Skip to main content
Log in

Spatial neighborhood intensity constraint (SNIC) and knowledge-based clustering framework for tumor region segmentation in breast histopathology images

  • Published:
Multimedia Tools and Applications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Based on the Nottingham Histological Grading (NHG) system, precise and accurate segmentation of breast tumor regions is crucial, typically in the scoring decision in terms of tubule formation. The main purposes of this study are to propose a robust segmentation framework that could produce repeatable, reproducible, and cost-effective measurable outputs. A novel spatial neighborhood intensity constraint (SNIC) and knowledge-based clustering framework for breast tumor region segmentation are proposed in this study. The proposed clustering framework constitutes of five different stages. These stages are color normalization, segmentation and removal of nucleus cells, SNIC, FCM with knowledge-based initial centroids selection, and post-processing. The main contribution of the proposed clustering framework lies within its simplicity yet powerful clustering ability producing precise segmentation in breast tumor regions using histopathology images. The SNIC is meant to remove the original RGB intensity of the nucleus cells and replace it with new intensity using the spatial information from the neighborhood pixels. Additionally, a knowledge-based initial centroids selection method is implemented to facilitate the fuzzy clustering algorithm. The proposed SNIC and knowledge-based initial centroids selection methods are expected to ease the clustering stage producing complementary results. For hypothesis validation purposes, justifications and validations are performed to validate the applicability of the proposed SNIC and knowledge-based initial centroids selection. Both of the proposed methods are found robust and plausible. The proposed framework achieved overall Accuracy (Acc), F1 score (F1), Area Overlap Measure (AOM), and Combined Equal Importance (CEI) of 91.2%, 92.1%, 85.7%, and 90.1%, respectively. For benchmarking purposes, the output results are compared to four recent works. The proposed framework demonstrates its robustness by outperformed these works achieving better results in Acc, F1, AOM, and CEI by 5.8%, 5.9%, 8.5%, and 7.0% higher than that of the best performance work amongst the four recent works.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Amal KRG, Arun LC (2017) A complete color normalization method on pathological images. Int J Adv Res Innov Ideas Educ 2:60–68

    Google Scholar 

  2. Arai K, Kadoya N, Kato T, Endo H, Komori S, Abe Y, Nakamura T, Wada H, Kikuchi Y, Takai Y, Jingu K (2017) Feasibility of CBCT-based proton dose calculation using a histogram-matching algorithm in proton beam therapy. Phys Medica 33:68–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejmp.2016.12.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Arjmand A, Meshgini S, Afrouzian R, Farzamnia A (2019) Breast tumor segmentation using K-means clustering and cuckoo search optimization. Int Conf Comput Knowl Eng ICCKE. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCKE48569.2019.8964794

  4. Ashiba HI (2021) A proposed framework for diagnosis and breast cancer detection. Mult Tools Appl 80:9333–9369. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-020-10131-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Cebeci Z, Yildiz F (2015) Comparison of K-means and fuzzy C-means algorithms on different cluster structures. J Agric Inf 3:13–23. https://doi.org/10.17700/jai.2015.6.3.196

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Das DK, Dutta PK (2019) Efficient automated detection of mitotic cells from breast histological images using deep convolution neutral network with wavelet decomposed patches. Comput Biol Med 104:29–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compbiomed.2018.11.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Elston CW, Ellis IO (1991) Pathological prognostic factors in breast cancer. The value of histological grade in breast cancer: experience from a large study with long-term follow-up. Histopathology 19(5):403–410

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Fouad S, Randell D, Galton A, Mehanna H, Landini G (2017) Unsupervised superpixel-based segmentation of histopathological images with consensus clustering. Commun Comput Inf Sci 723:767–779. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-60964-5_67

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Ganesan P, Sathish BS, Sajiv G (2016) Automatic segmentation of fruits in CIELuv color space image using hill climbing optimization and fuzzy C-means clustering. IEEE WCTFTR 2016: Proc World Conf Futur Trends Res Innov Soc Welf. https://doi.org/10.1109/STARTUP.2016.7583960

  10. George K, Faziludeen S, Sankaran P, Joseph P (2020) Breast cancer detection from biopsy images using nucleus guided transfer learning and belief based fusion. Comput Biol Med 124:103954. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compbiomed.2020.103954

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Gosain A, Dahiya S (2016) Performance analysis of various fuzzy clustering algorithms: a review. Procedia Comput Sci 79:100–111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2016.03.014

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Haralick RM, Dinstein I, Shanmugam K (1973) Textural features for image classification. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern 3:610–621. https://doi.org/10.1109/TSMC.1973.4309314

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Khan AM, El-daly H, Rajpoot N (2012) RanPEC: random projections with ensemble clustering for segmentation of tumor areas in breast histology images. Med Image Underst Anal

  14. Khan AM, El-Daly H, Simmons E, Rajpoot NM (2013) HyMaP: a hybrid magnitude-phase approach to unsupervised segmentation of tumor areas in breast cancer histology images. J Pathol Inform 4:S1. https://doi.org/10.4103/2153-3539.109802

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Li X, Plataniotis KN (2015) A complete color normalization approach to histopathology images using color cues computed from saturation-weighted statistics. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 62:1862–1873. https://doi.org/10.1109/TBME.2015.2405791

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Linder N, Konsti J, Turkki R, Rahtu E, Lundin M, Nordling S, Haglund C, Ahonen T, Pietikäinen M, Lundin J (2012) Identification of tumor epithelium and stroma in tissue microarrays using texture analysis. Diagn Pathol 7(22):1–11. https://doi.org/10.1186/1746-1596-7-22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Liu Q, Zhou B, Li S, Li AP, Zou P, Jia Y (2016) Community detection utilizing a novel multi-swarm fruit fly optimization algorithm with hill-climbing strategy. Arab J Sci Eng 41(3):807–828. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13369-015-1905-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Majeed H, Nguyen T, Kandel M, Marcias V, Do M, Tangella K, Balla A, Popescu G (2016) Automatic tissue segmentation of breast biopsies imaged by QPI. Quant Phase Imaging II. https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2209142

  19. Mekhmoukh A, Mokrani K (2015) Improved fuzzy C-means based particle swarm optimization (PSO) initialization and outlier rejection with level set methods for MR brain image segmentation. Comput Methods Prog Biomed 122:266–281. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmpb.2015.08.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Monaco J, Hipp J, Lucas D, Smith S, Balis U, Madabhushi A (2012) Image segmentation with implicit color standardization using spatially constrained expectation maximization: detection of nuclei. Lect Notes Comput Sci. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-33415-3_45

  21. Nickfarjam AM, Soltaninejad S, Tajeripour F (2014) A novel supervised bi-level thresholding technique based on particle swarm optimization. Arab J Sci Eng 39(2):753–766. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13369-013-0638-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Nobuyuki O (1979) A threshold selection method from gray-level histograms. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern. https://doi.org/10.1109/TSMC.1979.4310076

  23. Pantanowitz L, Farahani N, Parwani A (2015) Whole slide imaging in pathology: advantages, limitations, and emerging perspectives. Pathol Lab Med Int 7(23):23–33. https://doi.org/10.2147/PLMI.S59826

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Qu AP, Chen JM, Wang LW, Yuan JP, Yang F, Xiang QM, Maskey N, Yang GF, Liu J, Li Y (2015) Segmentation of hematoxylin-eosin stained breast cancer histopathological images based on pixel-wise SVM classifier. Sci China Inf Sci 58:1–13. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11432-014-5277-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Rakha EA, Reis-Filho JS, Baehner F, Dabbs DJ, Decker T, Eusebi V, Fox SB, Ichihara S, Jacquemier J, Lakhani SR, Palacios J, Richardson AL, Schnitt SJ, Schmitt FC, Tan PH, Tse GM, Badve S, Ellis IO (2010) Breast cancer prognostic classification in the molecular era: the role of histological grade. Breast Cancer Res 12:207. https://doi.org/10.1186/bcr2607

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Ramadijanti N, Barakbah A, Husna FA (2019) Automatic breast tumor segmentation using hierarchical K-means on mammogram. Int Electron Symp Knowl Creat Intell Comput. https://doi.org/10.1109/KCIC.2018.8628467

  27. Salsabili S, Mukherjee A, Ukwatta E, Chan ADC, Bainbridge S, Grynspan D (2019) Automated segmentation of villi in histopathology images of placenta. Comput Biol Med 113:103420. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compbiomed.2019.103420

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Sebai M, Wang T, Al-Fadhli SA (2020) PartMitosis: a partially supervised deep learning framework for mitosis detection in breast cancer histopathology images. IEEE Access 8:45133–45147. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2978754

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Sebai M, Wang X, Wang T (2020) MaskMitosis: a deep learning framework for fully supervised, weakly supervised, and unsupervised mitosis detection in histopathology images. Med Biol Eng Comput 58:1603–1623. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11517-020-02175-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Shen S, Sandham W, Granat M, Sterr A (2005) MRI fuzzy segmentation of brain tissue using neighborhood attraction with neural-network optimization. IEEE Trans Inf Technol Biomed 9:459–467. https://doi.org/10.1109/TITB.2005.847500

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Sigirci IO, Albayrak A, Bilgin G (2021) Detection of mitotic cells in breast cancer histopathological images using deep versus handcrafted features. Mult Tools Appl. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-021-10539-2

  32. Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, Laversanne M, Soerjomataram I, Jemal A, Bray F (2021) Global cancer statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin 71(3):209–249. https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.21660

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Tan XJ, Mustafa N, Mashor MY, Ab Rahman KS (2019) An improved initialization based histogram of K-mean clustering algorithm for hyperchromatic nucleus segmentation in breast carcinoma histopathological images. Lect Notes Electr Eng. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-6447-1_67

  34. Tariq M, Iqbal S, Ayesha H, Abbas I, Ahmad KT, Niazi MFK (2021) Medical image based breast cancer diagnosis: state of the art and future directions. Expert Syst Appl 167:114095. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2020.114095

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Vo DM, Nguyen NQ, Lee SW (2019) Classification of breast cancer histology images using incremental boosting convolution networks. Inf Sci 482:123–138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2018.12.089

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Yu C, Chen H, Li Y, Peng Y, Li J, Yang F (2019) Breast cancer classification in pathological images based on hybrid features. Mult Tools Appl 78:21325–21345. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-019-7468-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors gratefully acknowledge the financial support from the Fundamental Research Grant Scheme (FRGS) under a grant number of FRGS/1/2016/SKK06/UNIMAP/02/3 from the Ministry of Higher Education Malaysia.

Funding

This study was funded by the Ministry of Higher Education Malaysia under Fundamental Research Grant Scheme (FRGS) (FRGS/1/2016/SKK06/UNIMAP/02/3).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Xiao Jian Tan or Nazahah Mustafa.

Ethics declarations

Ethical approval

The protocol of this study had been approved by Medical Research and Committee of National Medical Research Register (NMRR) Malaysia referring to the protocol number: NMRR-17-281-34236.

Consent for publication

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Conflicts of interest/competing interests

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Tan, X.J., Mustafa, N., Mashor, M.Y. et al. Spatial neighborhood intensity constraint (SNIC) and knowledge-based clustering framework for tumor region segmentation in breast histopathology images. Multimed Tools Appl 81, 18203–18222 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-022-12129-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-022-12129-2

Keywords

Navigation