Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Intensive Care Admissions in Pregnancy: Analysis of a Level of Support Scoring System

  • Published:
Maternal and Child Health Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objectives

Development of a validated triaging system that can be used by obstetric providers to identify obstetric patients at risk of developing severe morbidity during an admission is urgently required. Maternal Critical Care Working Group (MCCWG) recommended a “level of care” strategy that based patient acuity needs on number of individual organ systems requiring support. The objective of this study was to apply the MCCWG level of support for critical care (MCCWG LOC) scoring to pregnant women admitted to an intensive care unit (ICU) to predict maternal outcomes and to compare it to the Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II scoring system.

Methods

In this retrospective study, we applied the MCCWG LOC scoring to pregnant women admitted to an ICU at the Detroit Medical Center, between January 2006 and December 2010. The MCCWG LOC was scored on admission to the ICU, and patients were subsequently divided into two groups (Group 1, patients requiring Level 1 and 2 support and Group 2, patients requiring level 3a and 3b support) and their outcome variables were compared. The MCCWG LOC scores were also compared to APACHE II scoring, an ICU scoring system, to test if an alignment of the two systems existed, and if they were able to predict outcomes such as death, hospital and intensive care stay.

Results

Sixty-nine pregnant women (0.25 % of deliveries) required admission to the ICU and 3 maternal deaths were reported. Sixty-four (92.7 %) patients had pre-existing medical problems. Fifty-eight (84 %) of admissions were secondary to a medical diagnosis. Mean APACHE II score (p < 0.018) and APACHE II predicted mortality rate were significantly higher in Group 2 (p < 0.018). The hospital length of stay (LOS) (p < 0.017) and ICU LOS (p < 0.0001) were significantly longer in Group 2 as compared to Group 1. Group 2 patients required more interventions while in the ICU (p < 0.0001). All the patients who died were classified as Group 2.

Conclusions for Practice

In a cohort of women requiring intensive care admission during pregnancy, MCCWG LOC, a simplified organ system based, triaging scoring system, predicted maternal outcomes and correlated with APACHE II score. Our data support initiatives for further development and testing of global obstetric triaging scoring systems for the purposes of risk stratification, monitoring of quality and resource allocation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. D’Alton, M. E. (2010). Where is the “M” in maternal-fetal medicine? Obstetrics and Gynecology, 116(6), 1401–1404. doi:10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181fd2556

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Hogan, M. C., Foreman, K. J., Naghavi, M., Ahn, S. Y., Wang, M., Makela, S. M., et al. (2010). Maternal mortality for 181 countries, 1980–2008: A systematic analysis of progress towards Millennium Development Goal 5. Lancet, 375(9726), 1609–1623. doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(10)60518-1

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Paxton, A., & Wardlaw, T. (2011). Are we making progress in maternal mortality? The New England Journal of Medicine, 364(21), 1990–1993. doi:10.1056/NEJMp1012860

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Callaghan, W. M., Creanga, A. A., & Kuklina, E. V. (2012). Severe maternal morbidity among delivery and postpartum hospitalizations in the United States. Obstetrics and Gynecology, 120(5), 1029–1036. doi:10.1097/AOG.0b013e31826d60c5

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Zeeman, G. G. (2006). Obstetric critical care: A blueprint for improved outcomes. Critical Care Medicine, 34(9 Suppl), S208–S214. doi:10.1097/01.ccm.0000231884.99763.69

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations, USA. (2010). Preventing maternal death. Sentinel Event Alert, (44):1–4.

  7. (2015). Obstetric care consensus no. 2: Levels of maternal care. Obstetrics and Gynecology, 125(2):502–515. doi:10.1097/01.AOG.0000460770.99574.9f

  8. Cantwell, R., Clutton-Brock, T., Cooper, G., Dawson, A., Drife, J., Garrod, D., et al. (2011). Saving mothers’ lives: Reviewing maternal deaths to make motherhood safer: 2006–2008. The Eighth Report of the Confidential Enquiries into Maternal Deaths in the United Kingdom. BJOG, 118(Suppl 1), 1–203. doi:10.1111/j.1471-0528.2010.02847.x

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Carle, C., Alexander, P., Columb, M., & Johal, J. (2013). Design and internal validation of an obstetric early warning score: Secondary analysis of the Intensive Care National Audit and Research Centre Case Mix Programme database. Anaesthesia, 68(4), 354–367. doi:10.1111/anae.12180

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Lewis, G. (ed) (2007). The Confidential Enquiry into Maternal and Child Health (CEMACH). Saving mothers’ lives: Reviewing maternal deaths to make motherhood safer—2003–2005. The Seventh Report on Confidential Enquiries into Maternal Deaths in the United Kingdom. London: CEMACH.

  11. Maternal Critical Care Working Group. (2011). Providing equity of critical and maternity care for the critically ill pregnant or recently pregnant woman. London Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. http://www.rcog.org.uk/files/rcog-corp/Prov_Eq_MatandCritCare.pdf. Accessed December 31, 2014 (2011).

  12. Pattinson, R. C., & Hall, M. (2003). Near misses: A useful adjunct to maternal death enquiries. British Medical Bulletin, 67, 231–243.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Knaus, W. A., Draper, E. A., Wagner, D. P., & Zimmerman, J. E. (1985). APACHE II: A severity of disease classification system. Critical Care Medicine, 13(10), 818–829.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. el-Solh, A. A., & Grant, B. J. (1996). A comparison of severity of illness scoring systems for critically ill obstetric patients. Chest, 110(5), 1299–1304.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Hazelgrove, J. F., Price, C., Pappachan, V. J., & Smith, G. B. (2001). Multicenter study of obstetric admissions to 14 intensive care units in southern England. Critical Care Medicine, 29(4), 770–775.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Gilbert, T. T., Smulian, J. C., Martin, A. A., Ananth, C. V., Scorza, W., & Scardella, A. T. (2003). Obstetric admissions to the intensive care unit: Outcomes and severity of illness. Obstetrics and Gynecology, 102(5 Pt 1), 897–903.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Rojas-Suarez, J., Paternina-Caicedo, A. J., Miranda, J., Mendoza, R., Duenas-Castel, C., & Bourjeily, G. (2014). Comparison of severity-of-illness scores in critically ill obstetric patients: A 6-year retrospective cohort. Critical Care Medicine, 42(5), 1047–1054. doi:10.1097/ccm.0000000000000124

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Pattinson, R., Say, L., Souza, J. P., Broek, N., & Rooney, C. (2009). WHO maternal death and near-miss classifications. Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 87(10), 734.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Souza, J. P., Cecatti, J. G., Haddad, S. M., Parpinelli, M. A., Costa, M. L., Katz, L., & Say, L. (2012). The WHO maternal near-miss approach and the maternal severity index model (MSI): Tools for assessing the management of severe maternal morbidity. PLoS ONE, 7(8), e44129. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0044129

    Article  PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Muench, M. V., Baschat, A. A., Malinow, A. M., & Mighty, H. E. (2008). Analysis of disease in the obstetric intensive care unit at a university referral center: A 24-month review of prospective data. The Journal of Reproductive Medicine, 53(12), 914–920.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Vasquez, D. N., Estenssoro, E., Canales, H. S., Reina, R., Saenz, M. G., Das Neves, A. V., et al. (2007). Clinical characteristics and outcomes of obstetric patients requiring ICU admission. Chest, 131(3), 718–724. doi:10.1378/chest.06-2388

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 100. (2009). Critical care in pregnancy. Obstetrics and Gynecology, 113(2), 443–450. doi:10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181993087

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Pollock, W., Rose, L., & Dennis, C. L. (2010). Pregnant and postpartum admissions to the intensive care unit: A systematic review. Intensive Care Medicine, 36(9), 1465–1474. doi:10.1007/s00134-010-1951-0

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Zwart, J. J., Dupuis, J. R., Richters, A., Ory, F., & van Roosmalen, J. (2010). Obstetric intensive care unit admission: A 2-year nationwide population-based cohort study. Intensive Care Medicine, 36(2), 256–263. doi:10.1007/s00134-009-1707-x

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Wanderer, J. P., Leffert, L. R., Mhyre, J. M., Kuklina, E. V., Callaghan, W. M., & Bateman, B. T. (2013). Epidemiology of obstetric-related ICU admissions in Maryland: 1999–2008*. Critical Care Medicine, 41(8), 1844–1852. doi:10.1097/CCM.0b013e31828a3e24

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Al-Suleiman, S. A., Qutub, H. O., Rahman, J., & Rahman, M. S. (2006). Obstetric admissions to the intensive care unit: A 12-year review. Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics, 274(1), 4–8. doi:10.1007/s00404-004-0721-z

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Panchal, S., Arria, A. M., & Harris, A. P. (2000). Intensive care utilization during hospital admission for delivery: Prevalence, risk factors, and outcomes in a statewide population. Anesthesiology, 92(6), 1537–1544.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Orsini, J., Butala, A., Diaz, L., Muzylo, E., Mainardi, C., & Kastell, P. (2012). Clinical profile of obstetric patients admitted to the medical-surgical intensive care unit (MSICU) of an inner-city hospital in New York. Journal of Clinical Medicine Research, 4(5), 314–317. doi:10.4021/jocmr1079w

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Kilpatrick, S. J., & Matthay, M. A. (1992). Obstetric patients requiring critical care. A five-year review. Chest, 101(5), 1407–1412.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Porreco, R. P., & Barkey, R. (2010). Peripartum intensive care. The Journal of Maternal-Fetal & Neonatal Medicine, 23(10), 1136–1138. doi:10.3109/14767058.2010.490890

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Monaco, T. J, Jr, Spielman, F. J., & Katz, V. L. (1993). Pregnant patients in the intensive care unit: A descriptive analysis. Southern Medical Journal, 86(4), 414–417.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Madan, I., Puri, I., Jain, N. J., Grotegut, C., Nelson, D., & Dandolu, V. (2009). Characteristics of obstetric intensive care unit admissions in New Jersey. The Journal of Maternal-Fetal & Neonatal Medicine, 22(9), 785–790. doi:10.3109/14767050902874097

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Division of Genetic and Metabolic Disorders, Department of Pediatrics and Center for Molecular Medicine and Genetics, Wayne State University/Detroit Medical Center, Detroit, MI, 48201, USA

    Mili Thakur

  2. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Wayne State University/Detroit Medical Center, Detroit, MI, USA

    Mili Thakur, Bernard Gonik, Navleen Gill, Awoniyi O. Awonuga, Frederico G. Rocha & Juan M. Gonzalez

  3. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA

    Juan M. Gonzalez

Authors
  1. Mili Thakur
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Bernard Gonik
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Navleen Gill
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Awoniyi O. Awonuga
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Frederico G. Rocha
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Juan M. Gonzalez
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mili Thakur.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors report no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Thakur, M., Gonik, B., Gill, N. et al. Intensive Care Admissions in Pregnancy: Analysis of a Level of Support Scoring System. Matern Child Health J 20, 106–113 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10995-015-1808-9

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10995-015-1808-9

Keywords

Search

Navigation