Skip to main content
Log in

Updating the Taxonomy of Dermatophytes of the BCCM/IHEM Collection According to the New Standard: A Phylogenetic Approach

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Mycopathologia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Recent taxonomical revisions based on multilocus gene sequencing have provided some clarifications to dermatophyte (Arthrodermataceae) family tree. These changes promoted us to investigate the impact of the changed nomenclature of the dermatophyte strains in the BCCM/IHEM fungal collection, which contains strains of all dermatophyte genera except for Ctenomyces. For 688 strains from this collection, both internal transcribed spacer region (ITS) and partial β-tubulin (BT) sequences were aligned and a multilocus phylogenetic tree was constructed. The ITS + BT phylogentic tree was able to distinguish the genera Arthroderma, Lophophyton, Microsporum, Paraphyton, Nannizzia and Trichophyton with high certainty. Epidermophyton, which is widely considered as a well-defined genus with E. floccosum as the only representative, fell within the Nannizzia clade, whereas the phylogenetic analysis, based on the ITS region alone, differentiates Epidermophyton from Nannizzia as a separate genus. Re-identification and reclassification of many strains in the collection have had a profound impact on the composition of the BCCM/IHEM dermatophyte collection. The biggest change is the decline of prevalence of Arthroderma strains; starting with 103 strains, only 22 strains remain in the genus after reassessment. Most Arthroderma strains were reclassified into Trichophyton, with A. benhamiae and A. vanbreuseghemii leaving the genus. The amount of Microsporum strains also dropped significantly with most of these strains being reclassified into the genera Paraphyton and Nannizzia.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Weitzman I, Summerbell RC. The dermatophytes. Clin Microbiol Rev. 1995;8(2):240–59.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. De Vroey Ch. Epidemiology of ringworm (dermatophytosis). Semin Dermatol. 1985;4:185–200.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Seebacher C, Bouchara J-P, Mignon B. Updates on the epidemiology of dermatophyte infections. Mycopathologia. 2008;166(5-6):335–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. de Hoog GS, et al. Atlas of clinical fungi. Electronic version 4.1. 4. Utrecht: CBS-KNAW Fungal Biodiversity Centre; 2017.

    Google Scholar 

  5. de Hoog GS, et al. Toward a novel multilocus phylogenetic taxonomy for the dermatophytes. Mycopathologia. 2017;182(1–2):5–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Gräser Y, et al. Phylogeny and taxonomy of the family Arthrodermataceae (dermatophytes) using sequence analysis of the ribosomal ITS region. Med Mycol. 1999;37(2):105–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Gräser Y, et al. Molecular taxonomy of the Trichophyton rubrum complex. J Clin Microbiol. 2000;38(9):3329–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Rezaei-Matehkolaei A, et al. Nucleotide sequence analysis of beta tubulin gene in a wide range of dermatophytes. Medical mycology. 2014;52(7):674–88.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Makimura K, et al. Phylogenetic classification and species identification of dermatophyte strains based on DNA sequences of nuclear ribosomal internal transcribed spacer 1 regions. J Clin Microbiol. 1999;37(4):920–4.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Symoens F, et al. Molecular analysis and mating behaviour of the Trichophyton mentagrophytes species complex. Int J Med Microbiol. 2011;301(3):260–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Summerbell RC. Form and function in the evolution of dermatophytes. Biology of dermatophytes and other keratinophilic fungi. Rev Iberoam Micol. 2000;17:30–43.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Glass NL, Donaldson GC. Development of primer sets designed for use with the PCR to amplify conserved genes from filamentous ascomycetes. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1995;61(4):1323–30.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. White, TJ, et al. Amplification and direct sequencing of fungal ribosomal RNA genes for phylogenetics. In: PCR protocols: a guide to methods and application, vol. 18, no. 1. 1990. p. 315–322.

  14. Zhan P, et al. Phylogeny of dermatophytes with genomic character evaluation of clinically distinct Trichophyton rubrum and T. áviolaceum. Stud Mycol. 2018;89:153–75.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Miller, MA, Pfeiffer W, Schwartz, T. Creating the CIPRES science gateway for inference of large phylogenetic trees. In: Proceedings of the gateway computing environments workshop (GCE), 14 Nov 2010, New Orleans, LA. 2010, p. 1–8.

  16. Ahmadi B, et al. Phylogenetic analysis of dermatophyte species using DNA sequence polymorphism in calmodulin gene. Sabouraudia. 2016;54(5):500–14.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Mirhendi H, et al. Translation elongation factor 1-α gene as a potential taxonomic and identification marker in dermatophytes. Med Mycol. 2014;53(3):215–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Rush-Munro FM, Smith JMB, Borelli D. The perfect state of Microsporum racemosum. Mycologia. 1970;62:856–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Summerbell RC, et al. ITS barcodes for Trichophyton tonsurans and T. equinum. Sabouraudia. 2007;45(3):193–200.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Beguin H, et al. The taxonomic status of Trichophyton quinckeanum and T. interdigitale revisited: a multigene phylogenetic approach. Med Mycol. 2012;50(8):871–82.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Suh Sung-Oui, Grosso Kendra M, Carrion Miguel E. Multilocus phylogeny of the Trichophyton mentagrophytes species complex and the application of matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization–time-of-flight (MALDI-TOF) mass spectrometry for the rapid identification of dermatophytes. Mycologia. 2018;110(1):118–30.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

Funding was provided by the Belgian Science Policy (Belspo).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to F. Baert.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Handling Editor: Sybren de Hoog.

Electronic supplementary material

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Baert, F., Stubbe, D., D’hooge, E. et al. Updating the Taxonomy of Dermatophytes of the BCCM/IHEM Collection According to the New Standard: A Phylogenetic Approach. Mycopathologia 185, 161–168 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11046-019-00338-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11046-019-00338-7

Keywords

Navigation