Skip to main content
Log in

A Recurrent Formula for Determination of the Effective Coercive Force in Layered Ferromagnetic Materials

  • Published:
Materials Science Aims and scope

The distribution of magnetic fluxes during reversal magnetization of three- and four-layer ferromagnetic materials with the same layer thickness by attachable probes with a U-shaped core is analyzed. The analytical expressions for determination of magnetic fluxes effective coercive force (CF) are obtained. The application of linear approximation for hysteresis loop demagnetizing sections of separate layers is substantiated. The stable regularities in these expressions are established. Based on them, a recurrent formula for the effective CF of layered ferromagnetic materials, which consist of an arbitrary number of layers of the same thickness, is proposed. The effective CF depends not only on the CF of individual layers, but also on their residual magnetic inductions. An experimental verification of the obtained expression is carried out on the 08kp and St3 steel samples. A magnetic analyzer of the KRM-Ts-MA type is used for CF and residual magnetic induction measurements. The calculated values of the effective CF for the two-layer ferromagnetic material of the mentioned steels according to the obtained recurrent formula and the measurement results agree well (the error does not exceed 3%).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1.
Fig. 2.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. V. G Gerasimov, A. D. Pokrovsky, and V. V. Sukhorukov, Non-Destructive Testing: in 5 books, Book 3: Electromagnetic control, Practical Handbook [in Russian], Vyshaya Shkola, Moscow (1992).

    Google Scholar 

  2. M. N. Mikheiev, and M. S. Gorkunov, Magnetic Methods of Structural Analysis and Non-Destructive Testing [in Russian], Nauka, Moscow (1993).

    Google Scholar 

  3. V. V. Kluyev, F. R. Sosnin, A. V. Kovaliov et al., in: V. Kliuyev (editor), Handbook on Non-Destructive Testing [in Russian], Mashinostroyeniye, Moscow (2005).

  4. G. V. Bida, and A. P. Nichipuruk, “Coercive force measurements in nondestructive testing,” Russian J. of Nondestructive Testing, 36, No. 10. 707–727 (2000); https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02759255.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. G. V. Bida, A. P. Nichipuruk, and T. P. Tsar’kova, “Magnetic properties of steels after quenching and tempering. I. General. Carbon steels,” Russian J. of Nondestructive Testing, 37, No. 2, 79–99 (2001); https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1016767721717.

  6. G. V. Bida, A. P. Nichipuruk, and T. P. Tsar’kova, “Magnetic properties of steels after quenching and tempering. II. Low-alloyed steels,” Russian J. of Nondestructive Testing, 37, No. 2, 100–115 (2001); https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1016719805787.

  7. G. V. Bida, “Magnetic properties of a body as nondestructive testing parameters of tempering quality of quenched steels (a review),” Russian J. of Nondestructive Testing, 38, No. 6, 412–424 (2002); https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1022122809006.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. G. Ya. Bezliudko, “Operational control of the fatigue state and life of metal products by non-destructive magnetic (coercimetric) method,” Tekhn. Diagnostika i Nerazrushayushchii Kontrol, No. 2, 20–26 (2003).

    Google Scholar 

  9. A. I. Ul’yanov, and A. A. Chulkina, “Magnetic properties of cementite and the coercive force of carbon steels after plastic deformation and annealing,” The Physics of Metals and Metallography, 107, No. 5, 439–448 (2009); https://doi.org/10.1134/s0031918x09050044.

  10. O. P. Ostash, O. V. Vol’demarov, and P. V. Hladysh, “Diagnostics of the structural-mechanical state of steels of steam pipelines by the coercimetric method and prediction of their service life,” Mater. Sci., 49, No. 5, 667–680 (2014); https://doi.org/10.1007/s11003-014-9661-3.

  11. Z. T. Nazarchuk, and V. N. Uchanin, “Electromagnetic structuroscopy of structural materials,” Novi Materialy i Tekhnologii v Metalurgii ta Mashynobuduvanni, No. 1, 8–16 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  12. G. Ya. Bezlyud’ko, V. F. Muzhitskii, and V. B Remezov, “Series of portable structuroscope-instruments based on measuring the coercive force,” Russian J. of Nondestructive Testing, 39, No. 4, 289–296 (2003); https://doi.org/10.1023/b:runt.0000009085.34384.ed.

  13. V. Uchanin, O. Ostash, G. Nardoni, and R. Solomakha, “Coercive force measurements for structural health monitoringin” in: R. M. Wilcox (editor), The Fundamentals of Structural Integrity and Failure. Chapter 5, Nova Sci. Publ., New York (2020), pp. 193–222.

  14. G. V. Bida, “Grain size and correlation of strength, plastic and toughness properties with coercive force of ferrite-pearlitic steels,” Tekhn. Diagnostika i Nerazrushayushchii Kontrol, No. 4, 40–45 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  15. S. G. Sandomirskii, “Magnetic control of the steel and cast iron articles structure. Modem state (review),” Litiyo i Metallurgiya (Foundry Production and Metallurgy), No. 2, 33–42 (2008); https://doi.org/10.21122/1683-6065-2008-2-33-42.

  16. S. G. Sandomirskii, “Structural and phase sensitivity of the coercive force of a minor hysteresis loop of steel,” Russian Metallurgy (Metally), No., 204–209 (2014); https://doi.org/10.1134/s0036029514030094.

  17. A. Yu. Bondarenko, “On the assessment of the residual life of welded joints by the magnetic method to ensure the quality of welded structures and products,” Tekhn. Diagnostika i Nerazrushayushchii Kontrol, No. 2, 42–45 (2002).

    Google Scholar 

  18. L. M. Lobanov, A. Yu. Bondarenko, and Yu. K. Bondarenko, “Evaluation of welded joints of structures by magnetic (coercimetric) method for predicting individual residual life,” Tekhn. Diagnostika i Nerazrushayushchii Kontrol, No. 1, 3–8 (2004).

    Google Scholar 

  19. V. Uchanin, and O. Ostash, “Development of electromagnetic NDT methods for structural integrity assessment,” Procedia Struct. Integrity, 16, 192–197 (2019); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prostr.2019.07.040.

  20. V. G. Rybachuk, and V. M. Uchanin, “Coercive force of two-layer ferromagnetic materials,” Selection and Processing of Information, 49, Is. 125, 3–8 (2021); https://doi.org/10.15407/vidbir2021.49.003.

  21. V. A. Gets, “Using a Phenomenological Model of a Hysteresis Loop to Model the Magnetic Properties of Steel,” in: Abstracts of the VI Int. Youth Sci. Conf. “Physics, Technology, Innovations” (May, 2019, Yekaterinburg, Russia), Method. Center of UPI Publ. House, Yekaterinburg (2019), pp. 856–857.

  22. V. A. Gets, “Study of the magnetic properties of ferromagnetic materials using mathematical modeling,” https://kmu.itmo.ru/file/download/application/1875 (application date 01.10.2021).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to V. G. Rybachuk.

Additional information

Translated from Fizyko-Khimichna Mekhanika Materialiv, Vol. 58, No. 4, pp. 98–104, July–August, 2022.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Rybachuk, V.G., Uchanin, V.M. A Recurrent Formula for Determination of the Effective Coercive Force in Layered Ferromagnetic Materials. Mater Sci 58, 533–539 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11003-023-00695-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11003-023-00695-1

Keywords

Navigation