.org/10.1001/archneur.1989.00520420033021.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. M. Tinetti, “Performance-oriented assessment of mobility problems in elderly patients,” J. Am. Ger. Soc., 34, No. 2, 119–126 (1986), https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-5415.1986.tb05480.x.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. C. Goetz, B. Tilley, S. Shaftman, et al., “Movement Disorder Societysponsored revision of the Unified Parkinson’s Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS): Scale presentation and clinimetric testing results,” Mov. Disord., 23, No. 15, 2129–2170 (2008), https://doi.org/10.1002/mds.22340.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. V. Peto, C. Jenkinson, R. Fitzpatrick, and R. Greenhall, “The development and validation of a short measure of functioning and well being for individuals with Parkinson’s disease,” Qual. Life Res., 4, No. 3, 241–248 (1995), https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02260863.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. R. Schwab and A. England, “Parkinson’s disease,” J. Chron. Dis., 8, No. 4, 488–509 (1958), https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-9681(58) 90006-7.

  19. S. Fahn, R. L. Elton, and members of the UPDRS Development Committee, “Unified Parkinson’s disease rating scale,” in: Recent Developments in Parkinson’s Disease, S. Fahn et al. (eds.), Macmillan Healthcare Information, Florham Park, NJ (1987), pp. 153–163, https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-374105-9.00091-5.

  20. C. Tomlinson, R. Stowe, S. Patel, et al., “Systematic review of levodopa dose equivalency reporting in Parkinson’s disease,” Mov. Disord., 25, No. 15, 2649–2653 (2010), https://doi.org/10.1002/mds.23429.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. P. Blomstedt and M. Hariz, “Deep brain stimulation for movement disorders before DBS for movement disorders,” Parkinsonism Relat. Disord., 6, No. 7, 429–433 (2010), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.parkreldis. 2010.04.005.

  22. H. Bronte-Stewart, C. Barberini, M. Koop, et al., “The STN beta-band profile in Parkinson’s disease is stationary and shows prolonged attenuation after deep brain stimulation,” Exp. Neurol., 215, No. 1, 20–28 (2009), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.expneurol.2008.09.008.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. A. Benabid, S. Chabardes, J. Mitrofanis, and P. Pollak, “Deep brain stimulation of the subthalamic nucleus for the treatment of Parkinson’s disease,” Lancet Neurol., 8, No. 1, 67–81 (2009), https://doi. org/10.1016/s1474-4422(08)70291-6.

  24. E. Lagrange, P. Krack, E. Moro, et al., “Bilateral subthalamic nucleus stimulation improves health-related quality of life in PD,” Neurology, 59, No. 12, 1976–1978 (2002), https://doi.org/10.1212/01.wnl.0000037486.82390.1c.

  25. M. Lanotte, “Deep brain stimulation of the subthalamic nucleus: anatomical, neurophysiological, and outcome correlations with the effects of stimulation,” J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry, 72, No. 1, 53–58 (2002), https://doi.org/10.1136/jnnp.72.1.53.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. J. Vesper, F. Klostermann, F. Stockhammer, et al., “Results of chronic subthalamic nucleus stimulation for Parkinson’s disease: a 1-year follow-up study,” Surg. Neurol., 57, No. 5, 306–311 (2002), https:// doi.org/10.1016/s0090-3019(02)00691-2.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to N. N. Gubareva.

Additional information

Translated from Zhurnal Nevrologii i Psikhiatrii imeni S. S. Korsakova, Vol. 117, No. 11, Iss. 1, pp. 24–30, November, 2017.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Gubareva, N.N., Fedorova, N.V., Bril’, E.V. et al. Dynamics of the Motor Symptoms of Parkinson’s Disease on the Background of Chronic Bilateral Electrical Stimulation of the Subthalamic Nucleus Using Two Methods to Verify Target Structure. Neurosci Behav Physi 49, 240–245 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11055-019-00721-3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11055-019-00721-3

Keywords

Navigation