Abstract
Students who are more liked by their teachers tend to be included by their peers and to perform successfully at school. Yet, very little is known whether peer inclusion can mediate the effect of teachers’ liking of students on students’ academic achievement. Teachers from Grades 5 and 6 reported their liking of each student and academic achievement (N = 1209; 49% females), whereas peers rated the inclusion of classmates. Results from a multilevel growth curve model revealed that, only at the individual level, higher values of peer inclusion mediated the association between teachers’ liking of students and academic achievement over time. This study provides new insights into the complex associations between teachers’ liking of students and academic achievement during early adolescence.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
Three-level growth curve models (level-1 = time; level-2 = students; level-3 = classrooms) can be estimated in Mplus structuring the dataset in a wide format and using a two-level framework as explained in the Mplus User Guide (see example 9.12; Muthén and Muthén 1998–2017). Given the presence of only two waves of data, the residual variances of the indicators were fixed at zero to allow model identification.
Since all possible parameters were estimated in multilevel growth curves (i.e., zero degrees of freedom), no fit indexes are reported because the models were just identified (i.e., perfect fit to the data; see Kline, 2015).
An alternative multivariate multilevel growth curve model was run in order to analyze if the change in teachers’ liking of students played a mediational role in the link between the change in peer inclusion and the change in academic achievement at both within-(students) and between- (classrooms) levels. Only at individual level, the changes in teachers’ liking of students played a mediational role (95% CI = 0.003, 0.025).
The hypothesized mediational model was tested among boys and girls and Swiss and non-Swiss students. Results from models run separately for boys and girls revealed that, at the student-level, the changes in peer inclusion were a significant mediator of the link between changes in teachers’ liking of students and changes in academic achievement only for boys (95% CI = 0.002, 0.038) but not for girls (95% CI = −0.003, 0.031). Also, results indicated that, at the student level, the changes in peer inclusion were a significant mediator of the link between changes in teachers’ liking of students and changes in academic achievement only for Swiss students (95% CI = 0.003, 0.028) but not for non-Swiss students (95% CI = −0.008, 0.017). At the classroom-level, the change in peer inclusion did not play a mediational role across all groups.
References
Asher, S. R., Singleton, L. C., Tinsley, B. R., & Hymel, S. (1979). A reliable sociometric measure for preschool children. Developmental Psychology, 15, 443–444. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.15.4.443.
Baraldi, A. N., & Enders, C. K. (2010). An introduction to modern missing data analyses. Journal of School Psychology, 48, 5–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2009.10.001.
Buhs, E. S., & Ladd, G. W. (2001). Peer rejection as antecedent of young children’s school adjustment: an examination of mediating processes. Developmental Psychology, 37, 550–560. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.37.4.550.
Buhs, E. S., Ladd, G., & Herald, S. (2006). Peer exclusion and victimization: processes that mediate the relation between peer group rejection and children’s classroom engagement and achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.98.1.1.
Buhs, E. S., Ladd, G. W., & Herald-Brown, S. L. (2010). Victimization and exclusion: Links to peer rejection, classroom engagement, and achievement. In S. R. Jimerson, S. M. Swearer & D. L. Espelage (Eds), The handbook of school bullying: An international perspective (pp. 163–172). New York, NY: Routledge.
Caprara, G. V., Luengo Kanacri, B. P., Gerbino, M., Zuffianò, A., Alessandri, G., Vecchio, G., & Bridgall, B. (2014). Positive effects of promoting prosocial behavior in early adolescence: evidence from a school-based intervention. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 38, 386–396. https://doi.org/10.1177/0165025414531464.
Cassidy, J., & Asher, S. R. (1992). Loneliness and peer relations in young children. Child Development, 63(2), 350–365. https://doi.org/10.2307/1131484.
Chang, L., Liu, H., Wen, Z., Fung, K. Y., Wang, Y., & Xu, Y. (2004). Mediating teacher liking and moderating authoritative teaching on Chinese adolescents’ perceptions of antisocial and prosocial behaviors. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96, 369–380. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.96.2.369.
Chang, L., Liu, H., Fung, K. Y., Wang, Y., Wen, Z., Li, H., & Farver, J. M. (2007). The mediating and moderating effects of teacher preference on the relations between students’ social behaviors and peer acceptance. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 53, 603–630.
Chen, X., Chang, L., Liu, H., & He, Y. (2008). Effects of the peer group on the development of social functioning and academic achievement: a longitudinal study in Chinese children. Child Development, 79, 235–251.
Coplan, R. J., & Weeks, M. (2010). Unsociability in childhood. In K. H. Rubin & R. J. Coplan (Eds.), The development of shyness and social withdrawal (pp. 64–83). New York, NY: Guilford.
Enders, C. K. (2010). Applied missing data analysis. New York, NY: The Guilford Press.
Gallardo, L., Barrasa, A., & Guevara-Viejo, F. (2016). Positive peer relationships and academic achievement across early and midadolescence. Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal, 44, 1637–1648. https://doi.org/10.2224/sbp.2016.44.10.1637.
Galvan, A., Spatzier, A., & Juvonen, J. (2011). Perceived norms and social values to capture school culture in elementary and middle school. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 32, 346–353. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appdev.2011.08.005.
Gasser, L., Grütter, J., Buholzer, A., & Wettstein, A. (2018). Emotionally supportive classroom interactions and students' perceptions of theirteachers as caring and just. Learning and Instruction, 54, 82–92.
Gasser, L., Grütter, J., Torchetti, L., & Buholzer, A. (2017). Competitive classroom norms and exclusion of children with academic and behaviordifficulties. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 49, 1–11.
Gazelle, H. (2006). Class climate moderates peer relations and emotional adjustment in children with an early history of anxious solitude: a child environment model. Developmental Psychology, 42, 1179–1192. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.42.6.1179.
Gest, S. D., & Rodkin, P. C. (2011). Teaching practices and elementary classroom peer ecologies. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 32, 288–296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appdev.2011.02.004.
Grütter, J., Gasser, L., Zuffianò, A., & Meyer, B. (2018). Promoting inclusion via cross-group friendship: the mediating role of change in trustand sympathy. Child Development89, e414–e430.
Hamm, V., & Hoffman, A. S. (2016). Teachers‘ influence on students‘ peer relationships and peer ecologies. In K. Wentzel & G. Ramani (Eds.), Handbook of social influences in school contexts: Social-emotional, motivation and cognitive outcomes (pp. 208–229). New York, NY: Routledge.
Hamre, B. K., & Pianta, R. C. (2006). Student–teacher relationships. In G. C. Bear & K. M. Minke (Eds.), Children’s needs III: Development, prevention, and intervention (pp. 59–71). Washington, DC: National Association of School Psychologists.
Hughes, J. N., & Chen, Q. (2011). Reciprocal effects of student-teacher and student-peer relatedness: effects on academic self-efficacy. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 32(5), 278–287. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appdev.2010.03.005.
Hughes, J. N., Cavell, T. A., & Willson, V. (2001). Further support for the developmental significance of the quality of the teacher–student relationship. Journal of School Psychology, 39, 289–301. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-4405(01)00074-7.
Hughes, J. N., Dyer, N., Luo, W., & Kwok, O. (2009). Effects of peer academic reputation on achievement in academically at-risk elementary students. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 30, 182–194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appdev.2008.12.008.
Hughes, J. N., Im, M., & Wehrly, S. E. (2014). Effect of peer nominations of teacher-student support at individual and classroom levels on social and academic outcomes. Journal of School Psychology, 52, 309–322. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2013.12.004.
Juvonen, J., Espinoza, G., & Knifsend, C. (2012). The role of peer relationships in student academic and extracurricular engagement. In S. L. Christenson, A. L. Reschly & C. Wylie (Eds.), Handbook of research on student engagement (pp. 387–401). New York, NY, US: Springer Science+Business Media. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-2018-7_18.
Killen, M., & Rutland, A. (2011). Children and social exclusion: Morality, prejudice and group identity. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.
Kline, R. B. (2015). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
Kochel, K. P., Bagwell, C. L., Ladd, G. W., & Rudolph, K. D. (2017). Do positive peer relations mitigate transactions between depressive symptoms and peer victimization in adolescence? Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 51, 44–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appdev.2017.04.003.
Kopystynska, O., Spinrad, T. L., Seay, D. M., & Eisenberg, N. (2016). The interplay of maternal sensitivity and gentle control when predicting children’s subsequent academic functioning: evidence of mediation by effortful control. Developmental Psychology, 52, 909–921. https://doi.org/10.1037/dev0000122.
Ladd, G. W. (2003). Probing the adaptive significance of children’s behavior and relationships in the school context: a child by environment perspective. In R. Kail (Ed.), Advances in child development and behavior (pp. 43–104). New York, NY: Wiley.
Ladd, G. W., Herald-Brown, S. L., & Reiser, M. (2008). Does chronic classroom peer rejection predict the development of children’s classroom participation during the grade school years? Child Development, 79, 1001–1015. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2008.01172.x.
Little, R. J. A. (1988). A test of missing completely at random for multivariate data with missing values. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 83, 1198–1202. https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1988.10478722.
McAuliffe, M. D., Hubbard, J. A., & Romano, L. J. (2009). The role of teacher cognition and behavior in children’s peer relations. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 37, 665–677. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10802-009-9305-5.
McCormick, M., O’Connor, E. E., Cappella, E., & McClowry, S. (2013). Teacher-child relationships and academic achievement: a multi-level propensity score model approach. Journal of School Psychology, 51, 611–624. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2013.05.001.
McLeod, J. D., Uemura, R., & Rohrman, S. (2012). Adolescent mental health, behavior problems, and academic achievement. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 53, 482–497. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022146512462888.
Mercer, S. H., & DeRosier, M. E. (2008). Teacher preference, peer rejection, and student aggression: a prospective study of transactional influence and independent contributions to emotional adjustment and grades. Journal of School Psychology, 46, 661–685. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2008.06.006.
Mikami, A. Y., Lerner, M. D., & Lun, J. (2010). Social context influences on children’s rejection by their peers. Child Development Perspectives, 4, 123–130. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1750-8606.2010.00130.x.
Miles, S. B., & Stipek, D. (2006). Contemporaneous and longitudinal associations between social behavior and literacy achievement in a sample of low-income elementary school children. Child Development, 77, 103–117. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2006.00859.x.
Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (1998–2017). Mplus user’s guide. 8th Edn Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén.
Pianta, R. C. (1999). Enhancing relationships between children and teachers. Washington, DC, US: American Psychological Association.
Pianta, R. C., & Hamre, B. K. (2009). Conceptualization, measurement, and improvement of classroom processes: standardized observation can leverage capacity. Educational Researcher, 38(2), 109–119. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X09332374.
Reichelt, M., Collischon, M., & Eberl, A. (2019). School tracking and its role in social reproduction: reinforcing educational inheritance and the direct effects of social origin. The British Journal of Sociology. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-4446.12655. Advanced online publication.
Roeser, R. W., Midgley, C., & Urdan, T. C. (1996). Perception of the school environment and early adolescents’ psychological and behavioral functioning in school: the mediating role of goals and belonging. Journal of Educational Psychology, 88, 408–422. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.88.3.408.
Rogoff, B. (1998). Cognition as a collaborative process. In D. Kuhn & R. S. Siegler (Eds.), Cognition, perception, and language (Vol. 2, pp. 679–744). In W. Damon (Ed.), Handbook of child psychology (5th ed.). New York: Wiley.
Rubin, K. H., Bukowski, W. M., & Laursen, B. (2009). Handbook of Peer Interactions, Relationships, and Groups. New York, NY: Guilfort.
Sameroff, A. J., & Mackenzie, M. J. (2003). Research strategies for capturing transactional models of development: the limits of the possible. Development and Psychopathology, 15, 613–640. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954579403000312.
Schwartz, D., Gorman, A. H., Duong, M. T., & Nakamoto, J. (2008). Peer relationships and academic achievement as interacting predictors of depressive symptoms during middle childhood. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 117, 289–299. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-843X.117.2.289.
Sette, S., Spinrad, T. L., & Baumgartner, E. (2017). The relations of preschool children’s emotion knowledge and socially appropriate behaviors to peer likability. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 41, 532–541.
Taylor, A. R. (1989). Predictors of peer rejection in early elementary grades: roles of problem behavior, academic achievement, and teacher preference. Journal of Clinical Child Psychology, 18, 360–365.
Tetzner, J., Becker, M., & Maaz, K. (2017). Development in multiple areas of life in adolescence: Interrelations between academic achievement, perceived peer acceptance, and self-esteem. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 41, 704–713. https://doi.org/10.1177/0165025416664432.
Thompson, E. L., Mehari, K. R., & Farrell, A. D. (2019). Deviant peer factors during early adolescence: cause or consequence of physical aggression? Child Development. Advanced online publication. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.13242.
Tofighi, D., & MacKinnon, D. P. (2011). RMediation: an R package for mediation analysis confidence intervals. Behavior Research Methods, 43, 692–700. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-011-0076-x.
Véronneau, M. H., Vitaro, F., Brendgen, M., Dishion, T. J., & Tremblay, R. E. (2010). Transactional analysis of the reciprocal links between peer experiences and academic achievement from middle childhood to early adolescence. Developmental Psychology, 46, 773–790. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0019816.
Wang, M. T., & Fredericks, J. A. (2014). The reciprocal links between school engagement, youth problem behaviors, and school dropout during adolescence. Child Development, 85, 722–737. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.12138.
Wentzel, K. R., & Muenks, K. (2016). Peer influence on students‘ motivation, academic achievement, and social behavior. In K. Wentzel & G. Ramani (Eds.), Handbook of social influences in school contexts: Social-emotional, motivation and cognitive outcomes (pp. 13–30). New York, NY: Routledge.
Zhang, X., & Sun, J. (2011). The reciprocal relations between teachers’ perceptions of children’s behavior problems and teacher–child relationships in the first preschool year. Journal of Genetic Psychology, 172, 176–198. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221325.2010.528077.
Zuffianò, A., Alessandri, G., Gerbino, M., Luengo Kanacri, B. P., Di Giunta, L., Milioni, M., & Caprara, G. V. (2013). Academic achievement: The unique contribution of self-efficacy beliefs in self-regulated learning beyond intelligence, personality traits, and self-esteem. Learning and Individual Differences, 23, 158–162. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2012.07.010.
Acknowledgements
The authors thank Dr. Antonio Zuffianò for the help and support in the analyses. The authors also thank the children and teachers who participated in this study.
Authors’ Contributions
SS participated in the design, performed the statistical analysis, participated in the interpretation of the data, drafted the manuscript, and revised it critically for important intellectual content; LG conceived of the study, participated in its design and coordination, acquired data, participated in the interpretation of the data, drafted the manuscript, and revised it critically for important intellectual content; and JG participated in the design and coordination of the study, acquired the data, participated in the interpretation of the data, helped to draft the manuscript, and revised it critically for important intellectual content. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Funding
This study was funded by the Swiss National Science Foundation (13DPD3_124764).
Data Sharing Declaration
The datasets generated and/or analyzed during the current study are not publicly available but are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Ethical Approval
The surveys have all received ethical clearance from the research commission of the University of Teacher Education Lucerne (Toepferstrasse 10, 6004 Lucerne, Switzerland).
Informed Consent
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
Additional information
Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Sette, S., Gasser, L. & Grütter, J. Links Between Teachers’ Liking of Students, Peer Inclusion, and Students’ Academic Achievement: A Two-Wave Longitudinal Study. J Youth Adolescence 49, 747–756 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-019-01048-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-019-01048-5