Skip to main content
Log in

Molecular phylogeny of endophytic isolates of Ampelomyces from Iran based on rDNA ITS sequences

  • Published:
Molecular Biology Reports Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

During 2012, five isolates of pycnidial fungi were recovered from roots of tomato (Solanum lycopersicum) plants in Iran. Based on morphological characteristics the presence of Ampelomyces was documented. To confirm morphological identification and clarify the placement of endophytic isolates of Ampelomyces, DNA was extracted from isolates using a genomic DNA purification Kit. Region of internal transcribed spacers 1, 2 and 5.8S genes of rDNA were amplified using ITS4 and ITS1 universal primer set. Amplicons were purified, sequenced and submitted to the GenBank. The resulting sequence (600 bp) was submitted to a BLAST search to find most similar sequences in GenBank. The ITS sequences of isolates obtained in Iran were compared to those of other related authentic sequences obtained from GenBank. Iranian endophytic isolates had 100 % similarity of among themselves, while all isolates of Ampelomyces sequences analyzed had an average of 95.2 % (range 87–100 %) similarity. When Ampelomyces ITS sequences were analyzed by both distance-based and maximum parsimony methods, the Ampelomyces isolates were segregate into 11 distinct clades. The ITS sequences of endophytic isolates obtained in Iran were identical with endophytic isolates from other country including USA, Australia, Hungary and Spain. Our analyses of phylogenetic data showed that endophytic isolates from Iran and other countries are distinct group. The high ITS sequence-divergence values and the phylogenetic analysis suggested the isolates of Ampelomyces in the clades are not closely related and indeed a problematic species complex.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. De Bary A (1870) Eurotium, Erysiphe, Cicinnobolus, nebst Bemerkungenüber die Geschlechtsorgane der Ascomyceten. In: De Bary A, Woronin M (eds) Beiträgezur Morphologie und Physiologie der Pilze. Verlag von C. Winter, Frankfurt a. M, pp 1–95

    Google Scholar 

  2. Emmons CW (1930) Cicinnoboluscesatii, a case study in host–parasite relationships. Bull Torrey Bot Club 57:421–441

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Hijwegen T (1988) Effect of seventeen fungicolous fungi on sporulation of cucumber powdery mildew. Neth J Plant Pathol 94:185–190

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Kiss L, Nakasone KK (1998) Ribosomal DNA internal transcribed spacer sequences do not support the species status of Ampelomyces quisqualis, a hyperparasite of powdery mildew fungi. Curr Genet 33:362–367

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Czerniawska B (2001) Studies on the biology and occurrence of Ampelomyces quisqualis in the Drawski Landscape Park (NW Poland). Acta Mycol 36:191–201

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Madej T, Antoszczyszyn S (1965) Ameplomyces quisqualis Ces. (Cicinoboluscesatii De Bary) w Szczecinie. Biul. Inst. Ochr. Rosl. 30:65–76

    Google Scholar 

  7. Falk SP, Gadoury DM, Cortesi P, Pearson RC, Seem RC (1995) Parasitism of Uncinula necator cleistothecia by the mycoparasite Ampelomyces quisqualis. Phytopathology 85:794–800

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Kiss L, Russell J, Szentiványi O, Xu X, Jeffries P (2004) Biology and biocontrol potential of Ampelomyces mycoparasites, natural antagonists of powdery mildew fungi. Biocontrol Sci Technol 14:635–651

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Liang C, Zhao HH, Zhang YH, Li BD, Lu GZ (2004) Biological characteristics of Ampelomyces quisqualis hyperparasite on tickseed powdery mildew. J Yunnan Agric Univ 19:648–652 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Marboutie G, Combe F, Boyer E, Berne A (1995) Travauxsur I Ampelomyces quisqualis (1993–1994). IOBC/WPRS Bull 18:75–78

    Google Scholar 

  11. Hofstein R, Daoust RA, Aeschlimann JP (1996) Constrains to the development of biofungicides: the example of “AQ10”, a new product for controlling powdery mildews. Entomophaga 41:455–460

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Whipps JM, Lumsden RD (2001) Commercial use of fungi as plant disease biological control agents: status and prospects. In: Butt TM, Jackson C, Magan N (eds) Fungi as biocontrol agents: progress, problems and potential. CABI Publishing, Wallingford, pp 9–22

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  13. Jarvis WR, Slingsby K (1977) The control of powdery mildew of greenhouse cucumber by water spray and Ampelomyces quisqualis. Plant Dis Rep 61:728–730

    Google Scholar 

  14. Sutton BC (1980) The Coelomycetes. Fungi imperfecti with pycnidia, acervuli and stromata. Commonwealth Mycological Institute, Kew

    Google Scholar 

  15. Kiss L (1997) Genetic diversity in Ampelomyces isolates, hyperparasites of powdery mildew fungi inferred from RFLP analysis of the rDNA ITS region. Mycol Res 101:1073–1080

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Nischwitz C, Newcombe G, Anderson CL (2005) Host specialization of the mycoparasite Eudarluca caricis and its evolutionary relationship to Ampelomyces. Mycol Res 109:421–428

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Sullivan RF, White JF (2000) Phomaglomerata as a mycoparasite of powdery mildew. Appl Environ Microbiol 66:425–427

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Szentiványi O, Kiss L, Russell JC, Kovács GM, Varga K, Jankovics T, Lesemann S, Xu XM, Jeffries P (2005) Ampelomyces mycoparasites from apple powdery mildew identified as a distinct group based on single-stranded conformation polymorphism analysis of the rDNA ITS region. Mycol Res 109:429–438

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Arenal F, Platas G, Monte E, Pelaez F (2000) ITS sequencing support for Epicoccum nigrum and Phoma epicoccina being the same biological species. Mycol Res 104:301–303

  20. White TJ, Bruns T, Lee S, Taylor J (1990) Amplification and direct sequencing of fungal ribosomal RNA genes for phylogenetics. In: Gelfland DH, Innis MA, Sninsky JJ, White TJ (eds) PCR protocols: a guide to methods and applications. Academic Press, San Diego, pp 315–322

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  21. Thompson JD, Higgins DG, Gibson TJ (1994) CLUSTAL W: improving the sensitivity of progressive multiple sequence alignment through sequence weighting, position-specific gap penalties and weight matrix choice. Nucleic Acid Res 22:4673–4680

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Saitou N, Nei M (1987) The neighbor-joining method: a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Mol Biol Evol 4:406–425

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Felsenstein J (1985) Confidence limits on phylogenies: an approach using the bootstrap. Evolution 39:783–791

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Tamura K, Dudley J, Nei M, Kumar S (2007) MEGA4: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis (MEGA) software version 4.0. Mol Biol Evol 24:1596–1599

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Rankovic B (1997) Hyperparasites of the genus Ampelomyces on powdery mildew fungi in Serbia. Mycopathologia 139:157–164

  26. Liang C, Yang J, Kovács GM, Szentiványi O, Li B, Xu XM, Kiss L (2007) Genetic diversity of Ampelomyces mycoparasites isolated from different powdery mildew species in China inferred from analyses of rDNA ITS sequences. Fungal Divers 24:225–240

    Google Scholar 

  27. Park MJ, Choi YJ, Hong SB, Shin HD (2010) Genetic variability and mycohost association of Ampelomyces quisqualis isolates inferred from phylogenetic analyses of ITS rDNA and actin gene sequences. Fungal Biol 114:235–247

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Seifert KA, Wingfield BD, Wingfield MJ (1995) A critique of DNA sequence analysis in the taxonomy of filamentous Ascomycetes and ascomycetous anamorphs. Can J Bot 73(suppl. 1):S760–S767

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Nazir RN, Hu X, Schidt J, Culham D, Robb J (1991) Potential use of PCR amplified ribosomal intergenic sequences in the detection and differentiation of Verticillium wilt pathogens. Physiol Mol Plant Pathol 39:1–11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Kiss L, Pintye A, Kovacs GM, Jankovics T, Fontaine MC, Harvey N et al (2011) Temporal isolation explains host-related genetic differentiation in a group of widespread mycoparasitic fungi. Mol Ecol 20:1492–1507

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Samad Jamali.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Jamali, S. Molecular phylogeny of endophytic isolates of Ampelomyces from Iran based on rDNA ITS sequences. Mol Biol Rep 42, 149–157 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11033-014-3750-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11033-014-3750-0

Keywords

Navigation