Abstract
Background
Elasmobranch populations are declining, predominantly driven by overfishing, and over a third of global sharks, rays, and chimeras are estimated to be threatened with extinction. In terms of trade, Brazil is ranked the eleventh-largest shark producer and the top importer of shark meat in the world. Research has shown that elasmobranchs are sold in Brazil under the name “cação” (a generic designation for cartilaginous fish) to overcome consumer resistance.
Methodology and results
This study used DNA barcoding to investigate the sale of sharks in the State of São Paulo during the COVID-19 lockdown. A total of 35 samples of “cação” were analysed, revealing six different shark species on sale, including Carcharhinus falciformis, Carcharhinus signatus, Carcharias taurus, Isurus oxyrinchus, and Isurus paucus, that are threatened with extinction according to the IUCN red list. This study demonstrates that vulnerable elasmobranchs are being commercialised under the label “cação” in the São Paulo State and Brazil.
Conclusions
Comparison of shark products traded before and during the COVID-19 pandemic showed no significant difference, suggesting lockdown did not affect patterns of species commercialisation. Effective fisheries and sale monitoring, correct product labelling legislation and increased consumer awareness that “cação” is shark are needed for appropriate conservation and management of shark populations in Brazil.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Since 1970, the abundance of oceanic sharks and rays has experienced a decline of 71%, which has been linked to an 18-fold increase in fishing pressures [1]. The result is that over a third of global Chondrichthyes are now threatened with extinction on the IUCN Red List [2]. Overexploitation, often driven by a demand for shark fins and meat, is considered the main cause of elasmobranch decline [2].
Brazil has the eleventh-largest capture rate for sharks globally and has a vigorous artisanal and commercial fishery with high levels of elasmobranch bycatch [3]. The country is also ranked as the largest importer of shark meat in the world [4]. Brazil has been recognised as one of the global hotspots for shark conservation [5], however, over 30% of all elasmobranch species in Brazil are at risk of extinction [6], with excessive fishing pressure named as the main contributor to these declines [2, 7]. More than a dozen shark species are caught as bycatch or targeted by the tuna longline fleet, with Prionace glauca (blue shark), Isurus oxyrinchus (shortfin mako) and Carcharhinus falciformis (silky shark) among the most commonly captured [8]. The elasmobranch capture rate in Brazil is also likely to be much higher than the official figures, due to issues with the accuracy of fisheries data including: the grouping of multiple shark species under a single designation, inconsistent monitoring of fishing vessels and the absence of a countrywide fisheries records for ten years [9,10,11].
In Brazil, shark meat is sold under the umbrella term “cação”, a generic designation for cartilaginous fish [12], designed to boost consumer acceptance [13]. The use of such a non-specific label helps to obscure the trade in elasmobranchs and hinders their conservation [14]. Surveys found over 70% of Brazilians were unaware that the term “cação” refers to sharks [15], showing low levels of consumer awareness [13]. Furthermore, 62% of people interviewed in Brazil considered shark meat to be of high quality, due to its pleasant taste, lack of bones and smoothness [16]. Elasmobranch meat is also regarded as relatively cheap [10]. Researchers and organisations in Brazil have made recent efforts to raise public awareness that “cação” is shark meat and to educate the population regarding mislabelling and its negative impact on shark populations [17].
DNA barcoding has become a widespread technique used for species identification, with the cytochrome oxidase I (COI) gene extensively used by researchers to identify processed shark products [18, 19]. Utilisation of DNA barcoding has uncovered mislabelling and trade of endangered elasmobranch products in many locations across the globe [20, 21], with an increasing focus on Brazil [12, 22, 23]. Two recent Brazilian studies using DNA barcoding found that 43% and 55% of their “cação” samples comprised of threatened species according to the IUCN red list, with the blue shark (Prionace glauca) identified as the most commonly traded species [24, 25].
The State of São Paulo, located in Southeast Brazil, is likely to be the largest importer and consumer of shark meat in Brazil [10] and previous investigations have highlighted the utilisation of endangered and/or prohibited species as part of the trade in “cação” here, typically by sampling carcasses and focusing on sharks of high conservation concern. One study included the application of multiplex PCR to investigate sharks of the genus Carcharhinus, where 48% of carcasses sampled at landing were identified as night shark (Carcharhinus signatus), protected in Brazil since 2004 [26]. Another focused on angelsharks and employed DNA barcoding, which identified Squatina Guggenheim, Squatina occulta and even the Brazilian guitarfish (Pseudobatos horkelii), all endangered species in Brazil [27]. Both studies highlighted the need for further investigation of the sale of prohibited and endangered species in São Paulo.
This study utilised the COI DNA barcoding to investigate the sale of shark meat products as “cação” in São Paulo State during the Coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic lockdown to determine if endangered and prohibited species were being sold. To explore whether any changes in practice or reduced fisheries monitoring during the COVID-19 lockdown impacted patterns of species commercialisation, a comparison was also made to recent DNA barcoding investigations in Brazil conducted prior to the COVID-19 pandemic.
Methods
Sample collection
A total of 35 samples of “cação” were obtained from 34 retailers (seafood wholesaler, fishmongers, and food markets) in São Paulo State, Brazil (cities of São Paulo, Bertioga, and Santos) (Fig. 1) between May–June 2020. Sample collection was conducted during the COVID-19 lockdown, uniquely permitting consideration of its effect on the commercialisation of threatened species. Local COVID-19 guidelines, including social distancing and lockdown measures, made the sampling significantly more challenging, consequently impacting the number of shark meat products obtained. Most of the samples (60%) were sold as fresh/unfrozen (Supplementary Material), however, discussion with sellers suggests freezing and thawing of products may occur in the wholesale chain, even in products marketed as fresh.
Small muscle tissue samples of < 25 mg (~ 1.0 cm3) were extracted from each sample and preserved in 1ml of RNAProtect (QIAGEN; Venlo, Netherlands) and stored at − 20 °C. The samples were shipped to the UK for molecular analysis at the University of Exeter (Exeter, UK).
DNA extraction and sequencing
DNA was extracted from the tissue samples, following a HOTSHOT protocol [28]. The PCR amplification of ~ 650 bp of the COI region followed Serra-Pereira et al. [29] and Ivanova et al. [30]. Subsequently, on samples that failed to amplify, a shark specific multiplex of primers was attempted [18]. This combines primers for a full COI DNA barcode, alongside a mini-barcoding approach using forward primer that has been shown to be effective on degraded samples [31]. After successful PCR amplification, the products were sent to GENEWIZ (Takeley, UK) for purification and Sanger sequencing with the forward primer. Two samples were also sequenced using the reverse mini-barcode (M13R) to help distinguish between Carcharhinus species.
Sequence and statistical analysis
The DNA barcodes generated were manually checked using BioEdit v7.2.5 [32] to remove the primer sequences and inspect the read quality. The sequences were referenced against GenBank [33] and BOLD [34]. This identified the top-match species corresponding to the sequences with > 98% homology. The conservation status of each species identified was referenced by consulting global [35] and national [7] extinction risk categories that were current at the time of data collection (i.e. ~ June 2020).
To explore the impact of COVID-19 lockdown on patterns of shark product commercialisation, a comparison was made between the data gathered here and two recent pre-pandemic DNA barcoding studies investigating the trade of shark species in Brazil. This includes the work of Merten Cruz et al. [23] who collected 55 shark samples along the Brazilian coastline in 2017, including 17 sourced in São Paulo State and Queiroz et al. [36] who collected 15 products from within São Paulo State in 2019. These represent the closest investigations in terms of geographic and temporal scope (that were conducted before lockdown), for comparison to this study. A one-way non-parametric similarity analysis (ANOSIM) using Bray–Curtis distance measure for each pre-pandemic study was conducted in Past v4 [37].
Results
DNA barcodes were obtained from all 35 products (average length 238 base pairs, bp), with nine samples (25%) successfully sequenced with the long COI barcode (average length 584 bp). The remaining 26 products yielded mini-barcodes (average length 127 bp), with two samples also sequenced using the additional reverse mini-barcode. All barcodes provided top species matches above 98% identity on GenBank and BOLD, with an average identity of 99.9% to their top matching species (Supplementary Material).
These sequences enabled the successful identification of 35 “cação” samples to species level, including six species of sharks: I. oxyrinchus, Isurus paucus (longfin mako), P. glauca, C. falciformis, Carcharias taurus (sand tiger shark) and C. signatus. For five samples, the barcodes generated had equal top matches to multiple records of P. glauca and a single Carharodon carcharhias record on Genbank. However, after reviewing the C. carcharhias sequence and conducting phylogenetic analysis (accession number JQ 654702.1, Supplementary Material), it was concluded that it was incorrectly identified on Genbank and discounted. It is important to note that the species determination of two samples (including C. falciformis and C. signatus) was only possible with the additional use of reverse mini-barcodes, helping to provide a top-match to a single species.
The most common species identified was blue shark (P. glauca, 28 products). The other shark species were less frequent with I. oxyrinchus and I. paucus identified in two products each, the remaining products were all identified to unique species (Fig. 2).
Of the “cação”products, 20% belonged to species threatened with extinction on the 2020 IUCN red list, including two vulnerable, three endangered and one critically endangered species (Table 1; Fig. 3).
To explore the impact of COVID-19 lockdown on patterns of species commercialisation, a comparison was made between this study and two DNA barcode investigations conducted pre-pandemic [23, 36]. No significant difference between the species traded pre-pandemic and during lockdown was demonstrated. (ANOSIM p = 0.828 and p = 0.965, respectively) (Fig. 4).
Discussion
The most striking result is that a fifth (20%) of the samples belonged to species threatened with extinction on the IUCN red list at the time of sampling, with C. signatus, I. oxyrinchus and I. paucus classified as endangered, while C. taurus was considered critically endangered locally. This finding is consistent with the results of previous studies that also identified these species being traded in Brazil [12, 20, 24,25,26].
Blue shark was by far the most prevalent species identified in products (80%) included in this study. Other Brazilian studies have also identified P. glauca as the most commonly sold species, accounting for between 24% [12] and 93% [36] of products. The result is consistent with the fact that blue shark represents 49–90% of the total pelagic sharks captured by commercial longline fisheries [9, 38], making this species the most common and widely traded shark in Brazil and internationally [24, 39]. Furthermore, P. glauca accounts for most of the shark carcasses being imported by Brazil [4], which ensures a year-round supply of shark meat [9, 40]. Although blue sharks are classified as near threatened by the IUCN [41] and ICMBio [7, 42], there has been growing concern for this species’ global conservation status due to overexploitation [38].
Shortfin and longfin mako were identified in two samples each, these species were reclassified as endangered by the IUCN in 2019 [43, 44]. In Brazil, I. oxyrinchus is currently listed as Critically Endangered, while I. paucus is classed as data deficient [42]. Mako sharks are highly prized for their fins and meat [40, 45] and, therefore, are of economic value to fisheries in Brazil. Moreover, after blue shark, shortfin mako is the most caught and reported shark in longline fisheries [46, 47]. Conversely, longfin mako sharks are only sporadically recorded as caught by Brazilian longline fisheries and are frequently grouped with I. oxyrinchus and other shark species in fisheries monitoring data [48]. Mako sharks have rarely been identified in previous barcode investigations of shark products in Brazil [23, 25, 36]. These results suggest that mako sharks may be a more significant component of Brazilian shark meat trade than previously thought, including in the region of São Paulo.
Perhaps the most surprising result was the identification of a sample as C. taurus. This finding is corroborated by previous work [24], which also reported sand tiger shark amongst the products analysed, despite records showing that only a few individuals of this species are landed every year in Brazil [49]. Sand tiger sharks are considered critically endangered [7, 42] in Brazil, and consequently, their commercialisation is banned. Therefore, this study showed that prohibited species are being traded under the label “cação” in São Paulo State. The global population of sand tiger sharks has only recently been upgraded from vulnerable to critically endangered [50] and as a result their commercialisation should be even more closely monitored.
The remaining samples were all identified as requiem sharks. One product was identified as C. signatus, a species which has been targeted in semi-pelagic fisheries since the 1990’s, [51] and is prohibited from being landed in Brazil. Previous studies have also reported night sharks amongst their samples [22, 25, 26]. The identification of another sample as C. falciformis in this study also supports the findings of previous research that vulnerable silky sharks were being traded in markets in Brazil [12, 24]. In fact, silky sharks have been particularly frequent in investigations conducted in the coastal regions of São Paulo State [26], suggesting that C. falciformis might be more commonly traded in this State.
When the samples were collected in May and June 2020, the State of São Paulo was experiencing its first wave of COVID-19 and the government instructed people to stay indoors, resulting in decreased fishing efforts and catch rates during this period [52]. It is possible that a reduction in monitoring and enforcement during the COVID-19 lockdown might also have increased the trade of endangered shark species, potentially explaining the sale of threatened and prohibited species identified here. However, comparison to the results of Merten Cruz et al. [23] and Queiroz et al. [36] gathered before the lockdown did not show a significant difference in the species traded. Perhaps reduced fishing effort during lockdown had little effect on bycatch, which accounts for much of the shark fishery, or there were minimal changes to fisheries enforcement during the lockdown. Despite the lack of a significant result, one striking difference is how much blue shark dominated the results here, at much higher proportions than most studies in Brazil, which could reflect an impact of the lockdown. It is suggested that blue shark likely originates from other countries, ensuring supplies of shark meat despite any local limitations on captures during lockdown. Brazil is a significant importer of shark meat, of which blue shark dominates the market, and the use of frozen products (perhaps even those captured before lockdown) could also have ensured continuous supply. While 60% of all products analysed in this study were collected fresh/unfrozen, it is difficult to ascertain whether these had been previously frozen and defrosted at retail chain. In fact, discussion with retailers during collection suggested that most sharks fished by longline fishing vessels in Brazilian waters are immediately frozen and sellers are known to defrost the meat and trade it as fresh to customers.
In the present research, restrictions of lockdown significantly complicated the collection of samples, limiting the number that could be collected. Other larger-scale investigations of shark products in Brazil, conducted prior to the COVID-19 pandemic, have also revealed similar sharks being traded, suggesting sales of species threatened with extinction is widespread regardless of lockdown [22, 25].
Conclusion
This study demonstrated that endangered and prohibited species are being traded in Brazil under the label “cação”. This is a prime example of the type of ‘umbrella’ sales term frequently used in fisheries where many species, often of varied conservation concern, are labelled with the same designation [25, 53]. The use of the term “cação” can prevent accurate monitoring of domestic and imported fisheries products, while also hindering customers from making an informed decision [10, 19]. Improved species-level monitoring of seafood products [9, 22], alongside programmes to educate the public that “cação”is a term for shark meat [17], are key in preventing the ongoing exploitation of protected elasmobranchs in Brazil [10, 24]. Perhaps surprisingly, the comparison of species commercialisation before and during COVID-19 in São Paulo State did not demonstrate a significant difference, suggesting lockdown did not affect patterns of sale. Further investigations with an extended data collection period, higher number of samples and in-depth interviews with fishermen in this region, as well as other Brazilian States, are needed to provide more comprehensive evidence on shark meat trade in Brazil.
Data availability
The data presented in this study are available in supplementary material submitted with this manuscript.
References
Pacoureau N, Rigby CL, Kyne PM et al (2021) Half a century of global decline in oceanic sharks and rays. Nature 589(7843):567–571. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-020-03173-9
Dulvy NK, Pacoureau N, Rigby CL et al (2021) Overfishing drives over one-third of all sharks and rays toward a global extinction crisis. Curr Biol 31:4773–4787. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2021.08.062
Santana FM, Feitosa LM, Lessa RP (2020) From plentiful to critically endangered: Demographic evidence of the artisanal fisheries impact on the smalltail shark (Carcharhinus porosus) from Northern Brazil. PLoS ONE 15(8):e0236146. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0236146
Niedermüller S, Ainsworth G, de Juan S, Garcia R, Ospina-Alvarez A, Pita P, Villasante S (2021) The shark and ray meat network a deep dive into a global affair. WWF MMI, Rome
Dulvy NK, Fowler SL, Musick JA et al (2014) Extinction risk and conservation of the world’s sharks and rays. Elife 3:e00590. https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.00590
PAN Tubarões: Primeiro Ciclo do Plano de Ação Nacional para a Conservação dos Tubarões e Raias Marinhos Ameaçados de Extinção (2023) [in Portuguese]. Organizadores: Jorge Eduardo Kotas, Eloisa Pinto Vizuete, Roberta Aguiar dos Santos, Maya Ribeiro Baggio, Paula Guimarães Salge e Rodrigo Barreto. Brasília (DF): ICMBio/CEPSUL, 384p.
Instituto Chico Mendes de Conservação da Biodiversidade (ICMBio) (2018) Livro vermelho da fauna brasileira ameaçada de extinção: Volume VI–Peixes” [in Portuguese] - Brasília, Brazil. Retrieved from: https://www.gov.br/icmbio/pt-br/centrais-de-conteudo/publicacoes/publicacoes-diversas/livro_vermelho_2018_vol6.pdf
Fiedler FN, Port D, Giffoni BB, Sales G, Fisch F (2016) Pelagic longline fisheries in Southeastern/south Brazil. Who cares about the law? Mar Policy 77:56–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2016.12.011
Barreto RR, Ferretti F, Flemming JM, Amorim A, Andrade H, Worm B, Lessa R (2016) Trends in the exploitation of South Atlantic shark populations. Conserv Biol 30:792–804. https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.12663
Barreto RR, Bornatowski H, Motta FS, Santander-Neto J, Vianna GMS, Lessa R (2017) Rethinking use and trade of pelagic sharks from Brazil. Mar Policy 85:114–122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2017.08.016
Santos P (2021) Recreational fishing as a source for the monitoring of a critically endangered shark in southern Brazil. Fish Res. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fishres.2021.106006
Almerón-Souza F, Sperb C, Castilho CL, Figueiredo PI, Gonçalves LT, Machado R, Oliveira LR, Valiati VH, Fagundes NJR (2018) Molecular identification of shark meat from local markets in Southern Brazil based on DNA barcoding: evidence for mislabeling and trade of endangered species. Front Genet 138:1–12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2018.00138
Bornatowski H, Braga RR, Barreto R (2017) Elasmobranchs consumption in Brazil: impacts and consequences. Advances in marine vertebrate research in Latin America. Springer, Berlin
Bornatowski H, Angelini R, Coll M, Barreto RR, Amorim AF (2018) Ecological role and historical trends of large pelagic predators in a subtropical marine ecosystem of the South Atlantic. Rev Fish Biol Fish 28(1):241–259. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11160-017-9492-z
Bornatowski H, Braga RR, Kalinowski C, Vitule JRS (2015) “Buying a pig in a poke” the problem of elasmobranch meat consumption in Southern Brazil. Ethnobiol Lett 6(1):196–202
Barbosa-Filho MLV, Hauser-Davis RA, Siciliano S, Dias TLP, Alves RRN, Costa-Neto EM (2019) Historical shark meat consumption and trade trends in a global richness hotspot. Ethnobiol Lett 10(1):97–103. https://doi.org/10.14237/ebl.10.1.2019.1560
Rangel BS, Barreto R, Gil N, Del Mar A, Castro C (2021) Brazil can protect sharks worldwide. Science 373(6555):633. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abj9634
Cardeñosa D, Fields A, Abercrombie D, Feldheim K, Shea SKH, Chapman DD (2017) A multiplex PCR mini-barcode assay to identify processed shark products in the global trade. PLoS ONE 12(10):e0185368. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0185368
Hobbs CAD, Potts RWA, Bjerregaard Walsh M, Usher J, Griffiths AM (2019) Using DNA barcoding to investigate patterns of species utilisation in UK shark products reveals threatened species on sale. Sci Rep 9(1):1–10. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-38270-3
Feitosa LM, Martins APB, Giarrizzo T, Macedo W, Monteiro IL, Gemaque R, Nunes JLS, Gomes F, Schneider H, Sampaio I, Souza R, Sales JB, Rodrigues-Filho LF, Tchaicka L, Carvalho-Costa LF (2018) DNA-based identification reveals illegal trade of threatened shark species in a global elasmobranch conservation hotspot. Sci Rep 8:1–11. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-21683-5
Pazartzi T, Siaperopoulou S, Gubili C, Maradidou S, Loukovitis D, Chatzispyrou A, Griffiths AM, Minos G, Imsiridou A (2019) High levels of mislabeling in shark meat–Investigating patterns of species utilization with DNA barcoding in Greek retailers. Food Control 98:179–186. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodcont.2018.11.019
Cruz VP, Adachi AMCL, Ribeiro GdS, Oliveira PH, Oliveira C, Oriano Junior R, de Freitas RHA, Forest F (2021) A shot in the dark for conservation: evidence of illegal commerce in endemic and threatened species of elasmobranch at a public fish market in southern Brazil. Aquat Conserv. https://doi.org/10.1002/aqc.3572
Merten Cruz M, Szynwelski BE, Ochotorena de Freitas TR (2021) Biodiversity on sale: the shark meat market threatens elasmobranchs in Brazil. Aquatic Conserv. https://doi.org/10.1002/aqc.3710
Bernardo C, de Lima Adachi AMC, da Cruz VP, Foresti F, Loose RH, Bornatowski H (2020) The label ‘caçao’ is a shark or a ray and can be a threatened species! Elasmobranch trade in Southern Brazil unveiled by DNA barcoding. Mar Policy 116(1):103920. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2020.103920
Alvarenga M, Solé-Cava A, Henning F (2021) What’s in a name? Phylogenetic species identification reveals extensive trade of endangered guitarfishes and sharks. Biol Conserv. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2021.109119
Domingues RR, de Amorim AF, Hilsdorf AWS (2013) Genetic identification of Carcharhinus sharks from the southwest Atlantic Ocean (Chondrichthyes: Carcharhiniformes). J Appl Ichthyol 29:738–742. https://doi.org/10.1111/jai.12154
Bunholi IV, Ferrette BLdS, De Biasi JB, CdeO M, Rotundo MM, Oliveira C, Foresti F, Mendonça FF (2018) The fishing and illegal trade of the angelshark: DNA barcoding against misleading identifications. Fish Res 206:193–197. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fishres.2018.05.018
Truett GE et al (2000) Preparation of PCR-quality mouse genomic dna with hot sodium hydroxide and tris (HotSHOT). Biotechniques 29:52–54. https://doi.org/10.2144/00291bm09
Serra-Pereira B, Moura T, Griffiths AM, Serrano Gordo L, Figueiredo I (2010) Molecular barcoding of skates (Chondrichthyes: Rajidae) from the southern Northeast Atlantic. Zoolog Scr 40(1):76–84
Ivanova NV, Zemlak TS, Hanner RH, Hebert PDN (2007) Universal primer cocktails for fish DNA barcoding. Mol Ecol Notes 7:544–548
Fields AT, Abercrombie DL, Eng R, Feldheim K, Chapman DD (2015) A novel mini-DNA barcoding assay to identify processed fins from internationally protected shark species. PLoS ONE 10(2):e0114844. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0114844
Hall TA (1999) BioEdit: a user-friendly biological sequence alignment editor and analysis program for Windows 95/98/NT. Nucleic Acids Symp Ser 41(41):95–98
Sayers EW, Cavanaugh M, Clark K, Pruitt KD, Schoch CL, Sherry ST, Karsch-Mizrachi I (2021) GenBank. Nucleic acids res 49(D1):D92–D96. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkaa1023
Ratnasingham S, Hebert PDN (2007) BOLD: the barcode of life data system. Mol Ecol Notes. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-8286.2007.01678.x
IUCN (2020) The IUCN red list of threatened species. Version 2020. https://www.iucnredlist.org. Accessed 15 Aug 2022
Queiroz B, Niero LP, Sanches A (2022) Molecular identification of shark meat traded as cação in Southwestern State of São Paulo Brazil. Arquivos de Ciencias do Mar. https://doi.org/10.32360/acmar.v55i2.62544
Hammer Ø, Harper DAT, Ryan PD (2001) Past: paleontological statistics software package for education and data analysis. Palaeontol Electron 4(1):9
Montealegre-Quijano S, Vooren CM (2010) Distribution and abundance of the life stages of the blue shark Prionace glauca in the Southwest Atlantic. Fish Res 101(3):168–179
Okes N, Sant G (2019) An overview of major shark traders, catchers and species. TRAFFIC, Cambridge
Dent F, Clarke S (2015) State of the global market for shark products. FAO Fisheries and Aquaculture Technical Paper No. 590. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), Rome, p 187
Rigby CL, Barreto R, Carlson J, Fernando D, Fordham S, Francis MP, Herman K, Jabado RW, Liu KM, Marshall A, Pacoureau N, Romanov E, Sherley RB, Winker H (2019) Prionace glauca The IUCN red list of threatened species 2019: e.T39381A2915850. https://doi.org/10.2305/IUCN.UK.2019-3.RLTS.T39381A2915850.en. Accessed 03 Dec 2022
ICMBio (2023) Sistema de Avaliação do Risco de Extinção da Biodiversidade – SALVE. https://salve.icmbio.gov.br/. Accessed 01 September 2023
Rigby CL, Barreto R, Carlson J, Fernando D, Fordham S, Francis MP, Herman K, Jabado RW, Liu KM, Marshall A, Pacoureau N, Romanov E, Sherley RB, Winker H (2019) Isurus oxyrinchus The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2019: e.T39341A2903170. https://doi.org/10.2305/IUCN.UK.2019-1.RLTS.T39341A2903170.en. Accessed on 07 Dec 2022
Rigby CL, Barreto R, Carlson J, Fernando D, Fordham S, Francis MP, Herman K, Jabado RW, Liu KM, Marshall A, Pacoureau N, Romanov E, Sherley RB, Winker H (2019) Isurus paucus. The IUCN red list of threatened species 2019: e.T60225A3095898. https://doi.org/10.2305/IUCN.UK.2019-1.RLTS.T60225A3095898.en Accessed on 07 Dec 2022.
Fields AT, Fischer GA, Shea SKH, Zhang H, Abercrombie DL, Feldheim KA, Babcock EA, Chapman DD (2017) Species composition of the international shark fin trade assessed through retail-market survey in Hong Kong. Conserv Biol 32(2):376–389. https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.13043
Lucena Frédou F, Travassos Tolotti M, Fredou T, Carvalho F, Hazin H, Burgess G, Coelho R, Waters J, Travassos P, Hazin F (2015) Sharks caught by the Brazilian tuna longline fleet: an overview. Rev Fish Biol Fisheries. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11160-014-9380-8
Mourato BL, Arfelli CA, Amorim AF, Hazin HG, Carvalho FC, Hazin FHV (2011) Spatio-temporal distribution and target species in a longline fishery off the Southeastern Coast of Brazil. Braz J Oceanogr 59(2):185–194
Amorim AF, Arfelli CA, Bacilieri S (2002) Shark data from Santos longliners fishery off southern Brazil (1971–2000). Col Vol Sci Pap ICCAT 54:1341–1348
Lessa R, Vooren C, Araújo M, Kotas J, Charvet P, Rincon G, Santana F, Gadig O, Sampaio C, Almeida Z, Rosa R, Almeida M (2005) Plano de Ações para Conservação e Manejo dos Estoques dos Recursos Pesqueiros. Plano de Ação para a Conservação e o Manejo de Estoques de Peixes Elasmobranquios do Brasil [in Portuguese] – SBEEL, 100 p. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.21264.81921
Rigby CL, Carlson J, Derrick D, Dicken M, Pacoureau N, Simpfendorfer C (2021) Carcharias taurus. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2021. e.T3854A2876505. https://doi.org/10.2305/IUCN.UK.2021-2.RLTS.T3854A2876505.en. Accessed 03 Dec 2022.
Hazin FHV, Lucena FM, Souza TSAL, Boeckman CE, Broadhurst MK, Menni RC (2000) Maturation of the night shark, Carcharhinus signatus, in the Southwestern Equatorial Atlantic Ocean. Bull Mar Sci 66(1):173–185
Instituto de Pesca (IP), Agência Paulista de Tecnologia dos Agronegócios (APTA), Secretaria de Agricultura e Abastecimento do Estado de São Paulo (SAA/SP) (IP/APTA/SAA/SP) (2023) Estatística Pesqueira Marinha e Estuarina do Estado de São Paulo. Consulta On-line. Programa de Monitoramento da Atividade Pesqueira Marinha e Estuarina do Estado de São Paulo. Retrieved from: http://www.propesq.pesca.sp.gov.br/ Accessed 07 March 2023
Vandamme SG, Griffiths AM, Taylor S, Di Muri C, Hankard EA, Towne JA, Watson M, Mariani S (2016) Sushi barcoding in the UK: another kettle of fish. Peer J 4:e1891. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.1891
Acknowledgements
The authors thank ExeterMarine, from the University of Exeter (Devon, UK), for funding this project. Ricardo and Regina Zuccolo are acknowledged for their help in sample collection. Phil Cannon is also thanked for proof reading.
Funding
This research was funded by ExeterMarine, from the University of Exeter (Devon, UK).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
AMG and VZ designed the study and secured funding; FMR collected the cação samples; AMG, VZ and EH conducted the DNA extraction, sequencing, and analysis; VZ performed data analysis; AMG supervised; EH and VZ created the figures; VZ wrote the original; AMG and VZ reviewed and edited the paper with contributions from EH.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors have no relevant financial or non-financial interests to disclose.
Ethical approval
No samples were taken from live animals; therefore, ethical approval was not required for this study. Local COVID-19 guidelines, including social distancing and sanitary measures, were followed during sample purchasing.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Zuccolo, V., Rego, F.M., Hughes, E. et al. Endangered shark species traded as “cação” in São Paulo during the COVID-19 lockdown: DNA-barcoding a snapshot of products. Mol Biol Rep 50, 9985–9992 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11033-023-08876-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11033-023-08876-6