Skip to main content
Log in

From Bq cm−3 to Bq cm−2 (and conversely)—part 2: useful dataset to apply the conversion to decommissioning operations

  • Published:
Journal of Radioanalytical and Nuclear Chemistry Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A large set of key parameters is provided to use in decommissioning operations, the conversion method fully described in the companion paper “From Bq cm−3 to Bq cm−2 (and conversely)—part 1: a useful conversion for autoradiography”. Maximum range RMAX and emission fraction FE are given for a large combination of radionuclides (3H, 14C, 60Co, 137Cs, 235U, 238U, 239Pu and 240Pu) and materials (plastic, concrete and steel) encountered in nuclear facilities. Geometric factor of the detector efficiency is investigated to consider the common complications related to the analysis of the contaminated facilities such as irregular surface or distance between detector and contaminated surface.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. OECD NEA (2014) R&D and Innovation Needs for Decommissioning Nuclear Facilities, Nuclear Energy Agency, report No. 7191

  2. ISO 7503-2 (2016) Measurement of radioactivity –Measurement and evaluation of surface contamination—Part 2: Test method using wipe tests

  3. L’Annunziata MF (2012) Handbook of radioactivity analysis, 3rd edn. Academic Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  4. Fichet P, Bresson F, Leskinen A, Goutelard F, Ikonen J, Siitari-Kaupi M (2012) Tritium analysis in building dismantling process using digital autoradiography. J Radioanal Nucl Chem 291:869–875

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Leskinen A, Fichet P, Siitari-Kauppi M, Goutelard F (2013) Digital autoradiography (DA) in quantification of trace level beta emitters on concrete. J Radioanal Nucl Chem 298:153–161

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Haudebourg R, Fichet P (2016) A non-destructive and on-site digital autoradiography-based tool to identify contaminating radionuclide in nuclear wastes and facilities to be dismantled. J Radioanal Nucl Chem 309:551–561

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. ISO 9698 (2010) Water quality—Determination of tritium activity concentration—liquid scintillation counting method

  8. Billon S, Sardini P, Leblond S, Fichet P (2019) From Bq cm−3 to Bq cm−2 (and conversely)- part 1: a useful conversion for autoradiography. J Radioanal Nucl Chem (in press)

  9. ISO 7503-3 (2016) Measurement of radioactivity. Measurement and evaluation of surface contamination- Part 3: Apparatus calibration

  10. Eckerman KF, Sjoreen AL (2004) Radiological toolbox user’s manual. Department of Energy, United States

    Book  Google Scholar 

  11. Laboratoire National Henri Becquerel, Library for gamma and alpha emissions http://www.lnhb.fr/nuclear-data/module-lara/. Accessed 6 May 2018

  12. Agostinelli S, Allison J, Amako K, Apostolakis J, Araujo H, Arce P, Asai M, Axen D, Banerjee S, Barrand G, Behner F, Bellagamba L, Boudreau J, Broglia L, Brunengo A, Burkhardt H, Chauvie S, Chuma J, Chytracek R, Cooperman G, Cosmo G, Degtyarenko P, Dell’Acqua A, Depaola G, Dietrich D, Enami R, Feliciello A, Ferguson C, Fesefeldt H, Folger G, Foppiano F, Forti A, Garelli S, Giani S, Giannitrapani R, Gibin D, Gomez Cadenas JJ (2003) GEANT4—a simulation toolkit. Nucl Instrum Methods Phys Res A 506:250–303

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. ISO 7503-1 (2016) Measurement of radioactivity- Measurement and evaluation of surface contamination- Part 1: General principles

  14. Schuler C, Butterweck G, Wernli C, Bochud F, Valley JF (2007). Calibration and Verification of Surface Contamination Meters-Procedures and Techniques. Paul Scherrer Institut

  15. Donnard J (2007) Étude et conception d’un imageur bêta à très haute résolution spatiale. PhD thesis of the university of Nantes, France, 204 pp

  16. Ilic R, Durrani SA (2003) Solid state nuclear track detector (Chapter 3). In: L’Annunziata MF (ed) Handbook of radioactivity analysis, 2nd edn. Elsevier Science, Amsterdam, pp 179–237

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  17. Nelson G, Reilly D (1991) Gamma-ray interactions with matter. Passive nondestructive analysis of nuclear materials, 27–42

  18. Berger MJ, Hubbell JH (1992) Photon attenuation coefficient. No. CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics, 73rd Ed. https://www.nist.gov/. Accessed 24 Oct 2018

  19. Hubbell JH (1969) Photon cross sections, attenuation coefficients, and energy absorption coefficients from 10 keV to 100 GeV. National Bureau of Standards

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work, included in the MAUD project, was performed within the Investments for the future program of the French Government and operated by the French National Radioactive Waste Management Agency (Andra). We would like to thank the reviewers for their constructive comments and criticisms in reviewing the paper.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sophie Billon.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 2043 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Billon, S., Sardini, P., Leblond, S. et al. From Bq cm−3 to Bq cm−2 (and conversely)—part 2: useful dataset to apply the conversion to decommissioning operations. J Radioanal Nucl Chem 320, 699–709 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10967-019-06540-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10967-019-06540-7

Keywords

Navigation