Skip to main content
Log in

PIF dataset: a comprehensive dataset of physiological and inertial features for recognition of human activities

  • 1232: Human-centric Multimedia Analysis
  • Published:
Multimedia Tools and Applications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Activities and falls monitoring systems using wearable technology have a promising future. The publicly available datasets are based on a few inertial features only acquired with an accelerometer, gyroscope, smartphone or smart Watches. The activities and falls performed are also less. In this study, a dataset is created by collecting physiological features along with inertial features which will help in developing and validating systems studying the effect of physiological features on the detection and prediction of falls and activities. The dataset consists of 7 activities and 8 falls for inertial data; 2 activities for ECG data; 6 activities for EMG data and 6 activities for GSR data. Basic body parameters like height, weight, etc. along with beats per minute, SpO2 and blood pressure are also recorded for 12 subjects. The collected data is analyzed statistically using a boxplot, pair plot, correlation heatmap and p value. The activities are classified using SVM, KNN, RF and DT. For GSR, more than 90% accuracy is achieved and for EMG, the accuracy is less than 80%. For IMU data, more than 95% accuracy is achieved. The results encourage combining inertial, physiological and basic body parameters to detect and predict falls and activities.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18
Fig. 19

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The dataset generated and analyzed during the current study is available at: https://data.mendeley.com/datasets/phb9y6cp5c/1.

References

  1. Coughlin S, Roberts D, O’Neill K, Brooks P (2018) Looking to tomorrow’s healthcare today: a participatory health perspective. Intern Med J 48:92–96. https://doi.org/10.1111/imj.13661

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. RBCCM (2020) RBC Capital Markets | The healthcare data explosion. In: Rbccm. https://www.rbccm.com/en/gib/healthcare/episode/the_healthcare_data_explosion . Accessed 10 Jun 2023

  3. Seshadri DR, Davies EV, Harlow ER et al (2020) Wearable sensors for COVID-19: a call to action to Harness our digital infrastructure for remote patient monitoring and virtual assessments. Front Digit Health 2:1–11. https://doi.org/10.3389/fdgth.2020.00008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Wu CT, Li GH, Huang CT et al (2021) Acute exacerbation of a chronic obstructive pulmonary disease prediction system using wearable device data, machine learning, and deep learning: development and cohort study. JMIR mHealth and uHealth 9. https://doi.org/10.2196/22591

  5. Wong CK, Ho DTY, Tam AR et al (2020) Artificial intelligence mobile health platform for early detection of COVID-19 in quarantine subjects using a wearable biosensor: protocol for a randomised controlled trial. BMJ Open 10:1–5. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-038555

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Sareen S, Sood SK, Gupta SK (2018) IoT-based cloud framework to control Ebola virus outbreak. J Ambient Intell Humaniz Comput 9:459–476. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12652-016-0427-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Sareen S, Gupta SK, Sood SK (2017) An intelligent and secure system for predicting and preventing Zika virus outbreak using fog computing. Enterp Inf Syst 11:1436–1456. https://doi.org/10.1080/17517575.2016.1277558

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Thakur P, Kaur S (2018) An intelligent system for predicting and preventing Chikungunya virus. In: 2017 International conference on energy, communication, data analytics and soft computing, ICECDS 2017. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc., pp 3483–3492. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICECDS.2017.8390109

  9. Sandhu R, Gill HK, Sood SK (2016) Smart monitoring and controlling of Pandemic Influenza A (H1N1) using Social Network Analysis and cloud computing. J Comput Sci 12:11–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jocs.2015.11.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Ahanger TA, Tariq U, Nusir M et al (2022) A novel IoT–fog–cloud-based healthcare system for monitoring and predicting COVID-19 outspread. J Supercomput 78:1783–1806. https://doi.org/10.1007/S11227-021-03935-W

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Quer G, Radin JM, Gadaleta M et al (2021) Wearable sensor data and self-reported symptoms for COVID-19 detection. Nat Med 27:73–77. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-020-1123-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Mishra T, Wang M, Metwally AA et al (2020) Pre-symptomatic detection of COVID-19 from smartwatch data. Nat Biomed Eng 4:1208–1220. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41551-020-00640-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Dhaliwal MK, Sharma R, Bindra N (2023) Analyzing wearable data for diagnosing COVID-19 using machine learning model. In: Lecture notes in electrical engineering, Springer, Singapore, pp 285–299. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-5868-7_22

  14. Mazzetta I, Zampogna A, Suppa A et al (2019) Wearable sensors system for an improved analysis of freezing of gait in Parkinson’s disease using electromyography and inertial signals. Sens (Switzerland) 19. https://doi.org/10.3390/s19040948

  15. Falih ADI, Adhi Dharma W, Sumpeno S (2017) Classification of EMG signals from forearm muscles as automatic control using Naive Bayes. 2017 Int Semin Intell Technol Its Appl Strength Link Between Univ Res Ind to Support ASEAN Energy Sect ISITIA 2017 - Proceeding 346–351. https://doi.org/10.1109/ISITIA.2017.8124107

  16. Ajerla D, Mahfuz S, Zulkernine F (2019) A real-time patient monitoring framework for fall detection. Wirel Commun Mob Comput 2019:1–13. https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/9507938

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Li Q, Stankovic JA, Hanson MA et al (2009) Accurate, fast fall detection using gyroscopes and accelerometer-derived posture information. Proc – 2009 6th Int Work Wearable Implant Body Sens Networks, BSN 2009 138–143. https://doi.org/10.1109/BSN.2009.46

  18. Majumder S, Mondal T, Deen MJ (2017) Wearable sensors for remote health monitoring. Sens (Switzerland) 17. https://doi.org/10.3390/s17010130

  19. Ichwana D, Arief M, Puteri N, Ekariani S (2018) Movements monitoring and falling detection systems for transient ischemic attack patients using accelerometer based on Internet of Things. In: 2018 International Conference on Information Technology Systems and Innovation (ICITSI). IEEE, pp 491–496

  20. Castro-García JA, Molina-Cantero AJ, Gómez-González IM et al (2022) Towards human stress and activity recognition: a review and a First Approach based on low-cost wearables. Electron 11:1–30. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics11010155

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Ayata D, Yaslan Y, Kamasak M (2017) Emotion recognition via galvanic skin response: comparison of machine learning algorithms and feature extraction methods. Istanbul Univ - J Electr Electron Eng 17:3129–3136

    Google Scholar 

  22. Santamaria-Granados L, Munoz-Organero M, Ramirez-Gonzalez G et al (2019) Using deep convolutional neural network for emotion detection on a physiological signals dataset (AMIGOS). IEEE Access 7:57–67. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2018.2883213

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Sen K, Pal S (2021) Alternative method for pain assessment using EMG and GSR. J Mech Med Biol 21:1–24. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0219519421500391

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Fu R, Wang H (2014) Detection of driving fatigue by using noncontact emg and ecg signals measurement system. Int J Neural Syst 24. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0129065714500063

  25. Chueh TH, Chen TB, Lu HHS et al (2012) Statistical prediction of emotional states by physiological signals with manova and machine learning. Int J Pattern Recognit Artif Intell 26:1–18. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0218001412500085

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  26. Kim J, Andr´ E (2009) Detection of affective patterns in physiological signals towards improving automatic emotion recognition. Handb Pattern Recognit Comput Vis Fourth Ed 415–434. https://doi.org/10.1142/9789814273398_018

  27. Soleymani M, Chanel G, Kierkels JJM, Pun T (2009) Affective characterization of movie scenes based on content analysis and physiological changes. Int J Semant Comput 3:235–254. https://doi.org/10.1142/S1793351X09000744

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Nadeem A, Mehmood A, Rizwan K (2019) A dataset build using wearable inertial measurement and ECG sensors for activity recognition, fall detection and basic heart anomaly detection system. Data Br 27:104717. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dib.2019.104717

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Wagner P, Strodthoff N, Bousseljot RD et al (2020) PTB-XL, a large publicly available electrocardiography dataset. Sci Data 7:1–15. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-020-0495-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Malešević N, Olsson A, Sager P et al (2021) A database of high-density surface electromyogram signals comprising 65 isometric hand gestures. Sci Data 8:1–10. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-021-00843-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Ozdemir MA, Kisa DH, Guren O, Akan A (2022) Dataset for multi-channel surface electromyography (sEMG) signals of hand gestures. Data Br 41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dib.2022.107921

  32. Sharma K, Castellini C, van den Broek EL et al (2019) A dataset of continuous affect annotations and physiological signals for emotion analysis. Sci Data 6:1–13. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-019-0209-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Ojetola O, Gaura E, Brusey J (2015) Data set for fall events and daily activities from inertial sensors. Proc 6th ACM Multimed Syst Conf MMSys 243–248. https://doi.org/10.1145/2713168.2713198

  34. DEAP: A dataset for emotion analysis using physiological and audiovisual signals. https://www.eecs.qmul.ac.uk/mmv/datasets/deap/.  Accessed 10 June 2023

  35. Sucerquia A, López JD, Vargas-Bonilla JF (2017) SisFall: a fall and movement dataset. Sens (Switzerland) 17. https://doi.org/10.3390/s17010198

  36. Sikder N, Nahid AA (2021) KU-HAR: an open dataset for heterogeneous human activity recognition. Pattern Recognit Lett 146:46–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.patrec.2021.02.024

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Mosquera-Lopez C, Wan E, Shastry M et al (2021) Automated detection of real-world falls: modeled from people with multiple sclerosis. IEEE J Biomed Heal Inf 25:1975–1984. https://doi.org/10.1109/JBHI.2020.3041035

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Miranda-Correa JA, Abadi MK, Sebe N, Patras I (2021) AMIGOS: a dataset for affect, personality and mood research on individuals and groups. IEEE Trans Affect Comput 12:479–493. https://doi.org/10.1109/TAFFC.2018.2884461

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Phinyomark A, Phukpattaranont P, Limsakul C (2012) Feature reduction and selection for EMG signal classification. Expert Syst Appl 39:7420–7431. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2012.01.102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Roccetti M, Delnevo G, Casini L, Salomoni P (2020) A cautionary tale for machine learning design: why we still need human-assisted big data analysis. Mob Netw Appl 25:1075–1083. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11036-020-01530-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Aslam N, Alzamzami O, Xia K et al (2023) Improving the review classification of Google apps using combined feature embedding and deep convolutional neural network model. J Ambient Intell Humaniz Comput. https://doi.org/10.1007/S12652-023-04529-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Bagui S, Li K (2021) Resampling imbalanced data for network intrusion detection datasets. J Big Data. https://doi.org/10.1186/S40537-020-00390-X

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Ramadhan NG (2021) Comparative analysis of ADASYN-SVM and SMOTE-SVM methods on the detection of type 2 diabetes mellitus. Sci J Inf 8:276–282. https://doi.org/10.15294/sji.v8i2.32484

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Awal MA, Masud M, Hossain MS et al (2021) A novel bayesian optimization-based machine learning framework for COVID-19 detection from inpatient facility data. IEEE Access 9:10263–10281. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3050852

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Li Y, Wang Y, Li T et al (2021) SP-SMOTE: a novel space partitioning based synthetic minority oversampling technique. Knowl-Based Syst 228:107269. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knosys.2021.107269

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Kim YT, Kim DK, Kim H, Kim DJ (2020) A comparison of oversampling methods for constructing a prognostic model in the patient with heart failure. Int Conf ICT Converg 379–383. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICTC49870.2020.9289522

  47. Anđelić N, Lorencin I, Baressi Šegota S, Car Z (2023) The development of symbolic expressions for the detection of Hepatitis C patients and the disease progression from blood parameters using genetic programming-symbolic classification algorithm. Appl Sci 13:1–33. https://doi.org/10.3390/app13010574

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. McCallan N, Davidson S, Ng KY et al (2023) Rebalancing techniques for asynchronously distributed EEG data to improve automatic seizure type classification. 2023 57th Annu Conf Inf Sci Syst CISS 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1109/CISS56502.2023.10089669

  49. Kaur R, Sharma R, Dhaliwal MK (2023) Evaluating Performance of SMOTE and ADASYN to classify falls and activities of daily living. In: Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Soft Computing for Problem Solving(SocProS 2023) Moving Toward Society 5.0 Department of Applied Mathematics and Scientific Computing IIT Roorkee and Liverpool Hope University, UK

  50. Bhoi SK, Panda SK, Patra B et al (2018) FallDS-IoT: a fall detection system for elderly healthcare based on IoT data analytics. Proc – 2018 Int Conf Inf Technol ICIT 155–160. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICIT.2018.00041

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors wish to acknowledge the assistance of Mr. Rakesh Sharma, Lab Technician, Computer Science and Engineering Department, at Thapar Institute of Engineering and Technology, Patiala, India for prototype designing.

Funding

This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, not-for-profit sectors.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rohini Sharma.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The author declare that they have no competing of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Dhaliwal, M.K., Sharma, R. & Kaur, R. PIF dataset: a comprehensive dataset of physiological and inertial features for recognition of human activities. Multimed Tools Appl (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-024-19285-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-024-19285-7

Keywords

Navigation