Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

A review on acute/sub-acute ischemic stroke lesion segmentation and registration challenges

  • Published:
Multimedia Tools and Applications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The segmentation of lesion tissue in brain images of stroke patients serves to distinguish the degree of the affected tissues, to perform anticipation on its recovery, and to quantify its development in longitudinal reviews. Manual depiction, the present standard, is tedious and experiences high intra-and inter-observer differences. Because of limited scholastic investigations of ischemic stroke identification, the achievement rate to distinguish stroke is low utilizing just CT image. Combination of CT and MRI images makes a composite image which gives more data than any of the information signals. Image segmentation is accomplished by a Random forest (RF) classifier connected on an arrangement of image elements extricated from each voxel and its neighborhood. An underlying arrangement of marked voxels is required to begin the procedure, preparing an underlying RF. The most unverifiable unlabeled voxels are appeared to the human administrator to choose some of them for incorporation in the preparation set, retraining the RF classifier. These strategies give very accurate segmented tumor output with very low error rate and very high accuracy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bhanu Prakash KN, Gupta V, Jianbo H, Nowinski WL (2008) Automatic processing of diffusion-weighted ischemic stroke images based on divergence measures: slice and hemisphere identification, and stroke region segmentation. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg 3(6):559–570

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Bienkowski P, Zatorski P, Baranowska A, Ryglewicz D, Sienkiewicz-Jarosz H (2010) Insular lesions and smoking cessation after first-ever ischemic stroke: a 3-month follow-up. Neurosci Lett 478(3):161–164

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Cai SS, von Coelln R, Kouo TJ (2016) Migratory stroke-like lesions in a case of adult-onset mitochondrial encephalomyopathy, lactic acidosis, and stroke-like episodes (MELAS) syndrome and a review of imaging findings. Radiology Case Reports

  4. Cheng Chung Wan G, Shih H-C, Shyu BC, Huang ACW (2016) Effects of thalamic hemorrhagic lesions on explicit and implicit learning during the acquisition and retrieval phases in an animal model of central post-stroke pain. Behav Brain Res 317:251–262

    Google Scholar 

  5. Geurts P, Ernst D, Wehenkel L (2006) Extremely randomized trees. Mach Learn 63(1):3–42

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Ghafurian S, Hacihaliloglu I, Metaxas DN, Tan V, Li K (2017) A computationally efficient 3D/2D registration method based on image gradient direction probability density function. Neurocomputing 229:100–108

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Gillebert CR, Humphreys GW, Mantini D (2014) Automated delineation of stroke lesions using brain CT images. NeuroImage: Clinical 4:540–548

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Ji H, Wu G, Wang Q, Wang Y, Kim M, Shen D (2012) Directed graph based image registration. Comput Med Imaging Graph 36(2):139–151

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Liu SX (2009) Symmetry and asymmetry analysis and its implications to computer-aided diagnosis: a review of the literature. J Biomed Inform 42(6):1056–1064

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Mah Y-H, Jager R, Kennard C, Husain M, Nachev P (2014) A new method for automated high-dimensional lesion segmentation evaluated in vascular injury and applied to the human occipital lobe. Cortex 56:51–63

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Mahapatra D (2014) Analyzing training information from random forests for improved image segmentation. IEEE Trans Image Process 23(4):1504–1512

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  12. Maiora J, Ayerdi B, Graña M (2014) Random forest active learning for AAA thrombus segmentation in computed tomography angiography images. Neurocomputing 126:71–77

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Menze BH, Van Leemput K, Lashkari D, Riklin-Raviv T, Geremia E, Alberts E, Gruber P, Wegener S, Weber M-A, Szekely G, Ayache N, Golland P (2016) A generative probabilistic model and discriminative extensions for brain lesion segmentation— with application to tumor and stroke. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 35(4):933–946

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Mitra J, Bourgeat P, Fripp J, Ghose S, Rose S, Salvado O, Connelly A, Campbell B, Palmer S, Sharma G, Christensen S, Carey L (2014) Stroke laterality bias in the management of acute ischemic stroke. NeuroImage 98:324–335

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Moro V, Pernigo S, Tsakiris M, Avesani R, Edelstyn NMJ, Jenkinson PM, Fotopoulou A (2016) Motor versus body awareness: voxel-based lesion analysis in anosognosia for hemiplegia and somatoparaphrenia following right hemisphere stroke. Cortex 83:62–77

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Mun JK, Park SJ, Kim SJ, Young Bang O, Chung C-S, Lee KH, Kim G-M (2016) Characteristic lesion pattern and echocardiographic findings in extra-cardiac shunt-related stroke. J Neurol Sci 369:176–180

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Rekik I, Allassonnière S, Carpenter TK, Wardlaw JM (2014) Using longitudinal metamorphosis to examine ischemic stroke lesion dynamics on perfusion-weighted images and in relation to final outcome on T2-w images. NeuroImage: Clinical 5:332–340

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Rosales RL, Efendy F, Teleg ESA, Delos Santos MMD, Rosalesd MCE, Ostrea M, Tanglao MJ, Ng AR (2016) Botulinum toxin as early intervention for spasticity after stroke or non-progressive brain lesion: a meta-analysis. J Neurol Sci 371:6–14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Saad NM, Noor NSM, Abdullah AR, Muda S, Muda AF, Abdul Rahman NNS (2017) Automated stroke lesion detection and diagnosis system. In: Proceedings of the International MultiConference of Engineers and Computer Scientists, vol. 1

  20. So RWK, Chung ACS (2017) A novel learning-based dissimilarity metric for rigid and non-rigid medical image registration by using Bhattacharyya distances. Pattern Recogn 62:161–174

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Stille M, Smith EJ, Crum WR, Modo M (2013) 3D reconstruction of 2D fluorescence histology images and registration with in vivo MR images: application in a rodent stroke model. J Neurosci Methods 219(1):27–40

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Sweeney EM, Shinohara RT, Shiee N, Mateen FJ, Chudgar AA, Cuzzocreo JL, Calabresi PA, Pham DL, Reich DS, Crainiceanu CM (2013) OASIS is automated statistical inference for segmentation, with applications to multiple sclerosis lesion segmentation in MRI. NeuroImage: Clinical 2:402–413

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Tao D, Cheng J, Gao X, Li X, Deng C (2017) Robust sparse coding for mobile image labeling on the cloud. IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology 27(1):62–72

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Tao D, Guo Y, Li Y, Gao X (2018) Tensor rank preserving discriminant analysis for facial recognition. IEEE Trans Image Process 27(1):325–334

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  25. Tateishi Y, Hamabe J, Kanamoto T, Nakaoka K, Morofuji Y, Horie N, Izumo T, Morikawa M, Tsujino A (2016) Subacute lesion volume as a potential prognostic biomarker for acute ischemic stroke after intravenous thrombolysis. J Neurol Sci 369:77–81

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. van Asselena M, Kessels RPC, Frijns CJM, Jaap Kappelle L, Neggers SFW, Postma A (2009) Object-location memory: a lesion-behavior mapping study in stroke patients. Brain Cogn 71(3):287–294

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Wilke M, de Haan B, Juenger H, Karnath H-O (2011) Manual, semi-automated, and automated delineation of chronic brain lesions: a comparison of methods. Neuroimage 56(4):2038–2204

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Yang X, Liu W, Tao D, Cheng J (2017) Canonical correlation analysis networks for two-view image recognition. Inf Sci 385:338–352

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Yu W, Tannast M, Zheng G (2017) Non-rigid free-form 2D–3D registration using a B-spline-based statistical deformation model. Pattern Recogn 63:689–699

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Zhang T, Xue J, Zhao X, Wang C, Liu Z, Zhou Y, Wang Y, Wang Y (2012) A prospective cohort study of lesion location and its relation to post-stroke depression among Chinese patients. J Affect Disord 136(1–2):e83–e87

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Electronics and Communication Engineering, Pondicherry Engineering College (PEC), Pondicherry University (A Central University), Puducherry, India

    M. Sunil Babu

  2. Department of Electronics and Communication Engineering, Pondicherry Engineering College (PEC), Puducherry, India

    V. Vijayalakshmi

Authors
  1. M. Sunil Babu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. V. Vijayalakshmi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. Sunil Babu.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Babu, M.S., Vijayalakshmi, V. A review on acute/sub-acute ischemic stroke lesion segmentation and registration challenges. Multimed Tools Appl 78, 2481–2506 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-018-6344-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-018-6344-3

Keywords

Search

Navigation