Abstract
Context
Urban forest soils represent significant reservoirs of biodiversity in cities. Retaining this diversity under urban land-use change requires understanding on how species richness, community assembly and uniqueness of species assemblages are related to local forest characteristics and surrounding landscape structure.
Objectives
Our aim was to assess the significance and relative importance of logging history, tree species composition and urbanization in shaping soil microbial communities across urban spruce-dominated forest landscapes. We investigated responses of microbial diversity from three complementary viewpoints: local diversity, community assembly patterns and community uniqueness.
Methods
We collected soil bacterial and fungal metabarcoding data from 73 spruce-dominated forest sites distributed in three urban centers across southern Finland. We related these data to measurements of logging intensity, tree species composition and degree of urbanization.
Results
Logging intensity, tree species composition and urbanization affected site-scale microbial diversity, but the effects varied between microbial groups. Only logging intensity had a significant imprint on microbial assembly, and this effect was restricted to bacteria. Relative uniqueness of microbial assemblages at the landscape-scale was coupled with the uniqueness of tree species composition in all microbial groups, and further affected by tree diversity in saprotrophic fungi and urbanization in ectomycorrhizal fungi.
Conclusions
In the context of urban spruce-dominated forests, locally diverse tree stands are not necessarily the same as those that contribute the most to landscape-scale diversity. Identifying and preserving contrasting tree stand structures, which support distinctive soil microbial assemblages, may be the winning strategy in maintaining a wide range of soil microbial diversity.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Preservation of Earth’s biodiversity cannot rely solely on remote natural reserves. Instead, it needs to be addressed across all land-use, including cities (Oke et al. 2021). Urban forests, representing true forest vegetation retained within and around cities, play a key role in providing habitats for urban wildlife (Alvey 2006). Urban forests are often structurally similar with, and grade into, indigenous forest habitats in the ex-urban landscapes (Hedblom and Söderströn 2008; Korhonen et al. 2020; Pregitzer et al. 2021). Hence, city forests with rare habitat types or exceptionally good habitat quality (Ives et al. 2016; Korhonen et al. 2020, 2021) can contribute to the preservation of threatened biodiversity as parts of larger regional habitat networks.
Species diversity across a habitat patch network can be divided into components consisting of local species richness (alpha-diversity), variation in species communities between sites (beta-diversity), and total cumulative species diversity across the network (gamma-diversity) (Whittaker 1960). Beta-diversity can be further divided into components representing species replacement and species richness difference between sites (Legendre 2014). From the viewpoint of biodiversity conservation, an optimal set of habitat patches is one that captures and maintains gamma-diversity effectively (Socolar et al. 2016). However, true gamma-diversity in a given area is often unknown, and biodiversity conservation planning must rely on available knowledge on alpha and beta-diversity and their drivers. In systems where beta-diversity is dominated by species replacement, patterns of species richness (alpha-diversity) have limited utility in effective biodiversity management planning. Instead, more focus should be put on identifying suites of sites with contrasting species assemblages and characteristics of the environment that predict biotic uniqueness (Heino et al. 2017). In cities, this question becomes relevant when reconciliating between urban development, green area management and biodiversity, e.g., when designating areas to infill development or retention as natural areas, or when deciding on management practices applied in green areas.
Although soils have been estimated to harbor around 59% of all species on Earth, including 90% of fungi (Anthony et al. 2023), soil biodiversity hasn’t received proportional attention in biodiversity conservation efforts (Parker 2010). Previous studies in urban forests have highlighted the importance of surrounding landscape matrix (forest fragmentation and urban development) as a significant determinant of forest soil biodiversity (Malmivaara-Lämsä et al. 2008; Scholier et al. 2023; Tatsumi et al. 2023), but less is known about the role of forest management and tree tree species composition in the urban context.
Earlier studies on management effects on boreal forest soil biota have focused primarily on forestry operations applied in commercial wood production (e.g., Lazaruk et al. 2005; Hartmann et al. 2012; Parladé et al. 2019; Rähn et al. 2023). However, urban forestry generally operates at smaller scales and with lower intensity of logging, mainly aiming to maintain tree regeneration and public safety (Gundersen et al. 2005). Therefore, management effects from soil microbiome studies in production forests can be difficult to extrapolate into urban forests. Furthermore, urban forests tend to be more variable in tree species composition than respective forest types in managed production forest landscapes (Korhonen et al 2020), which can be reflected in soil microbial assemblages though litter and symbiotic host related effects (Prescott and Grayston 2013).
In this study, we set out to investigate how soil microbial communities in urban forest soils relate to three sources of variation: (1) forest logging intensity, (2) tree species composition, and (3) degree of urbanization. More specifically, we asked:
-
What are the effects and relative contributions of logging intensity, tree species composition and urbanization in explaining local diversity and community composition of bacteria and fungi in the forest soil?
-
Can we predict individual sites’ contributions to landscape-level soil microbial diversity based on forest characteristics such as past logging intensity, tree diversity, compositional uniqueness of tree species composition, or the degree of urbanization?
To answer these questions, we sampled 73 urban spruce-dominated forest plots distributed in three urban regions in southern Finland, representing typical variability in management intensity and forest structure. We analyzed microbial diversity and taxonomic composition in soil samples collected at each site with DNA metabarcoding. We then tested the effects of the three focal environmental covariates on microbial community data at different levels or organization: (1) local diversity and other site-level community characteristics, (2) community assembly, i.e., variation in community composition across sites, and (3) community uniqueness, i.e., magnitude of site-specific contributions to microbial taxonomic turnover across sites.
Methods
Study area and sample plots
We collected data from 73 forest plots distributed in three urban centers in southern Finland (Fig. 1): Helsinki region (45 sites in cities of Helsinki, Espoo and Vantaa; 1 581 residents per km2), Lahti (8 sites, 261 residents per km2), and Tampere (20 sites, 473 residents per km2) (StatFin 2022). We targeted Norway spruce (Picea abies L. H. Karst.) dominated city-owned forests situated within inner urban, outer urban or peri-urban zones around the urban centers (Helminen et al. 2020) with bilberry (Vaccinium myrtillus L.) as the dominant field layer shrub species. To achieve a sample of sites representing typical management intensities in urban forests, we consulted cities’ forest databases to locate forest stands with prior records of partial or selective cuttings, as well as sites that were known to be unmanaged. In addition, we included sites with no prior information available regarding management history. Logging intensity was quantified later during field sampling based on quantities of cut stumps. All sites were on mineral soils 10–160 m above sea level, with mean annual temperature 4.9–6.3 °C and rainfall 600–650 mm. Canopy tree layer consisted of mature (≥ 60 year old) spruce alone or mixed with other tree species. Basal area of living trees varied between 17.5 and 48.3 m2/ha (mean 32.7), and the share of Norway spruce was on average 77%.
Sample plots consisted of four interconnected 20 × 20 m squares that were placed inside forest stands (Appendix A). We avoided large continuous canopy openings that were larger than a few trees wide as well as heavily trampled areas with worn understorey vegetation.
Forest stand characteristics and urbanization
We measured all living trees ≥ 5 cm at breast height (1.3 m), all cut tree stumps with diameter ≥ 10 cm at cut surface, and their decay class (1 to 5, from least to most decayed; Renvall 1995) within the study plots.
To quantify management intensity in forest sites, we reduced the logging history data into two main gradients by running a principal component analysis on square root transformed basal areas of cut stumps and extracting site scores for the two first principal components (Appendix B). The first component axis (Logging_recent) reflected the intensity of relatively recent logging (< decadal timescale), while the second axis (Logging_old) mostly associated with the oldest signs of logging (> decadal timescale).
To quantify forest tree diversity at each site, we calculated Shannon diversity of tree species (TreeDiv) based on proportional tree basal areas, and the number of ectomycorrhizal tree species (ECM tree richness).
Variability in tree species composition was summarized in two principal component axes calculated from square root transformed basal areas of tree species (Appendix B). The first component axis (Trees_Pinus) was mostly associated with the abundance of pines (Pinus sylvestris), while the second axis (Trees_Betula) was mostly associated with the abundance of birches (Betula pendula and B. pubescens).
The relative uniqueness of tree species composition was quantified by calculating an index of local contribution to beta-diversity (Legendre and De Cáceres 2013). The index (LCBD-Trees) was calculated from a distance matrix (Sørensen dissimilarity) derived from tree composition data (square root transformed basal areas of tree species) using the beta.div.comp and LCBD.comp functions in the adespatial package (v0.3-21; Dray et al. 2023).
We assessed the degree of urbanization around sample plots by calculating the proportion of built land surface within a 200 m radius around sample plot center based on Corine Land Cover 2018 GIS-dataset. Land classes considered as built land included Urban fabric; Industrial, commercial and transport units; Mine, dump and construction sites; and Artificial, non-agricultural vegetated areas.
Soil sampling
Soil sampling was done between May 19th and July 19th 2022. Samples were collected from 16 regularly spaced grid points across each study plot (Appendix A). The minimum distance between two sampling points was 10 m. If the grid point was on a rock, bare mineral soil or path, we moved the sampling point to the nearest suitable spot in the vicinity. Material was collected from each sampling point into one pooled sample per site.
At each point, we collected ca. 0.5 dl of material from the humus layer between the undecomposed litter layer and mineral soil. After removing the undecomposed surface litter and roots, material was extracted with a DNA-sterilized hand shovel down to the boundary between humus layer and mineral soil to a maximum depth of 15 cm. Material was collected into a PE zip lock bag and stored on ice during transport. Within 12 h from collecting, the samples were sieved through 2 mm mesh in the laboratory and stored in – 20 °C until further processing.
Soil chemical analyses
We measured the carbon (C) and nitrogen (N) content of the soil samples from combustion products with an elemental analyzer (Leco TruMac, St. Joseph, US-MI). Soil acidity was quantified by measuring pH from an aqueous solution with 10 ml of soil sample mixed with 50 ml of distilled water.
Ergosterol was measured from soil samples as a biomarker of living fungal biomass following the protocol of Adamczyk et al. (2019). Analyses were done with high-performance liquid chromatography (Waters Arc HPLC, Milford, US-MA). We calculated estimates of ectomycorrhizal and saprotrophic fungal biomasses based on ergosterol content and relative read abundances corresponding to each functional group (i.e., relative read abundance * ergosterol content; Tedersoo et al. 2016).
DNA extraction and sequencing
DNA was extracted from two ca. 200 mg portions of material from each sample. Extractions were done with DNeasy PowerSoil Pro (Qiagen, Hilden, DE) according to the manufacturer’s instructions to a final volume of 100 µl. We combined replicate extractions from the same soil sample before DNA analyses.
For bacterial metabarcoding, V4 region of the 16S rRNA gene was amplified with primers 515F (GTGCCAGCMGCCGCGGTAA) and 806R (GGACTACHVGGGTWTCTAAT). For fungal metabarcoding, the Internal Transcribed Spacer 2 of the nrRNA coding region was amplified with primers ITS3-2024F (GCATCGATGAAGAACGCAGC) and ITS4-2409R (TCCTCCGCTTATTGATATGC). Indexed amplicons were sequenced with Illumina NovaSeq 6000 (paired-end 250 bp) at Novogene Co (Cambridge, GB).
Bioinformatics
Sequence reads were demultiplexed, and index and primer sequences were removed from paired-end reads. We applied vsearch (v2.18.0; Rognes et al. 2016) for further sequence processing. Individual R1 and R2 reads were first quality filtered, and then assembled. Assembled reads were chimera filtered de novo. Remaining reads were clustered into OTUs with 98% similarity threshold. OTUs were taxonomically assigned with 80% confidence cutoff using Naïve Bayesian Classifier trained with bacterial SILVA (v138; Quast et al. 2012; Yilmaz et al. 2014) and fungal UNITE (v9, dynamic, all eucaryotes; Abarenkov et al. 2022) databases in mothur v.1.36.1 (Schloss et al. 2009). Fungal OTUs were further assigned to functional groups according to FungalTraits database (Põlme et al. 2020) based on genus-level taxonomical assignments. OTU tables were finally filtered by discarding bacterial OTUs that had less than 1‰ relative abundance and fungal OTUs that had less 0.1‰ relative abundance in all samples and OTUs that had maximum read counts in negative controls. Taxonomic and functional composition of the bacterial and fungal communities are summarized in Appendix C.
Community data preparation
Data preparation and further analyses of community data were done in R (v4.2.2; R Core Team 2022). We calculated diversity indices and distance matrices for all bacteria, ectomycorrhizal (ECM) fungi (46% of fungal reads) and saprotrophic (SAP) fungi (30% of fungal reads). We considered SAP fungi to include soil, litter, wood and unspecified saprotrophs. We presumed that the occurrence of dung, nectar/tap saprotrophs and sooty molds (< 0.2% of all fungal reads) in forest soil samples was mostly incidental, and thus, we omitted them from the SAP group.
We estimated Shannon diversity with sample read depth of 32k for bacteria, 66k for ECM fungi, and 58k for SAP fungi using the estimateD function in the iNEXT package (v3.0.9; Chao et al. 2014; Hsieh et al. 2022). In each case, the applied read depth corresponded to estimated sample coverage of > 99%.
We calculated Bray–Curtis distance matrices with rarefaction by randomly subsampling OTU datasets with 100 iterations to the read depths listed above using the avgdist function in the vegan package (v2.6-4; Oksanen et al. 2022). OTU read counts were square root transformed before distance calculations to improve ecological signal detection.
To quantify relative uniqueness of bacterial, ECM fungal and SAP fungal communities, we calculated local contributions to beta-diversity indices representing the replacement component of beta-diversity (LCBDrepl) using the beta.div.comp and LCBD.comp functions in the adespatial package. LCBDrepl is an index that measures how exceptional each site is, when compared with the other sites, in terms of taxon replacement (Legendre 2014). We calculated LCBDrepl for bacteria based on the quantitative indices of replacement (Sørensen, Podani family) from the full OTU data. For ECM and SAP fungi, we calculated the LCBDrepl indices based on presence-absence (Jaccard, Podani family) from a reduced dataset focusing on taxa identified to species-level. This was done to avoid conflating fungal taxa with (potentially artefactual) intraspecific sequence variants and other sequence reads with uncertain taxonomic affinity. First, we pooled together OTUs that were assigned to the same species. Then, we assigned the species-level OTUs as present if their relative abundance in relation to the total read count per sample was > 0.1‰. Relationships between the LCBDrepl indices, Shannon diversity and numbers of rare species are reported in Appendix D.
Statistical analyses
Analyses of local microbial diversity, community characteristics and relative uniqueness
We used linear mixed models (LMMs) estimated by the lme function in the nlme package (v3.1–164; Pinheiro et al. 2023) to test the effects of environmental predictors on univariate responses. Firstly, we analyzed local microbial diversity (Shannon diversity of bacteria, ECM fungi and SAP fungi) and other community characteristics including Proteobacteria:Acidobacteriota ratio (see Zhou et al. 2018) and ECM and SAP fungal biomasses (Table 1). Secondly, we analyzed measures of relative community uniqueness for each microbial group (LCBDrepl-Bacteria, LCBDrepl-ECM and LCBDrepl-SAP, Table 1).
For the first set of response variables, we included explanatory variables describing logging intensity (Logging_recent and Logging_old), tree stand composition (Trees_Pinus and Trees_Betula) and urbanization (BuiltLand_200m). To control for variation driven by soil properties, we also included variables describing soil chemistry (CN_ratio and pH). ECM tree richness was included as an additional explanatory variable for ECM fungal diversity. For the second set of response variables (i.e., community uniqueness), we included logging intensity (Logging_recent and Logging_old), tree species diversity (TreeDiv), uniqueness of tree species composition (LCBD-Trees) and urbanization (BuiltLand_200m). Before model estimation, the explanatory variables were centered and scaled to mean = 0 and sd = 1. Region was included as a random factor in all LMMs to account for the geographical clustering of sites at regional level. We checked that all LMMs satisfied assumptions of homogeneity of variances and normality of residuals by inspecting diagnostic plots (Pinheiro and Bates 2000). To avoid problems with multicollinearity, we checked that variance inflation factors for all explanatory variables were < 2 in all LMMs.
Analyses of microbial community assembly
We applied generalized dissimilarity modeling (GDM) based on Bray–Curtis distance matrices (R package gdm v1.5.0–9.1; Fitzpatrick et al. 2022) to test the significance of environmental predictors in explaining bacterial and fungal OTU community composition and to assess their relative importance. We included variables describing logging intensity (Logging_recent and Logging_old), tree stand composition (Trees_Pinus and Trees_Betula), urbanization (BuiltLand_200m), soil chemistry (CN_ratio and pH) and the spatial arrangement of sites (geographic coordinates) as predictors in the models. We assessed predictor importance and statistical significance based on permutational analysis (nPerm = 400).
To further illustrate how microbial diversity was distributed across spatial scales, we applied additive portioning of the total Shannon diversity of microbial communities into components representing mean diversity in individual sites and variability between sites within and between regions. Partitioning was done with the adipart function in the vegan package.
Results
Predictors of local microbial diversity and community characteristics
Forest stands with higher amounts of old logging (Logging_old) had higher local diversity of bacteria and SAP fungi (Table 2). Furthermore, higher amount of old logging was associated with lower Proteobacteria:Acidobacteriota ratio and a marginally significant shift to a higher biomass of ECM fungi and lower biomass of SAP fungi. Intensity of recent logging (Logging_recent) had no significant associations with any of the investigated microbial responses.
Tree species composition influenced microbial diversity and community characteristics along a direction of variation that was mostly associated with the abundance of birches (Trees_Betula). Diversities of bacteria and SAP fungi decreased with increasing abundance of birches, while the biomass of SAP fungi increased. Variation related to the abundance of pines (Trees_Pinus) had no significant associations with any of the microbial responses. Forest stands with higher number of ECM tree species had marginally higher diversity of ECM fungi (Table 2).
Forest stand situated in more urbanized areas (higher BuiltLand_200m) had marginally higher diversity of bacteria but significantly lower diversity of SAP fungi and lower ECM fungal biomass (Table 2).
Predictors of microbial community assembly
Additive partitioning of Shannon diversity indicated that the dominant bacterial and fungal OTU composition was relatively homogeneous across sites, and that regional differences accounted only for a small fraction of the total variability between sites (Fig. 2a). GDMs explained 38.4% of the variation in OTU assembly for bacteria, 13.8% for ECM fungi and 29.0% for SAP fungi. The intensity of old logging was significantly associated with bacterial assembly, while none of the other forest stand characteristics or urbanization predicted variation in bacterial or fungal assembly significantly (Fig. 2b). All microbial groups showed significant spatial signal, indicating that sites that were geographically closer to one another tended to have more similar communities. However, variation in soil chemical properties accounted for the largest proportion of the variance that was explained.
Distribution of microbial diversity and predictors of community assembly. Additive partitioning of Shannon diversity. a represents how much of the total diversity was accounted for by diversity in individual sites (α) and variability (β) within and between regions in each microbial group. Results from the GDMs of microbial OTU assembly. b represent how much of the variation between sites was explained by environmental predictors. Bar widths show variable importance calculated as the percent change in deviance explained between a model fit with and without permuting the variable in question
Predictors of microbial community uniqueness
Taxon turnover accounted for 67.3% of the total beta-diversity for bacteria (calculated from the full OTU dataset), 63.0% for ECM fungi and 62.6% for SAP fungi (calculated from the species-level presence-absence dataset). The magnitude of site-specific contributions to microbial taxonomic turnover across sites, i.e., relative uniqueness of microbial communities (LCBDrepl), was positively associated with the uniqueness of tree species composition in all three microbial groups: bacteria, ECM fungi and SAP fungi (Table 3). Thus, forest sites where tree species composition deviated the most from the total average tended to have the most unique soil microbial assemblages. Furthermore, the uniqueness of ECM fungi was negatively associated with urbanization (Table 3), indicating that ECM fungal assemblages in forest patches surrounded by large proportion of built-up area tended to be less unique than communities in less urbanized areas. Finally, the uniqueness of SAP fungi was negatively associated with tree diversity (Table 3), indicating that stands with relatively high dominance of Norway spruce tended to have more unique SAP fungal assemblages. Logging history did not predict community uniqueness in any of the three microbial groups.
Discussion
Urban forest landscapes are continuously shaped by planned and inadvertent human influence through active forest management and land-use development in the surroundings. In this study, we aimed to show how above-ground forest characteristics and disturbances are reflected in below-ground microbial assemblages as drivers of (1) community diversity and composition, and as determinants of (2) community assembly patterns and (3) community uniqueness across a spruce-dominated forest landscape. Our results show that logging history, tree species composition and urbanization each have predictable effects on soil microbiomes at one or more levels of diversity. However, our analyses also showed that the above-ground predictors had relatively limited power in explaining community assembly at the OTU-level, highlighting the significance of soil quality data in predicting microbial community composition at fine taxonomic levels.
Effective conservation prioritization aiming to preserve maximum species diversity within a habitat network, such as an urban forest landscape, should be based on understanding about which areas provide highest complementarity to the landscape-scale diversity. As biodiversity data covering whole landscapes is usually unavailable, particularly for soil organisms, such prioritization needs to rely on more readily available proxies, e.g., occurrence patterns of easily observable indicator species or forest structural data to point out potential biodiversity or rarity hotspots. Our results show that above-ground forest features such as the proportion of built-up land surrounding the forest, tree diversity within the forest, and the uniqueness of tree species composition have the potential to predict community uniqueness across a forest network. While the degree of urbanization and tree diversity are relatively easy to measure and compare between just two forest stands, comparisons of relative uniqueness of tree species composition require information about how forest structure varies throughout the focal landscape. However, a potentially generalizable implication of our result is that a network of sites with contrasting tree species compositions is likely to capture more soil microbial diversity than respective network with higher local tree species diversity but lower between-site variability in tree species composition (see Heinrichs et al. 2019). In the following sections, we discuss the implications of our findings more specifically in terms of logging disturbance, tree species composition and urbanization in the context of boreal spruce-dominated forest landscapes.
Logging intensity
Earlier studies in boreal Norway spruce dominated stands have shown that harvesting of 30% of tree basal area results in predictable shifts in soil fungal communities within a timeframe of few years (Kim et al. 2021). Based on our observations of cut stumps in early stages of decay (decay classes 1–2), only a few sites in this study had been harvested with comparable intensity in recent years. Paucity of responses to recent logging activity suggests that microbial communities were generally well buffered against acute disturbance effects at the prevailing levels of tree harvesting observed across the plot network.
Although no short-term logging related effects were found, soil microbial communities showed responses to decades old logging activities. We presume that these effects may relate to long-term changes in tree layer following logging disturbance. Stands with higher amounts of old logging tended to have higher basal area of living trees and lower cover of vascular plants in the field layer (see Appendix E), indicating that the effect was potentially mediated by increasing influence of recalcitrant tree (needle) litter and/or dominance of competitive tree-root associated fungi in the soil organic layer. This interpretation is consistent with the observed decrease in Proteobacteria:Acidobacteriota ratio, indicating a shift towards more oligotrophic conditions (Fierer et al. 2007), and the change in fungal biomasses to higher ECM and lower SAP fungal abundance,
Tree species mixture
Our results revealed contrasting responses to tree diversity and deciduous tree admixture among microbial groups. While ECM fungal diversity was marginally higher in stands with higher tree species richness (consistent with, e.g., Kernaghan et al. 2003 and Tedersoo et al. 2016), stands with low tree species diversity (i.e., high relative dominance of spruce) contributed the most to the landscape-scale diversity of SAP fungi. This effect was probably driven primarily by birch admixture, which was also associated with lower site-level diversity of SAP fungi. In the context of spruce-dominated forests, it is likely that deciduous tree admixtures mainly benefit generalist species, whereas specialized spruce forest associated species are more restricted to pure spruce stands (see also Kebrle et al. 2021). Thus, allowing a certain share of the forest area to develop as close to pure spruce stands is probably necessary for maintaining soil microbial diversity at the landscape-scale, despite concerns over the resilience of such forest structures with increasing risks of climate driven forest damages (Venäläinen et al. 2020).
Urbanization
Aside from marginally positive effect on site-level diversity of bacteria, the effects of urbanization on microbial diversity were mainly negative. While SAP fungi decreased in diversity at the stand-scale, urbanization had no apparent role in explaining the uniqueness of SAP fungal assemblages across sites. In contrast, urbanization had no significant effect on ECM fungal diversity at the stand scale but promoted ECM fungal assemblages that were less unique. In growing and densifying cities, further fragmentation of remaining forest areas with built-up land cover may therefore be expected to result in increasingly generic ECM fungal communities, possibly due to the loss of disturbance sensitive forest specialist species.
Data availability
Sequence read data files will be made available under BioProject ID PRJNA1012880 in NCBI sequence read archive. OTU tables, and metadata on OTUs, samples and study sites are deposited in the Dryad Digital Repository https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.h44j0zps5.
References
Abarenkov K, Zirk A, Piirmann T, Pöhönen R, Ivanov F, Nilsson RH, Kõljalg U (2022) UNITE QIIME release for eukaryotes. Version 16.10.2022. Unite Community
Adamczyk B, Sietiö OM, Straková P, Prommer J, Wild B, Hagner M, Pihlatie M, Fritze H, Richter A, Heinonsalo J (2019) Plant roots increase both decomposition and stable organic matter formation in boreal forest soil. Nat Commun 10(1):3982
Alvey AA (2006) Promoting and preserving biodiversity in the urban forest. Urban for Urban Gree 5(4):195–201
Anthony MA, Bender SF, van der Heijden MG (2023) Enumerating soil biodiversity. PNAS 120(33):e2304663120
Chao A, Gotelli NJ, Hsieh TC, Sander EL, Ma KH, Colwell RK, Ellison AM (2014) Rarefaction and extrapolation with Hill numbers: a framework for sampling and estimation in species diversity studies. Ecol Monogr 84(1):45–67
Dray S, Bauman D, Blanchet G, Borcard D, Clappe S, Guénard G, Jombart T, Larocque G, Legendre P, Madi N, Wagner HH (2023) Adespatial: multivariate multiscale spatial analysis. R package version 0.3-21
Fierer N, Bradford MA, Jackson RB (2007) Toward an ecological classification of soil bacteria. Ecology 88(6):1354–1364
Fitzpatrick M, Mokany K, Manion G, Nieto-Lugilde D, Ferrier S (2022). Gdm: generalized dissimilarity modeling. R package version 1.5.0-9.1
Gundersen V, Frivold LH, Löfström I, Jørgensen BB, Falck J, Øyen BH (2005) Urban woodland management–the case of 13 major Nordic cities. Urban for Urban Gree 3(3–4):189–202
Hartmann M, Howes CG, VanInsberghe D, Yu H, Bachar D, Christen R, Henrik Nilsson R, Hallam SJ, Mohn WW (2012) Significant and persistent impact of timber harvesting on soil microbial communities in Northern coniferous forests. ISME J 6(12):2199–2218
Hedblom M, Söderström B (2008) Woodlands across Swedish urban gradients: status, structure and management implications. Landscape Urban Plan 84(1):62–73
Heino J, Bini LM, Andersson J, Bergsten J, Bjelke U, Johansson F (2017) Unravelling the correlates of species richness and ecological uniqueness in a metacommunity of urban pond insects. Ecol Indic 73:422–431
Heinrichs S, Ammer C, Mund M, Boch S, Budde S, Fischer M, Müller J, Schöning I, Schulze ED, Schmidt W, Weckesser M, Schall P (2019) Landscape-scale mixtures of tree species are more effective than stand-scale mixtures for biodiversity of vascular plants, bryophytes and lichens. Forests 10(1):73
Helminen V, Nurmio K, Vesanen S (2020) Kaupunki-maaseutu-alueluokitus 2018 Paikkatietopohjaisen alueluokituksen päivitys [Urban-rural classification 2018]. Suomen ympäristökeskuksen raportteja 21/2020, Finnish Environment Institute (SYKE), ISBN 978-952-11-5172-9 (PDF) [in Finnish with English summary]
Hsieh TC, Ma KH, Chao A (2022) iNEXT: interpolation and extrapolation for species diversity. R package version 3.0.0
Ives CD, Lentini PE, Threlfall CG, Ikin K, Shanahan DF, Garrard GE, Bekessy SA, Fuller RA, Mumaw L, Rayner L, Rowe R (2016) Cities are hotspots for threatened species. Global Ecol Biogeogr 25(1):117–126
Kebrle D, Zasadil P, Hošek J, Barták V, Šťastný K (2021) Large trees as a key factor for bird diversity in spruce-dominated production forests: Implications for conservation management. Forest Ecol Manag 496:119460
Kernaghan G, Widden P, Bergeron Y, Légaré S, Paré D (2003) Biotic and abiotic factors affecting ectomycorrhizal diversity in boreal mixed-woods. Oikos 102(3):497–504
Kim S, Axelsson EP, Girona MM, Senior JK (2021) Continuous-cover forestry maintains soil fungal communities in Norway spruce dominated boreal forests. Forest Ecol Manag 480:118659
Korhonen A, Siitonen J, Kotze DJ, Immonen A, Hamberg L (2020) Stand characteristics and dead wood in urban forests: potential biodiversity hotspots in managed boreal landscapes. Landscape Urban Plan 201:103855
Korhonen A, Penttilä R, Siitonen J, Miettinen O, Immonen A, Hamberg L (2021) Urban forests host rich polypore assemblages in a Nordic metropolitan area. Landscape Urban Plan 215:104222
Lazaruk LW, Kernaghan G, Macdonald SE, Khasa D (2005) Effects of partial cutting on the ectomycorrhizae of Picea glauca forests in northwestern Alberta. Can J Forest Res 35(6):1442–1454
Legendre P (2014) Interpreting the replacement and richness difference components of beta diversity. Global Ecol Biogeogr 23(11):1324–1334
Legendre P, De Cáceres M (2013) Beta diversity as the variance of community data: dissimilarity coefficients and partitioning. Ecol Lett 16(8):951–963
Malmivaara-Lämsä M, Hamberg L, Haapamäki E, Liski J, Kotze DJ, Lehvävirta S, Fritze H (2008) Edge effects and trampling in boreal urban forest fragments–impacts on the soil microbial community. Soil Biol Biochem 40(7):1612–1621
Oke C, Bekessy SA, Frantzeskaki N, Bush J, Fitzsimons JA, Garrard GE, Grenfell M, Harrison L, Hartigan M, Callow D, Cotter B, Gawler S (2021) Cities should respond to the biodiversity extinction crisis. Npj Urban Sustain 1(1):11
Oksanen J, Simpson G, Blanchet F, Kindt R, Legendre P, Minchin P, O'Hara R, Solymos P, Stevens M, Szoecs E, Wagner H, Barbour M, Bedward M, Bolker B, Borcard D, Carvalho G, Chirico M, De Caceres M, Durand S, Evangelista H, FitzJohn R, Friendly M, Furneaux B, Hannigan G, Hill M, Lahti L, McGlinn D, Ouellette M, Ribeiro Cunha E, Smith T, Stier A, Ter Braak C, Weedon J (2022) Vegan: community ecology package. R package version 2.6-4
Parker SS (2010) Buried treasure: soil biodiversity and conservation. Biodivers Conserv 19(13):3743–3756
Parladé J, Queralt M, Pera J, Bonet JA, Castaño C, Martínez-Peña F, Piñol J, Senar MA, De Miguel AM (2019) Temporal dynamics of soil fungal communities after partial and total clear-cutting in a managed Pinus sylvestris stand. Forest Ecol Manag 449:117456
Pinheiro JC, Bates DM (2000) Mixed-effects models in S and S-plus. Springer, Berlin
Pinheiro JC, Bates DM, R Core Team (2023) _nlme: linear and nonlinear mixed effects models. R package version 3.1-164
Põlme S, Abarenkov K, Nilsson RH, Lindahl BD, Clemmensen KE, Kauserud H et al (2020) Fungaltraits: a user-friendly traits database of fungi and fungus-like stramenopiles. Fungal Divers 105:1–16
Pregitzer CC, Charlop-Powers S, Bradford MA (2021) Natural area forests in US cities: opportunities and challenges. J Forest 119(2):141–151
Prescott CE, Grayston SJ (2013) Tree species influence on microbial communities in litter and soil: current knowledge and research needs. Forest Ecol Manag 309:19–27
Quast C, Pruesse E, Yilmaz P, Gerken J, Schweer T, Yarza P, Peplies J, Glöckner FO (2012) The SILVA ribosomal RNA gene database project: improved data processing and web-based tools. Nucleic Acids Res 41(D1):D590–D596
R Core Team (2022) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria
Rähn E, Tedersoo L, Adamson K, Drenkhan T, Sibul I, Lutter R, Anslan S, Pritsch K, Drenkhan R (2023) Rapid shift of soil fungal community compositions after clear-cutting in hemiboreal coniferous forests. Forest Ecol Manag 544:121211
Renvall P (1995) Community structure and dynamics of wood-rotting Basidiomycetes on decomposing conifer trunks. Karstenia 35:1–51
Rognes T, Flouri T, Nichols B, Quince C, Mahé F (2016) VSEARCH: a versatile open source tool for metagenomics. PeerJ 4:e2584
Schloss PD, Westcott SL, Ryabin T, Hall JR, Hartmann M, Hollister EB, Lesniewski RA, Oakley OO, Parks DH, Robinson CJ, Sahl JW, Stres B, Thallinger GG, Van Horn DJ, Weber CF (2009) Introducing mothur: open-source, platform-independent, community-supported software for describing and comparing microbial communities. Appl Environ Microb 75(23):7537–7541
Scholier T, Lavrinienko A, Brila I, Tukalenko E, Hindström R, Vasylenko A, Cayol C, Ecke F, Singh NJ, Forsman TJ, Tolvanen A, Matala J, Huitu O, Kallio ER, Koskela E, Mappes T, Watts PC (2023) Urban forest soils harbour distinct and more diverse communities of bacteria and fungi compared to less disturbed forest soils. Mol Ecol 32(2):504–517
Socolar JB, Gilroy JJ, Kunin WE, Edwards DP (2016) How should beta-diversity inform biodiversity conservation? Trends Ecol Evol 31(1):67–80
StatFin (2022) Preliminary population structure by area, 2022M10*. https://statfin.stat.fi:443/PxWeb/api/v1/en/StatFin/vamuu/statfin_vamuu_pxt_11lj.px Accessed 12 December 2022
Tatsumi C, Atherton KF, Garvey SM, Conrad-Rooney E, Morreale LL, Hutyra LR, Templer PH, Bhatnagar JM (2023) Urbanization and edge effects interact to drive mutualism breakdown and the rise of unstable pathogenic communities in forest soil. PNAS 120(36):e2307519120
Tedersoo L, Bahram M, Cajthaml T, Põlme S, Hiiesalu I, Anslan S, Harend H, Buegger F, Pritsch K, Koricheva J, Abarenkov K (2016) Tree diversity and species identity effects on soil fungi, protists and animals are context dependent. ISME J 10(2):346–362
Venäläinen A, Lehtonen I, Laapas M, Ruosteenoja K, Tikkanen OP, Viiri H, Ikonen VP, Peltola H (2020) Climate change induces multiple risks to boreal forests and forestry in Finland: a literature review. Glob Change Biol 26(8):4178–4196
Whittaker RH (1960) Vegetation of the siskiyou mountains. Oregon California Ecol Monogr 30(3):279–338
Yilmaz P, Parfrey LW, Yarza P, Gerken J, Pruesse E, Quast C, Schweer T, Peplies J, Ludwig W, Glockner FO (2014) The SILVA and “all-species living tree project (LTP)” taxonomic frameworks. Nucleic Acids Res 42:D643–D648
Zhou Z, Wang C, Luo Y (2018) Effects of forest degradation on microbial communities and soil carbon cycling: a global meta-analysis. Global Ecol Biogeogr 27(1):110–124
Acknowledgements
We thank Katri Leino, Tuija Hytönen, Sara Turunen, Kaarina Pynnönen and Heli Vuorilampi for assistance.
Funding
Open access funding provided by Natural Resources Institute Finland. Open access funding provided by Natural Resources Institute Finland. The work was supported by Luonnonvarakeskus, City of Espoo, Helsingin Kaupunki, City of Lahti, City of Tampere, City of Vantaa.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
A.K. and L.H. conceived the ideas and designed methodology; A.K., O.K. and L.H. collected the data; S.A. and B.A. conducted soil chemical analyses; A.K. analyzed the data; A.K. led the writing of the manuscript. All authors contributed critically to the drafts and gave final approval for publication.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Korhonen, A., Katavisto, O., Adamczyk, S. et al. Uniqueness of tree stand composition and soil microbial communities are related across urban spruce-dominated forests. Landsc Ecol 39, 142 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-024-01956-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-024-01956-3