Skip to main content
Log in

A source biasing and variance reduction technique for Monte Carlo radiation transport modeling of emission tomography problems

  • Published:
Journal of Radioanalytical and Nuclear Chemistry Aims and scope Submit manuscript

A Correction to this article was published on 27 February 2020

This article has been updated

Abstract

A numerical radiation transport methodology for predicting gamma emission tomographs was developed utilizing the deterministic fuel burn-up software, ORIGEN, in the SCALE code package as a source definition input for Monte Carlo N Particle Transport ver. 6.1 to simulate gamma emission spectra from irradiated nuclear fuel and measured by an inorganic scintillator detector. Variance reduction utilized analytical expressions for the solid angle and field of view between source, collimator and detector to normalize the gamma energy spectrum from a non-analog monodirectionally biased beam source problem to approximate the equivalent analog problem of an isotropic source. One normalization scheme, which assumes that the source is distributed in a thin cylindrical volume, can achieve lower than 6% error and an order of 107 reduction in the computational cost. A different normalization scheme involving a truncated cone source distribution overestimated the count rate by approximately 45% but had similar computational savings. In both approaches, the accuracy and computational savings of the method improves with increasing collimator aspect ratio. This method is therefore useful for problems with high aspect ratio collimators.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

Change history

  • 27 February 2020

    In the original article, Equation 4 was incorrectly published. The correct equation is provided in this correction

References

  1. X-Ray Mass Attenuation Coefficients—water, liquid, NIST. https://physics.nist.gov/PhysRefData/XrayMassCoef/ComTab/water.html. Accessed 15 July 2018

  2. Jacobsson S, Bäcklin A, Håkansson A, Jansson P (2000) A tomographic method for experimental verification of the integrity of spent nuclear fuel. Appl Radiat Isot 53:681–689

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Jacobsson S, Håkansson A, Jansson P, Bäcklin A (2001) A tomographic method for verification of the integrity of spent nuclear fuel assemblies—II: experimental investigation. Nucl Technol 135:146–153

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Jacobsson S, Håkansson A, Bäcklin A, Jansson P, Osifo O, Willman C (2006) Tomography for partial-defect verification: experiences from measurements using different devices. ESARDA Bull 33:15–25

    Google Scholar 

  5. Lundqvist T, Jacobsson S, Håkansson A (2007) SPECT imaging as a tool to prevent proliferation of nuclear weapons. Nucl Instrum Methods A 580:843–847

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Jacobsson S, Lundqvist T, Håkansson A (2008) Verification of completeness of spent nuclear fuel assemblies by means of tomography. PHYSOR 08(4):3131–3137

    Google Scholar 

  7. Parker H, Joyce M (2015) The use of ionising radiation to image nuclear fuel: a review. Prog Nucl Energy 85:297–318

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Jansson P, Svärd S, Håkansson A, Bäcklin A (2006) A device for nondestructive experimental determination of the power distribution in a nuclear fuel assembly. Nucl Sci Eng 152:76–86

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Andersson P, Holcombe S (2017) A computerized method (UPPREC) for quantitative analysis of irradiated nuclear fuel assemblies with gamma emission tomography at the Halden reactor. Ann Nucl Energy 110:88–97

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Holcombe S, Jacobsson S, Hallstadius L (2015) A Novel gamma emission tomography instrument for enhanced fuel characterization capabilities within the OECD Halden Reactor Project. Ann Nucl Energy 85:837–845

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Lanthanum Bromide Scintillation Detectors, Ortec-online.com (2017) http://www.ortec-online.com/-/media/ametekortec/brochures/lanthanum.pdf. Accessed 15 Dec 2017

  12. Kawrakow I, Fippel M (2000) Investigation of variance reduction techniques for Monte Carlo photon dose calculation using XVMC. Phys Med Bio 45:2163–2183

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Rearden B, Jessee M (2016) SCALE Code System

  14. Goorley T et al (2012) Initial MCNP6 release overview. Nucl Technol 180:298–315

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Nilsson J (2010) Using the LaBr3:Ce scintillation detector for mobile γ-spectrometry. http://lup.lub.lu.se/luur/download?func=downloadFile&recordOId=2157130&fileOId=2157384. Accessed 17 Feb 2018

Download references

Acknowledgements

This material is based upon work supported by the U.S. Department of Energy, Nuclear Energy University Programs, Project 17-13011, and by the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Nuclear Education Program under Award NRC-HQ-13-G-38-0026.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Joseph Graham.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kilby, S., Jin, Z., Avachat, A. et al. A source biasing and variance reduction technique for Monte Carlo radiation transport modeling of emission tomography problems. J Radioanal Nucl Chem 320, 37–45 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10967-019-06457-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10967-019-06457-1

Keywords

Navigation