Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Patents and Appropriation: Concerns and Evidence1

  • Published:
The Journal of Technology Transfer Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

For over the past twenty years, the United States has witnessed a pro-patent movement. In response, numerous concerns have been raised, including possible impediments to innovation in cumulative technologies, emergence of anti-commons, barriers to entry and an elevation of costs of innovation associated with defensive patenting, growth in patent litigation and poor quality patents. Although there is little systematic evidence that these concerns have materialized in any substantial way, vigilance is nonetheless warranted.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allison, J.R. and M.A. Lemley, 1998, 'Empirical Evidence on the Validity of Litigated Patents, 'AIPLA Quarterly Journal 26 (3), 185–275.

    Google Scholar 

  • American Intellectual Property Law Association (AIPLA), 1997, 2001, 2003 'Report of the Economic Survey, 'AI-PLA, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arora, A., M. Ceccagnoli and W.M. Cohen, 2004, 'R&D and the Patent Premium, 'Mimeo, Carnegie Mellon University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arora, A., A. Fosfuri and A. Gambardella, 2001, Markets for Technology:Economics of Innovation and Corporate Strat-egy, MIT Press: Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Association of University Technology Managers (AUTM), 2002, 'The AUTM Licensing Survey, Fiscal Year 2002,' Association of University Technology Managers, Norwalk, Connecticut.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barton, J., 2000, 'Intellectual Property Rights.Reforming the Patent System, 'Science 287, 1933–1934.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, W.M., 2002, 'The pro-patent movement in the United States:Indicators and Impacts, 'in Institute on Intellectual Property, Report on Patents and the Economy, Tokyo.

  • Cohen, W.M. and S. Merrill, eds., 2003, Patents in the Knowl-edge-Based Economy, Washington, DC.: National Acade-mies Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, W.M., R.R. Nelson and J.P. Walsh, 2000, 'Protecting their Intellectual Assets: Appropriability Conditions and why U.S.Manufacturing Firms Patent (or not), 'NBER Working Paper 7522 (revised, 2004, as mimeo, Duke Uni-versity).

  • Cohen, W.M., R.R. Nelson and J.P. Walsh, 2002, 'Links and Impacts:The Influence of Public Research on Industrial R&D, 'Management Science 48 (1), 1–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evenson, R.and Y. Kislev, 1976, 'A Stochastic Model of Applied Research, 'Journal of Political Economy 84, 265–281.

    Google Scholar 

  • Federal Trade Commission, 2003, 'To Promote Innovation: The Proper Balance of Competition and Patent Law and Policy, 'Washington: Federal Trade Commission, October.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, B.H, S. Graham, D. Harhoff and D.C. Mowery, 2004, 'Prospects for improving U.S.Patent Quality via Postgrant Opposition, 'in Innovation Policy and the Economy, A.B. Jaffe, J. Lerner and S. Stern (eds.), Cambridge: National Bureau of Economic Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, B.H. and R.H. Ziedonis, 2001, 'The Patent Paradox Revisited:An Empirical Study of Patenting in the U.S. Semiconductor Industry, 1979–1995, 'R&D Journal of Economics 32 (1), 101–128.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heller, M.A. and R.S.Eisenberg, 1998, 'Can patents deter innovation?The Anticommons in Biomedical Research,' Science 280 (May 1), 698–701.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henderson, R., L. Orsenigo and G.P. Pisano, 1999, 'The Pharmaceutical Industry and the Revolution in Molecular Biology:Interactions among Scientific, Institutional and (eds.), Organizational Change, 'in D.C. Mowery and R.R. Nelson Sources of Industrial Leadership:Studies of Seven Industries, New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hicks, D., T. Breitzman, D. Olivastro and K. Hamilton, 2001, 'The Changing Composition of Innovative Activity in the US-A Portrait based on Patent Analysis, 'Research Policy 30 (4), 681–704.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jaffe, A., 2000, 'The U.S.Patent System in Transition:Policy Innovation and the Innovation process, 'Research Policy 29, 531–558.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kingston, W., 2001, 'Innovation Needs Patent Reform, 'Research Policy 30, 403–423.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koenig, G., 1980, Patent Invalidity:A Statistical and Substan-tive Analysis, Clark Boardman, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kortum, S.and J. Lerner, 1999, 'What is Behind the Recent Surge in Patenting?, 'Research Policy 28, 1–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lanjouw, J.O. and J. Lerner, 1998, 'The enforcement of Intel-lectual Property Rights:A Survey of the Empirical Litera-ture, 'Annales d 'Economie et de Statistique No.49 /50, 223–246.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lanjouw, J.O. and M.Schankerman, 2003, 'Enforcement of Patent Rights in the United States, 'in W. Cohen and S. Merrill (eds.), Patents in the Knowledge-Based Economy, Washington, DC.: National Academies Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levin, R., 1982, 'The Semiconductor Industry, 'in R.R.Nel-son (ed.), Government and Technical Progress:A Cross-Industry Analysis, New York: Pergamon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levin, R.C., A.K. Klevorick, R.R. Nelson and S.G. Winter, 1987, 'Appropriating the Returns from Industrial R&D ', Brookings Papers on Economic Activity 783–820.

  • Levin, R.C. and J. Levin, 2003, 'Benefit and Costs of an Opposition Process, 'in W. Cohen and S. Merrill (eds.), Patents in the Knowledge-Based Economy, Washington, DC.: National Academies Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mansfield, E., 1986, 'Patents and Innovation:An Empirical Study, 'Management Science 32, 173-l8l.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mazzoleni, R.and R.R. Nelson, 1998, 'Economic theories about the Benefits and Costs of Patents, 'Journal of Eco-nomic Issues 32 (4), 1031–1052.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merges, R., 1994, 'Intellectual Property Rights and Bargain-ing Breakdown:the Case of Blocking Patents, 'Tennessee Law Review 62 (1), 74–106.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merges, R., 1999, 'As Many as Six Impossible Patents before Breakfast:Property Rights for Business Concepts Cohen.and Patent System Reform, 'Berkeley High Technology Law Journal 14, 577–615.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merges, R.and R.R. Nelson, 1990, 'On the Complex Eco-nomics of Patent Scope, 'Columbia Law Review, May.

  • National Research Council (NRC), 2004, A Patent System for the 21st Century, Washington, DC.: National Academies Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, R.R., 1982, 'The Role of Knowledge in R&D Effi-ciency, 'Quarterly Journal of Economics 97, 453–470.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, R.R., 2004, 'The Market Economy and the Scientific Commons, 'Research Policy 33 (3), 455–472.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quillen, C.D. and O.H. Webster, 2001, 'Continuing Patent Applications and Performance of the U.S.Patent Office, 'Federal Circuit Bar Journal 11(1), 1–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schankerman, M.and A. Pakes, 1986, 'Estimates of the Value of Patent Rights in European Countries During the Post-1950 Period, 'The Economic Journal 96, 1052–1076.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scherer, F.M. et al., 1959, Patents and the Corporation, 2nd edn, Boston, privately published.

  • Scherer, F.M. and D. Harhoff, 2000, 'Technology Policy for a World of Skew-distributed Outcomes, 'Research Policy 29, 559–566.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scotchmer, S, 1991, 'Standing on the Shoulders of Giants: Cumulative Research and the Patent Law, 'Journal of Eco-nomic Perspectives 5, 29–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shapiro, C., 2000, 'Navigating the Patent Thicket:Cross Licenses, Patent Pools, and Standard Setting, 'in Innova-tion Policy and the Economy, Vol.1, A. Jaffe, J. Lerner and S. Stern (eds.), Cambridge, National Bureau of Eco-nomic Research and MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, C.T. and Z.A. Silberston, 1973, The Economic Impact of the Patent System:A Study of the British Experience, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • von Hippel, E., 1988, The Sources of Innovation, Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walsh, J.P., A. Arora, and W.M. Cohen, 2003, 'E.ects of Research Tool Patents and Licensing on Biomedical Inno-vation, 'in W. Cohen and S. Merrill (eds.), Patents in the Knowledge-Based Economy, Washington, DC. National Academies Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walsh, J.P., A. Arora and W.M Cohen, 2003b, 'Working through the Patent Problem,' Science 299 (Feb.14), 121.

    Google Scholar 

  • Warshofsky, F., 1994, The Patent Wars:The Battle to Own the World 's Technology, New York: Wiley and Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ziedonis, R.H., 2003, 'Patent litigation in the U.S.semicon-ductor industry, 'in W. Cohen and S. Merrill (eds.), Pat-ents in the Knowledge-Based Economy, Washington, DC.: National Academies Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cohen, W.M. Patents and Appropriation: Concerns and Evidence1 . The Journal of Technology Transfer 30, 57–71 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-004-4358-7

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-004-4358-7

Navigation