Skip to main content
Log in

Part C Early Intervention Enrollment in Low Birth Weight Infants At-Risk for Developmental Delays

  • Published:
Maternal and Child Health Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objectives To investigate enrollment patterns in Part C Early Intervention (EI) for low birth weight (LBW) infants (≤2500 g). A secondary aim is to characterize LBW infants that are not enrolled in EI, but would qualify by meeting criteria for a condition associated with a “high-probability” for developmental delays (i.e., Intraventricular Hemorrhage grade III or higher, Apgar score of ≤5 at 5 min, and/or birth weight of ≤1200 g). Methods Data were gathered from 165 LBW infants participating in a high-risk infant follow-up program. Developmental assessment was completed. Basic demographic information and data regarding enrollment in EI were collected via parent questionnaire. Medical variables were extracted from each infant’s electronic medical record. Results 71.5 % of LBW infants were not enrolled in EI. Factors influencing probability of EI enrollment included birth weight, gestational age, developmental test scores, and insurance status. Of the 107 infants living in Oregon who were not enrolled in EI, 42.1 % would qualify for services due to an early medical condition identified in Oregon as a condition associated with a “high-probability” for developmental delays. Conclusions Less than one third of LBW infants were enrolled in EI by their first visit to a high-risk infant follow-up program. Those infants demonstrating developmental delays and public insurance were more likely to be enrolled. The majority of infants who have readily identifiable medical risk factors that qualify them for EI were not enrolled. This study was limited by the constraints implicated by using a clinical sample.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bailey, D. B., Hebbeler, K., Scarborough, A., Spiker, A., Mallik, S., & Nelson, L. (2005). Thirty-six-month outcomes for families of children who have disabilities and participated in early intervention. Pediatrics, 116(6), 1346–1352.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ballantyne, M., Stevens, B., Guttman, A., Willan, A. R., & Rosenbaum, P. (2013). Maternal and infant predictors of attendance at neonatal follow-up programmes. Child: Care, Health and Development, 40(2), 250–258.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barfield, W. D., Clements, K. M., Lee, K. G., Kotelchuck, M., Wilber, N., & Wise, P. H. (2008). Using linked data to assess patterns of early intervention (EI) referral among very low birth weight infants. Maternal and Child Health Journal, 12(1), 24–33. doi:10.1007/s10995-007-0227-y.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Barre, N., Morgan, A., Doyle, L. W., & Anderson, P. J. (2011). Language abilities in children who were very preterm and/or very low birth weight: A meta-analysis. Journal of Pediatrics, 158(5), 766–774. doi:10.1016/j.jpeds.2010.10.032.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bayley, N. (2005). Bayley scales of infant and toddler development-third edition. San Antonio: The Psychological Corporation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blasco, P., & Saxton, S. (2009). Examining developmental/behavioral ability in infants and toddlers born premature and low-birth-weight (LBW). Portland: IRB approved database. Oregon Health & Science University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blasco, P., Spiker, D., & Hebbler, K. (2012). Are we missing a vulnerable group of young children in early intervention? Panel session on low birth weight infants at the conference on research innovations in early intervention (CRIEI), San Diego, CA.

  • De Schuymer, L., De Groote, I., Beyers, W., Striano, T., & Roeyers, H. (2011). Preverbal skills as mediators for language outcome in preterm and full term children. Early Human Development, 87(4), 265–272. doi:10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2011.01.029.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Duvall, S. W., Erickson, S. J., MacLean, P., & Lowe, J. R. (2015). Perinatal medical variables predict executive function within a sample of preschoolers born very low birth weight. Journal of Child Neurology, 30(6), 735–740. doi:10.1177/0883073814542945.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Foster-Cohen, S., Edgin, J. O., Champion, P. R., & Woodward, L. J. (2007). Early delayed language development in very preterm infants: Evidence from the MacArthur-bates CDI. Journal of Child Language, 34(3), 655–675. doi:10.1017/S0305000907008070.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gross, R. T., Spiker, D., & Haynes, C. W. (Eds.). (1997). Helping low birth weight, premature babies: The infant health and development program. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guarini, A., Sansavini, A., Fabbri, C., Alessandroni, R., Faldella, G., & Karmiloff-Smith, A. (2009). Reconsidering the impact of preterm birth on language outcome. Early Human Development, 85(10), 639–645. doi:10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2009.08.061.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Guralnick, M. J. (Ed.). (1997). The effectiveness of early intervention. Baltimore: Paul Brookes Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton, B. E., Martin, J. A., Osterman, M. J. K., Curtin, S. C., & Mathews, T. J. (2015). Births: Final data for 2015. National vital statistics reports (No. 12). Hyattsville, MD: National Center for Health Statistics.

  • Hebbeler, K., Spiker, D., Scarborough, A., Mallik, S., Simeonsson, R., Singer, M., et al. (2007). National early intervention longitudinal study (NEILS) final report. Menlo Park: SRI Publication.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill, J. L., Brooks-Gunn, J., & Waldfogel, J. (2003). Sustained effects of high participation in an early intervention for low-birth-weight premature infants. Developmental Psychology, 39(4), 730–744. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.39.4.730.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hutchinson, E. A., De Luca, C. R., Doyle, L. W., Roberts, G., & Anderson, P. J. (2013). School-age outcomes of extremely preterm or extremely low birth weight children. Pediatrics, 131(4), 1053–1061. doi:10.1542/peds.2012-2311.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jimenez, M. E., Barg, F. K., Guevara, J. P., Gerdes, M., & Fiks, A. G. (2012). Barriers to evaluation for early intervention services: Parent and early intervention employee perspectives. Academic Pediatrics, 12(6), 551–557. doi:10.1016/j.acap.2012.08.006.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Litt, J. S., & Perrin, J. M. (2014). Influence of clinical and sociodemographic characteristics on early intervention enrollment after NICU discharge. Journal of Early Intervention, 36(1), 37–48. doi:10.1177/1053815114555575.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Little, A. A., Kamholz, K., Corwin, B. K., Barrero-Castillero, A., & Wang, C. J. (2015). Understanding barriers to early intervention services for preterm infants: Lessons from two states. Academic Pediatrics, 15(4), 430–438. doi:10.1016/j.acap.2014.12.006.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • McCarton, C., Brooks-Gunn, J., Wallace, I., Bauer, C., Bennett, F., Bernbaum, J., et al. (1997). Results at 8 years of intervention for low birthweight premature infants: The infant health and development program. Journal of the American Medical Association, 227, 126–132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCormick, M. C., McCarton, C., Brooks-Gunn, J., Belt, P., & Gross, R. T. (1998). The infant health and development program: Interim summary. Journal of Developmental and Behavioral Pediatrics, 19, 359–370.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Oregon administrative rules, chapter 166, division 500, rule 0020 is cited as OAR 166-500-0020. http://Sos.oregon.gov/archives/pages/about_rules.aspx. Accessed 5 July 2015.

  • Rosenberg, S. A., Robinson, C. C., Shaw, E. F., & Ellison, M. C. (2013). Part C early intervention for infants and toddlers: Percentage eligible versus served. Pediatrics, 131(1), 38–46. doi:10.1542/peds.2012-1662.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Shackelford, J. (2006). State and jurisdictional eligibility definitions for infants and toddlers with disabilities under IDEA (NECTAC notes no. 21). Chapel Hill: The University of North Carolina, FPG Child Development Institute, National Early Childhood Technical Assistance Center.

  • Tang, B. G., Feldman, H. M., Huffman, L. C., Kagawa, K. J., & Gould, J. B. (2012). Missed opportunities in the referral of high-risk infants to early intervention. Pediatrics, 129(6), 1027–1034. doi:10.1542/peds.2011-2720.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, C. J., Elliott, M. N., Rogowski, J., Lim, N., Ratner, J. A., & Schuster, M. A. (2009). Factors influencing the enrollment of eligible extremely-low-birth-weight children in the part C early intervention program. Academic Pediatrics, 9(4), 283–287. doi:10.1016/j.acap.2009.04.001.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, M. E., Perrigo, J. L., Banda, T. Y., Matic, T., & Goldfarb, F. D. (2013). Barriers to accessing services for young children. Journal of Early Intervention, 35(1), 61–74. doi:10.1177/1053815113507111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kristi L. Atkins.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Atkins, K.L., Duvall, S.W., Dolata, J.K. et al. Part C Early Intervention Enrollment in Low Birth Weight Infants At-Risk for Developmental Delays. Matern Child Health J 21, 290–296 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10995-016-2113-y

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10995-016-2113-y

Keywords

Navigation