Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Method of Controlling the Energy Balance of Electrolytic Cells for Aluminum Production

  • Published:
Metallurgist Aims and scope

A brief analysis is made of different approaches to controlling the energy balance of electrolytic cells and the composition of the electrolyte. The effect of various factors on the temperature characteristics of electrolytes is studied during the production of aluminum. The goals of the investigation as a whole were to optimize the parameters of the cell and create a program for controlling its energy balance by monitoring the working voltage and electrolyte-temperature distribution and automatically keeping these parameters within prescribed limits. The results obtained from the investigation can be used to develop and introduce a technology for automatically controlling the production of aluminum in electrolytic cells.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. G. P. Tarcy and K. Torklep, “Current efficiency in prebake and Soderberg,” Light Metals, 319–334 (2005).

  2. A. Solheim, S. Rolseth, E. Skybakmoen, et al., “Liquidus temperature and alumina solubility in the system Na3AlF6– AlF3–LiF–CaF2–MgF2,” Light Metals, 451–460 (1995).

  3. Yu. G. Mikhalev, A. B. Braslavskii, and L. A. Isaeva, “Effect of cryolite ratio, electrolyte superheating, and additions of potassium fluoride on alumina dissolution rate,” Proc. 11th Int. Conf. Aluminum of Siberia – 2005, Krasnoyarsk.

  4. K. Grotheim and H. Kvande, Introduction to Aluminum Electrolysis – Understanding the Hall-Heroult Process, Aluminium-Verlag, Düsseldorf (1993).

    Google Scholar 

  5. L. Paulino, J. Yamamoto, R. A. Camilli, and J. C. Araujo, “Bath ratio control improvements at Alcoa Posos de Caldas – Brazil,” Light Metals, 419 (2005).

  6. A. Meghlaoui and N. Aljabri, “Aluminum fluoride control strategy improvement,” Light Metals, 425 (2003).

  7. F. J. S. McFadden, G. P. Bearne, P. C. Austin, and B. J. Welch, “Application of advanced process control to aluminium reduction cells – a review,” Light Metals., 1233 (2001).

  8. O. Bonnardel and P. Homsi, “The Pechiney semi-continuous and automatic measurement device (CMD), a new tool for automatic measurements,” Light Metals, 303–309 (1999).

  9. S. N. Turusov, S. I. Nozhko, and V. I. Sedykh, “Comparative evaluation of sensors that measure the degree of superheating of the electrolyte in an aluminum reduction cell,” Tsvet. Met., No. 54, 35–38 (2005).

  10. T. Rieck, M. Iffert, P. White, et al., “Increased current efficiency and energy consumption at the TRITMENT Smelter Essen using 9 Box matrix control,” Light Metals, 449–456 (2003).

  11. A. I. Berezin, T. V. Piskazhova, V. V. Gritsko, et al., “Control of electrolysis technology based on electrolyte superheat,” Proc. Conf. Aluminum of Siberia – 2006.

  12. F. J. S. McFadden et al, “Control of temperature in aluminium reduction cells – challenges in measurement and variability,” Light Metals, 1171–1180 (2001).

  13. K. Grjotheim et al., Aluminium Electrolysis, Aluminium-Verlag, Düsseldorf (1982).

    Google Scholar 

  14. T. A. Utigard, “Why ‘best’ pots operate between 955 and 970°C,” Light Metals, 319–326 (1999).

  15. W. Haupin, “The liquidus enigma,” Light Metals, 477–480 (1992).

  16. V. A. Ershov and I. A. Sysoev, Patent No. 2467095 RF, IPC C25C3/06, “Method of determining alumina concentration in a cryolite-alumina melt,” No. 2011118778/02, subm. 05.10.11, publ. 12.20.12, Byull., No. 32.

  17. V. A. Ershov, I. A. Sysoev, V. V. Kondrat’ev, et al., “Control of the concentration of alumina in the electrolyte during the production of aluminum,” Metallurg, No. 11, 96–101 (2011).

  18. I. A. Sysoev, V. A. Ershov, Yu. V. Bogdanov, and V. V. Kondrat’ev, “Study of the effect of technological factors on the temperature characteristics of electrolytes in aluminum production,” Vestn. Irkutsk. Gos. Tekh. Univ., No. 2, 193–198 (2010).

  19. I. A. Sysoev, V. A. Ershov, and V. V. Kondrat’ev, “Control of the energy regime in aluminum reduction cells,” Vestn. Irkutsk. Gos. Tekh. Univ., No. 12, 198–203 (2012).

  20. I. A. Sysoev and V. A. Ershov, Registr. Cert. Comp. Progr. No. 2014615075 RF, “Superheat computer program for controlling the energy regime of electrolytic cells used to make aluminum,” subm. 03.19.2014, reg. 05.16.2014.

Download references

The studies described above were performed with the support of a grant from the President of the Russian Federation (Grant No. MK-7534.2013.8).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to I. A. Sysoev.

Additional information

Translated from Metallurg, No. 6, pp. 70–76, June, 2015.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sysoev, I.A., Ershov, V.A. & Kondrat’ev, V.V. Method of Controlling the Energy Balance of Electrolytic Cells for Aluminum Production. Metallurgist 59, 518–525 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11015-015-0134-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11015-015-0134-1

Keywords

Navigation