Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Vulnerable Women’s Perceptions of Individual Versus Group Prenatal Care: Results of a Cross-Sectional Survey

  • Published:
Maternal and Child Health Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction Vulnerable pregnant women (e.g. women with low socio-economic status or recent immigrants) are less likely to receive adequate prenatal care or to attend perinatal education classes. CenteringPregnancy (CP) is a model of group prenatal care which combines assessment, education and support. This study aimed to assess patient experience among vulnerable women in group prenatal care compared to individual care. Methods Women participating in CP at a community-based health centre in urban Alberta were eligible to participate. A convenience sample of women who received individual care at a low-risk maternity clinic served as comparison. Women were asked a series of questions on their prenatal care experience. Demographic and patient responses were compared using Chi square, fisher’s exact and t tests. Results Forty-five women accessing CP and 92 women accessing individual care participated. Women in CP were younger, more likely to be single and having their first baby than women in individual care. Women in CP were significantly more likely to report having received enough information on exercise during pregnancy (92 vs. 66%, p = 0.002), breastfeeding (95 vs. 70%, p = 0.002) and baby care (95 vs. 67%, p = 0.001). Women in CP were more likely to report that they felt their prenatal care providers were interested in how the pregnancy was affecting their life (100 vs. 93%, p ≤ 0.001). Discussion Group prenatal care provides a positive experience and improved information exchange among vulnerable populations. Programs interested in engaging, educating and empowering vulnerable pregnant women may benefit from implementation of group care.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alexander, G. R., & Kotelchuck, M. (2001). Assessing the role and effectiveness of prenatal care: History, challenges, and directions for future research. Public Health Reports, 116(4), 306–316.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Andersson, E., Christensson, K., & Hildingsson, I. (2012). Parents’ experiences and perceptions of group-based antenatal care in four clinics in Sweden. Midwifery, 28(4), 502–508.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baldwin, K. A. (2006). Comparison of selected outcomes of centering pregnancy versus traditional prenatal care. Journal of Midwifery & Women’s Health, 51(4), 266–272.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bartholomew, S. (2009). What mothers say: The Canadian Maternity Experiences Survey: Public Health Agency of Canada.

  • Brixval, C. S., Axelsen, S. F., Lauemøller, S. G., Andersen, S. K., Due, P., & Koushede, V. (2015). The effect of antenatal education in small classes on obstetric and psycho-social outcomes: A systematic review. Systematic Reviews, 4(1), 20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Broadhead, W., Gehlbach, S. H., De Gruy, F. V., & Kaplan, B. H. (1988). The Duke-UNC functional social support questionnaire: Measurement of social support in family medicine patients. Medical Care, 709–723.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chalmers, B., Dzakpasu, S., Heaman, M., & Kaczorowski, J. (2008). The Canadian maternity experiences survey: An overview of findings. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Canada, 30(3), 217–228.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edmonds, B. T., Mogul, M., & Shea, J. A. (2015). Understanding low-income African American women’s expectations, preferences, and priorities in prenatal care. Family & Community Health, 38(2), 149–157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feijen-de Jong, E. I., Jansen, D. E., Baarveld, F., van der Schans, C. P., Schellevis, F. G., & Reijneveld, S. A. (2011). Determinants of late and/or inadequate use of prenatal healthcare in high-income countries: A systematic review. The European Journal of Public Health, 22(6), 904–913.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gagnon, A. J., & Sandall, J. (2007). Individual or group antenatal education for childbirth or parenthood, or both. The Cochrane Library.

  • Glickman, M. E., Rao, S. R., & Schultz, M. R. (2014). False discovery rate control is a recommended alternative to Bonferroni-type adjustments in health studies. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 67(8), 850–857.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Godin, K. M., Alton, G. D., Gangodawilage, H. P., Procter, T. D., Bourdages, N. B., Blue, S. E., et al. (2015). Knowledge change associated with participation in prenatal education programs in Ontario: A cohort study. Canadian Journal of Public Health. Revue Canadienne de Sante Publique, 106(6), 401–407.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heaman, M. I., Green, C. G., Newburn-Cook, C. V., Elliott, L. J., & Helewa, M. E. (2007). Social inequalities in use of prenatal care in Manitoba. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Canada, 29(10), 806–816.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heaman, M. I., Newburn-Cook, C. V., Green, C. G., Elliott, L. J., & Helewa, M. E. (2008). Inadequate prenatal care and its association with adverse pregnancy outcomes: A comparison of indices. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, 8(1), 15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heaman, M. I., Sword, W., Elliott, L., Moffatt, M., Helewa, M. E., Morris, H., et al. (2015). Perceptions of barriers, facilitators and motivators related to use of prenatal care: A qualitative descriptive study of inner-city women in Winnipeg, Canada. SAGE Open Medicine, 3, 2050312115621314.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heaman, M. I., Sword, W. A., Akhtar-Danesh, N., Bradford, A., Tough, S., Janssen, P. A., et al. (2014). Quality of prenatal care questionnaire: Instrument development and testing. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, 14(1), 188.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heberlein, E. C., Picklesimer, A. H., Billings, D. L., Covington-Kolb, S., Farber, N., & Frongillo, E. (2016). The comparative effects of group prenatal care on psychosocial outcomes. Archives of Women’s Mental Health, 19(2), 259–269.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Homer, C. S., Ryan, C., Leap, N., Foureur, M., Teate, A., & Catling-Paull, C. J. (2012). Group versus conventional antenatal care for women. The Cochrane Library.

  • Ickovics, J. R., Kershaw, T. S., Westdahl, C., Magriples, U., Massey, Z., Reynolds, H., et al. (2007). Group prenatal care and perinatal outcomes: A randomized controlled trial. Obstetrics & Gynecology, 110(2 Pt 1), 330–339. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.AOG.0000275284.24298.23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ickovics, J. R., Reed, E., Magriples, U., Westdahl, C., Rising, S., S., & Kershaw, T. S. (2011). Effects of group prenatal care on psychosocial risk in pregnancy: Results from a randomised controlled trial. Psychol Health, 26(2), 235–250. https://doi.org/10.1080/08870446.2011.531577.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Jafari, F., Eftekhar, H., Mohammad, K., & Fotouhi, A. (2010). Does group prenatal care affect satisfaction and prenatal care utilization in Iranian pregnant women? Iranian Journal of Public Health, 39(2), 52.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Kennedy, H. P., Farrell, T., Paden, R., Hill, S., Jolivet, R. R., Cooper, B. A., & Rising, S. S. (2011). A randomized clinical trial of group prenatal care in two military settings. Military Medicine, 176(10), 1169–1177.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kingston, D., Heaman, M., Chalmers, B., Kaczorowski, J., O’Brien, B., Lee, L., et al. (2011). Comparison of maternity experiences of Canadian-born and recent and non-recent immigrant women: Findings from the Canadian maternity experiences survey. Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology Canada: JOGC, 33(11), 1105–1115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Linard, M., Blondel, B., Estellat, C., Deneux-Tharaux, C., Luton, D., Oury, J., et al. (2018). Association between inadequate antenatal care utilisation and severe perinatal and maternal morbidity: An analysis in the Pre CARE cohort. BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, 125(5), 587–595.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lu, M. C., Prentice, J., Stella, M. Y., Inkelas, M., Lange, L. O., & Halfon, N. (2003). Childbirth education classes: Sociodemographic disparities in attendance and the association of attendance with breastfeeding initiation. Maternal and Child Health Journal, 7(2), 87–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Massey, Z., Rising, S. S., & Ickovics, J. (2006). Centering Pregnancy group prenatal care: Promoting relationship-centered care. Journal of Obstetric, Gynecologic, & Neonatal Nursing, 35(2), 286–294.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mazor, K. M., Clauser, B. E., Field, T., Yood, R. A., & Gurwitz, J. H. (2002). A demonstration of the impact of response bias on the results of patient satisfaction surveys. Health Services Research, 37(5), 1403–1417.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mazul, M. C., Ward, T. C. S., & Ngui, E. M. (2017). Anatomy of good prenatal care: Perspectives of low income African-American women on barriers and facilitators to prenatal care. Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities, 4(1), 79–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McDonald, S. D., Sword, W., Eryuzlu, L. E., & Biringer, A. B. (2014). A qualitative descriptive study of the group prenatal care experience: Perceptions of women with low-risk pregnancies and their midwives. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, 14(1), 334.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McDonald, S. W., Lyon, A. W., Benzies, K. M., McNeil, D. A., Lye, S. J., Dolan, S. M., et al. (2013). The All Our Babies pregnancy cohort: Design, methods, and participant characteristics. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2393-13-s1-s2.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • McNeil, D. A., Vekved, M., Dolan, S. M., Siever, J., Horn, S., & Tough, S. C. (2012). Getting more than they realized they needed: A qualitative study of women’s experience of group prenatal care. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2393-12-17.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • McNeil, D. A., Vekved, M., Dolan, S. M., Siever, J., Horn, S., & Tough, S. C. (2013). A qualitative study of the experience of centering pregnancy group prenatal care for physicians. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, 13(1), S6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nkansah-Amankra, S., Dhawain, A., Hussey, J., & Luchok, K. J. (2010). Maternal social support and neighborhood income inequality as predictors of low birth weight and preterm birth outcome disparities: Analysis of south Carolina pregnancy risk assessment and monitoring system survey, 2000–2003. Maternal & Child Health Journal, 14(5), 774–785. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10995-009-0508-8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Partridge, S., Balayla, J., Holcroft, C. A., & Abenhaim, H. A. (2012). Inadequate prenatal care utilization and risks of infant mortality and poor birth outcome: A retrospective analysis of 28,729,765 US deliveries over 8 years. American Journal of Perinatology, 29(10), 787.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Picklesimer, A. H., Billings, D., Hale, N., Blackhurst, D., & Covington-Kolb, S. (2012). The effect of centering pregnancy group prenatal care on preterm birth in a low-income population. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 206(5), 415.e1–415.e7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rising, S. S. (1998). Centering pregnancy: An interdisciplinary model of empowerment. Journal of Nurse-Midwifery, 43(1), 46–54.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ruiz-Mirazo, E., Lopez-Yarto, M., & McDonald, S. D. (2012). Group prenatal care versus individual prenatal care: A systematic review and meta-analyses. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Canada, 34(3), 223–229.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shakespear, K., Waite, P. J., & Gast, J. (2010). A comparison of health behaviors of women in centering pregnancy and traditional prenatal care. Maternal and Child Health Journal, 14(2), 202–208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada. (1998). Healthy beginnings: Guidelines for care during pregnancy and childbirth. SOGC Clinical Practice Guidelines, 72.

  • StataCorp. (2013). Stata Statistical Software: Release 13. College Station, TX.

  • Tanner-Smith, E. E., Steinka-Fry, K. T., & Lipsey, M. W. (2014). The effects of Centering Pregnancy group prenatal care on gestational age, birth weight, and fetal demise. Maternal and Child Health Journal, 18(4), 801–809.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tough, S. C., Siever, J. E., & Johnston, D. W. (2007). Retaining women in a prenatal care randomized controlled trial in Canada: Implications for program planning. BMC Public Health, 7(148).

  • Wheatley, R. R., Kelley, M. A., Peacock, N., & Delgado, J. (2008). Women’s narratives on quality in prenatal care: A multicultural perspective. Qualitative Health Research, 18(11), 1586–1598.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • White, D. E., Fraser-Lee, N. J., Tough, S., & Newburn-Cook, C. V. (2006). The content of prenatal care and its relationship to preterm birth in Alberta, Canada. Health Care for Women International, 27(9), 777–792.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson-Mitchell, K., & Rummens, J. A. (2013). Perinatal outcomes of uninsured immigrant, refugee and migrant mothers and newborns living in Toronto, Canada. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 10(6), 2198–2213.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • World Health Organization. (2016). WHO recommendations on antenatal care for a positive pregnancy experience. Retrieved from Geneva: http://www.who.int/reproductivehealth/publications/maternal_perinatal_health/anc-positive-pregnancy-experience/en/.

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank all the women who participated in this study, as well as the staff and care providers at the health centers where the study took place. EH receives scholarship support from the Canadian Institutes for Health Research Vanier Scholarship, Alberta Innovates Health Solutions and the University of Calgary. AM is supported by a New Investigator Award from the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR). Funding for this study was provided by Alberta Health. The funders did not have any role in the study design, data collection, data analysis, manuscript preparation and/or publication decision. The interpretation and conclusions contained herein are those of the researchers and do not necessarily represent the views of the Government of Alberta. Neither the Government nor Alberta Health expresses any opinion in relation to this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Erin Hetherington.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hetherington, E., Tough, S., McNeil, D. et al. Vulnerable Women’s Perceptions of Individual Versus Group Prenatal Care: Results of a Cross-Sectional Survey. Matern Child Health J 22, 1632–1638 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10995-018-2559-1

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10995-018-2559-1

Keywords

Navigation