Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Carbon conservation strategy for the management of pig slurry by composting: Initial study of the bulking agent influence

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The intensification of the livestock production systems implies a potential environmental risk, associated with the great generation of animal wastes and slurries and their storage and management. Manure management is associated with considerable emissions of ammonia (NH3) and greenhouse gases (GHG). However, the potential for GHG mitigation is highly dependent on the waste treatment strategy considered. This laboratory study aims to evaluate the influence of the type of bulking agent used on the potential reduction of the carbon dioxide (CO2) emission, dealing with carbon (C) conservation when the solid fraction of pig (Sus scrofa domesticus) slurry is managed by composting. For this, a composting experiment in batch reactors was run with four mixtures elaborated using the solid fraction of pig slurry (SPS) and different materials (maize (Zea mays) stalks, barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) straw, cotton (Gossypium hirsutum) gin and garden prunings) as bulking agents. The potential C conservation in the mixtures was evaluated by determining the CO2 emissions; the evolution of the mixtures, the thermal profile developed and the thermodynamics of the process were also studied. The mixtures elaborated with cotton gin and garden prunings showed the fastest temperature development, and also the highest CO2 emissions. However, the use of maize stalks as bulking agent reduced CO2 emissions due to its slow degradability: this could constitute a suitable strategy to promote C conservation during the management of pig slurry by composting.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adani F, Ubbiali C, Generini P (2006) The determination of biological stability of composts using the dynamic respiration index: the results of experience. Waste Manag 26:41–48

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Argyropoulos DS, Menachem SB (1997) Lignin. In: Eriksson, K-E.L. (Ed.), Adv Biochem Eng Biot 57: 127–158.

  • Barrena-Gómez R, Lima FV, Ferrer AS (2006) The use of respiration indices in the composting process: a review. Waste Manag Res 24:37–47

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bernal MP (2008) Compost: production, use and impact on carbon and nitrogen cycles. Monograph nº. 631, International Fertiliser Society, York. ISBN 987-0-85310-268-7

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernal MP, Navarro AF, Roig A, Cegarra J, García D (1996) Carbon and nitrogen transformation during composting of sweet sorghum bagasse. Biol Fert Soil 22:141–148

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bernal MP, Alburquerque JA, Moral R (2009) Composting of animal manures and chemical criteria for compost maturity assessment. a review. Bioresour Technol 100:5444–5453

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bertora C, Alluvione F, Zavattaro L, van Groenigen JW, Velthof G, Grignani C (2008) Pig slurry treatment modifies slurry composition, N2O, and CO2 emissions after soil incorporation. Soil Biol Biochem 40:1999–2006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown S, Kruger C, Subler S (2008) Greenhouse gas balance for composting operations. J Environ Qual 37:1396–1410

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bustamante MA, Paredes C, Marhuenda-Egea FC, Pérez-Espinosa A, Bernal MP, Moral R (2008) Co-composting distillery wastes with animal manure: carbon and nitrogen transformations and evaluation of compost stability. Chemosphere 72:551–557

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bustamante MA, Restrepo AP, Alburquerque A, Pérez-Murcia MD, Paredes C, Moral R, Bernal MP (2013) Recycling of anaerobic digestates by composting: effect of the bulking agent used. J Clean Prod 47:61–69

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Castaldi P, Alberti G, Merella R, Mellis P (2005) Study of the organic matter evolution during municipal solid waste composting aimed at identifying suitable parameters for the evaluation of compost maturity. Waste Manag 25:209–213

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cole CV, Duxbury J, Freney J, Heinemeyer O, Minami K, Mosier A, Paustian K, Rosenberg N, Sampson N, Sauerbeck D, Zhao Q (1997) Global estimates of potential mitigation of greenhouse gas emissions by agriculture Nutr. Cycl Agroecosyst 49:221–228

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doublet J, Francou C, Poitrenaud M, Houot S (2012) Influence of bulking agents on organic matter evolution during sewage sludge composting; consequences on compost organic matter stability and N availability. Bioresour Technol 102:1298–1307

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duchateau K, Vidal C (2003) Between 1990 and 2000, European agriculture has reduced its greenhouse gas emissions by 6.4 %. Environment and Energy. Theme 8–1/2003.

  • Estevez-Schwarz I, Seoane S, Núñez A, López-Mosquera ME (2012) Production and characterization of a compost made from garden and other types of waste. Pol J Environ Stud 21(4):43–52

    Google Scholar 

  • FAO (2008) FAOSTAT. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome, Italy. www.faostat.fao.org/. Cited 16 May 2014.

  • FAO (2010). Greenhouse gas emissions from the dairy sector. A life cycle assessment. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome, Italy.

  • Fukumoto Y, Inubushi K (2009) Effect of nitrite accumulation on nitrous oxide emission and total nitrogen loss during swine manure composting. Soil Sci Plant Nutr 55:428–434

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Georgacakis D, Tsavdaris A, Bakouli J, Symeonidis S (1996) Composting solid swine manure and lignite mixtures with selected plant residues. Bioresour Technol 56:195–200

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoeve M, Hutchings NJ, Peters GM, Svanström M, Jensen LS, Bruun S (2014) Life cycle assessment of pig slurry treatment technologies for nutrient redistribution in Denmark. J Environ Manag 132:60–70

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hue NV, Liu J (1995) Predicting compost stability. Compos Sci Util 3:8–15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • IPCC (2007) Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. In: Metz B, Davidson OR, Bosch PR, Dave R, Meyer LA (eds) Climate Change 2007: Working Group III: Mitigation of Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Kariyapperuma KA, Furon A, Wagner-Riddle C (2012) Non-growing season nitrous oxide fluxes from an agricultural soil as affected by application of liquid and composted swine manure. Can J Soil Sci 92:315–327

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lesschen JP, van den Berg M, Westhoek HJ, Witzke HP, Oenema O (2011) Greenhouse gas emission profiles of European livestock sectors. Anim Feed Sci Technol 166–167:16–28

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liang Y, Leonard JJ, Feddes JJR, McGill WB (2006) Influence of carbon and buffer amendment on ammonia volatilization in composting. Bioresour Technol 97:748–761

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liao PH, Vizcarra AT, Chen A, Lo KV (1993) Composting separated solid swine manure. J Environ Sci Health A 28:1889–1901

    Google Scholar 

  • Lopez-Ridaura S, van der Werf H, Paillat JM, Le Bris B (2009) Environmental evaluation of transfer and treatment of excess pig slurry by life cycle assessment. J Environ Manag 90:1296–1304

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Macías F, Camps M (2010) Soil carbon sequestration in a changing global environment. Mitig Adapt Strateg Glob Chang 15:511–529

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mc Carthy G, Lawlor PG, Coffey L, Nolan T, Gutierrez M, Gardiner GE (2011) An assessment of pathogen removal during composting of the separated solid fraction of pig manure. Bioresour Technol 102:9059–9067

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Navarro AF, Cegarra J, Roig A, Bernal MP (1991) An automatic microanalysis method for the determination of organic carbon in wastes. Commun Soil Sci Plant Anal 22:2137–2144

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nolan T, Troy SM, Healy MG, Kwapinski W, Leahy JJ, Lawlor PG (2011) Characterization of compost produced from separated pig manure and a variety of bulking agents at low initial C/N ratios. Bioresour Technol 102:7131–7138

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Mara FP (2011) The significance of livestock as a contributor to global greenhouse gas emissions today and in the near future. Anim Feed Sci Technol 166–167:7–15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paillat JM, Robin P, Hassouna M, Leterme P (2005) Predicting ammonia and carbon dioxide emissions from carbon and nitrogen biodegradability during animal waste composting. Atmos Environ 39:6833–6842

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paredes C, Bernal MP, Roig A, Cegarra J, Sánchez-Monedero MA (1996) Influence of bulking agent on the degradation of olive-mill wastewater sludge during composting. Int. Biodeterior Biodegrad 38:205–210

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Qiu S, McComb AJ, Bell RW, Davis JA (2005) Response of soil microbial activity to temperature, moisture, and litter leaching on a wetland transect during seasonal refilling. Wetl Ecol Manag 13:43–54

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sommer SG, Kjellerup V, Kristjansen O (1992) Determination of total ammonium nitrogen in pig and cattle slurry: sample preparation and analysis. Acta Agric Stand, Sect Bull, Soil Plant Sci 42:146–151

    Google Scholar 

  • Sundberg C (2005) Improving Compost Process Efficiency by Controlling Aeration, Temperature and pH. Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences (http://pub.epsilon.slu.se/950/1/CeSu103fin0.pdf).

  • Szanto GL, Hamelers HVM, Rulkens WH, Veeken AHM (2007) NH3, N2O and CH4 emissions during passively aerated composting of straw-rich pig manure. Bioresour Technol 98:2659–2670

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taherzadeh MJ, Karimi K (2008) Pretreatment of lignocellulosic wastes to improve ethanol and biogas production: a review. Int J Mol Sci 9:1621–1651

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vallejo A, Skiba UM, García-Torres L, Arce A, López-Fernández S, Sánchez-Martín L (2006) Nitrogen oxides emission from soils bearing a potato crop as influenced by fertilization with treated pig slurries and composts. Soil Biol Biochem 38:2782–2793

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • VanderZaag AC, MacDonald JD, Evans L, Vergé XPC, Desjardins RL (2013) Towards an inventory of methane emissions from manure management that is responsive to changes on Canadian farms. Environ Res Lett 8

  • Vanotti M, Millner P, Szogi A, Campbell C, Fetterman L (2006) Aerobic Composting of Swine Manure Solids Mixed with Cotton Gin Waste. ASABE, St. Joseph, Mich, ASABE Paper No. 064061

    Google Scholar 

  • Vanotti MB, Szogi AA, Vives CA (2008) Greenhouse gas emission reduction and environmental quality improvement from implementation of aerobic waste treatment systems in swine farms. Waste Manag 28:759–766

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhu N (2007) Effect of low initial C/N ratio on aerobic composting of swine manure with rice straw. Bioresour Technol 98:9–13

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The research has been funded by the People Programme (Marie Curie Actions) of the European Union’s Seventh Framework Programme FP7/2007-2013/under REA grant agreement n° 289887, and the results and conclusions achieved reflect only the author’s view - the Union not being liable for any use that may be made of the information contained therein. This work has been also supported by a ‘Juan de la Cierva’ contract to Dr. Bustamante (Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation) co-funded by the EU through the Social Funds. The authors also wish to thank Dr. D.J. Walker for the English revision of the paper.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Soil and Water Conservation and Organic Waste Management, Centro de Edafología y Biología Aplicada del Segura CSIC, PO Box 164, 30100, Murcia, Spain

    A. Santos & M. P. Bernal

  2. Department of Agrochemistry and Environment, Miguel Hernandez University, EPS-Orihuela, Ctra Beniel Km 3.2, 03312-Orihuela, Alicante, Spain

    M. A. Bustamante & R. Moral

Authors
  1. A. Santos
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. M. A. Bustamante
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. R. Moral
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. M. P. Bernal
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. Santos.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Santos, A., Bustamante, M.A., Moral, R. et al. Carbon conservation strategy for the management of pig slurry by composting: Initial study of the bulking agent influence. Mitig Adapt Strateg Glob Change 21, 1093–1105 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11027-014-9593-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11027-014-9593-0

Keywords

Search

Navigation