Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Comparison of the Influences of Neuromidin and Magnetic Stimulation on Neuroplasticity in Experimental Traumatic Neuropathy

  • Published:
Neuroscience and Behavioral Physiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Aim of study. Traumatic neuropathy is a current problem in contemporary neurology because of the frequent occurrence of severe neurological deficit and the poor prognosis for recovery. The aim of the present work was to study the effects of the anticholinesterase agent Neuromidin and transspinal magnetic stimulation on neuroplastic axon changes in the rat sciatic nerve in experimental neurotmesis. Materials and methods. Animals (20 rats) were divided into three groups: group 1 (controls) received no treatment; animals of group 2 received rhythmic transspinal magnetic stimulation of intensity 0.8–1.0 T, frequency 3 Hz, and duration 3–5 min daily for one month; animals of group 3 were treated with i.m. injections of Neuromidin at a dose of 0.035 mg/day. Results and conclusions. The results obtained here on the recovery of myelin, axon, and nodes of Ranvier structures in myelinated fibers and lemmocyte (Schwann cell) ultrastructure in experimental animals treated with both magnetic stimulation and Neuromidin led to the conclusion that the use of both methods stimulated compensatory-restorative processes in traumatic neuropathies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. S. A. Zhivolupov, Traumatic Neuropathies and Plexopathies (pathogenesis, clinical features, diagnosis, and treatment): Auth. Abstr. Dissert. Doct. Med. Sci., St. Petersburg (2000).

  2. W. I. McDonald, “Structural and functional changes in human experimental neuropathy,” Mod. Trends Neurol., 4, 145–164 (1967).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. N. A. Rashidov, Clinical-Experimental Assessment of the Efficacy of Various Types of Conservative Therapy of Traumatic Neuropathies (an experimental-clinical study): Auth. Abstr. Dissert. Cand. Med. Sci., St. Petersburg (2001).

  4. P. K. Thanos, S. Okajima, and J. K. Terzis, “Ultrastructure and cellular biology of nerve regeneration,” J. Reconstr. Microsurg., 14, No. 6, 423–436 (1998).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. G. Stoll and H. W. Müller, “Nerve injury, axonal degeneration and neural regeneration: basic insights,” Brain Pathol., 9, No. 2, 313–325 (1999).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. A. A. Mironov, Ya. Yu. Komissarchik, and V. A. Mironov, Electron Microscopy Methods in Biology and Medicine, Nauka, St. Petersburg (1994).

  7. G. A. Akimov et al., “Current concepts of the pathogenesis, diagnosis, and treatment of traumatic injuries to the nerve trunks of the limbs (review),” Zh. Nevrol. Psikhiat., 89, No. 5, 126–132 (1989).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. S. A. Zhivolupov, I. N. Samartsev, N. A. Rashidov, and E. V. Yako vlev, “Current concepts of the regeneration of nerve fibers in peripheral nervous system traumas,” Vestn. Ross. Voen.-Med. Akad., 43, No. 3, 190–198 (2013).

  9. L. R. Robinson, “Traumatic injury to peripheral nerves,” Muscle Nerve, 23, No. 6, 863–873 (2000).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. N. A. Rashidov et al., “Characteristics of the demyelination and remyelination of the sciatic nerve in the treatment of experimental compressive neuropathy,” Vestn. Ross. Voen.-Med. Akad., 12, No. 2, 59–62 (2004).

    Google Scholar 

  11. J. Shen et al., “Neuropathy: T1 and T2 measurements in acute peripheral nerve traction injury in rabbits,” Radiology, 254, No. 3, 729–738 (2010).

  12. S. A. Zhivolupov, D. A. Iskra, and N. A. Rashidov, “Effects of pulsed magnetic stimulation on restorative and compensatory processes in nerve and plexus traumas,” in: Current Questions in the Clinical Features, Diagnosis, and Treatment, St. Petersburg (1999), pp. 82–83.

  13. N. V. Skripchenko et al., Clinical-Electroneuromyographic Measures in the Assessment of the Severity and Prognosis of Facial Nerve Neuropathy in Children, Nauka, St. Petersburg (2000), pp. 449–450.

    Google Scholar 

  14. E. Kerezoudi, R. H. King, and J. R. Muddle, “Influence of age on the late retrograde effects of sciatic nerve section in the rat,” J. Anat., 187, No. 1, 27–35 (1995).

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. L. Wan, S. Zhang, R. Xia, and W. Ding, “Short-term low-frequency electrical stimulation enhanced remyelination of injured peripheral nerves by inducing the promyelination effect of brain-derived neurotrophic factor on Schwann cell polarization,” J. Neurosci. Res., 88, No. 12, 2578–2587 (2010).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. L. D. Wan, R. Xia, and W. L. Ding, “Electrical stimulation enhanced remyelination of injured sciatic nerves by increasing neurotrophins,” Neuroscience, 169, No. 3, 1029–1038 (2010).

  17. I. Gunay and T. Mert, “Pulsed magnetic fields enhance the rate of recovery of damaged nerve excitability,” Bioelectromagnetics, 32, No. 3, 200–208 (2010).

  18. J. Classen, S. J. Boniface, U. Ziemann, et al., “Stimulation-induced plasticity in the human motor cortex,” in: Plasticity in the Human Nervous System: Investigations with Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation, Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge (2003), pp. 135–165.

  19. L. S. Onishchenko, “Ultrastructural changes in the central and peripheral nervous system in experimental allergic encephalomyelitis,” in: Multiple Sclerosis: Selected Questions in Theory and Practice, St. Petersburg (2000), pp. 405–435.

  20. V. P. Frazon, O. A. Rodrigues Filho, C. E. Jordao, et al., “Phrenic nerve diabetic neuropathy in rats: unmyelinated fibers morphometry,” J. Periph. Nerv. Syst., 14, No. 2, 137–145 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. T. H. Moss, “Segmental demyelination in the peripheral nerves of mice affected by a hereditary neuropathy (dystonia musculorum),” Acta. Neuropathol., 53, No. 1, 51–56 (1981).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. S. A. Zhivolupov, I. N. Samartsev, and F. A. Syroezhkin, “Current concepts in neuroplasticity (theoretical aspects and practical significance),” Zh. Nevrol. Psikhiat., 10, 102–108 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S. A. Zhivolupov.

Additional information

Translated from Zhurnal Nevrologii i Psikhiatrii imeni S. S. Korsakova, Vol. 114, No. 6, Iss. I, pp. 57–62, June, 2014.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhivolupov, S.A., Rashidov, N.A., Onishchenko, L.S. et al. Comparison of the Influences of Neuromidin and Magnetic Stimulation on Neuroplasticity in Experimental Traumatic Neuropathy. Neurosci Behav Physi 46, 110–115 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11055-015-0206-5

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11055-015-0206-5

Keywords

Navigation