Skip to main content
Log in

Semi-analytic contact technique in a non-linear parametric model order reduction method for gear simulations

  • Published:
Meccanica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

A Correction to this article was published on 05 August 2021

This article has been updated

Abstract

In this work we present a novel method for the solution of gear contact problems in flexible multi-body. These problems are characterized by significant variation in the location and size of the contact area, typically requiring a high number of degrees of freedom to correctly capture deformation and stress fields. Therefore fully dynamic simulation is computationally prohibitive. To overcome these limitations, we exploit a combined analytic-numerical contact model within a parametric model order reduction (PMOR) scheme. The reduction space consists of a truncated set of eigenvectors augmented with a parameter dependent set of residual static shape vectors. Each static shape is computed by interpolating among a set of displacement modes of the interacting bodies, obtained from a series of precomputed static contact analyses. During the contact analyses, an analytic model based on the Hertz theory describes the teeth local deformation. We implement the proposed method in an in-house code and we apply it to spur and helical gears dynamic contact analyses. We compare the results with classical PMOR schemes highlighting how the combined use of the semi-analytic contact model allows to decrease further the model complexity as well as the computational burden, for both static and dynamic cases. Finally, we validate the methodology by means of a comparison with experimental data found in literature, showing that the numerical method is able to capture quantitatively the static transmission error measurements in case of both helical and spur geared transmission for different torque levels.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18
Fig. 19
Fig. 20
Fig. 21

Similar content being viewed by others

Change history

Notes

  1. In the remainder of this paper we will refer to \(\alpha\) and P of Eq. (20) respectively as Hertz-penetration gap and Hertz-contact force.

  2. In the remaining of this paper the q-dependence of the matrices and vectors in Eq. (25) are implied for notational convenience.

  3. Differently from the spur gear example, in case of aligned helical gears the complexity of the contact formulations does not vary along the angular pitch just as the number of gear axial sections in contact.

References

  1. Andersson A, Vedmar L (2003) A dynamic model to determine vibrations in involute helical gears. J Sound Vib 260(2):195–212

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  2. Ascher UM, Petzold LR (1998) Computer methods for ordinary differential equations and differential-algebraic equations, vol 61. SIAM, Philadelphia

  3. Blockmans B, Tamarozzi T, Naets F, Desmet W (2015) A nonlinear parametric model reduction method for efcient gearcontact simulations. Int J Numer Methods Eng 102(5):1162–1191

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Cai Y (1995) Simulation on the rotational vibration of helical gears in consideration of the tooth separation phenomenon (a new stiffness function of helical involute tooth pair). J Mech Des 117(3):460–469

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Chang L, Liu G, Wu L (2015) A robust model for determining the mesh stiffness of cylindrical gears. Mech Mach Theory 87:93–114

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Craig J (1987) A review of time-domain and frequency-domain component mode synthesis method. Int J Anal Exp Modal Anal 2(2):59–72

    Google Scholar 

  7. Ding Ca, Zhang L, Zhou Fz, Zhu J, Zhao Sz (2001) Theoretical formula for calculation of line-contact elastic contact deformation. Tribol Beijing 21(2):135–138

    Google Scholar 

  8. Fiszer J, Tamarozzi T, Desmet W (2016) A semi-analytic strategy for the system-level modelling of flexibly supported ball bearings. Meccanica 51(6):1503–1532

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Guilbault R, Lalonde S, Thomas M (2012) Nonlinear damping calculation in cylindrical gear dynamic modeling. J Sound Vib 331(9):2110–2128

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  10. Harris TA, Kotzalas MN (2006) Essential concepts of bearing technology, 5th edn. CRC Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  11. Heirman GHK, Tamarozzi T, Desmet W (2011) Static modes switching for more efficient flexible multibody simulation. Int J Numer Methods Eng 87(11):1025–1045

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Johnson KL (1987) Contact mechanics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. KU Leuven (2016) MUTANT: Multibody transient analysis of transmission. http://www.mech.kuleuven.be/en/pma/research/mod/research-areas/mutant

  14. Kuang J, Yang Y (1992) An estimate of mesh stiffness and load sharing ratio of a spur gear pair. In: The 1992 ASME design technical conferences–6th international power transmission and gearing conference, Scottsdale, September 1992. Advancing Power Transmission into the 21st Century, vol 1. ASME, New York, pp 1–9

  15. Kurokawa S, Ariura Y, Ogata A (1999) High precision measurement and analysis of transmission errors of gears under load. In: World congress on gearing and power transmission No 4, Paris, FRANCE, pp 1777–1788

  16. Özgüven HN, Houser DR (1988) Mathematical models used in gear dynamicsa review. J Sound Vib 121(3):383–411

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Palermo A, Anthonis J, Mundo D, Desmet W (2014) A novel gear test rig with adjustable shaft compliance and misalignments part I: design. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  18. Puttock M, Thwaite E (1969) Elastic compression of spheres and cylinders at point and line contact. Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation, Australia. National Standards Laboratory. Technical paper

  19. Russo R, Brancati R, Rocca E (2009) Experimental investigations about the influence of oil lubricant between teeth on the gear rattle phenomenon. J Sound Vib 321(3):647–661

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  20. Shabana A (1989) Dynamics of multibody systems. Wiley, New York

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  21. Tamarozzi T, Blockmans B, Desmet W (2015) Dynamic stress analysis of the high-speed stage of a wind turbine gearbox using a coupled flexible multibody approach. In: CWD Conference for wind power drives, Aachen, Belgium

  22. Tamarozzi T, Blockmans B, Desmet W (2015) On the applicability of static modes switching in gear contact applications. In: ASME 2015 international design engineering technical conferences and computers and information in engineering conference, vol 10

  23. Tamarozzi T, Heirman G, Desmet W (2014) An on-line time dependent parametric model order reduction scheme with focus on dynamic stress recovery. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 268:336–358

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  24. Tamarozzi T, Ziegler P, Eberhard P, Desmet W (2013) On the applicability of static modes switching in gear contact applications. Multibody Syst Dyn 30:209–219

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Toso A, Van Wermeskerken F, Cappellini N, Heirman G (2015) On the effect of lightweight gear blank topology on transmission dynamics. In: ASME 2015 international design engineering technical conferences and computers and information in engineering conference

  26. Vijayakar SM (1993) Contact analysis of gears using a combined finite element and surface integral method. Gear Technol 10:26

    Google Scholar 

  27. Weber C, Banaschek K (1953) Schriftenreihe antriebstechnik, chap 11. Friedr. Vieweg & Sohn, Braunschweig

    Google Scholar 

  28. Wriggers P (2006) Computational contact mechanics. Springer, Berlin

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors gratefully acknowledge the support of the European Commission for their support of the Marie Curie program through the EMVEM project (GA 315967) and the IAPP DEMETRA project (GA 324336). The Research Fund KU Leuven is gratefully acknowledged for its support. The research of T. Tamarozzi is funded by a grant from the IWTVLAIO Flanders VIRTUAL MATES. The IWT agency is gratefully acknowledged also for its support within the OPTIWIND project. This research was partially supported by Flanders Make, the strategic research centre for the manufacturing industry.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Niccolò Cappellini.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Cappellini, N., Tamarozzi, T., Blockmans, B. et al. Semi-analytic contact technique in a non-linear parametric model order reduction method for gear simulations. Meccanica 53, 49–75 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11012-017-0710-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11012-017-0710-5

Keywords

Navigation