Skip to main content
Log in

Synthesis and characterization of natural rubber/graphene quantum dot nanocomposites

  • ORIGINAL PAPER
  • Published:
Journal of Polymer Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The natural rubber/graphene quantum dots (GQDs) nanocomposites were prepared and their properties have been studied. Graphene oxide prepared via modified Hummer’s method was the precursor used to synthesis graphene quantum dots. The two-roll mill was used for the compounding of the natural rubber/graphene quantum dot (NR/GQD) nanocomposites. The nanocomposites are characterized using UV–visible Spectroscopy, Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy (FTIR), Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM), X-ray Diffraction Analysis (XRD), Thermogravimetric Analysis (TGA). The mechanical and diffusion properties of the natural rubber/graphene quantum dot (GQDs) nanocomposites were also investigated. The TEM analysis revealed that GQD has tiny spherical shaped morphology with an average size value of 5 nm. The FTIR and XRD studies clearly showed the strong interaction between GQDs and NR and the peak at 8.490 in the diffractogram of nanocomposites indicates the uniform distribution of GQDs in matrix of NR. The incorporation of 1phr of GQD shows a 30%, 13% and 23% of enhancement in respective tensile strength, elongation at break and young’s modulus of the NR/GQD nanocomposite compared to that of pure natural rubber. The study found that the incorporation of GQDs into the natural rubber matrix dramatically increased the mechanical and thermal properties of the of NR. The nanocomposite with 1.5 phr of GQD showed higher thermal stability and is ascribed to the uniform dispersion and interaction of GQD in the NR matrix. The GQD will act as a protective barrier and thus it arrests the thermal decomposition by absorbing the heat that liberated in the matrix.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Neto AC, Guinea F, Peres NM, Novoselov KS, Geim AK (2009) The electronic properties of graphene. Rev Mod Phys 81(1):109

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Yavari F, Koratkar N (2012) Graphene-based chemical sensors. J Phys Chem Lett 3(13):1746–1753

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Kim H, Abdala AA, Macosko CW (2010) Graphene/polymer nanocomposites. Macromolecules 43(16):6515–6530

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Tang Z et al (2012) Grafting of polyester onto graphene for electrically and thermally conductive composites. Macromolecules 45(8):3444–3451

  5. Sadasivuni KK, Ponnamma D, Kim J, Thomas S (eds) (2015) Graphene-based polymer nanocomposites in electronics. Springer, Switzerland

    Google Scholar 

  6. Zhan Y et al (2011) Dispersion and exfoliation of graphene in rubber by an ultrasonically‐assisted latex mixing and in situ reduction process. Macromol Mater Eng 296(7):590-602

  7. Zhan Y, Lavorgna M, Buonocore G, Xia H (2012), Enhancing electrical conductivity of rubber composites by constructing interconnected network of self-assembled graphene with latex mixing. J Mater Chem 22:10464-10468

  8. Shen J, Zhu Y, Yang X, Li C (2012) Graphene quantum dots: emergent nanolights for bioimaging, sensors, catalysis and photovoltaic devices. Chem Commun 48(31):3686–3699

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Ritter KA, Lyding JW (2009) The influence of edge structure on the electronic properties of graphene quantum dots and nanoribbons. Nat Mater 8(3):235

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Pan D, Zhang J, Li Z, Wu M (2010) Hydrothermal route for cutting graphene sheets into blue-luminescent graphene quantum dots. Adv Mater 22(6):734–738

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Yuan W, Liu A, Huang L, Li C, Shi G (2013) High-performance NO2 sensors based on chemically modified graphene. Adv Mater 25(5):766–771

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Fowler JD, Allen MJ, Tung VC, Yang Y, Kaner RB, Weiller BH (2009) Practical chemical sensors from chemically derived graphene. ACS Nano 3(2):301–306

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Lee C, Ahn J, Lee KB, Kim D, Kim J (2012) Graphene-based flexible NO2 chemical sensors. Thin Solid Films 520(16):5459–5462

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Zaaba NI, Foo KL, Hashim U, Tan SJ, Liu WW, Voon CH (2017) Synthesis of graphene oxide using modified hummers method: solvent influence. Procedia Eng 1(184):469–477

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Soney C George.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Edayadiyil, J.J., Abraham, J., Rajeevan, S. et al. Synthesis and characterization of natural rubber/graphene quantum dot nanocomposites. J Polym Res 28, 358 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10965-021-02713-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10965-021-02713-9

Keywords

Navigation