Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Arithmetic Matrix Operations that Preserve Conversion

  • Published:
Journal of Mathematical Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

The behavior of the conversion property under arithmetic matrix operations is investigated. Bibliography: 15 titles.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. R. A. Brualdi and B. L. Shader, “On sing-nonsigular matrices and the conversion of the permanent into the determinant,” DIMACS Ser. Discrete Math. Theor. Comput. Sci., 4, 117–134 (1991).

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. M. V. Budrevich and A. E. Guterman, “Permanent has less zeros than determinant over finite fields,” Amer. Math. Soc., Contemp. Math., 579, 33–42 (2012).

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. M. P. Coelho and M. A. Duffner, “Immanant preserving and immanant converting maps,” Linear Algebra Appl., 418, No. 1, 177–187 (2006).

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. A. Guterman, G. Dolinar, and B. Kuz’ma, “P’olya convertibility problem for symmetric matrices,” Matem. Zametki, 92, No. 5, 624–635 (2012).

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. G. Dolinar, A. E. Guterman, and B. Kuz’ma, “On the Gibson barriers for the P’olya problem,” Fundam. Prikl. Matem., 16, No. 8, 73–86 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  6. J. von zur Gathen, “Permanent and determinant,” Linear Algebra Appl., 96, 87–100 (1987)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. P. M. Gibson, “Conversion of the permanent into the determinant,” Proc. Amer. Math. Soc., 27, 471–476 (1971).

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. B. Kuz’ma, “A note on immanant preservers,” Fundam. Prikl. Matem., 13, No. 4, 113–120 (2007).

    Google Scholar 

  9. C. H. C. Little, “A characterization of convertible (0;1)-matrices,” J. Combin. Theory, Ser. B, 18, 187–208 (1975)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. M. Marcus and H. Minc, “On the relation between the determinant and the permanent,” Illinois J. Math., 5, 376–381 (1961).

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  11. H. Minc, Permanents, Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge (1984).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  12. G. P’olya, “Aufgabe 424,” Arch. Math. Phys., 20, No. 3, 271 (1913)

    Google Scholar 

  13. N. Robertson, P. D. Seymour, and R. Thomas, “Permanents, Pfaffian orientations, and even directed circuits,” Ann. Math., 150, 929–975 (1999).

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  14. L. G. Valiant, “The complexity of computing the permanent,” Theor. Comput. Sci., 8, 189-201 (1979).

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  15. V. V. Vazirani and M. Yannakakis, “Pfaffian orientations, 0-1 permanents, and even cycles in directed graphs,” Discrete Appl. Math., 25, 179-190 (1989).

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow, Russia

    M. V. Budrevich

Authors
  1. M. V. Budrevich
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. V. Budrevich.

Additional information

Translated from Zapiski Nauchnykh Seminarov POMI, Vol. 419, 2013, pp. 26–42.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Budrevich, M.V. Arithmetic Matrix Operations that Preserve Conversion. J Math Sci 199, 386–393 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10958-014-1866-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10958-014-1866-3

Keywords

Search

Navigation