Abstract
Context
Despite calls for landscape connectivity research to account for spatiotemporal dynamics, studies have overwhelmingly evaluated the importance of habitats for connectivity at single or limited moments in time. Remote sensing time series represent a promising resource for studying connectivity within dynamic ecosystems. However, there is a critical need to assess how static and dynamic landscape connectivity modelling approaches compare for prioritising habitats for conservation within dynamic environments.
Objectives
To assess whether static landscape connectivity analyses can identify similar important areas for connectivity as analyses based on dynamic remotely sensed time series data.
Methods
We compared degree and betweenness centrality graph theory metric distributions from four static scenarios against equivalent results from a dynamic 25-year remotely sensed surface-water time series. Metrics were compared at multiple spatial aggregation scales across south-eastern Australia’s 1 million km2 semi-arid Murray–Darling Basin and three sub-regions with varying levels of hydroclimatic variability and development.
Results
We revealed large differences between static and dynamic connectivity metric distributions that varied by static scenario, region, spatial scale and hydroclimatic conditions. Static and dynamic metrics showed particularly low overlap within unregulated and spatiotemporally variable regions, although similarities increased at coarse aggregation scales.
Conclusions
In regions that exhibit high spatiotemporal variability, static connectivity modelling approaches are unlikely to serve as effective surrogates for more data intensive approaches based on dynamic, remotely sensed data. Although this limitation may be moderated by spatially aggregating static connectivity outputs, our results highlight the value of remotely sensed time series for assessing connectivity in dynamic landscapes.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Albanese G, Haukos DA (2017) A network model framework for prioritizing wetland conservation in the Great Plains. Landscape Ecol 32:115–130
Avon C, Bergès L (2016) Prioritization of habitat patches for landscape connectivity conservation differs between least-cost and resistance distances. Landscape Ecol. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-015-0336-8
Ballinger A, Mac Nally RC (2006) The landscape context of flooding in the Murray–Darling Basin. Adv Ecol Res 39:85–105
Bino G, Kingsford RT, Brandis K (2016) Australia’s wetlands—learning from the past to manage for the future. Pacific Conserv Biol 22:116–129
Bishop-Taylor R, Tulbure MG, Broich M (2015) Surface water network structure, landscape resistance to movement and flooding vital for maintaining ecological connectivity across Australia’s largest river basin. Landscape Ecol 30:2045–2065
Bishop-Taylor R, Tulbure MG, Broich M (2017a) Data from: Surface-water dynamics and land use influence landscape connectivity across a major dryland region. Dryad Digit Repos. https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.qf83q
Bishop-Taylor R, Tulbure MG, Broich M (2017b) Surface water dynamics and land use influence landscape connectivity across a major dryland region. Ecol Appl 27:1124–1137
Bishop-Taylor R, Tulbure MG, Broich M (2017c) Impact of hydroclimatic variability on regional-scale landscape connectivity across a dynamic dryland region. Ecol Indic. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2017.07.029
Blonder B, Wey TW, Dornhaus A, James R, Sih A (2012) Temporal dynamics and network analysis. Methods Ecol Evol 3:958–972
Bodin Ö, Norberg J (2006) A network approach for analyzing spatially structured populations in fragmented landscape. Landscape Ecol 22:31–44
Butts CT (2009) Revisiting the foundations of network analysis. Science 325:414–416
Carroll C, Wang T, Roberts DR, Michalak JL, Lawler JJ, Nielsen SE, Stralberg D, Wang T (2017) Scale-dependent complementarity of climatic velocity and environmental diversity for identifying priority areas for conservation under climate change. Glob Change Biol. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.13679
Castorani MCN, Reed DC, Alberto F, Bell TW, Simons RD, Cavanaugh KC, Raimondi PT (2015) Connectivity structures local population dynamics: a long-term empirical test in a large metapopulation system. Ecology 96:3141–3152
Cavanaugh KC, Siegel DA, Raimondi PT, Alberto F (2014) Patch definition in metapopulation analysis: a graph theory approach to solve the mega-patch problem. Ecology 95:316–328
Correa Ayram CA, Mendoza ME, Salicrup DR, Granados EL (2014) Identifying potential conservation areas in the Cuitzeo Lake basin, Mexico by multitemporal analysis of landscape connectivity. J Nat Conserv 22:424–435
Davis J, O’Grady AP, Dale A, Arthington AH, Gell PA, Driver PD, Capon SJ (2015) When trends intersect: the challenge of protecting freshwater ecosystems under multiple land use and hydrological intensification scenarios. Sci Total Environ 534:65–78
Drake JC, Griffis-Kyle KL, McIntyre NE (2017) Graph theory as an invasive species management tool: case study in the Sonoran Desert. Landscape Ecol. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-017-0539-2
Drusch M, Del Bello U, Carlier S, Colin O, Fernandez V, Gascon F, Meygret A (2012) Sentinel-2: ESA’s optical high-resolution mission for GMES operational services. Remote Sens Environ 120:25–36
Estrada E, Bodin Ö (2008) Using network centrality measures to manage landscape connectivity. Ecol Appl 18:1810–1825
Fagan ME, DeFries RS, Sesnie SE, Arroyo-Mora JP, Chazdon RL (2016) Targeted reforestation could reverse declines in connectivity for understory birds in a tropical habitat corridor. Ecol Appl 26:1456–1474
Fortin M-J, James PMA, MacKenzie A, Melles SJ, Rayfield B (2012) Spatial statistics, spatial regression, and graph theory in ecology. Spat Stat 1:100–109
Fortuna MA, Gómez-Rodríguez C, Bascompte J (2006) Spatial network structure and amphibian persistence in stochastic environments. Proc R Soc B Biol Sci 273:1429–1434
Geoscience Australia (2006) GEODATA TOPO 250 K Series 3 (Packaged—Shape file format). http://www.ga.gov.au/metadata-gateway/metadata/record/gcat_63999. Accessed Nov 2016
Heimhuber V, Tulbure MG, Broich M (2016) Modeling 25 years of spatio-temporal surface water and inundation dynamics on large river basin scale using time series of Earth observation data. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 20:2227–2250
Heimhuber V, Tulbure MG, Broich M (2017) Modeling multidecadal surface water inundation dynamics and key drivers on large river basin scale using multiple time series of Earth-observation and river flow data. Water Resour Res 20:2227–2250
Hernández A, Miranda M, Arellano EC, Saura S, Ovalle C (2015) Landscape dynamics and their effect on the functional connectivity of a Mediterranean landscape in Chile. Ecol Indic 48:198–206
Kingsford RT (2000) Ecological impacts of dams, water diversions and river management on floodplain wetlands in Australia. Austral Ecol 25:109–127
Kool JT, Moilanen A, Treml EA (2012) Population connectivity: recent advances and new perspectives. Landscape Ecol 28:165–185
Leblanc M, Tweed S, Van Dijk A, Timbal B (2012) A review of historic and future hydrological changes in the Murray–Darling Basin. Glob Planet Change 80–81:226–246
Littlefield CE, McRae BH, Michalak J, Lawler JJ, Carroll C (2017) Connecting today’s climates to future analogs to facilitate species movement under climate change. Conserv Biol. https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.12938
Lloyd MW, Widmeyer PA, Neel MC (2016) Temporal variability in potential connectivity of Vallisneria americana in the Chesapeake Bay. Landscape Ecol 31:2307–2321
Locher-Krause KE, Volk M, Waske B, Thonfeld F, Lautenbach S (2017) Expanding temporal resolution in landscape transformations: insights from a landsat-based case study in Southern Chile. Ecol Indic 75:132–144
Lymburner L, Tan P, Mueller N, Thackway R, Lewis A, Thankappan M, Senarath U (2010) The National Dynamic Land Cover Dataset. National Earth Observation Group, Geoscience Australia, Canberra
Martensen AC, Saura S, Fortin M-J (2017) Spatio-temporal connectivity: assessing the amount of reachable habitat in dynamic landscapes. Methods Ecol Evol. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijlh.12426
McIntyre NE, Wright CK, Swain S, Hayhoe K, Liu G, Schwartz FW, Henebry GM (2014) Climate forcing of wetland landscape connectivity in the Great Plains. Front Ecol Environ 12:59–64
McRae BH, Beier P (2007) Circuit theory predicts gene flow in plant and animal populations. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 104:19885–19890
McRae BH, Dickson BG, Keitt TH, Shah VB (2008) Using circuit theory to model connectivity in ecology, evolution, and conservation. Ecology 89:2712–2724
Minor ES, Urban DL (2008) A graph-theory framework for evaluating landscape connectivity and conservation planning. Conserv Biol 22:297–307
Morán-Ordóñez A, Pavlova A, Pinder AM, Sim L, Sunnucks P, Thompson RM, Davis J (2015) Aquatic communities in arid landscapes: local conditions, dispersal traits and landscape configuration determine local biodiversity. Divers Distrib 21:1230–1241
Mui AB, Caverhill B, Johnson B, Fortin MJ, He Y (2017) Using multiple metrics to estimate seasonal landscape connectivity for Blanding’s turtles (Emydoidea blandingii) in a fragmented landscape. Landscape Ecol 32:531–546
Murphy MA, Dezzani R, Pilliod DS, Storfer A (2010) Landscape genetics of high mountain frog metapopulations. Mol Ecol 19:3634–3649
Murphy AL, Pavlova A, Thompson R, Davis J, Sunnucks P (2015) Swimming through sand: connectivity of aquatic fauna in deserts. Ecol Evol 5:5252–5264
Newman MEJ (2003) The structure and function of complex networks. SIAM Rev 45:167–256
O’Connor P (1986) The biology of the Murray crayfish, Euastacus armatus (Decapoda: Parastacidae) and recommendations for the future management of the fishery (unpublished NSW Department of Agriculture data summary)
O’Farrill G, Schampaert KG, Rayfield B, Bodin Ö, Calme S, Sengupta R, Gonzalez A (2014) The potential connectivity of waterhole networks and the effectiveness of a protected area under various drought scenarios. PLoS ONE 9:e95049
Page K, Read A, Frazier P, Mount N (2005) The effect of altered flow regime on the frequency and duration of bankfull discharge: Murrumbidgee River, Australia. River Res Appl 578:567–578
Pascual-Hortal L, Saura S (2007) Impact of spatial scale on the identification of critical habitat patches for the maintenance of landscape connectivity. Landsc Urban Plan 83:176–186
Piquer-Rodríguez M, Torella S, Gavier-Pizarro G, Volante J, Somma D, Ginzburg R, Kuemmerle T (2015) Effects of past and future land conversions on forest connectivity in the Argentine Chaco. Landscape Ecol 30:817–833
Pittock B, Abbs D, Suppiah R, Jones R (2006) Climatic background to past and future floods in Australia. Adv Ecol Res 39:13–39
Pittock J, Finlayson CM (2011) Australia’s Murray–Darling Basin: freshwater ecosystem conservation options in an era of climate change. Mar Freshw Res 62:232
Puckridge JT, Sheldon F, Walker KF, Boulton A (1988) Flow variability and the ecology of large rivers. Mar Freshw Res 49:55–72
Roe JH, Brinton AC, Georges A (2009) Temporal and spatial variation in landscape connectivity for a freshwater turtle in a temporally dynamic wetland system. Ecol Appl 19:1288–1299
Rogers K, Ralph TJ (2010) Floodplain wetlands of the Murray–Darling Basin and their freshwater biota. In: Rogers K, Ralph TJ (eds) Floodplain wetl. Biota murray–darling basin water habitat requirements. CSIRO Publishing, Collingwood, pp 1–16
Rubio L, Bodin Ö, Brotons L, Saura S (2014) Connectivity conservation priorities for individual patches evaluated in the present landscape: how durable and effective are they in the long term? Ecography (Cop) 38:782–791
Ruiz L, Parikh N, Heintzman LJ, Collins SD, Starr SM, Wright CK, McIntyre NE (2014) Dynamic connectivity of temporary wetlands in the southern Great Plains. Landscape Ecol 29:507–516
Saunders MI, Brown CJ, Foley MM, Febria CM, Albright R, Mehling MG, Burfeind DD (2015) Human impacts on connectivity in marine and freshwater ecosystems assessed using graph theory: a review. Mar Freshw Res 67:277–290
Saura S, Pascual-Hortal L (2007) A new habitat availability index to integrate connectivity in landscape conservation planning: comparison with existing indices and application to a case study. Landsc Urban Plan 83:91–103
Schaffer-Smith D, Swenson JJ, Barbaree B, Reiter ME (2017) Three decades of Landsat-derived spring surface water dynamics in an agricultural wetland mosaic; Implications for migratory shorebirds. Remote Sens Environ 193:180–192
Schick RS, Lindley ST (2007) Directed connectivity among fish populations in a riverine network. J Appl Ecol 44:1116–1126
Schmit C, Rounsevell MDA, La Jeunesse I (2006) The limitations of spatial land use data in environmental analysis. Environ Sci Policy 9:174–188
Shah VB, McRae BH (2008) Circuitscape: a tool for landscape ecology. In: Varoquaux G, Vaught T, Millman J (eds) In: Proceedings of the 7th Python in Science Conference (SciPy 2008). Pasadena, CA, pp 62–66
Smith MA, Green DM (2005) Dispersal and the metapopulation paradigm in amphibian ecology and conservation: are all amphibian populations metapopulations? Ecography (Cop) 28:110–128
Tulbure MG, Broich M (2013) Spatiotemporal dynamic of surface water bodies using Landsat time-series data from 1999 to 2011. ISPRS J Photogramm Remote Sens 79:44–52
Tulbure MG, Broich M, Stehman SV, Kommareddy A (2016) Surface water extent dynamics from three decades of seasonally continuous Landsat time series at subcontinental scale in a semi-arid region. Remote Sens Environ 178:142–157
Tulbure MG, Kininmonth SJ, Broich M (2014) Spatiotemporal dynamics of surface water networks across a global biodiversity hotspot—implications for conservation. Environ Res Lett 9:114012
Urban DL, Keitt TH (2001) Landscape connectivity: a graph-theoretic perspective. Ecology 82:1205–1218
Urban DL, Minor ES, Treml EA, Schick RS (2009) Graph models of habitat mosaics. Ecol Lett 12:260–273
Vanderhoof MK, Alexander LC, Todd MJ (2015) Temporal and spatial patterns of wetland extent influence variability of surface water connectivity in the Prairie Pothole Region, United States. Landsc Ecol. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-015-0290-5
Verburg PH, Neumann K, Nol L (2011) Challenges in using land use and land cover data for global change studies. Glob Change Biol 17:974–989
Watts AG, Schlichting P, Billerman S, Jesmer B, Micheletti S, Fortin MJ, Murphy MA (2015) How spatio-temporal habitat connectivity affects amphibian genetic structure. Front Genet 6:1–13
Wright CK (2010) Spatiotemporal dynamics of prairie wetland networks: power-law scaling and implications for conservation planning. Ecology 91:1924–1930. https://doi.org/10.1890/09-0865.1
Zeigler SL, Fagan WF (2014) Transient windows for connectivity in a changing world. Mov Ecol 2:1
Acknowledgements
This work was funded through an Australian Research Council Discovery Early Career Researcher Award (DE140101608) to Tulbure. We thank both anonymous reviewers for their valuable comments and suggestions.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding authors
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Bishop-Taylor, R., Tulbure, M.G. & Broich, M. Evaluating static and dynamic landscape connectivity modelling using a 25-year remote sensing time series. Landscape Ecol 33, 625–640 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-018-0624-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-018-0624-1