Skip to main content
Log in

Ranking and Selection of Populations on the Base of Sample Means

  • Published:
Journal of Mathematical Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

A number of directions is indicated in which for statistical problems of decision making related to ordering the parameters of distributions, it is expedient to lean on comparison of sample means. It is assumed that the corresponding parametric family has no nontrivial sufficient statistics. The key role is played by establishing conditions under which the reliability of inferences increases monotonically with increasing the sampling size. Examples of applications are given.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. M. I. Revyakov, “Schur-convexity of 2nd order, certain subclass of multivariate arrangement increasing functions with applications in statistics,” J. Multivariate Anal., 116, 25–34 (2013).

  2. E. L. Lehmann, Testing Statistical Hypotheses, Wiley (1986).

  3. C. Ma, “On peakedness of distributions of convex combinations,” J. Statist. Plan. Inference, 70, 51–56 (1998).

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. F. Proschan, “Peakedness of distributions of convex combinations,” Ann. Math. Statist., 36, 1703–1706 (1965).

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. M. L. Eaton, “Some optimum properties of ranking procedures,” Ann. Math. Statist., 38, 124–137 (1967).

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. E. L. Lehmann, “On a theorem of Bahadur and Goodman,” Ann. Math. Statist., 37, 1–6 (1966).

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. M. A. Girshick “Contributions to the Theory of sequential analysis. I,” Ann. Math. Statist., 17, 123–143 (1946).

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. R. H. Randles and M. Hollander, “Γ-minimax selection procedures in treatments versus control problems,” Ann. Math. Statist., 42, 330–341 (1971).

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. A. W. Marshall and I. Olkin, Inequalities: Theory of Majorization and Its Applications, Academic Press (1979).

  10. M. Y. An, “Logconcavity versus logcovexity: a complete characterization,” J. Economic Theory, 80, 350–369 (1998).

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. C. R. Rao, Linear Statistical Inference and Its Applications, Wiley (1965).

  12. G. G. Lorentz, “An inequality for rearrangements,” Amer. Math. Monthly., 60, 176–179 (1953).

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. M. I. Revyakov, “Optimal substitution of arguments of an arrangement increasing function based on sufficient statistics for parameter-arguments,” J. Math. Sci., 176, No. 2, 209–223 (2011).

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. Revyakov.

Additional information

Translated from Zapiski Nauchnykh Seminarov POMI, Vol. 454, 2016, pp. 238–253.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Revyakov, M. Ranking and Selection of Populations on the Base of Sample Means. J Math Sci 229, 756–766 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10958-018-3715-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10958-018-3715-2

Navigation