Skip to main content
Log in

The impact of silver on uranium quantification by kinetic phosphorescence analysis

  • Published:
Journal of Radioanalytical and Nuclear Chemistry Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The quantification of uranium (U) by Kinetic Phosphorescence Analysis (KPA) is negatively impacted by the presence of silver (Ag). KPA can be combined with gamma spectroscopy to determine recovery of short-lived uranium isotopes after radiochemical purification in nuclear forensics relevant samples. Fission products can impact accurate gamma spectroscopy analysis. Removal of the 132Te fission product can be accomplished via deposition on a Ag disk. The purpose of this work is to determine the concentration of Ag that begins to quench the phosphorescent signal as part of sample purification scheme for U and the necessary steps for successful sample analysis via gamma spectroscopy and KPA.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Morley SM, Seiner B, Finn E, Greenwood L, Smith SC, Gregory S, Haney M, Lucas D, Arrigo L, Beacham T (2015) Integrated separation scheme for measuring a suite of fission and activation products from a fresh mixed fission and activation product sample. J Radioanal Nucl Chem 304:509–515

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Elliston J, Glover S, Filby R (2005) Comparison of direct kinetic phosphorescence analysis and recovery corrected kinetic phosphorescence analysis for the determination of natural uranium in human tissues. J Radioanal Nucl Chem 263:301–306

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Douglas M, Friese J, Greenwood L, Farmer O, Thomas M, Maiti T, Finn E, Garofoli S, Gassman P, Huff M (2009) Separation and quantification of chemically diverse analytes in neutron irradiated fissile materials. J Radioanal Nucl Chem 282:63–68

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Ramebäck H, Vesterlund A, Tovedal A, Nygren U, Wallberg L, Holm E, Ekberg C, Skarnemark G (2010) The jackknife as an approach for uncertainty assessment in gamma spectrometric measurements of uranium isotope ratios. Nucl Instrum Methods Phys. Res., Sect. B 268:2535–2538

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. IAEA Livechart-Table of Nuclides-Nuclear Structure and Decay Data.IAEA

  6. Rosenberg BL, Shozugawa K, Steinhauser G (2015) Detection of Fuel Release in a Nuclear Accident: A Method for Preconcentration and Isolation of Reactor-Borne 239Np Using Ion-Specific Extraction Chromatography. Anal Chem 87:17: 8651–8656

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Haney MM, Seiner BN, Finn EC, Friese JI (2016) Rapid quantitation of uranium from mixed fission product samples. J Radioanal Nucl Chem307:1737–1742

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Seiner BN, King AR, Finn E, Greenwood LR, Metz LA, Friese J, Marsden O, Davies AV, Scivier P (2016) Fission product analysis of HEU irradiated within a boron carbide capsule: comparison of detection methodology at PNNL and AWE. J Radioanal Nucl Chem 307:1729–1734

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Miley S, Hylden A, Friese J (2013) Resolution of uranium isotopes with kinetic phosphorescence analysis. J Radioanal Nucl Chem 296:923–925

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Beck C, Seiner B, Smith S, Bowen J, Finch Z, Friese J (2016) Kinetic phosphorescence analysis to quantify europium and terbium. J Radioanal Nucl Chem 307:2187–2192

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Sowder A, Clark S, Fjeld R (1998) The effect of sample matrix quenching on the measurement of trace uranium concentrations in aqueous solutions using kinetic phosphorimetry. J Radioanal Nucl Chem 234:257–260

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Elliston J, Glover S, Filby R (2001) The determination of natural uranium in human tissues by recovery corrected kinetic phosphorescence analysis. J Radioanal Nucl Chem 248:487–491

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Chemcheck (2006) Manual and Automatic Kinetic Phosphorescence Analyzer KPA-11. Operation Manual.

  14. Smith R, Martell A, Motekaitis R (2004) NIST standard reference database 46. 2

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was sponsored by the Office of the Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense for Nuclear Matters. PNNL is operated by Battelle for the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) under Contract No. DE-AC05-76RL0-1830. PNNL draws on signature capabilities in chemistry, earth sciences, and data analytics to advance scientific discovery and create solutions to the nation’s toughest challenges in energy resiliency and national security.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chelsie Beck.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Arnold, E., Uhnak, N., Schroeder, J. et al. The impact of silver on uranium quantification by kinetic phosphorescence analysis. J Radioanal Nucl Chem 331, 5167–5172 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10967-022-08574-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10967-022-08574-w

Keywords

Navigation