Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Improving Prediction Accuracy of Rainfall Time Series By Hybrid SARIMA–GARCH Modeling

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Natural Resources Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper, a hybrid of seasonal autoregressive integrated moving average (SARIMA)-generalized autoregressive conditional heteroscedasticity (GARCH) was applied to eliminate conditional variance of the SARIMA model of rainfall time series in two different climatic environments (Agartala: humid, and Jodhpur: arid). In addition, the effectiveness of data normalization techniques (differencing and transformation) to stabilize conditional variance in the SARIMA residuals is additionally examined. The residuals from SARIMA models were tested for heteroscedasticity, utilizing the McLeod–Li test, and demonstrated some autocorrelation. Then, the rainfall time series was transformed (differencing and Box–Cox) so that the effect of heteroscedasticity is eliminated. The hybrid SARIMA–GARCH model based on transformed rainfall time series resulted in good statistics performance indices at both climatic environments. The findings of the study suggest that the performance of SARIMA models can be enhanced by using appropriate transformation (Box–Cox) along with GARCH model of residuals of highly skewed rainfall time series from both climatic environments. For Agartala station of monthly rainfall time series, the best model was SARIMA (0, 1, 1) (0, 1, 1)12–GARCH (1, 2) with coefficient of determination (R2) = 0.72 and root-mean-square error (RMSE) = 25.22, but after Box–Cox transformation of data, the best model was SARIMA (0, 1, 1) (0, 1, 1)12–GARCH (2, 4) with R2 = 0.87 and RMSE = 0.672. For the monthly rainfall series of Jodhpur station, the best model was SARIMA (0, 1, 1) (0, 1, 1)12–GARCH (1, 2) with R2 = 0.68 and RMSE = 16.75, but after Box–Cox transformation of data the best model was SARIMA (0, 1, 1) (0, 1, 1)12–GARCH (1, 2) with R2 = 0.79 and RMSE = 1.917. The performance indices indicate that hybrid (SARIMA–GARCH) models fitted to transformed time-series rainfall data performed best in the humid as well as the arid regions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6
Figure 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Asar, O., Ilk, O., & Dag, O. (2017). Estimating Box–Cox power transformation parameter via goodness of fit tests. Communications in Statistics-Simulation and Computation, 46(1), 91–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bera, A., & Higgins, M. (1995). On ARCH models: Properties, estimation, and testing. In L. Oxley, D. A. R. George, C. J. Roberts, & S. Sayer (Eds.), Surveys in econometrics (pp. 171–224). Cambridge: Blackwell Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bollerslev, T. (1986). Generalized autoregressive conditional heteroscedasticity. Journal of Econometrics, 31, 307–327.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Box, G. E. P., & Cox, D. R. (1964). An analysis of transformations. Journal of Royal Statistical Society Series B, 26, 211–252.

    Google Scholar 

  • Box, G. E. P., & Jenkins, G. M. (1976). Time series analysis: Forecasting and control (Revised ed.). San Francisco: Holden-Day.

  • Brockwell, P. J., & Davis, R. A. (2002). Modeling and forecasting with ARMA processes in introduction to time series and forecasting. New York City: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Chang, X., Gao, M., Wang, Y., & Hou, X. (2012). Seasonal autoregressive integrated moving average model for precipitation time series. Journal of Mathematics and Statistics, 8(4), 500–505.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Engle, R. F. (1982). Autoregressive conditional heteroscedasticity with estimates of the variance of United Kingdom inflation. Econometrica, 50(4), 987–1008.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hyndman, R. J., & Khandakar, Y. (2008). Automatic time series forecasting: The forecast package for R. Journal of Statistical Software, 26(3), 1–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jha, V., Singh, R. V., & Bhakar, S. R. (2003). Stochastic modelling of soil moisture. Journal of Agricultural Engineering, 40(4), 51–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kane, I. L., & Yusof, F. (2013). Assessment of risk of rainfall events with a hybrid of ARFIMA–GARCH. Modern Applied Sciences, 7(12), 78–89.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kottegoda, N. T. (1980). Stochastic water resources technology. London: The Macmillan Press Ltd.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Livina, V., Ashkenazy, Y., Kizner, Z., Strygin, V., Bunde, A., & Havlin, S. (2003). A stochastic model of river discharge fluctuations. Physica A, 330(1–2), 283–290. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physa.2003.08.012.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ljung, G. M., & Box, G. E. P. (1978). On a measure of lack of fit in time series models. Biometrika, 65, 297–303.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Machiwal, D., & Jha, M. K. (2012). Hydrologic time series analysis: Theory and practice. New Delhi: Springer/Germany and Capital Publishing Company.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • McLeod, A. I., & Li, W. K. (1983). Diagnostic checking ARMA time series models using squared residual autocorrelations. Journal of Time Series Analysis, 4, 269–273.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mishra, A. K., & Desai, V. R. (2005). Drought forecasting using stochastic models. Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment, 19, 326–339.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Modarres, R., & da Silva, V. P. R. (2007). Rainfall trends in arid and semi-arid regions of Iran. Journal of Arid Environment, 70, 344–355.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Modarres, R., & Ouarda, T. B. M. J. (2012). Generalized autoregressive conditional heteroscedasticity modelling of hydrologic time series. Hydrological Processes, 27(22), 3174–3191.

    Google Scholar 

  • Modarres, R., & Ouarda, T. B. M. J. (2013). Modelling heteroscedasticity of streamflow time series. Hydrological Sciences Journal, 58(1), 54–64. https://doi.org/10.1080/02626667.2012.743662.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Otache, M. Y., Ahaneku, I. E., Mohammed, A. S., & Musa, J. J. (2012). Conditional heteroscedasticity in streamflow process: Paradox or reality? Open Journal of Modern Hydrology, 2, 79–90. https://doi.org/10.4236/ojmh.2012.24010.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pandey, P., Pandey, V., Singh, R. V., & Bhakar, S. R. (2009). Stochastic modelling of actual Black Gram evapotranspiration. Journal of Water Resource and Protection, 1(6), 448–455.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rahman, M. R., & Lateh, H. (2015). Climate change in Bangladesh: A spatio-temporal analysis and simulation of recent temperature and rainfall data using GIS and time series analysis model. Theoretical and Applied Climatology, 128(1), 27–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sun, H., Zhao, N., Zeng, X., & Yan, D. (2015). Study of solar radiation prediction and modeling of relationships between solar radiation and meteorological variables. Energy Conversion and Management, 105, 880–890.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tol, R. J. S. (1996). Autoregressive conditional heteroscedasticity in daily temperature measurements. Environmetrics, 7(1), 67–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Toth, E., Drath, A., & Montanari, A. (2000). Comparison of short-term rainfall prediction models for real-time flood forecasting. Journal of Hydrology, 239, 132–147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, H. R., GAO, X., Qian, L. X., & Song, Y. U. (2012). Uncertainty analysis of hydrological processes based on ARMA–GARCH model. Science China Technological Science, 55(8), 2321–2331.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, W., Van Gelder, P. H. A., Vrijling, J. K., & Ma, J. (2005). Testing and modelling autoregressive conditional heteroscedasticity of streamflow processes. Nonlinear Processes in Geophysics, 12, 55–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weiss, A. A. (1984). ARMA models with ARCH errors. Journal of Time Series Analysis, 5(2), 129–143. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9892.1984.tb00382.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yusof, F., Kane, I. L., & Yusop, Z. (2013a). Structural break or long memory: An empirical survey on daily rainfall data sets across Malaysia. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences (HESS), 17, 1311–1318.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yusof, F., Kane, I. L., & Yusop, Z. (2015). Measuring volatility persistence on rainfall records with the hybrid of autoregressive fractional integrated moving average (ARFIMA)-Hidden Markov Model (HMM). AIP Conference Proceedings, 1643, 446–452. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4907479.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yusof, F., Kane, I. L., & Yusuf, Z. (2013b). Hybrid of ARIMA–GARCH modeling in rainfall time series. Jurnal Teknologi, 63(2), 27–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yusuf, F., & Kane, I. L. (2012). Volatility modelling of rainfall time series. Theoretical and Applied Climatology, 113(1–2), 247–258.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

Authors are grateful to the agencies that provided the data used in the present study. The authors appreciate the constructive comments from two anonymous reviewers, and we are grateful to Editor Dr. John Carranza for the valuable comments which substantially helped in improving the final version of the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to V. Pandey.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Pandey, P.K., Tripura, H. & Pandey, V. Improving Prediction Accuracy of Rainfall Time Series By Hybrid SARIMA–GARCH Modeling. Nat Resour Res 28, 1125–1138 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11053-018-9442-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11053-018-9442-z

Keywords

Navigation