Skip to main content
Log in

Error of a Standard Procedure for Measuring Airflow Velocity in Low-Subsonic-Speed Wind Tunnels

  • Published:
Measurement Techniques Aims and scope

A standard procedure for measuring airflow velocity has been developed in order to unify and standardize applied measuring instruments and data processing algorithms, as well as to reduce the time required for the development and certification of such standard procedures. The study examines the sources of error in indirect airflow velocity measurements within the range of 3–105 m/s. The following sources of instrumental error in indirect measurement are analyzed: digital and analog pressure sensors, pitot-static tubes, temperature and relative humidity sensors, and atmospheric pressure sensors. The greatest contribution to the instrumental error is shown to be made by the measurement of pressure difference and atmospheric pressure. The procedural error, which depends on the adopted measurement model, is considered. The authors propose a mathematical measurement model including the optimal expressions for determining the density of humid air and corrections for compressibility, which allows the procedural error to be reduced. In addition, requirements are developed for the metrological characteristics of the used measuring instruments, ensuring that the combined error of indirect airflow velocity measurements complies with the permissible limits of Δperm = ±0.2 m/s. The authors give recommendations on the use of measuring instruments and algorithms of measurement result processing, which enable a 39% measurement error reduction and the creation of a standard procedure for measuring airflow velocity. This procedure can be used in the aviation industry when measuring airflow velocity via the pneumometric method.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 4.
Fig. 5.
Fig. 6.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. GOST OIML R 111-1-2009. GSI. Weights of classes E1, E2, F1, F2, M1, M1–2, M2, M2–3 and M3. Part 1. Metrological and Technical Requirements.

  2. MI 2000-89. GSI. Low-Subsonic-Speed Wind Tunnels. Metrological Certifi cation Procedure.

References

  1. V. A. Kozlovskii and S. E. Filippov, Flow Field Nonuniformity in a U-6 Wind Tunnel. Assessment of Its Effect on the Aerospace Performance of Models, in: Proc. 19th Seminar: Aircraft Aerodynamics, February 28–29, 2008, Volodarsky village, Moscow Region, TsAGI (2008), pp. 73–74.

  2. A. N. Petunin, Determination of Airflow Parameters Using the Pneumometric and Velocity Methods, Uch. Zap. TsAGI, 19, No. 3, 1–8 (1988).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  3. A. N. Petunin, Methods and Techniques for Measuring Gas Flow Parameters, Mashinostroenie, Moscow (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  4. V. A. Babin, N. A. Kulikov, and A. I. Samoilenko, Measurement Error of Low Subsonic Airflow Velocities, in: Proc. 3rd Sector-Wide Conf. on Measurement Technique and Metrology for Aircraft Research — KIMILA 2018, June 5–6, 2018, Zhukovsky, TsAGI (2018), pp. 120–130.

  5. R. S. Davis, Metrologia, 29, No. 1, 67–70 (1992), https://doi.org/10.1088/0026-1394/29/1/008.

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. A. I. Volkov and I. M. Zharskii, Big Chemistry Handbook, Sovremennaya Shkola, Minsk (2005).

  7. S. Yu. Khizhnyak and O. V. Dovydenko, Study into the Accuracy of Procedures for Measuring Airflow Velocities and Mach Numbers for TsAGI Wind Tunnels, in: Proc. 5th All-Russian Sci. Practical Conf.: Measurements in the Modern World-2015, June 2–4, 2015, St. Petersburg, SPbPU (2015), pp. 229–235.

  8. B. G. Artem'ev and Yu. E. Lukashov, Handbook for Metrology Experts, 2nd rev. and enl. ed., Standartinform, Moscow, (2009).

  9. A. S. Doinikov, L. N. Bryanskii, and B. N. Krupin, Metrology Handbook, Standartinform, Moscow (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  10. E. I. Sychev, V. N. Khramenkov, and A. D. Shkitin, Fundamentals of Military Metrology, Voenizdat, Moscow (1993).

    Google Scholar 

  11. O. Dovydenko, G. Birukov, A. Samoylenko, V. Maskaev, and V. Petronevich, in: 29th Int. Sci. Symp.: Metrology and Metrology Assurance, MMA-2019, September 6–10, 2019, Sozopol, IEEE, Article ID 8936021 (2019), https://doi.org/10.1109/MMA.2019.8936021.

  12. O. V. Dovydenko and S. Yu. Khizhnyak, Study into the Accuracy of Airflow Velocity Measurement Procedures for TsAGI Subsonic-Speed Wind Tunnels, in: 10th All-Russian Sci. Tech. Conf.: Metrological Support of Defense and Security in the Russian Federation, October 27–29, 2014, Povedniki village, Moscow Region (2014), pp. 62–66.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S. Yu. Khizhnyak.

Additional information

Translated from Izmeritel'naya Tekhnika, No. 1, pp. 8–15, January, 2023.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Khizhnyak, S.Y., Dovydenko, O.V. & Samoylenko, A.I. Error of a Standard Procedure for Measuring Airflow Velocity in Low-Subsonic-Speed Wind Tunnels. Meas Tech 66, 6–13 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11018-023-02183-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11018-023-02183-z

Keywords

Navigation