Skip to main content
Log in

Emission and performance analysis of DI diesel engines fueled by biodiesel blends via CFD simulation of spray combustion and different spray breakup models: a numerical study

  • Published:
Journal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In the current study, computational fluid dynamics code was used to perform 3D simulation of mixture formation and combustion of biodiesel fuel spray in a direct injection diesel engine. Thus, the spray atomization and combustion processes were simulated by applying the improved version of KH–RT spray breakup model coupled with advanced ECFM-3Z model for combustion. To this aim, experimental results were used first to validate the calculated values of NOx, soot, heat release rate, and in-cylinder pressure and good agreement was obtained. To develop the engine performance and reduce the emission, various models of spray breakup of biodiesel fuel were simulated, and the optimum spray breakup model was specified. Also, the accuracy of each model was determined in comparison with the experimental results. The results show that the TAB breakup model has not provided acceptable results for spray characteristics compared to the other models. Since the simulation results of in-cylinder pressure and emissions were consistent with the experimental results by the KHRT model, it could be concluded that this model has correctly predicted the size of droplets produced by spray fragmentation and penetration, and it could be used to simulate the atomization of biodiesel fuel spray under different engine conditions by adjusting the model constants.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

DI:

Direct injection

HD:

Heavy duty

NOx :

Nitrogen oxides

CO:

Carbon monoxide

HC:

Hydrocarbon

BSFC:

Brake-specific fuel consumption

IVC:

Inlet valve closing

IVO:

Inlet valve opening

EVO:

Exhaust valve opening

CA:

Crank angle

TDC:

Top dead center

BDC:

Bottom dead center

aBDC:

After bottom dead center

bBDC:

Before bottom dead center

aTDC:

After top dead center

bTDC:

Before top dead center

CI:

Heat release rate

SI:

Spark ignition

AFR:

Air/fuel ratio

CFD:

Computational fluid dynamics

HRR:

Compression ignition

BTE:

Brake thermal efficiency

RPM:

Revolution per minute

MB:

Methyl butanoate

DDM:

Discrete droplet method

LLNL:

Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory

KHRT:

Kelvin–Helmholtz and Rayleigh–Taylor

References

  1. Ramos JI. Internal combustion engine modeling. Washington: Hemisphere Publishing Corporation; 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Kapusta LJ, Pielecha I, Wistocki K, Teodorczyk A. Autoignition and combustion of n-hexane spray in subcritical supercritical environments. J Therm Anal Calorim. 2016;123:819–28.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Zarenezhad Ashkezari A, Hossein Nezhad A, Farahat S. Reduction of pollutant emissions by developing a variable valve timing system in a direct injection diesel engine using computational fluid dynamics modeling. Environ Prog Sustain Energy. 2016;35:1430–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Naber JD, Siebers DL. Effects of gas density and vaporization on penetration and dispersion of diesel sprays. SAE paper 960034. SAE; 1996.

  5. Ricart LM, Xin J, Bower GR, Reitz RD. In-cylinder measurement and modeling of liquid fuel spray penetration in a heavy-duty diesel engine. SAE paper 971591. SAE; 1997.

  6. Liu AB, Reitz RD. Modeling the effects of drop drag and break-up on fuel sprays. SAE paper 930072. SAE; 1993.

  7. Villiers ED, Gosman AD. Large eddy simulation of primary diesel spray atomization. SAE paper 2004-01-0100. SAE; 2004.

  8. Kim BS, Yoon WH, Ryu SH, Ha JS. Effect of the injector nozzle hole diameter and number on the spray characteristics and the combustion performance in medium-speed diesel marine engines. SAE paper 2005-01-3853. SAE; 2005.

  9. Park SH, Suh HK, Lee CS. Effect of cavitating flow on the flow and fuel atomization characteristics of biodiesel and diesel fuels. Energy Fuels. 2007;22:605–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Hossainpour S, Binesh AR. Investigation of fuel spray atomization in a DI heavy-duty diesel engine and comparison of various spray breakup models. Fuel. 2009;88:799–805.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Shui LF, Lei Z, Bai-gang S, Zhi-jie L, Schock HJ. Validation and modification of WAVE spray model for diesel combustion simulation. Fuel. 2008;87:3420–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Sun ZY, Li GX, Chen C, Yu YS, Gao GX. Numerical investigation on effects of nozzle’s geometric parameters on the flow and the cavitation characteristics within injector’s nozzle for a high-pressure common-rail DI diesel engine. Energy Convers Manag. 2015;89:843–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Taghavifar H, Khalilarya S, Jafarmadar S. Exergy analysis of combustion in VGT-modified diesel engine with detailed chemical kinetics mechanism. Energy. 2015;93:740–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. An H, Yang WM, Li J. Effects of ethanol addition on biodiesel combustion: a modeling study. Appl Energy. 2015;143:176–88.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Venu H, Raju VD, Subramani L. Combined effect of influence of nano additives, combustion chamber geometry and injection timing in a DI diesel engine fueled with ternary (diesel–biodiesel ethanol) blends. Energy. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2019.02.163.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Verhelst S, Turner JWG, Sileghem L, Vancoillie J. Methanol as a fuel for internal combustion engines. Prog Energy Combust Sci. 2019;70:43–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Yaws CL. Chemical properties handbook: physical, thermodynamic, environmental, transport, safety, and health related properties for organic and inorganic chemicals. New York: McGraw-Hill; 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Su TF, Patterson M, Reitz RD, Farrell PV. Experimental and numerical studies of high pressure multiple injection sprays. SAE paper 960861. SAE; 1996.

  19. Bellman R, Pennington RH. Effects of surface tension and viscosity on Taylor instability. Q Appl Math. 1954;12:151–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Dukowicz JK. A particle-fluid numerical model for liquid sprays. Comput Phys. 1980;35:229–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Mewes D, Mayinger F. Heat and mass transfer. Berlin : Springer; 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Naber JD, Reitz RD. Modeling engine spray/wall impingement. SAE paper 880107. SAE; 1988.

  23. Wachters LHJ, Westerling NAJ. The heat transfer from a hot wall to impinging water drops in spheroidal state. Chem Eng Sci. 1996;21:737–43.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Yakhot V, Orszag SA, Thangam S, Gatski TB, Speziale CG. Development of turbulence models for shear flows by a double expansion technique. Phys Fluids. 1992;4:139–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Colin O, Benkenida A, Quinn C. The 3-zones extended coherent flame model (ECFM3Z) for computing premixed/diffusion combustion. Oil Gas Sci Technol. 2004;59:593–609.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Helie J, Trouve A, Quinn C. A modified coherent flame model to describe turbulent flame propagation in mixtures with variable composition. Proc Combust Inst. 2000;28:193–201.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. ICE Physics and Chemistry. AVL FIRE user manual v.2014.1, 2014.

  28. Hioyasu H, Nishida K. Simplified three dimensional modeling of mixture formation and combustion in a DI diesel engine. SAE paper 890269. SAE; 1989.

  29. Nagle J, Strickland-Constable RF. Oxidation of carbon between 1000–2000 C. In: Proceedings of the fifth conference on carbon. New York: Pergamon; 1962.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  30. Baumgarten C. Heat and mass transfer, part: mixture formation in internal combustion engines. Berlin: Springer; 1965.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Reitz RD. Modeling atomization processes in high pressure vaporizing sprays. At Spray Technol. 1987;3:309–37.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Chu CCC. One-dimensional transient fluid model for fuel–coolant interaction analysis. Thesis, University of Wisconsin-Madison, 1986.

  33. Fisher EM, PitzWJ Curran HJ, Westbrook CK. Detailed chemical kinetic mechanisms for combustion of oxygenated fuels. Proc Combust Inst. 2000;28:1579–86.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Brakora JL, Ra Y, Retiz RD, Mcfarlane J, Daw CS. Development and validation of a reduced reaction mechanism for biodiesel-fueled engine simulation. SAE paper 2008-01-1378. SAE; 2008.

  35. Cheng AS, Upatnieks A, Mueller CJ. Investigation of the impact of biodiesel fuelling on NOx emissions using an optical direct injection diesel engine. Int J Engine Res. 2006;7(4):297–318.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Abbas Zarenezhad Ashkezari.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ashkezari, A.Z., Divsalar, K., Malmir, R. et al. Emission and performance analysis of DI diesel engines fueled by biodiesel blends via CFD simulation of spray combustion and different spray breakup models: a numerical study. J Therm Anal Calorim 139, 2527–2539 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10973-019-08922-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10973-019-08922-1

Keywords

Navigation