The paper presents the assessment of equivalence of the spectral radiance scales in the wavelength range from 250 to 2500 nm, reproduced at the national metrology institutes of Korea (KRISS), China (NIM), and Russia (VNIIOFI), carried out in the framework of international comparisons. The common set of three tungsten strip lamps was used as an artefact. Based on a series of blind measurements of the lamps spectral radiance performed at each laboratory alternately, the reference value of the comparison was determined at each wavelength as a weighted mean of the measured data of three laboratories. The degree of equivalence of each laboratory was then calculated as the deviation of the measurement data of that participant from the reference value. A data analysis method was proposed for calculating the degree of equivalences and their uncertainties. The method is based on processing spectral radiance ratios, rather than differences, which allows eliminating the influence of a result of one particular participant to results of other laboratories. The comparison results confirm the equivalence of spectral radiance scales of all the laboratories within their expanded uncertainties (k = 2) except a few wavelength points.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
The International System of Units (SI), BIPM (2019), 9th ed., https://www.bipm.org/utils/common/pdf/si-brochure/SI-Brochure-9-EN.pdf.
Mutual Recognition of National Measurement Standards and of Calibration and Measurement Certificates Issued by National Metrology Institutes, CIPM, Paris (1999), https://www.bipm.org/utils/en/ pdf/CIPM-MRA-2003.pdf.
Dong-Joo Shin, Seongchong Park, Dong-Hoon Lee, Dai Caihong, Wu Zhifeng, Wang Yanfei, Boris Khlevnoy, Maxim Solodilov, and Svetlana Kolesnikova, “Report on the APMP.PR-S6: 2012-2013 supplementary comparison of spectral radiance from 250 nm to 2500 nm,” Metrologia, 57, Tech. Suppl. 02001 (2020), DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/0026-1394/57/1A/02001.
J. Hollandt, J. Seidel, R. Klein, G. Ulm, A. Migdall, and M. Ware, “Primary Sources for Use in Radiometry,” in: A. C. Parr, R. U. Datla, and J. L. Gardner (eds.), Optical Radiometry, Vol. 41, Experimental Methods in the Physical Sciences, Elsevier/Academic Press, San Diego, CA (2005).
B. Khlevnoy, “Final report on CCPR-S1: Spectral radiance 220 nm to 2500 nm,” Metrologia, 45, Tech. Suppl. 02001 (2008), DOI:https://doi.org/10.1088/0026-1394/45/1A/02001.
Boris Khlevnoy, Victor Sapritsky, Bernard Rougie, Charles Gibson, Howard Yoon, Arnold Gaertner, Dieter Taubert, and Juergen Hartmann, “CCPR-S1 supplementary comparison for spectral radiance in the range of 220nm to 2500nm,”Metrologia, 46, No. 4, S174–S180 (2009), DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/0026-1394/46/4/S08.
B. B. Khlevnoi, V. I. Sapritskii, and S. S. Kolesnikova, “International comparisons of the CCPR-S1 units of spectral radiance at wavelengths of 220–2500 nm,” Meas. Tech., 53, No. 7, 748–757 (2010),
Guidelines for CCPR Key Comparisons Report Preparation CCPR-G2, CCPR Key Comparison Working Group, Rev. 4, January 2019, https://www.bipm.org/utils/common/pdf/CC/CCPR/CCPR-G2.pdf.
Guidelines for RMO PR Key Comparisons, CCPR-G6 Version 1.0, October 2014, https://www.bipm.org/utils/common/pdf/CC/CCPR/CCPR-G6.pdf.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Russian translation published in Izmeritel'naya Tekhnika, No. 12, pp. 51–57, December, 2020.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Shin, DJ., Khlevnoy, B.B., Dai, C. et al. Assessment of Equivalence of the Spectral Radiance Scales Following the Results of the Comparison between the National Metrology Institutes of Korea, China, and Russia. Meas Tech 63, 1004–1011 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11018-021-01884-7
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11018-021-01884-7