Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Maternal Depressive Symptoms and Adolescent Health Risk Problems: The Role of School Engagement

  • Empirical Research
  • Published:
Journal of Youth and Adolescence Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Maternal depressive symptoms disrupt positive youth development, though the pervasiveness of this disruption is understudied. Additionally, it remains unknown whether prosocial factors such as adolescent school engagement may buffer against this risk factor. Using multigenerational, longitudinal data spanning ten years from an ethnically diverse sample of mother-child dyads (66% Black, 17% Hispanic, and 17% White), this study examines the effect of maternal depressive symptoms in late childhood (ages 8–13) on the development and progression of offspring depressive symptoms, substance use, and delinquent behavior during adolescence (ages 14–17). Further, the study examines whether school engagement moderates the ill effects of maternal depressive symptoms. Mother-son (n = 212) and mother-daughter (n = 215) dyads are compared to assess for similarities and differences between male and female offspring. The results indicate that offspring of mothers with greater maternal depressive symptoms are more likely to display higher levels of depressive symptoms, substance use, and delinquency throughout adolescence, although important nuances emerge across outcome and child sex. Additionally, while school engagement itself is associated with reduced depressive symptoms, substance use and delinquency among adolescents, it is not profound enough to offset the risk posed by maternal depressive symptoms. The findings of this study reinforce the pervasive, negative, intergenerational impact of maternal depressive symptoms and has implications for prevention and intervention efforts for adolescent health risk problems.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Unfortunately, limited sample sizes across race/ethnicity preclude the ability to examine if race/ethnicity moderates the proposed relationships.

  2. Only 476 mother-child dyads met the criteria for having a G3 complete at least one interview between the ages of 14 and 17 (63 were not yet 14 years of age at the last data collection). Nine mother-child dyads were removed from the sample because there was no information on maternal depressive symptoms between the ages of eight and 13, and an additional 27 mother-child dyads were removed because there was not at least three years of information on maternal depressive symptoms. The remaining 13 mother-child dyads were removed as a result of listwise deletion.

  3. One item from the original scale (“I felt that I could not shake off the blues even with help from my family and friends”) was not administered in this sample due to confusion reported by subjects in a pretest.

  4. Individual growth curves of maternal depressive symptoms were created and the intercept and slope of the growth curves (a linear slope best represented maternal growth curves) were used as predictors of each adolescent behavior. Given that only the intercept (i.e., level) was a significant predictor of adolescent behavior and not the slope (i.e., growth) of maternal depressive symptoms, we opted to present the results for the average of maternal depressive symptoms in late childhood for ease in interpretation. The effects of the intercept of maternal depressive symptoms and the average level of maternal depressive symptoms are the same in direction and significance.

  5. Due to differences in the CES-D (Radloff, 1977), the CES-D Adolescent (Radloff, 1977), and the principal investigators preferences, the reference period and response options for depressive symptoms vary between maternal measures of depressive symptoms and child measures of depressive symptoms.

  6. Given that maternal age at birth of G3 was highly correlated with G3’s year of birth, both covariates were not included in the models simultaneously. Nonetheless, all models were estimated with each covariate, respectively - maternal age at G3 birth and G3 birth year—and the results were the same in direction and significance.

  7. For simplicity, we did not allow slopes to vary across individuals.

  8. Tests for significant difference in means were calculated using the following formula: \(t = \frac{{\left( { {x_1} } \right. - {\left. {x_2} \right)} }}{{\sqrt {\frac{{s_1^2}}{{n_1}} + \frac{{s_2^2}}{{n_2}}} }}\)

References

  • Ahun, M. N., Consoli, A., Pingault, J. B., Falissard, B., Battaglia, M., Boivin, M., Tremblay, R. E., & Côté, S. M. (2018). Maternal depression symptoms and internalising problems in the offspring: the role of maternal and family factors. European child & adolescent psychiatry, 27(7), 921–932.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ammerman, R. T., Putnam, F. W., Altaye, M., Stevens, J., Teeters, A. R., & Van Ginkel, J. B. (2013). A clinical trial of in-home CBT for depressed mothers in home visitation. Behavior Therapy, 44(3), 359–372.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Augustyn, M. B., Fulco, C. J., & Henry, K. L. (2018). Intergenerational continuity in depression: The importance of time-varying effects, maternal co-morbid health risk behaviors and child’s gender. Journal of youth and adolescence, 47(10), 2143–2168.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Avenevoli, S., Swendsen, J., He, J. P., Burstein, M., & Merikangas, K. R. (2015). Major depression in the National Comorbidity Survey–Adolescent Supplement: prevalence, correlates, and treatment. Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 54(1), 37–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beyers, J. M., & Loeber, R. (2003). Untangling developmental relations between depressed mood and delinquency in male adolescents. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 31(3), 247–266.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bond, L., Butler, H., Thomas, L., Carlin, J., Glover, S., Bowes, G., & Patton, G. (2007). Social and school engagement in early secondary school as predictors of late teenage substance use, mental health, and academic outcomes. Journal of Adolescent Health, 40(4), 357. e9–18.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bonell, C., Shackleton, N., Fletcher, A., Jamal, F., Allen, E., Mathiot, A., Markham, W., Aveyard, P., & Viner, R. (2017). Student-and school-level belonging and commitment and student smoking, drinking and misbehaviour. Health education journal, 76(2), 206–220.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bradshaw, C. P., Schaeffer, C. M., Petras, H., & Ialongo, N. (2010). Predicting negative life outcomes from early aggressive–disruptive behavior trajectories: Gender differences in maladaptation across life domains. Journal of youth and adolescence, 39(8), 953–966.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Brame, R., Paternoster, R., Mazerolle, P., & Piquero, A. (1998). Testing for the equality of maximum-likelihood regression coefficients between two independent equations. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 14(3), 245–261.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brennan, P. A., Hammen, C., Andersen, M. J., Bor, W., Najman, J. M., & Williams, G. M. (2000). Chronicity, severity, and timing of maternal depressive symptoms: relationships with child outcomes at age 5. Developmental psychology, 36(6), 759.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Brennan, P. A., Le Brocque, R., & Hammen, C. (2003). Maternal depression, parent–child relationships, and resilient outcomes in adolescence. Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 42(12), 1469–1477.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brook, J. S., Whiteman, M., Nomura, C., Gordon, A. S., & Cohen, P. (1988). Personality, family, and ecological influences on adolescent drug use: A developmental analysis. Journal of Chemical Dependency Treatment, 1(2), 123–161.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bussey, K., & Bandura, A. (1999). Social cognitive theory of gender development and differentiation. Psychological review, 106(4), 676.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, S. B., Morgan-Lopez, A. A., Cox, M. J., & McLoyd, V. C. (2009). A latent class analysis of maternal depressive symptoms over 12 years and offspring adjustment in adolescence. Journal of abnormal psychology, 118(3), 479.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Carter, A. (2019). The consequences of adolescent delinquent behavior for adult employment outcomes. Journal of youth and adolescence, 48(1), 17–29.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Catalano, R. F., Oesterle, S., Fleming, C. B., & Hawkins, J. D. (2004). The importance of bonding to school for healthy development: Findings from the Social Development Research Group. Journal of school health, 74(7), 252–261.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, M. A., & Piquero, A. R. (2009). New evidence on the monetary value of saving a high risk youth. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 25(1), 25–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Copeland, W. E., Wolke, D., Shanahan, L., & Costello, E. J. (2015). Adult functional outcomes of common childhood psychiatric problems: a prospective, longitudinal study. JAMA psychiatry, 72(9), 892–899.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Evans, S. Z., Simons, L. G., & Simons, R. L. (2016). Factors that influence trajectories of delinquency throughout adolescence. Journal of youth and adolescence, 45(1), 156–171.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Farnworth, M., Thornberry, T. P., Krohn, M. D., & Lizotte, A. J. (1994). Measurement in the study of class and delinquency: Integrating theory and research. Journal of research in crime and delinquency, 31(1), 32–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flory, K., Lynam, D., Milich, R., Leukefeld, C., & Clayton, R. (2004). Early adolescent through young adult alcohol and marijuana use trajectories: Early predictors, young adult outcomes, and predictive utility. Development and psychopathology, 16(1), 193–213.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fontaine, N. M., Brendgen, M., Vitaro, F., & Tremblay, R. E. (2016). Compensatory and protective factors against violent delinquency in late adolescence: Results from the Montreal longitudinal and experimental study. Journal of Criminal Justice, 45, 54–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gajos, J. M., & Beaver, K. M. (2017). Maternal depression and risk for antisocial behaviour in children. Child & Family Social Work, 22(1), 349–363.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gardner, W., Mulvey, E. P., & Shaw, E. C. (1995). Regression analyses of counts and rates: Poisson, overdispersed Poisson, and negative binomial models. Psychological bulletin, 118(3), 392.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gelfand, D. M., & Teti, D. M. (1990). The effects of maternal depression on children. Clinical Psychology Review, 10(3), 329–353.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodman, S. H., & Garber, J. (2017). Evidence‐based interventions for depressed mothers and their young children. Child development, 88(2), 368–377.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Guo, J., Hawkins, J. D., Hill, K. G., & Abbott, R. D. (2001). Childhood and adolescent predictors of alcohol abuse and dependence in young adulthood. Journal of studies on alcohol, 62(6), 754–762.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Gustafsson, H. C., & Cox, M. J. (2012). Relations among intimate partner violence, maternal depressive symptoms, and maternal parenting behaviors. Journal of Marriage and Family, 74(5), 1005–1020.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Haynie, D. L., & Osgood, D. W. (2005). Reconsidering peers and delinquency: How do peers matter? Social Forces, 84(2), 1109–1130.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heron, M. (2018). Deaths: Leading causes for 2016. National Vital Statistics Reports, 67(6). Hyattsville MD; National Center for Health Statistics.

  • Hoeve, M., Dubas, J. S., Gerris, J. R., van der Laan, P. H., & Smeenk, W. (2011). Maternal and paternal parenting styles: Unique and combined links to adolescent and early adult delinquency. Journal of adolescence, 34(5), 813–827.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jacobson, K. C., & Rowe, D. C. (1999). Genetic and environmental influences on the relationships between family connectedness, school connectedness, and adolescent depressed mood: sex differences. Developmental Psychology, 35(4), 926.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jenkins, P. H. (1995). School delinquency and school commitment. Sociology of Education, 68(3), 221–239.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joyce, H. D., & Early, T. J. (2014). The impact of school engagement and teacher support on depressive symptoms in adolescents: A multilevel analysis. Children and youth services review, 39, 101–107.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Kuckertz, J. M., Mitchell, C., & Wiggins, J. L. (2018). Parenting mediates the impact of maternal depression on child internalizing symptoms. Depression and anxiety, 35(1), 89–97.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lam, S. F., Jimerson, S., Kikas, E., Cefai, C., Veiga, F. H., Nelson, B., Hatzichristou, C., Polychroni, F., Basnett, J., Duck, R., Farrell, P., Liu, Y., Negovan, V., Shin, H., Stanculescu, E., Wong, B. P. H., Yang, H., & Zollneritsch, J. (2012). Do girls and boys perceive themselves as equally engaged in school? The results of an international study from 12 countries. Journal of school psychology, 50(1), 77–94.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, S., & Smith-Adcock, S. (2005). A model of girls’ school delinquency: School bonding and reputation. Professional school counseling, 9(1), 78–87.

    Google Scholar 

  • Libbey, H. P. (2004). Measuring student relationships to school: Attachment, bonding, engagement, and engagement. Journal of school health, 74(7), 274–283.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Luthar, S. S., & Sexton, C. C. (2007). Maternal drug abuse versus maternal depression: Vulnerability and resilience among school-age and adolescent offspring. Development and Psychopathology, 19(1), 205–225.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Maguin, E., & Loeber, R. (1996). Academic performance and delinquency. Crime and justice, 20, 145–264.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malecki, C. K., & Demaray, M. K. (2002). Measuring perceived social support: Development of the child and adolescent social support scale (CASSS). Psychology in the Schools, 39(1), 1–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mason, W. A., Chmelka, M. B., Trudeau, L., & Spoth, R. L. (2017). Gender moderation of the intergenerational transmission and stability of depressive symptoms from early adolescence to early adulthood. Journal of youth and adolescence, 46(1), 248–260.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mesman, J., & Groeneveld, M. G. (2018). Gendered parenting in early childhood: Subtle but unmistakable if you know where to look. Child Development Perspectives, 12(1), 22–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mikkonen, J., Moustgaard, H., Remes, H., & Martikainen, P. (2016). Intergenerational transmission of depressive symptoms - The role of gender, socioeconomic circumstances, and the accumulation of parental symptoms. Journal of Affective Disorders, 204, 74–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2016.06.036.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, J. W., Naimi, T. S., Brewer, R. D., & Jones, S. E. (2007). Binge drinking and associated health risk behaviors among high school students. Pediatrics, 119(1), 76–85.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (NIAAA). Alcohol Alert, No. 67, “Underage Drinking,” 2006. Available at: https://pubs.niaaa.nih.gov/publications/AA67/AA67.htm.

  • Nolen-Hoeksema, S., & Hilt, L. (2006). Possible contributors to the gender differences in alcohol use and problems. The Journal of general psychology, 133(4), 357–374.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Oetting, E. R., & Donnermeyer, J. F. (1998). Primary socialization theory: The etiology of drug use and deviance. I. Substance use & misuse, 33(4), 995–1026.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pate, C. M., Maras, M. A., Whitney, S. D., & Bradshaw, C. P. (2017). Exploring psychosocial mechanisms and interactions: Links between adolescent emotional distress, school engagement, and educational achievement. School mental health, 9(1), 28–43.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Patel, V., Chisholm, D., Parikh, R., Charlson, F. J., Degenhardt, L., Dua, T., & Lund, C. (2016). Addressing the burden of mental, neurological, and substance use disorders: key messages from Disease Control Priorities. The Lancet, 387(10028), 1672–1685.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paternoster, R., Brame, R., Mazerolle, P., & Piquero, A. (1998). Using the correct statistical test for the equality of regression coefficients. Criminology, 36(4), 859–866.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pilowsky, D. J., Wickramaratne, P. J., Rush, A. J., Hughes, C. W., Garber, J., Malloy, E., & Wisniewski, S. R. (2006). Children of currently depressed mothers: a STAR* D ancillary study. The Journal of clinical psychiatry, 67(1), 126–36.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Radloff, L. S. (1977). The CES-D Scale: A self-report depression scale for research in the general population. Applied Psychological Measurement, 1(3), 385–401. https://doi.org/10.1177/014662167700100306.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rebellon, C. J., Manasse, M. E., Agnew, R., Van Gundy, K. T., & Cohn, E. S. (2016). The relationship between gender and delinquency: Assessing the mediating role of anticipated guilt. Journal of Criminal Justice, 44, 77–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sanders, M. R., Markie-Dadds, C., & Turner, K. M. (2003). Theoretical, scientific and clinical foundations of the Triple P-Positive Parenting Program: A population approach to the promotion of parenting competence (Vol. 1). Queensland: Parenting and Family Support Centre, The University of Queensland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schuler, M. S., Vasilenko, S. A., & Lanza, S. T. (2015). Age-varying associations between substance use behaviors and depressive symptoms during adolescence and young adulthood. Drug and alcohol dependence, 157, 75–82.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, D. A., & Paternoster, R. (1987). The gender gap in theories of deviance: Issues and evidence. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 24(2), 140–172.

    Google Scholar 

  • StataCorp, L. P. (2015). Stata 15. College station. TX, USA.

  • Thornberry, T. P., Henry, K. L., Krohn, M. D., Lizotte, A. J., & Nadel, E. L. (2018). Key findings from the Rochester intergenerational study. Intergenerational Continuity of Criminal and Antisocial Behavior: An International Overview of Current Studies. London, England: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, M. T., Willett, J. B., & Eccles, J. S. (2011). The assessment of school engagement: Examining dimensionality and measurement invariance by gender and race/ethnicity. Journal of School Psychology, 49(4), 465–480.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Warr, M. (2002). Companions in crime: The social aspects of criminal conduct. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

  • Welsh, B. C., Loeber, R., Stevens, B. R., Stouthamer-Loeber, M., Cohen, M. A., & Farrington, D. P. (2008). Costs of juvenile crime in urban areas: A longitudinal perspective. Youth violence and juvenile justice, 6(1), 3–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wickham, M. E., Senthilselvan, A., Wild, T. C., Hoglund, W. L., & Colman, I. (2015). Maternal depressive symptoms during childhood and risky adolescent health behaviors. Pediatrics, 135(1), 59–67.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Zalewski, M., Thompson, S. F., & Lengua, L. J. (2017). Parenting as a moderator of the effects of maternal depressive symptoms on preadolescent adjustment. Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology, 46(4), 563–572.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Adrienne Freeman-Gallant, PhD. and Rebekah Chu, Ph.D. for their assistance in compiling, managing, and preparing the data for the analysis.

Funding

Support for the Rochester Youth Development Study has been provided by the National Institute on Drug Abuse (R01DA020195, R01DA005512), the Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention (86-JN-CX-0007, 96-MU-FX-0014, 2004-MU-FX-0062), the National Science Foundation (SBR-9123299), and the National Institute of Mental Health (R01MH56486, R01MH63386). Technical assistance for this project was also provided by an NICHD grant (R24HD044943) to The Center for Social and Demographic Analysis at the University at Albany. Points of view or opinions in this document are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official position or policies of the funding agencies.

Authors’ Contributions

CF conceived of the study, participated in its design and coordination, and drafted the manuscript; MBA conceived of the study, participated in the study design and coordination, performed the measurement and statistical analysis, and helped draft the manuscript; KH conceived of the study, participated in its design and interpretation of the data, and helped to draft the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Data Sharing Declaration

The data for this study are not currently available to the public, but provisions to deposit the Rochester Intergenerational Study data at the Inter-University Consortium for Political and Social Research are currently underway.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Celia J. Fulco.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. Additionally, all research conducted was in compliance with the research procedures set forth by the University at Albany.

Informed Consent

Informed consent was obtained from all participants in this research and was approved by the Institutional Review Board at the University at Albany.

Additional information

Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendices

Appendix A. Individual Items in Scales

Maternal Depressive Symptoms (α = 0.91–.94)

In the past two weeks, how often did you?

Responses: 0 (Never), 1 (Seldom), 2 (Sometimes), 3 (Often), 4 (Always)

1. Feel bothered by things that don’t usually bother you?

2. Not feel like eating or have a poor appetite?

3. Feel you had trouble keeping your mind on what you were doing?

4. Feel depressed?

5. Feel that everything you did was an effort, or that everything was difficult for you to do?

6. Feel hopeful for the future? (reverse coded)

7. Feel that you were just as good as other people? (reverse coded)

8. Think your life has been a failure?

9. Feel fearful?

10. Sleep restlessly?

11. Feel happy? (reverse coded)

12. Feel that you talked less than usual?

13. Feel lonely?

14. Feel that people were unfriendly?

15. Feel you enjoyed life? (reverse coded)

16. Have crying spells?

17. Feel sad?

18. Feel people disliked you?

19. Feel that you could not “get going”?

Adolescent Delinquency

Since the date of the last interview, have you? No/Yes.

If yes, how many times?

1. Run away from home in the past year?

2. Skipped classes without an excuse in the past year?

3. Lied about your age to get into some place or to buy something?

4. Hitchhiked a ride with a stranger?

5. Carried a hidden weapon?

6. Been loud or rowdy in a public place where somebody complained and you got in trouble?

7. Begged for money or things from strangers?

8. Been drunk in a public place?

9. Damage, destroyed or marked up somebody else’s property on purpose?

10. Set fire on purpose or tried to set fire to a house, building or car?

11. Avoided paying for things, like a movie, taking bus rides, using a computer or anything else?

12. Gone into or tried to go into a building to steal or damage something?

13. Tried to steal or actually stolen money or things worth $5 or less?

14. Tried to steal or actually stolen money or things worth between $5 and $50?

15. Tried to steal or actually stolen money or things between $50 and $100?

16. Tried to steal or actually stolen money or things over $100?

17. Tried to buy or sell things that were stolen?

18. Take a car or motorcycle for a ride without the owner’s permission?

19. Stolen or tried to steal a car or motor vehicle?

20. Forged a check or used fake money to pay for something?

21. Used or tried to use a credit card, bank card, or automatic teller card without permission?

22. Attacked someone with a weapon or with the idea of seriously hurting or killing them?

23. Hit someone with the idea of hurting them, other than what you already mentioned?

24. Been involved in a gang or posse fight?

25. Thrown objects such as rocks or bottles at people, other than what you already mentioned?

26. Used a weapon or force to make someone give you money?

27. Made obscene phone calls?

28. Been paid for having sexual relations with someone?

29. Physically hurt or threatened to hurt someone to get them to have sex with you?

30. Sold marijuana, weed or reefer?

31. Sold hard drugs such as crack, heroin, cocaine, LSD or acid?

Adolescent Depressive Symptoms (α = 0.88–.90)

Since your last interview, how often did you? 0) Never, 1) Almost never, 2) Sometimes, 3) Often

1. Feel you had trouble keeping your mind on what you were doing?

2. Feel depressed or very sad?

3. Feel hopeful about the future? (reverse-coded)

4. Feel bothered by things that don’t usually bother you?

5. Not feel like eating because you felt upset about something?

6. Feel that everything you did was an effort, or that everything was difficult for you to do?

7. Feel scared or afraid?

8. Toss and turn because you couldn’t sleep?

9. Feel that you talked less than usual?

10. Feel nervous or stressed?

11. Feel lonely?

12. Feel people disliked you?

13. Feel you enjoyed life? (reverse-coded)

School Engagement (α = 0.84)

How much do you agree or disagree with these statements? 1) Strongly disagree, 2) Disagree, 3) Agree, 4) Strongly Agree

1. You like school a lot

2. School is boring to you (reverse-coded)

3. You do poorly at school (reverse-coded)

4. You don’t really belong at school (reverse-coded)

5. Homework is a waste of time (reverse-coded)

6. You try hard at school

7. You usually finish your homework

8. Getting good grades is important to you

9. Sometimes you do extra work to improve your grades

How important is it to you? 1) Not important at all, 2) Not very important, 3) Important, 4) Very important

1. To graduate from high school?

2. To go to college?

3. To graduate from college?

What are your grades in? 0) Failing, 1) Below average, 2) Average, 3) Above average

1. English or language arts?

2. History or social studies?

3. Arithmetic or math?

4. Science?

Peer Support (α = 0.90)

If you needed to, how likely would you be to? 1) Very unlikely, 2) Unlikely, 3) Likely, 4) Very likely

1. Talk to friends about personal or private things?

2. Ask friends for advice when you need to make an important decision?

3. Borrow money from a friend?

4. Talk to friends about problems you are having with family members?

5. Talk to friends about trouble you are having at school?

6. Go to friends for help in an emergency?

7. How likely friends are to care about you no matter what is happening in your life?

Peer Delinquency

Since your last interview, how many of these friends? 1) None of them, 2) A few of them (1 or 2), 3) Some of them, 4) Most of them

1. Used money or force to get money or things from people?

2. Attacked someone with a weapon or with the idea of seriously hurting them?

3. Hit someone with the idea of hurting them?

4. Stole something worth more than $100?

5. Stole something worth more than $5 but less than $50?

6. Damaged or destroyed someone else’s property?

7. Took a car or motorcycle for a ride or drive without the owner’s permission?

8. Used marijuana, weed or reefer?

9. Used ecstasy, “X”, “E”, or other club drugs?

10. Used hard drugs such as crack, heroin, cocaine, LSD or acid?

11. Drank beer, wine or liquor?

Appendix B. Correlation Matrix for Mother-Son Dyads (N*T = 745, N = 212)

 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

1

1.00

             

2

0.10**

1.00

            

3

0.12**

0.39**

1.00

           

4

0.15**

0.15**

0.07*

1.00

          

5

−0.25**

−0.22**

−0.19**

−0.09*

1.00

         

6

0.00

0.12**

0.02

0.01

0.18**

1.00

        

7

0.22**

0.49**

0.37**

0.08

−0.31**

0.04

1.00

       

8

0.05

−0.06

−0.03

−0.09

−0.01

0.08*

−0.03

1.00

      

9

0.05

0.01

−0.02

−0.26**

−0.07

0.06

0.04

−0.09*

1.00

     

10

0.02

0.28**

0.14

−0.03

−0.10**

0.28**

0.16**

−0.04

−0.00

1.00

    

11

−0.06

−0.05

−0.06

−0.11**

0.07*

0.04

−0.01

−0.20**

0.03

0.01

1.00

   

12

0.08*

0.03

0.08*

0.11**

−0.00

−0.01

0.04

0.01

0.02

−0.01

−0.64**

1.00

  

13

−0.08*

−0.04

−0.07*

−0.09*

0.12**

0.09*

−0.06

0.18**

−0.04

−0.06

−0.17**

−0.04

1.00

 

14

−0.05

−0.10*

−0.02

−0.01

0.10**

−0.01

−0.06

−0.00

0.01

−0.01

0.10

0.06

−0.18**

1.00

*p < .05, **p< .01

1. Adolescent depressive symptoms (Avg. 14–17)

8. Live with both parents (Avg.14–17)

2. Adolescent substance use (Avg. 14–17)

9. Financial strain (Avg.14–17)

3. Adolescent delinquency (Avg.14–17)

10. Age

4. Maternal depressive symptoms (Avg. 8–13)

11. Black

5. School engagement (Avg.14–17)

12. Hispanic

6. Peer support (Avg.14–17)

13. G3 Birth year

7. Peer delinquency (Avg.14–17)

14. Neighborhood arrest rate

Appendix C. Correlation Matrix For Mother-Daughter Dyads (N*T = 759, N = 215)

 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

1

1.00

             

2

0.26**

1.00

            

3

0.16**

0.44**

1.00

           

4

0.30**

0.11**

0.08*

1.00

          

5

−0.32**

−0.33**

−0.30**

−0.11**

1.00

         

6

−0.06

0.07*

−0.01

0.00

0.18**

1.00

        

7

0.28**

0.56**

0.40**

0.07*

−0.28**

0.06

1.00

       

8

−0.06

0.00

−0.01

−0.06

0.03

−0.03

−0.04

1.00

      

9

0.19**

0.12**

0.04

0.29**

−0.16**

−0.05

0.06

−0.03

1.00

     

10

0.02

0.23**

0.08*

0.02

0.01

0.26**

0.10**

−0.03

0.09*

1.00

    

11

−0.07*

−0.14**

−0.03

−0.12**

0.16**

0.01

−0.02

−0.11**

−0.13**

0.01

1.00

   

12

0.03

−0.01

−0.06

0.19**

−0.08*

−0.01

−0.02

−0.03

0.08*

−0.01

−0.63**

1.00

  

13

−0.10**

−0.01

−0.03

−0.05

0.07*

−0.01

0.01

0.20**

0.00

−0.09*

−0.21**

0.06

1.00

 

14

−0.08*

−0.05

0.03

0.00

0.06

−0.11**

−0.07*

−0.04

−0.03

0.03

0.19**

0.01

−0.09*

1.00

*p< .05, **p< .01

1. Adolescent depressive symptoms (Avg. 14–17)

8. Live with both parents (Avg.14–17)

2. Adolescent substance use (Avg. 14–17)

9. Financial strain (Avg.14–17)

3. Adolescent delinquency (Avg.14–17)

10. Age

4. Maternal depressive symptoms (Avg. 8–13)

11. Black

5. School engagement (Avg.14–17)

12. Hispanic

6. Peer support (Avg.14–17)

13. G3 Birth year

7. Peer delinquency (Avg.14–17)

14. Neighborhood arrest rate

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Fulco, C.J., Bears Augustyn, M. & Henry, K.L. Maternal Depressive Symptoms and Adolescent Health Risk Problems: The Role of School Engagement. J Youth Adolescence 49, 102–118 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-019-01046-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-019-01046-7

Keywords

Navigation