Abstract
In mining operations, the time delay between grade estimations and decision-making based on those estimations can be substantial. This may lead to the scheduling of stopes mining that is based on information which is seriously out of date and, consequently, results in a substantial mined resources and reserves bias. To mitigate this gap between the grade estimation of an orebody and its exploitation, this paper proposes a method to quickly update resources and reserves that are integrated into the concept of real-time mining. The current standard for grade data collection in underground mines relies on a conventional chemical lab analysis of sparse drill hole or chip/face samples. The proposed methodology for the continuous and swift updating of mine resources and reserves requires a constant and rapid stream of measurements at the stopes. Consequently, this work proposes using portable X-ray fluorescence (XRF) devices to carry out the fast and abundant monitoring of ore grades. However, these fast data are highly uncertain; hence, the objective of this proposed method is to use the total data measurements and integrate their uncertainty into the resources modeling. The first step in the proposed methodology consists of creating a joint distribution function between “uncertain” XRF and the corresponding “hard” measurements based on empirical historical data. Then, the uncertainty of the XRF measurements is derived from these joint distributions through the conditional distribution of the real values applied to the known XRF measurement. The second step involves updating the reserves by integrating these uncertain XRF data, which are quantified by conditional distributions, into the grade characterization models. To achieve this, a stochastic simulation with point distributions is applied. An actual case study of a copper sulfide deposit illustrates the proposed methodology.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Alabert FG (1987) Stochastic imaging of spatial distributions using hard and soft information. Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA
Deutsch CV, Journel AG (1992) Gslb: geostatistical software library and user’s guide. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Dimitrakopoulos R, Farrelly CT, Godoy M (2002) Moving forward from traditional optimization: grade uncertainty and risk effects in open-pit design. Min Technol 111:82–88
Fisher BS, Schnittger S (2012) Autonomous and remote operation technologies in the mining industry: benefits and costs. BAE research report 12.1
Goovaerts P (1997) Geostatistics for natural resources evaluation. Oxford University Press on Demand, London
Horta A, Soares A (2010) Direct sequential co-simulation with joint probability distributions. Math Geosci 42:269–292. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11004-010-9265-x
Jewbali A, Dimitrakopoulos R (2011) Implementation of conditional simulation by successive residuals. Comput Geosci 37:129–142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cageo.2010.04.008
Journel AG (1986) Constrained interpolation and qualitative information—the soft kriging approach. Math Geol 18:269–286
Journel AG, Huijbregts CJ (1978) Mining geostatistics. Academic Press, London
Journel AG, Kyriakidis PC (2004) Evaluation of mineral reserves: a simulation approach. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Kalnicky DJ, Singhvi R (2001) Field portable XRF analysis of environmental samples. J Hazard Mater 83:93–122
Matysek AL, Fisher BS (2016) Productivity and innovation in the mining industry. BAE research report 2016.1
Osterholt V, Benndorf J, (2015) Real-time mining process flow analysis. Published document of European Programme Horizon 2020 funded project Real-Time Mining. Published under www.realtime-mining.eu on 05/11/2015
Sganzerla C, Seixas C, Conti A (2016) Disruptive innovation in digital mining. Proc Eng 138:64–71
Soares A (2001) Direct sequential simulation and cosimulation. Math Geol 33:911–926. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1012246006212
Soares A, Nunes R, Azevedo L (2017) Integration of uncertain data in geostatistical modelling. Math Geosci 49:253–273. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11004-016-9667-5
Vargas-Guzmán JA, Dimitrakopoulos R (2002) Conditional simulation of random fields by successive residuals. Math Geol 34:597–611. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1016099029432
Wambeke T, Benndorf J (2017) A simulation-based geostatistical approach to real-time reconciliation of the grade control model. Math Geosci 49:1–37. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11004-016-9658-6
Zhu H, Journel AG (1993) Formatting and integrating soft data: stochastic imaging via the Markov–Bayes algorithm. In: Soares A (ed) Geostatistics Tróia ’92. Quantitative geology and geostatistics, vol 5. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 1–12
Funding
Funding was provided by the H2020 Research and Innovation Programme (Grant no. 641989).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Neves, J., Pereira, M.J., Pacheco, N. et al. Updating Mining Resources with Uncertain Data. Math Geosci 51, 905–924 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11004-018-9759-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11004-018-9759-5