Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

The Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale: Screening Tool for Postpartum Anxiety as Well? Findings from a Confirmatory Factor Analysis of the Hebrew Version

  • Published:
Maternal and Child Health Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objectives The Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) was originally created as a uni-dimensional scale to screen for postpartum depression (PPD); however, evidence from various studies suggests that it is a multi-dimensional scale measuring mainly anxiety in addition to depression. The factor structure of the EPDS seems to differ across various language translations, raising questions regarding its stability. This study examined the factor structure of the Hebrew version of the EPDS to assess whether it is uni- or multi-dimensional. Methods Seven hundred and fifteen (n = 715) women were screened at 6 weeks postpartum using the Hebrew version of the EPDS. Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) was used to test four models derived from the literature. Results Of the four CFA models tested, a 9-item two factor model fit the data best, with one factor representing an underlying depression construct and the other representing an underlying anxiety construct. Conclusions for Practice The Hebrew version of the EPDS appears to consist of depression and anxiety sub-scales. Given the widespread PPD screening initiatives, anxiety symptoms should be addressed in addition to depressive symptoms, and a short scale, such as the EPDS, assessing both may be efficient.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. These centers provide all vaccination and well child visits from birth to 6 years old.

References

  1. Adouard, F., Glangeaud-Freudenthal, N. M. C., & Golse, B. (2005). Validation of the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) in a sample of women with high-risk pregnancies in France. Archives of Womens Mental Health, 8, 89–95.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Andajani-Sutjahjo, S., Manderson, L., & Astbury, J. (2007). Complex emotions, complex problems: Understanding the experiences of perinatal depression among new mothers in urban Indonesia. Culture, Medicine and Psychiatry, 31, 101–122.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Andrews Horowitz, J., & Cousins, A. (2006). Postpartum depression treatment rates for at-risk women. Nursing Research, 55(2S), s23–s27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Berle, J. O., Aarre, T. F., Mykletun, A., Dahl, A. A., & Holsten, F. (2003). Screening for postnatal depression: Validation of the Norwegian version of the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale, and assessment of risk factors for postnatal depression. Journal of Affective Disorders, 76, 151–156.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Brockington, I. F., Macdonald, E., & Wainscott, G. (2006). Anxiety, obsessions and morbid preoccupations in pregnancy and the puerperium. Archives of Womens Mental Health, 9, 253–263.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Brouwers, E. P. M., Van Baar, A. L., & Pop, V. J. M. (2001). Does the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale measure anxiety? Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 51, 659–663.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Brown, T. A. (2015). Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research (2nd ed.). New York: The Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Byrne, B. M. (2012). Structural equation modeling with Mplus. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Chabrol, H., & Teissedre, F. (2004). Relation between Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale scores at 2–3 days and 4–6 weeks postpartum. Journal of Reproductive and Infant Psychology, 22(1), 33–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Cox, J. L., & Holden, J. (2003). Perinatal mental health: A guide to the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale. London: Gaskell.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Cox, J. L., Holden, J. M., & Sagovsky, R. (1987). Detection of postnatal depression: Development of the 10-item Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale. British Journal of Psychiatry, 150, 782–786.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. DeVaus, D. (2002). Analyzing social science data: 50 key problems in data analysis. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Earls, M. F. (2010). Incorporating recognition and management of perinatal and postpartum depression into pediatric practice. Pediatrics, 126, 1032.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Farr, S. L., Dietz, P. M., O’Hara, M. W., Burley, K., & Ko, J. Y. (2014). Postpartum anxiety and comorbid depression in a population-based sample of women. Journal of Women’s Health, 23(2), 120–128.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Gibson, J., McKenzie-McHarg, K., Shakespeare, J., Price, J., & Gray, R. (2009). A systematic review of studies validating the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale in antepartum and postpartum women. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, 119(5), 350–364.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Glasser, S., & Barell, V. (1999). Depression scale for research in and identification of postpartum depression. Harefuah, 136, 764–768. [Hebrew].

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Guedeney, N., & Fermanian, J. (1998). Validation study of the French version of the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS): New results about use and psychometric properties. European Psychiatry, 13, 83–89.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Ip, W. Y., & Martin, C. R. (2007). The factor structure of the Chinese version of the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS). Journal of Reproductive and Infant Psychology, 25, 83–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Jomeen, J., & Martin, C. R. (2005). Confirmation of an occluded anxiety component within the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) during early pregnancy. Journal of Reproductive and Infant Psychology, 23, 143–154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Jomeen, J., & Martin, C. R. (2007). Replicability and stability of the multidimensional model of the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale in late pregnancy. Journal of Psychiatric and Mental Health Nursing, 14, 319–324.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Kandel-Katznelson S, Maisel S, Zilber N, Lerner J. (2000) Validation of the Hebrew translation of the Edinburgh postnatal depression scale: Background, methods and findings. Tenth Annual Conference of the Israeli Psychiatric Association, Jerusalem, Israel [Hebrew].

  22. Kline, R. B. (2011). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (3rd ed.). New York: The Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Lee King, P. A. (2012). Replicability of structural models of the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) in a community sample of postpartum African American women with low socioeconomic status. Archives of Womens Mental Health, 15, 77–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Matthey, S. (2008). Using the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale to screen for anxiety disorders. Depression and Anxiety, 25, 926–931.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Matthey, S., Fisher, J., & Rowe, H. (2013). Using the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale to screen for anxiety disorders: Conceptual and methodological considerations. Journal of Affective Disorders, 146, 224–230.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Montazeri, A., Torkan, B., & Omidvari, S. (2007). The Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS): Translation and validation study of the Iranian version. BMC Psychiatry, 7, 11.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Phillips, J., Charles, M., Sharpe, L., & Matthey, S. (2009). Validation of the subscales of the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale in a sample of women with unsettled infants. Journal of Affective Disorders, 118, 101–112.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Pop, V. J., Komproe, I. H., & Van Son, M. J. (1992). Characteristics of the Edinburgh Post Natal Depression Scale in the Netherlands. Journal of Affective Disorders, 26, 105–110.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Reck, C., Müller, M., Tietz, A., & Möhler, E. (2013). Infant distress to novelty is associated with maternal anxiety disorder and especially with maternal avoidance behavior. Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 27, 404–412.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Reichenheim, M. E., Moraes, C. L., Oliveira, A. S. D., & Lobato, G. (2011). Revisiting the dimensional structure of the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS): Empirical evidence for a general factor. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 11, 93.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Ross, L. E., Gilbert Evans, S. E., Sellers, E. M., & Romach, M. K. (2003). Measurement issues in postpartum depression part 1: Anxiety as a feature of postpartum depression. Archives of Womens Mental Health, 6, 51–57.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Rowe, H. J., Fisher, J. R. W., & Loh, W. M. (2008). The Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale detects but does not distinguish anxiety disorders from depression in mothers of infants. Archives of Womens Mental Health, 11, 103–108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Sijtsma, K. (2009). On the use, the misuse, and the very limited usefulness of Cronbach’s alpha. Psychometrika, 74, 107–120.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Small, R., Lumley, J., Yelland, J., & Brown, S. (2007). The performance of the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale in English speaking and non-English speaking populations in Australia. Social Psychiatry Psychiatric Epidemiology, 42, 70–78.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Swalm, D., Brooks, J., Doherty, D., Nathan, E., & Jacques, A. (2010). Using the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale to screen for perinatal anxiety. Archives of Womens Mental Health, 13, 515–522.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2007). Using multivariate statistics (5th ed.). New York, NY: Pearson.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Tuohy, A., & McVey, C. (2008). Subscales measuring symptoms of non-specific depression, anhedonia, and anxiety in the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale. British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 47, 153–169.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Woolhouse, H., Brown, S., Krastev, A., Perlen, S., & Gunn, J. (2009). Seeking help for anxiety and depression after childbirth: Results of the Maternal Health Study. Archives of Womens Mental Health, 12, 75–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Social Work, Bar Ilan University, 5290002, Ramat Gan, Israel

    Rena Bina

  2. School of Social Work, University of Maryland, 525 W. Redwood St., Baltimore, MD, 21201, USA

    Donna Harrington

Authors
  1. Rena Bina
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Donna Harrington
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rena Bina.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bina, R., Harrington, D. The Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale: Screening Tool for Postpartum Anxiety as Well? Findings from a Confirmatory Factor Analysis of the Hebrew Version. Matern Child Health J 20, 904–914 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10995-015-1879-7

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10995-015-1879-7

Keywords

Search

Navigation