Skip to main content
Log in

Analysis of the Methods for Determining Losses in the Transformer Magnetic Core

  • Published:
Measurement Techniques Aims and scope

To effectively minimize magnetic losses and increase the efficiency of machines, particularly transformers, exact separation of total losses in the magnetic cores of electrical appliances into hysteresis and eddy current is required. To address this issue, the author proposes three variants of the wattmeter method, based on different dependences of eddy current and hysteresis losses on the magnetization reversal frequency, magnetic flux, and temperature, referring to the methods of two frequencies, two densities, and two temperatures. Two experiments were performed for each of the three methods under different conditions. In no-load experiments at two frequencies, at two magnetic flux densities, and two temperatures of the magnetic core, the active powers spent on heating the core were measured, and expressions for the powers of hysteresis and eddy current losses were obtained. The experimental results obtained using different methods are consistent with each other. The advantages and difficulties of each method are analyzed. The combination of methods determines the degree of density index for the magnetic flux in the hysteresis loss power expression (Steinmetz factor) in a particular transformer.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. E. Hajipour, M. Vakilian, and M. Ghafouri, Int. T. Electr. Comput. Eng. Sys., 2, No. 1, 34–38 (2014), https://doi.org/10.12691/iteces-2-1-6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. S. M. Plotnikov, “Determination of eddy currents and hysteresis losses in magnetic cores of electrical machines,” Izmer. Tekhn., No. 11, 54–58 (2020), https://doi.org/10.32446/0368-1025it.2020-11-54-58.

  3. G. Bertotti, IEEE T. Magn., 24, No. 1, 621–630 (1988), https://doi.org/10.1109/20.43994.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  4. Y. Chen and P. Pillay, Conf. Record of the 2002 IEEE Industry Applications Conf. 37th IAS Ann. Meeting (2002), Vol. 2, pp. 759–766, https://doi.org/10.1109/IAS.2002.1042645.

  5. M. F. De Campos, J. Magn. Magn. Mater., 301, 94–99 (2006), https://doi.org/10.1016/jJmmm.2005.06.014.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  6. S. E. Zirka, Y. I. Moroz, P. Marketos, and A. J. Moses, IEEE T. Magn., 46, No. 2, 286–289 (2010), https://doi.org/10.1109/TMAG.2009.2032858.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  7. J. C. Olivares-Galvan et al., 7th Mediterr. Conf. Exhibit. on Power Generation, Transmission, Distribution and Energy Conversion (MedPower 2010), pp. 1–5, https://doi.org/10.1049/cp.2010.0900.

  8. M. Popescu, T. J. E. Miller, M. McGilp, et al., 2007 IEEE Industry Applications Annual Meeting, pp. 60–66, https://doi.org/10.1109/07IAS.2007.14.

  9. M. Najgebauer, “Models for prediction of energy loss in soft magnetic materials,” Conference: XII International PhD Workshop OWD, Wisla, Poland, Oct. 23–26, 2010, pp. 487–482.

  10. M. Ibrahim and P. Pillay, IEEE Energy Conversion Congress and Exposition (ECCE) (2012), pp. 1–8, https://doi.org/10.1109/ECCE.2012.6342536.

  11. P. Parthasaradhy and S. V. Ranganayakulu, “Hysteresis and eddy current losses of magnetic material by Epstein frame method – novel approach,” Int. J. Eng. Sci., 85–93 (2014).

  12. S. M. Plotnikov, Patent No. 2755053 RF, Izobret., Polezn. Modeli, No. 26 (2021).

  13. S. Xue, J. Feng, S. Guo, et al., IEEE T. Magnet., 54, No. 1, 1–10 (2018), https://doi.org/10.1109/TMAG.2017.2755593.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. J. Chen, D. Wang, S. Cheng, et al., IEEE T. Magnet., 51, No. 11, 1–4 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1109/TMAG.2015.2432081.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. N. Takahashi, M. Morishita, D. Miyagi, and M. Nakano, IEEE T. Magnet., 46, No. 2, 548–551 (2010), https://doi.org/10.1109/TMAG.2009.2033122.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  16. A. S. Zubchenko, Steel and Alloy Grade Guide, Mashinostroenie, Moscow (2003).

    Google Scholar 

  17. V.V. Druzhinin, Magnetic Properties of Electrical Steel, Energiya, Moscow (1974).

    Google Scholar 

  18. S. M. Plotnikov, Patent No. 2743902 RF, Izobret., Polezn. Modeli, No. 7 (2021).

  19. I. I. Ivanov and V. S. Ravdonik, Electrical Engineering, Vysshaya Shkola, Moscow (1984).

    Google Scholar 

  20. S. M. Plotnikov, “Estimation of errors in the wattmeter method for determining magnetic losses in transformers,” Izmer Tekhn., No. 3, 40–44 (2021), https://doi.org/10.32446/0368-1025it.2021-3-40-44.

  21. S. M. Plotnikov, Patent No. 2764780 RF, Izobret., Polezn. Modeli, No. 3 (2022).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S. M. Plotnikov.

Additional information

Translated from Izmeritel’naya Tekhnika, No. 1, pp. 52–57, January, 2022.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Plotnikov, S.M. Analysis of the Methods for Determining Losses in the Transformer Magnetic Core. Meas Tech 65, 59–64 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11018-022-02048-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11018-022-02048-x

Keywords

Navigation