Abstract
We extend the study of superinstantons presented in (Kimura and Pestun in superinstanton counting and localization, 2019) to include orthosymplectic supergroup gauge theories, \(B_{n_0|n_1}\), \(C_n\), and \(D_{n_0|n_1}\). We utilize equivariant localization to obtain the LMNS contour integral formula for the instanton partition function, and we investigate the Seiberg–Witten geometries associated with these theories. We also explore the brane configurations involving positive and negative branes together with O-planes that realize the orthosymplectic supergroup theories.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data Availability
The work has no associated data.
Notes
We thank the anonymous referee for pointing this out.
This dose not imply the equivalence of these two kinds of theories!
For a brief review on O4-planes, see Appendix 1.
References
DeWitt, B.S.: Supermanifolds, Cambridge Monographs on Mathematical Physics, Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, vol. 5 (2012)
Efetov, K.: Supersymmetry in Disorder and Chaos. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2012)
Wegner, F.: Supermathematics and its Applications in Statistical Physics: Grassmann Variables and the Method of Supersymmetry. Springer, Berlin (2016)
Parisi, G., Sourlas, N.: Random magnetic fields, supersymmetry and negative dimensions. Phys. Rev. Lett. 43, 744 (1979)
Quella, T., Schomerus, V.: Superspace conformal field theory. J. Phys. A 46, 494010 (2013)
Alvarez-Gaume, L., Manes, J.L.: Supermatrix models. Mod. Phys. Lett. A 6, 2039–2050 (1991)
Yost, S.A.: Supermatrix models. Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 7, 6105–6120 (1992)
Berkovits, N., Vafa, C., Witten, E.: Conformal field theory of AdS background with Ramond-Ramond flux. JHEP 03, 018 (1999)
Cumrun V.: Brane/anti-brane systems and \(U(N|M)\) supergroup
Dijkgraaf, R., Heidenreich, B., Jefferson, P., Vafa, C.: Negative branes supergroups and the signature of spacetime. JHEP 02, 050 (2018)
Okuda, T., Takayanagi, T.: D-branes Ghost. JHEP 03, 062 (2006)
Nekrasov, N.: Magnificent four. Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 24(5), 1171–1202 (2020)
Nekrasov, N., Piazzalunga, N.: Magnificent four with colors. Commun. Math. Phys. 372(2), 573–597 (2019)
Cumrun V.: Non-unitary holography
Mikhaylov, V., Witten, E.: Branes and supergroups. Commun. Math. Phys. 340(2), 699–832 (2015)
Hull, C.M.: Duality and the signature of space-time. JHEP 11, 017 (1998)
Marino, M., Schiappa, R., Schwick, M.: New Instantons for matrix models
Schiappa, R., Schwick, M., Tamarin, N.: All the D-branes of resurgence
Kimura, T.: Aspects of supergroup gauge theory. Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 38(03), 2330001 (2023)
Kimura, T., Pestun, V.: Super instanton counting and localization
Seiberg, N., Witten, E.: Monopoles, duality and chiral symmetry breaking in N=2 supersymmetric QCD. Nucl. Phys. B 431, 484–550 (1994)
Seiberg, N., Witten, E.: Electric-magnetic duality, monopole condensation, and confinement in N=2 supersymmetric Yang-Mills theory. Nucl. Phys. B 426, 19–52 (1994)
Kimura, T., Sugimoto, Y.: Topological vertex/anti-vertex and supergroup gauge theory. JHEP 04, 081 (2020)
Nekrasov, N., Shadchin, S.: ABCD of instantons. Commun. Math. Phys. 252, 359–391 (2004)
Marino, M., Wyllard, N.: A Note on instanton counting for N=2 gauge theories with classical gauge groups. JHEP 05, 021 (2004)
Kimura, T.: Instanton Counting. Quantum geometry and algebra, Springer, Berlin (2021)
Losev, A., Nekrasov, N., Shatashvili, S.L.: Testing Seiberg-Witten solution. NATO Sci. Ser. C 520, 359–372 (1999)
Losev, A., Nekrasov, N., Shatashvili, S.L.: Issues in topological gauge theory. Nucl. Phys. B 534, 549–611 (1998)
Moore, G.W., Nekrasov, N., Shatashvili, S.: Integrating over Higgs branches. Commun. Math. Phys. 209, 97–121 (2000)
Hollands, L., Keller, C.A., Song, J.: From SO/Sp instantons to W-algebra blocks. JHEP 03, 053 (2011)
Zhang, X.: Seiberg-Witten geometry of four-dimensional \({{\cal{N} }}\)=2 SO-USp quiver gauge theories. Phys. Rev. D 100(12), 125015 (2019)
Danielsson, U.H., Sundborg, B.: The Moduli space and monodromies of \(N=2\) supersymmetric SO(\(2r+1\)) Yang-Mills theory. Phys. Lett. B 358, 273–280 (1995)
Brandhuber, A., Landsteiner, K.: On the monodromies of \(N=2\) supersymmetric Yang-Mills theory with gauge group SO(\(2n\)). Phys. Lett. B 358, 73–80 (1995)
Martinec, E.J., Warner, N.P.: Integrable systems and supersymmetric gauge theory. Nucl. Phys. B 459, 97–112 (1996)
Nekrasov, N., Pestun, V.: Seiberg-Witten geometry of four-dimensional \({{\cal{N} }}=2\) quiver gauge theories. SIGMA 19, 047 (2023)
Frappat, L., Sorba, P., Sciarrino, A.: Dictionary on Lie superalgebras
Kimura, T., Zhu, R.: Web construction of ABCDEFG and affine quiver gauge theories. JHEP 09, 025 (2019)
Kimura, T., Pestun, V.: W-algebras, quiver. Lett. Math. Phys. 108(6), 1351–1381 (2018)
Kimura, T., Pestun, V.: Quiver elliptic W-algebras. Lett. Math. Phys. 108(6), 1383–1405 (2018)
Kimura, T., Pestun, V.: Fractional quiver W-algebras. Lett. Math. Phys. 108(11), 2425–2451 (2018)
Hanany, A., Zaffaroni, A.: Issues on orientifolds: on the brane construction of gauge theories with SO(2n) global symmetry. JHEP 07, 009 (1999)
Kapustin, A.: D(n) quivers from branes. JHEP 12, 015 (1998)
Chen, H., Kimura, T., Lee, N.: Quantum integrable systems from supergroup gauge theories. JHEP 09, 104 (2020)
Zafrir, G.: Brane webs and \(O5\)-planes. JHEP 03, 109 (2016)
Aganagic, M., Klemm, A., Marino, M., Vafa, C.: The topological vertex. Commun. Math. Phys. 254, 425–478 (2005)
Awata, H., Kanno, H.: Instanton counting. Macdonald functions and the moduli space of D-branes. JHEP 05, 039 (2005)
Iqbal, A., Kozcaz, C., Vafa, C.: The Refined topological vertex. JHEP 10, 069 (2009)
Kim, S., Yagi, F.: Topological vertex formalism with O5-plane. Phys. Rev. D 97(2), 026011 (2018)
Bourgine, J.-E., Fukuda, M., Matsuo, Y., Zhu, R.: Reflection states in Ding-Iohara-Miki algebra and brane-web for D-type quiver. JHEP 12, 015 (2017)
Hayashi, H., Zhu, R.: More on topological vertex formalism for 5-brane webs with O5-plane. JHEP 04, 292 (2021)
Nawata, S., Zhu, R.: Instanton counting and O-vertex. JHEP 09, 190 (2021)
Kimura, T., Nieri, F.: Intersecting defects and supergroup gauge theory. J. Phys. A 54(43), 435401 (2021)
Nieri, F.: Defects at the tntersection: the supergroup side, Springer Proc. Math. Stat. 396, 223–234 (2022)
Gomis, J., Le Floch, B., Pan, Y., Peelaers, W.: Intersecting surface defects and two-dimensional CFT. Phys. Rev. D 96(4), 045003 (2017)
Pan, Y., Peelaers, W.: Intersecting surface defects and instanton partition functions. JHEP 07, 073 (2017)
Gorsky, A., Le Floch, B., Milekhin, A., Sopenko, N.: Surface defects and instanton–vortex interaction. Nucl. Phys. B 920, 122–156 (2017)
Alday, L.F., Gaiotto, D., Tachikawa, Y.: Liouville correlation functions from four-dimensional gauge theories. Lett. Math. Phys. 91, 167–197 (2010)
Wyllard, N.: A(N-1) conformal Toda field theory correlation functions from conformal N = 2 SU(N) quiver gauge theories. JHEP 11, 002 (2009)
Awata, H., Yamada, Y.: Five-dimensional AGT conjecture and the deformed virasoro algebra. JHEP 01, 125 (2010)
Awata, H., Yamada, Y.: Five-dimensional AGT relation and the deformed beta-ensemble. Prog. Theor. Phys. 124, 227–262 (2010)
Awata, H., Fujino, H., Ohkubo, Y.: Crystallization of deformed Virasoro algebra, Ding-Iohara-Miki algebra and 5D AGT correspondence. J. Math. Phys. 58(7), 071704 (2017)
Awata, H., Feigin, B., Shiraishi, J.: Quantum algebraic approach to refined topological vertex. JHEP 03, 041 (2012)
Noshita, G.: 5d AGT correspondence of supergroup gauge theories from quantum toroidal \( \mathfrak{gl} _{1}\). JHEP 12, 157 (2022)
Gaiotto, D.: N=2 dualities. JHEP 08, 034 (2012)
Hollands, L., Keller, C.A., Song, J.: Towards a 4d/2d correspondence for Sicilian quivers. JHEP 10, 100 (2011)
Nakajima, H.: Instantons on ALE spaces, quiver varieties, and Kac-Moody algebras. Duke Math. J. 76(2), 365–416 (1994)
Nakajima, H.: Quiver varieties and Kac-Moody algebras. Duke Math. J. 91, 515–560 (1998)
Thind, J.: Quiver representations in the super-category and gabriel’s theorem for \(A(m,n)\)
Bovdi, V.A., Zubkov, A.N.: Super-representations of quivers and related polynomial semi-invariants. Int. J. Algebra Comput. 30(04), 883–902 (2020)
Rimanyi, R., Rozansky, L.: New quiver-like varieties and lie superalgebras. Commun. Math. Phys. 400(1), 341–370 (2023)
Orlando, D., Reffert, S.: Relating gauge theories via gauge/bethe correspondence. JHEP 10, 071 (2010)
Nekrasov, N.: Superspin chains and supersymmetric gauge theories. JHEP 03, 102 (2019)
Zenkevich, Y.: Higgsed network calculus. JHEP 08, 149 (2021)
Ishtiaque, N., Moosavian, S.F., Raghavendran, S., Yagi, J.: Superspin chains from superstring theory. SciPost Phys. 13(4), 083 (2022)
Varadarajan, V. S.: Supersymmetry for mathematicians: an introduction, Am. Math. Soc. (2004)
Berezin, F.A.: Introduction to Superanalysis. Springer, Berlin (1987)
Evans, N.J., Johnson, C.V., Shapere, A.D.: Orientifolds, branes, and duality of 4-D gauge theories. Nucl. Phys. B 505, 251–271 (1997)
Giveon, A., Kutasov, D.: Dynamics, brane, theory. Gauge. Rev. Mod. Phys. 71, 983–1084 (1999)
Zwiebach, B.: A First Course in String Theory. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2009)
Gimon, E.G., Polchinski, J.: Consistency conditions for orientifolds and D-manifolds. Phys. Rev. D 54, 1667–1676 (1996)
Acknowledgements
Y.S. thanks Satoshi Nawata for explaining the effect of fermionic zero modes in orthosymplectic quiver gauge theories and Go Noshita for explaining details on negative branes and T–duality, as well as giving their constructive comments on the manuscript. Y.S. also thanks Cumrun Vafa for his encouragement and beneficial discussions during his stay in ICTP. Part of this work has been presented in French Strings Meeting 2023 at LAPTh, Annecy, France and New Pathways in Exploration of Quantum Field Theory and Quantum Gravity beyond Supersymmetry III at ICTP, Trieste, Italy. Y.S. would like to thank the organizers for their hospitality. The authors would like to thank the anonymous referees for their valuable advice. This work was in part supported by EIPHI Graduate School (No. ANR-17-EURE-0002) and Bourgogne-Franche-Comté region.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Appendices
A Supermathematics
1.1 A.1 Superlinear algebra
We will give a very brief introduction on supergroups first, following [26]. For more about supergroups and its mathematical meanings, we refer the readers to [1, 36, 75, 76].
A supervector space is a \(\mathbb {Z}_2\)-graded vector space consists of both commuting and anti-commuting variables
Its superdimension
can be negative.
A linear map M between supervector space V and W can be written in terms of a supermatrix
with \(M_{\sigma \sigma ^{\prime }} \in \text {Hom}\left( V_\sigma , W_{\sigma ^{\prime }}\right) \). The corresponding superdeterminant (or Berezinian) is
And the supertrace is
Also, we define the supertranspositon of a supermatrix by
where \(A^{\text {t}}\) denotes the ordinary transpose operation. We can check that \(\left( M_1 M_2\right) ^{\text{ st } }=M_2^{\text{ st } } M_1^{\text{ st } }\), but \(\left( M^{\text{ st } }\right) ^{\text{ st } } \ne M\) in general.
The Hermitian conjugation of a supermatrix is defined as follows:
which satisfies .
1.2 A.2 Supergroups and superalgebras
1.2.1 A.2.1 Classification of classical supergroups
Like the ordinary classification of semi-simple Lie groups (algebras), we can also classify classical supergroups (superalgebras). The results are roughly given by the following table [5]:
For details from the mathematical side, see [36].
1.2.2 A.2.2 Unitary supergroup
We define the squared norm
for \(\Psi \in \mathbb {C}^{n|m}\). Then the A-type (unitary supergroup) \(\text {U}(n|m)\) is defined as the isometry group with respect to the supervector space \(\mathbb {C}^{n|m}\) such that
Thus, we have
The bosonic subgroup of \(\text {U}(n|m)\) is given by \(\text {U}(n) \times \text {U}(m)\), and the fermonic part is given by \({{\textbf {n}}} \times {{{\textbf {m}}}}\) and \( {{{\textbf {n}}}} \times {{\textbf {m}}}\) bifundamental representations with the dimension 2nm.
1.2.3 A.2.3 Orthosymplectic supergroup
Consider the real supervector space \(\mathbb {R}^{n|2m}\). The squared norm is defined by:
with the skew-symmetric form
Then, the isometry group of \(\mathbb {R}^{n|2m}\) is given by
Thus, we have
The bosonic part of \({{\,\textrm{OSp}\,}}(n|m)\) is thus given by \(\text {O}(n) \times \text {Sp}(m)\), and the fermonic part is given by \({{\textbf {n}}} \times {\textbf {2m}}\) bifundamental representation with the dimension 2nm.
1.2.4 A.2.4 Superalgebras
Superalgebra is also graded
with the supercommutator
for \(a,b\in {\mathfrak {A}}\). Here, we denote the parity of an element \(x \in V_\sigma \) by \(|x|=\sigma \) for \(\sigma =0,1\), which is called even/bosonic for \(\sigma =0\), and odd/fermionic for \(\sigma =1\). The supercommutator also satisfies the super-version of Jacobi identity
For example, we denote
which corresponds to the A-type supergroup \(A_{n-1|m-1}\).
B Orientifold planes
In order to realize the Hanany–Witten construction of BCD-type gauge theory, we need to introduce the orientifold planes (or O-plane), see [77, 78]. A very pedagogical review is [79, Problem 15.4]. Here, we only briefly introduce the effect of O4-planes.
For a BCD-type gauge theory, the brane configuration is:
The world volume of an O-plane reflects the supersymmetry generators, and thus results in the space-time reflection \(\left( x^4, x^5, x^7, x^8, x^9\right) \rightarrow \left( -x^4,-x^5,-x^7,-x^8,-x^9\right) \) and the gauging of world sheet parity \(\Omega \).
Without the O4-plane, the worldvolume of coincident D4-branes will make up a \(\text {U}(n)\) gauge theory. If all D4-branes are coincident and lying on the O4-plane, the open string modes between the D4-branes and their mirror image under O4-plane will give rise to an \({{\,\textrm{SO}\,}}\left( 2n \right) \) or an \(\text {Sp}\left( n\right) \) gauge theory, depending on the choice of whether \(\Omega ^2=\pm 1\) [80]. And for the case of \({{\,\textrm{SO}\,}}\left( 2n+1\right) \), an extra (half) D4-brane should be placed at on the O4-plane.
The brane contents of a BCD-type gauge theory are listed as follows:
in which “−” means extending direction and “\(\bullet \)” means the brane is pointlike in this direction. Notice the D4\(^+\)-brane is finite along \(x^6\) direction. In our BCD-type supergroup gauge theory, we also need to consider D4\(^-\)-branes in addition to ordinary D4\(^+\)-branes. The extra brane contents are:
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Kimura, T., Shao, Y. Orthosymplectic superinstanton counting and brane dynamics. Lett Math Phys 113, 122 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11005-023-01740-5
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11005-023-01740-5