Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Quantitative Analysis of Gradient Descent Algorithm using scaling methods for improving the prediction process based on Artificial Neural Network

  • Published:
Multimedia Tools and Applications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The health development is one of the most important challenges in the world today. All human beings are affected by many diseases due to various circumstances like pollution, climate change, living habits, etc. Therefore, the improvement of predicting diseases is a very essential process in medical management. Prediction refers to the results of an algorithm after it has been trained on a dataset. It is a mathematical process that seeks to predict future outcomes by analyzing methods. Classification methods of machine learning can be used to find accurate prediction of disease by the symptoms. This paper reviews the gradient descent algorithm such as Logistic Regression and Artificial Neural Network. These models are highly applicable and deliver reliable prediction accuracy with the help of a dataset. The survey indicates that the most popular classification techniques are Artificial Neural Network and Logistic Regression. The major purpose of this study is to investigate the performance of various scaling methods, including ensemble normalization and standardization methods, for improving disease prediction. The study also presents a performance comparison of classification algorithms, with and without applying the feature scaling of the data preprocessing techniques. In the proposed system, two algorithms, Artificial Neural Network and Logistic Regression, were used for the classification. Firstly, the accuracy of Artificial Neural Network and Logistic Regression without scaling method was calculated. The results show that Artificial Neural Network produces the highest accuracy of 86.13% in predicting heart disease. Next, various scaling methods were applied with Artificial Neural Network and Logistic Regression algorithms to improve the accuracy of the prediction process. The experimental results show that the accuracy of Artificial Neural Network using Ensemble Normalization and Standardization is 98.81%, which is greater than the other accuracies. Finally, a statistical test was used to assess the significance of the difference in performance among the classifiers.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

The data is used to support the finding of this study are included in the article.

References

  1. Bashir S, Khan ZS, Khan FH, Anjum A, Bashir K (2019) “Improving Heart Disease Prediction Using Feature Selection Approaches”, Proceedings of 2019 16th International Bhurban Conference on Applied Sciences & Technology (IBCAST) Islamabad, Pakistan, 8th – 12th January, 2019

  2. Battineni G, Sagaro GG, Chinatalapudi N, Amenta F (2020) Applications of Machine Learning Predictive Models in the Chronic Disease Diagnosis. J Person Med. https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm10020021

  3. Dahiwade D, Patle G, Meshram E (2019) Designing Disease Prediction Model Using Machine Learning Approach. Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Computing Methodologies and Communication (ICCMC 2019) IEEE Xplore Part Number: CFP19K25-ART.

  4. Diwakar M et al (2021) Latest trends on heart disease prediction using machine learning and image fusion. Materials Today: Proceedings 37:3213–3218

    Google Scholar 

  5. Salma J, et al (2020) Artificial Intelligence and Machine learning based prediction of resistant and susceptible mutations in Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Scientific Reports 10(1). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-62368-2

  6. Javeed A, Rizvi SS, Zhou S, Riaz R, Khan SU, Kwon SJ (2020) “Heart Risk Failure Prediction Using a Novel Feature Selection Method for Feature Refinement and Neural Network for Classification”, Hindawi Mobile Information Systems Volume 2020, Article ID 8843115, 11 pages https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/8843115, Published 26 August 2020

  7. Kasasbeh AS, Christensen S, Parsons MW, Campbell B, Albers GW, Lansberg MG (2019) “Artificial Neural Network Computer Tomography Perfusion Prediction of Ischemic Core”, online Data Supplement is available with this article at https://doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.118.022649

  8. Khan Y, Qamar U, Yousaf N, Khan A (2019) “Machine learning techniques for heart disease datasets: a survey”, ICMLC '19, February 22–24, 2019, Zhuhai, China

  9. Kumar S, Hossain A, Rahman M (2018) “Implementation of a Web Application to Predict Diabetes Disease: An Approach Using Machine Learning Algorithm”, 2018 21st International Conference of Computer and Information Technology (ICCIT), 21–23 December, 2018

  10. Prasanth K, Pradeepini G, Kamakshi P (2019) Feature Selection Effects on Gradient Descent Logistic Regression for Medical Data Classification. International Journal of Intelligent Engineering & Systems 12(5). https://doi.org/10.22266/ijies2019.1031.28

  11. Mary MMA, Beena TLA (2020) Heart disease prediction using machine learning techniques: A survey. Int J Res Appl Sci Eng Technol 8(10):441–447

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Meshref H (2019) “Cardiovascular disease diagnosis: a machine learning interpretation approach”, (IJACSA) Int J Adv Comput Sci Appl, Vol. 10, No. 12

  13. Mhatre T, Varma S (2019) “Heart Disease Prediction using Evolutionary based Artificial Neural Network, Int J Eng Res Technol (IJERT) Vol. 8 Issue 08, August-2019

  14. Wazir M et al (2019) Pancreatic cancer prediction through an artificial neural network. Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence 2:2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Musleh MM, Alajrami E, Khalil AJ, Abu-Nasser BS, Barhoom AM, Abu-Naser SS (2019) “Predicting liver patients using artificial neural network”, Int J Acad Inf Syst Res (IJAISR), Pages: 1–11

  16. Rani S, Masood S (2020) Predicting congenital heart disease using machine learning techniques. J Discrete Math Sci Cryptogr 23(1):293–303

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Razia S et al (2018) A Comparative study of machine learning algorithms on thyroid disease prediction. Int J Eng Technol 7(2.8):315–319

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Salehi M, Zare A, Taheri A (2021) Artificial neural networks (ANNs) and partial least squares (PLS) regression in the quantitative analysis of respirable crystalline silica by Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR). Ann Work Expo Health 65(3):346–357

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Salim NAM et al (2021) Prediction of dengue outbreak in Selangor Malaysia using machine learning techniques. Sci Rep 11(1).  https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-79193-2

  20. Spann A et al (2020) Applying machine learning in liver disease and transplantation: a comprehensive review. Hepatology 71(3):1093–1105. https://doi.org/10.1002/hep.31103-2020

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Subhadra K, Vikas B (2019) Neural network based intelligent system for predicting heart disease. International Journal of Innovative Technology and Exploring Engineering 8(5):484–487

    Google Scholar 

  22. Terrada O, Hamida S, Cherradi B, Raihani A (2020) “Supervised Machine Learning Based Medical Diagnosis Support System for Prediction of Patients with Heart Disease”, researchgate.net-publication-345325800_ https://doi.org/10.25046/aj050533

  23. Valle’e A, Cinaud A, Blachier V, Lelong H’l’ n, Safar ME, Blacher J Coronary heart disease diagnosis by artificial neural networks including aortic pulse wave velocity index and clinical parameters. J Hypertens 37:1682–1688. https://doi.org/10.1097/HJH.0000000000002075

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to D. Jeni Jeba Seeli.

Ethics declarations

The authors declare that they have no competing financial interests or personal relationships that could influence the work reported in this paper.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Seeli, D.J.J., Thanammal, K.K. Quantitative Analysis of Gradient Descent Algorithm using scaling methods for improving the prediction process based on Artificial Neural Network. Multimed Tools Appl 83, 15677–15691 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-023-16136-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-023-16136-9

Keywords

Navigation