Abstract
The normative process of autonomy development in adolescence involves changes in adolescents’ information management typically characterized by decreasing disclosure and increasing concealment. These changes may have an important impact on the early detection and timely treatment of mental health conditions and risky behavior. Therefore, the objective was to extend our understanding of how these developmental changes in adolescent disclosure might impact adolescent mental health interviews. Specifically, we estimated the effects of third party presence and type of third party presence (adult, child, or both) on adolescents’ reports of psychiatric symptoms, substance use, suicidal behavior, and childhood adversity. In this representative sample of 3005 adolescents from Mexico City (52.1 % female), administered the World Mental Health Composite International Diagnostic Interview (WMH-CIDI-A), adult presence influenced reporting the most; in their presence, adolescents reported more ADHD, parental mental illness and economic adversity, but less panic disorder, PTSD, drug use and disorder, and suicidal behavior. The presence of children was associated with increased odds of reporting conduct disorder, opportunity for drug use, parental criminal behavior, neglect, and the death of a parent. While adolescent information management strategies are normative and even desirable as a means of gaining emotional autonomy, they may also interfere with timely detection and treatment or intervention for mental health conditions and risky behaviors. Research and practical implications of these findings are discussed.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
American Psychiatric Association. (1994). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders, (DSM-IV) (4th ed.). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association.
Aquilino, W. S. (1997). Privacy effects on self-reported drug use: Interactions with survey mode and respondent characteristics. NIDA Research Monograph, 167, 383–415.
Aquilino, W. S., Wright, D. L., & Supple, A. J. (2000). Response effects due to bystander presence in CASI and paper-and-pencil surveys of drug use and alcohol use. Substance Use & Misuse, 35(6–8), 845–867.
Benjet, C., Borges, G., Medina-Mora, M. E., Zambrano, J., & Aguilar-Gaxiola, S. (2009). Youth mental health in a populous city of the developing world: Results from the Mexican Adolescent Mental Health Survey. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 50(4), 386–395.
Benjet, C., Borges, G., Méndez, E., Casanova, L., & Medina-Mora, M. E. (2014). Adolescent alcohol use and alcohol use disorders in Mexico City. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 136, 43–50.
Brener, N. D., Eaton, D. K., Kann, L., Grunbaum, J. A., Gross, L. A., Kyle, T. M., & Ross, J. G. (2006). The association of survey setting and mode with self-reported health risk behaviors among high school students. Public Opinion Quarterly, 70(3), 354.
Campione-Barr, N., Lindell, A. K., Giron, S. E., Killoren, S. E., & Greer, K. B. (2015). Domain differentiated disclosure to mothers and siblings and associations with sibling relationship quality and youth emotional adjustment. Developmental Psychology, 51(9), 1278–1291.
Chan, H. Y., Brown, B. B., & Von Bank, H. (2015). Adolescent disclosure of information about peers: The mediating role of perceptions of parents’ right to know. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 44(5), 1048–1065.
Courtney, M. E., Piliavin, I., Grogan-Kaylor, A., & Nesmith, A. (1998). Foster youth transitions to adulthood: A longitudinal view of youth leaving care. Madison, WI: Institute for Research on Poverty.
Davis, C. G., Thake, J., & Vilhena, N. (2010). Social desirability biases in self-reported alcohol consumption and harms. Addictive Behaviors, 35(4), 302–311.
Diop, A., Le, K. T., & Traugott, M. (2015). Third-party presence effect with propensity score matching. Journal of Survey Statistics and Methodology, 3(2), 193–215.
Endicott, J., Andreasen, N., & Spitzer, R. L. (1978). Family history research diagnostic criteria. New York, NY: New York State Psychiatric Institute.
Epstein, J. F., Barker, P. R., & Kroutil, L. A. (2001). Mode effects in self-reported mental health data. Public Opinion Quarterly, 65(4), 529–549.
Gans, J. E., & Brindis, C. D. (1995). Choice of research setting in understanding adolescent health problems. Journal of Adolescent Health, 17(5), 306–313.
Gfroerer, J., Wright, D., & Kopstein, A. (1997). Prevalence of youth substance use: The impact of methodological differences between two national surveys. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 47(1), 19–30.
Green, J. G., McLaughlin, K. A., Berglund, P. A., Gruper, M. J., Sampson, N. A., Zaslavsky, A. M., et al. (2010). Childhood adversities and adult psychiatric disorders in the national comorbidity survey replication I: Associations with first onset of DSM-IV disorders. Archives of General Psychiatry, 67, 113–123.
Hofstede, G., Hofstede, G. J., & Minkov, M. (2010). Cultures and organizations: Software of the mind: Intercultural cooperation and its importance for survival. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
Holtgraves, T. (2004). Social desirability and self-reports: Testing models of socially desirable responding. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30(2), 161–172.
Hoyt, G. M., & Chaloupka, F. J. (1994). Effect of survey conditions on self-reported substance use. Contemporary Economic Policy, 12(3), 109–121.
Instituto Mexicano de la Juventud. (2005). Jóvenes Mexicanos: Encuesta Nacional de Juventud [Mexican Youth: National Survey of Youth 2005]. [consulted 2010 October 12]. http://cendoc.imjuventud.gob.mx/investigacion/docs/ENJ2005-TomoI.swf.
Jensen, P. S., Rubio-Stipec, M., Canino, G., Bird, H. R., Dulcan, M. K., Schwab-Stone, M. E., & Lahey, B. B. (1999). Parent and child contributions to diagnosis of mental disorder: Are both informants always necessary? Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 38(12), 1569–1579.
Johnson, T. P., & Van de Vijver, F. J. (2002). Social desirability in cross-cultural research. In J. A. Harkness, F. J. R. van de Vijver, & P. P. Mohler (Eds.), Cross-cultural survey methods (pp. 195–204). New York: Wiley Series in Survey Methodology.
Kann, L., Brener, N. D., Warren, C. W., Collins, J. L., & Giovino, G. A. (2002). An assessment of the effect of data collection setting on the prevalence of health risk behaviors among adolescents. Journal of Adolescent Health, 31(4), 327–335.
Keijsers, L., & Poulin, F. (2013). Developmental changes in parent–child communication throughout adolescence. Developmental Psychology, 49(12), 2301–2308.
Kerr, M., & Stattin, H. (2000). What parents know, how they know it, and several forms of adolescent adjustment: Further support for a reinterpretation of monitoring. Developmental Psychology, 36(3), 366–380.
Kessler, R. C., Avenevoli, S., Green, J., Gruber, M. J., Guyer, M., He, Y., et al. (2009). National comorbidity survey replication adolescent supplement (NCS-A): III. Concordance of DSM-IV/CIDI diagnoses with clinical reassessments. Journal of the Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 48, 386–399.
Kessler, R. C., McLaughlin, K. A., Green, J. G., Gruber, M. J., Sampson, N. A., Zaslavsky, A. M., et al. (2010). Childhood adversities and adult psychopathology in the WHO World Mental Health Surveys. British Journal of Psychiatry, 197, 378–385.
Kessler, R. C., & Ustun, T. B. (2004). The world mental health (WMH) survey initiative version of the world health organization (WHO) composite international diagnostic interview (CIDI). International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research, 13, 93–121.
Krumpal, I. (2013). Determinants of social desirability bias in sensitive surveys: A literature review. Quality & Quantity, 47(4), 2025–2047.
Laird, R. D., Marrero, M. D., Melching, J. A., & Kuhn, E. S. (2013). Information management strategies in early adolescence: Developmental change in use and transactional associations with psychological adjustment. Developmental Psychology, 49(5), 928–937.
McElvaney, R., Greene, S., & Hogan, D. (2014). To tell or not to tell? factors influencing young people’s informal disclosures of child sexual abuse. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 29(5), 928–947.
Merikangas, K. R., Avenevolli, S., Costello, E. J., Koretz, D., & Kessler, R. C. (2009). National Comorbidity Survey Replication adolescent supplement: I. Background and measures. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 48, 367–379.
Mneimneh, Z. N. (2012). Interview Privacy and Social Conformity Effects on Socially Desirable Reporting Behavior: Importance of Cultural, Individual, Question, Design and Implementation Factors (Doctoral dissertation, The University of Michigan).
Newman, J. C., Des Jarlais, D. C., Turner, C. F., Gribble, J., Cooley, P., & Paone, D. (2002). The differential effects of face-to-face and computer interview modes. American Journal of Public Health, 92(2), 294–297.
Nucci, L., Smetana, J., Araki, N., Nakaue, M., & Comer, J. (2014). Japanese adolescents’ disclosure and information management with parents. Child Development, 85(3), 901–907.
Ong, A. D., & Weiss, D. J. (2000). The impact of anonymity on responses to sensitive questions1. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 30(8), 1691–1708.
Pollner, M., & Adams, R. E. (1994). The interpersonal context of mental health interviews. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 35(3), 283–290.
Rescorla, L. A., Ginzburg, S., Achenbach, T. M., Ivanova, M. Y., Almqvist, F., Begovac, I., et al. (2013). Cross-informant agreement between parent-reported and adolescent self-reported problems in 25 societies. Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, 42(2), 262–273.
Research Triangle Institute. (2009). SUDAAN (Version 10.0.141) [Computer software]. Research Triangle Park, NC: Research Triangle Institute.
Salbach-Andrae, H., Klinkowski, N., Lenz, K., & Lehmkuhl, U. (2009). Agreement between youth-reported and parent-reported psychopathology in a referred sample. European Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 18(3), 136–143.
Seiffge-Krenke, I., & Kollmar, F. (1998). Discrepancies between mothers’ and fathers’ perceptions of sons’ and daughters’ problem behaviour: A longitudinal analysis of parent–adolescent agreement on internalising and externalising problem behaviour. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 39(05), 687–697.
Smetana, J. G., & Asquith, P. (1994). Adolescents’ and parents’ conceptions of parental authority and personal autonomy. Child Development, 65, 1147–1162.
Smetana, J. G., Metzger, A., Gettman, D. C., & Campione-Barr, N. (2006). Disclosure and secrecy in adolescent-parent relationships. Child Development, 77(1), 201–217.
Smetana, J. G., Villalobos, M., Tasopoulos-Chan, M., Gettman, D., & Campione-Barr, N. (2009). Early and middle adolescents’ disclosure to parents about activities in different domains. Journal of Adolescence, 32, 693–713.
Snyder, S. M., & Merritt, D. H. (2015). The influence of supervisory neglect on subtypes of emerging adult substance use after controlling for familial factors, relationship status, and individual traits. Substance Abuse, 36(4), 507–514.
Strauss, M. A. (1979). Measuring intrafamily conflict and violence: The conflict tactics (CT) scales. Journal of Marriage and Family, 41, 75–88.
Taietz, P. (1962). Conflicting Group Norms and the “Third” Person in the Interview. American Journal of Sociology, 68(1), 97–104.
Tilton-Weaver, L. (2014). Adolescents’ information management: Comparing ideas about why adolescents disclose to or keep secrets from their parents. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 43(5), 803–813.
Tourangeau, R., & Yan, T. (2007). Sensitive questions in surveys. Psychological Bulletin, 133(5), 859.
van de Looij-Jansen, P. M., Goldschmeding, J. E., & de Wilde, E. J. (2006). Comparison of anonymous versus confidential survey procedures: Effects on health indicators in Dutch adolescents. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 35(4), 652–658.
Villalobos, M., & Smetana, J. D. (2012). Puerto Rican adolescents’ disclosure and lying to parents about peer and risky activities: Associations with teens’ perceptions of Latino values. Journal of Adolescence, 35, 875–885.
Yau, J. P., Tasopoulos-Chan, M., & Smetana, J. G. (2009). Disclosure to parents about everyday activities among American adolescents from Mexican, Chinese, and European backgrounds. Child Development, 80(5), 1481–1498.
Acknowledgments
We thank the WMH staff for assistance with instrumentation and fieldwork.
Authors’ Contributions
A.H. participated in the interpretation of the data and drafted the manuscript; C.B. conceived of the study, coordinated the study, and participated in the drafting of the manuscript; E.M. participated in the design and performed the statistical analysis; L.C. coordinated quality control and the acquisition of data. She received her masters of public mental health from the National Autonomous University of Mexico; M.E.M.M. participated in the design and coordination of the study.
Funding
The Mexican Adolescent Mental Health Survey was supported by the National Council on Science and Technology and Ministry of Education grant CONACYT-SEP-SSEDF-2003-CO1-22 and National Council on Science and Technology grant CB-2010-01-155221 with supplementary support from Fundación Azteca. Writing of this paper was possible through a U.S. Student Fulbright-García Robles research grant and the Mexico-U.S. Commission for Educational and Cultural Exchange (COMEXUS).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflicts of Interest
The authors report no conflict of interests.
Ethical Approval
This study was approved by the internal review committee of the National Institute of Psychiatry Ramón de la Fuente Muñiz.
Human and Animals Rights
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Herrera, A.V., Benjet, C., Méndez, E. et al. How Mental Health Interviews Conducted Alone, in the Presence of an Adult, a Child or Both Affects Adolescents’ Reporting of Psychological Symptoms and Risky Behaviors. J Youth Adolescence 46, 417–428 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-016-0418-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-016-0418-1