Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Relocation of two earthquakes in the Southwest Indian Ridge area combining land seismic stations’ with OBSs’ data

  • Original Research Paper
  • Published:
Marine Geophysical Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Two earthquakes were recorded by 20 ocean bottom seismometers (OBS) deployed in the Southwest Indian Ridge (SWIR) area during a three-dimensional seismic survey in 2010. Their magnitudes (both M b = 4.4) and hypocenters have been determined by National Earthquake Information Center (NEIC) only using land seismic stations onset times. After the frequency analysis and the band-pass filtering of the OBSs’ data, 7 and 13 P-phase onset times from OBSs were successfully picked for these two events, respectively. Then these two events were relocated by HYPOSAT program with onset times together from OBSs and land seismic stations using different velocity models. These relocation experiments confirm both the importance of adding OBSs’ onset data and the need to apply a local oceanic velocity model for the location of these two events happened on the SWIR. This research has accumulated a wealth of experience for earthquakes observation and research using OBSs in the ocean.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ao W et al (2010) The correction of shot and OBS position in the 3D seismic experiment of the SW Indian Ocean Ridge. Chin J Geopys 53:1072–1081

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cannat M, Rommevaux-Jestin C, Sauter D, Deplus C, Mendel V (1999) Formation of the axial relief at the very slow spreading Southwest Indian Ridge (49° to 69°E). J Geophys Res Solid Earth 104:22825–22843

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen GM, Yang X, Liu J (2009) Analysis on effectiveness of several methods for earthquake location positioning in Guangdong digital seismic network in the Tenth Five-Year Plan period. South China J Seismol 29:69–78

    Google Scholar 

  • deMartin BJ, Sohn RA, Canales JP, Humphris SE (2007) Kinematics and geometry of active detachment faulting beneath the Trans-Atlantic Geotraverse (TAG) hydrothermal field on the Mid-Atlantic Ridge. Geology 35:711–714

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dick HJ, Lin J, Schouten H (2003) An ultraslow-spreading class of ocean ridge. Nature 426:405–412

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dolenc D, Romanowicz B, Uhrhammer R, McGill P, Neuhauser D, Stakes D (2007) Identifying and removing noise from the Monterey ocean bottom broadband seismic station (MOBB) data. Geochem Geophys Geosyst. doi:10.1029/2006GC001403

    Google Scholar 

  • Duan G, Zhang LN, Hui CX (2014) Location differences between Intermediate and deep focus earthquakes in Taiwan using different location methods in Java open system. China Earthq Eng J 36:1087–1092

    Google Scholar 

  • Georgen JE, Lin J, Dick HJ (2001) Evidence from gravity anomalies for interactions of the Marion and Bouvet hotspots with the Southwest Indian Ridge: effects of transform offsets. Earth Planet Sci Lett 187:283–300

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hao TY, You QY (2011) Progress of homemade OBS and its application on ocean bottom structure survey. Chin J Geophys Chin Ed 54:3352–3361

    Google Scholar 

  • Kennett B, Engdahl E (1991) Traveltimes for global earthquake location and phase identification. Geophys J Int 105:429–465

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kennett B, Engdahl E, Buland R (1995) Constraints on seismic velocities in the Earth from traveltimes. Geophys J Int 122:108–124

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klein FW (1978) Hypocenter locations program HYPOINVERSE. US Geol Surv Open File Rep 78–694:1–113

    Google Scholar 

  • Klein FW (1985) User’s guide to HYPOINVERSE, a program for VAX and Professional 350 computers to solve for earthquake locations. US Geol Surv Open File Rep 85–515:1–54

    Google Scholar 

  • Klein FW (2002) User’s guide to HYPOINVERSE-2000, a Fortran program to solve for earthquake locations and magnitudes. US Geol Surv Open-File Report 02–171:1–123

    Google Scholar 

  • Klein FW (2003) The HYPOINVERSE2000 earthquake location program. Int Geophys 81:1619–1620

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu HY, Niu XW, Ruan AG, Wu ZL, Li JB, Pan SJ (2012) Analysis of seismic signals of ocean bottom seimometer. J Trop Oceanogr 31:90–96

    Google Scholar 

  • Lin JY, Lee TC, Hsieh HS, Chen YF, Lin YC, Lee HH, Wen YY (2014) A study of microseisms induced by Typhoon Nanmadol using ocean-bottom seismometers. Bull Seismol Soc Am 104:2412–2421

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sauter D, Cannat M, Meyzen C, Bezos A, Patriat P, Humler E, Debayle E (2009) Propagation of a melting anomaly along the ultraslow Southwest Indian Ridge between 46°E and 52°20′E: interaction with the Crozet hotspot? Geophys J Int 179:687–699

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schweitzer J (2001) HYPOSAT—an enhanced routine to locate seismic events. Pure Appl Geophys 158:277–289

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schweitzer J, Kennett BL (2007) Comparison of location procedures: the Kara Sea event of 16 August 1997. Bull Seismol Soc Am 97:389–400

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sohn RA, Hildebrand JA, Webb SC (1999) A microearthquake survey of the high-temperature vent fields on the volcanically active East Pacific Rise (9°50′N). J Geophys Res Solid Earth 104:25367–25377

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sun AH, Chen QF, Chen Y, Li G, Zhang ZQ (2012) Relocation of earthquakes in the northeastern Tianshan Mountains area and improvement of local 1-dimensional crustal velocity model. Earthq Res China 27:235–247

    Google Scholar 

  • Tao CH et al (2012) First active hydrothermal vents on an ultraslow-spreading center: southwest Indian Ridge. Geology 40:47–50

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waldhauser F, Ellsworth WL (2000) A double-difference earthquake location algorithm: method and application to the northern Hayward fault, California. Bull Seismol Soc Am 90:1353–1368

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wessel P, Smith WHF (1995) New version of the generic mapping tools. Eos Trans Am Geophys Union 76:329

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang JZ et al (2012) OBS seismic data processing and preliminary results on the hydrothermal field of the Southwest Indian Ridge. J Trop Oceanogr 31:79–89

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang JZ, Zhao MH, Qiu XL, Li JB, Ruan AG (2013) Seismic phases from the Moho and its implication on the ultraslow spreading ridge. Acta Oceanol Sin 32:75–86

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao MH et al (2010) Research development and prospect on the three-dimensional seismic structures of slow and ultraslow spreading ocean ridges. J Trop Oceanogr 29:1–7

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhao MH et al (2013) Three-dimensional seismic structure of the Dragon Flag oceanic core complex at the ultraslow spreading Southwest Indian Ridge (49°39′E). Geochem Geophys Geosyst 14:4544–4563

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We highly appreciate the scientists and the crew of DY115-21 cruise on board R/V Dayang Yihao. We are equally thankful for the discussions with John Chen, Jean-Claude Sibuet and Hongfeng Yang. This research was supported by funds from Chinese National Natural Science Foundation (Contracts 41606064, 41176053, 91428204), and DY115 (Contract DYXM-115-02-1-01). Some figures were plotted using GMT (Wessel and Smith 1995).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Minghui Zhao.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Luo, W., Zhao, M., Zhang, J. et al. Relocation of two earthquakes in the Southwest Indian Ridge area combining land seismic stations’ with OBSs’ data. Mar Geophys Res 38, 27–37 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11001-016-9289-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11001-016-9289-9

Keywords

Navigation