Abstract
A simple, bivalent semantics is defined for Łukasiewicz’s 4-valued modal logic Łm4. It is shown that according to this semantics, the essential presupposition underlying Łm4 is the following: A is a theorem iff A is true conforming to both the reductionist (rt) and possibilist (pt) theses defined as follows: rt: the value (in a bivalent sense) of modal formulas is equivalent to the value of their respective argument (that is, ‘ A is necessary’ is true (false) iff A is true (false), etc.); pt: everything is possible. This presupposition highlights and explains all oddities arising in Łm4.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Anderson, A.R., & Belnap, N.D. Jr. (1975). Entailment. The Logic of Relevance and Necessity, vol. I: Princeton University Press.
Carnielli, W. (Manuscript). Many-valued models (available at http://www.unilog-org/many-valued.pdf, pp. 1–36.
Church, A. (1956). Introduction to Mathematical Logic. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Dugundji, J. (1940). Note on a property of matrices for Lewis and Langford’s calculi of propositions. Journal of Symbolic Logic, 5(4), 150–151.
Font, J.M., & Hajek, P. (2002). On Łukasiewicz four-valued modal logic. Studia Logica, 70(2), 157–182.
González, C. (2012). MaTest, available at http://ceguel.es/matest. (Last access 08/02/2015).
Hughes, G.E., & Creswell, M.J. (1968). Introduction to modal logic. London: Methuen.
Lemmon, E.J. (1966). Algebraic semantics for modal logics I. The Journal of Symbolic Logic, 31(1), 46–65.
Lemmon, E.J. (1966). Algebraic semantics for modal logics II. The Journal of Symbolic Logic, 31(2), 191–218.
Lewis, C.I., & Langdord, C.H. (1932). Symbolic Logic, New York: Century Company. Reprinted, New York: Dover Publications, 2nd edition, 1959, with a new Appendix III (Final Note on System S2) by Lewis.
Łukasiewicz, J. (1951). Aristotle’s syllogistic from the standpoint of modern formal logic. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Łukasiewicz, J (1953). A system of modal logic. The Journal of Computing Systems, 1, 111–149.
Mendelson, E. (1964). Introduction to mathematical logic, 5th edn: Chapman and Hall/CRC.
Méndez, J.M., & Robles, G. (In preparation). A strong and rich 4-valued modal logic without Łukasiewicz-type paradoxes.
Mortensen, C. (1989). Anything is possible. Erkenntnis, 30, 319–337.
Mortensen, C. (2005). It isn’t so, but could it be? Logique et Analyse, 48(189–192), 351–360.
Smiley, T.J. (1961). On Łukasiewicz’s Ł-modal system. Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic, 2, 149–153.
Tkaczyk, M. (2011). On axiomatization of Łukasiewicz’s four-valued modal logic. Logic and Logical Philosophy, 20(3), 215–232.
Acknowledgments
Work supported by research project FFI2011-28494, financed by the Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness. -G. Robles is supported by Program Ramón y Cajal of the Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness. -We sincerely thank the referees of the JPL for their comments and suggestions on a previous draft of this paper.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Méndez, J.M., Robles, G. & Salto, F. An Interpretation of Łukasiewicz’s 4-Valued Modal Logic. J Philos Logic 45, 73–87 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10992-015-9362-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10992-015-9362-x