Skip to main content
Log in

How measures of agricultural landscape patterns are affected by crop rotation dynamics

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Landscape Ecology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Context

Landscape patterns have been measured as a fundamental part of landscape ecology, especially with increasing computational power and availability of landcover data. Among the challenges associated with landscape measurement is identifying the appropriate scale of application, both temporal and spatial. Measurement of landscape patterns in highly-dynamic landscapes is especially challenged by temporal scale selection.

Objectives

This short communication focuses on how landscape pattern measurements vary in response to normal variability in a highly-dynamic landscape

Methods

For a small agricultural landscape with known crop rotation dynamism sequences, a simulation model provided 30 years of crop rotations. These 30 different landscapes were measured with landscape pattern measurements and the variability of the measurements was assessed.

Results

Almost half of the measurement values were outliers, and 12 of the 30 years had at least one outlier landscape pattern measurement value, even though the basis of landscape change was a normative agricultural practice. For a consistent but dynamic landscape, some landscape measurements or simulation years had high variability, demonstrating that inferences from highly-dynamic landscapes need to be based on fine-resolution time steps.

Conclusions

The application of landscape pattern measurements continues to be a common method in landscape ecology, and temporal dimensions are key to detecting change and what might be causing or responding to that change. The temporal resolution of change implies that highly-dynamic landscapes require more-frequent sampling, and that comparisons for agricultural landscapes over long time periods requires more than a single temporal endpoint.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Asbjornsen H, Hernandez-Santana V, Liebman M, Bayala J, Chen J, Helmers M, Ong CK (2013) Targeting perennial vegetation in agricultural landscapes for enhancing ecosystem services. Renew Agric Food Syst 29(02):101–125

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bormann FH, Likens GE (1979) Pattern and process in a forested ecosystem. Springer-Verlag, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Castellazzi MS, Matthews J, Angevin F, Sausse C, Wood G, Burgess PJ, Brown I, Conrad KF, Perry JN (2010) Simulation scenarios of spatio-temporal arrangement of crops at the landscape scale. Environ Model Softw 25:1881–1889

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark JS, Grimm EC, Donovan JJ, Fritz SC, Engstrom DR, Almendinger JE (2002) Drought cycles and landscape responses to past aridity on prairies of the Northern Great Plains, USA. Ecology 83(3):595–601

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Corry RC (2013) Landscapes of Intersecting trade and environmental policies: intensive Canadian and American farmlands. Landsc Res 39(2):107–122

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Corry RC (2016) Global and local policy forces for landscape perennialization in central North American agriculture. Geogr Tidsskr-Dan J Geogr 116(1):5–13

    Google Scholar 

  • Corry RC (2018a) Extending the string-of-lights metaphor to describe dynamism in agricultural landscapes. Landscape Ecol 33(7):1013–1022

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Corry RC (2018b) Recent losses of perennial cover in a Great Lakes agricultural region. Can Geogr 62(2):178–187

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Corry RC, Nassauer JI (2002) Managing for Small Patch Patterns in Human-dominated Landscapes: cultural factors and corn belt agriculture. In: Liu J, Taylor W (eds) Integrating landscape ecology into natural resource management. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 92–113

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Franzluebbers AJ, Paine LK, Winsten JR, Krome M, Sanderson MA, Ogles K, Thompson D (2012) Well-managed grazing systems: a forgotten hero of conservation. J Soil Water Conserv 67(4):100a–104a

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gustafson EJ (1998) Quantifying landscape spatial pattern: what is the state of the art? Ecosystems 1:143–156

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hart JF (1998) The Rural Landscape. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore

    Google Scholar 

  • Iglewicz B, Hoaglin DC (1993) How to detect and handle outliers. In: Mykytka EF (ed) The ASQC basic references in quality control: statistical techniques. ASQC Quality Press, Wisconsin, p 87

    Google Scholar 

  • Leys C, Ley C, Klein O, Bernard P, Licata L (2013) Detecting outliers: do not use standard deviation around the mean, use absolute deviation around the median. J Exp Soc Psychol 49(4):764–766

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lin BB (2011) Resilience in agriculture through crop diversification: adaptive management for environmental change. Bioscience 61(3):183–193

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lockwood JA, Debrey LD (1990) A solution for the sudden and unexplained extinction of the rocky mountain grasshopper (Orthoptera: Acrididae). Environ Entomol 19(5):1194–1205

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loucks OL (1970) Evolution of diversity, efficiency, and community stability. Am Zool 10:17–25

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • McDonald JH (2014) Handbook of biological statistics. Sparky House Publishing, Baltimore

    Google Scholar 

  • McGarigal K, Marks BJ (1995) FRAGSTATS: spatial pattern analysis program for quantifying landscape structure. USDA Forest Service Pacific Northwest Research Station, Portland, p 122

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • McGarigal K, Cushman SA, Neel MC, Ene E (2002) FRAGSTATS: spatial pattern analysis program for categorical maps. University of Massachusetts, Amherst

    Google Scholar 

  • Munkholm LJ, Heck RJ, Deen B (2013) Long-term rotation and tillage effects on soil structure and crop yield. Soil Tillage Res 127:85–91

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ontario Ministry of Agriculture Food and Rural Affairs (2009) Agronomy guide for field crops. Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs, Ontario

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramankutty N, Evan AT, Monfreda C, Foley JA (2008) Farming the planet: 1 Geographical distribution of global agricultural lands in the year 2000. Glob Biogeochem Cycles. https://doi.org/10.1029/2007GB002952

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schulte LA, Liebman M, Asbjornsen H, Crow TR (2006) Agroecosystem restoration through strategic integration of perennials. J Soil Water Conserv 61(6):165A–169A

    Google Scholar 

  • Tilman D, Fargione J, Wolff B, D’antonio C, Dobson A, Howarth R, Schindler D, Schlesinger WH, Simberloff D, Swackhamer D (2001) Forecasting agriculturally driven global environmental change. Science 292(5515):281–284

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Turner MG (1990) Spatial and temporal analysis of landscape patterns. Landscape Ecol 4(1):21–30

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turner MG, Romme WH, Gardner RH, O’Neill RV, Kratz TK (1993) A revised concept of landscape equilibrium: disturbance and stability on scaled landscapes. Landscape Ecol 8(3):213–227

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turner BL, Wuellner M, Malo DD, Herrick JE, Dunn BH, Gates R (2018) Ecosystem functions in mixed cropland–grassland systems influenced by soil legacies of past crop cultivation decisions. Ecosphere 9(12):e02521

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weaver WF (1962) Crown surveys in Ontario. Department of Lands and Forests, Toronto, p 26

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright CK, Wimberly MC (2013) Recent land use change in the Western Corn Belt threatens grasslands and wetlands. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 110(10):4134–4139

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wu JG, Hobbs R (2002) Key issues and research priorities in landscape ecology: an idiosyncratic synthesis. Landscape Ecol 17(4):355–365

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research work was supported by a grant from the Landscape Architecture Canada Foundation.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Robert C. Corry.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Corry, R.C. How measures of agricultural landscape patterns are affected by crop rotation dynamics. Landscape Ecol 34, 2159–2167 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-019-00823-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-019-00823-w

Keywords

Navigation