Skip to main content
Log in

Kostant–Kumar Polynomials and Tangent Cones to Schubert Varieties for Involutions in A n , F 4, and G 2

  • Published:
Journal of Mathematical Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Let G be a complex reductive algebraic group and W be its Weyl group. We prove that if W is of type An, F4, or G2 and w, w’ are disjoint involutions in W, then the corresponding Kostant–Kumar polynomials do not coincide. As a consequence, we deduce that the tangent cones to the Schubert subvarieties Xw, Xw’ of the flag variety of G do not coincide as well.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. J. Humphreys, Linear Algebraic Groups, Springer (1975).

  2. S. Billey, “Kostant polynomials and the cohomology ring for G/B,” Duke Math. J., 96, 205–224 (1999).

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. M. A. Bochkarev, “Tangent cones to Schubert varieties,” in: The Third International School-Conference on Lie Algebras, Algebraic groups, and Invariant Theory Dedicated to the 75th Birthday of E. B. Vinberg, Togliatti, Russia (2012), pp. 12–13.

  4. N. Bourbaki, Lie Groups and Lie Algebras, Chaps. 4–6, Springer (2002).

  5. S. Billey and V. Lakshmibai, “Singular loci of Schubert varieties,” Progr. Math., 182, Birkhäuser (2000).

  6. M. Dyer, “The nil-Hecke ring and Deodhar’s conjecture on Bruhat intervals,” Invent. Math., 111, 571– 574 (1993).

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. D. Yu. Eliseev and M. V. Ignatyev, “Kostant polynomials and tangent cones to Schubert varieties,” in: The Third International School-Conference on Lie Algebras, Algebraic Groups, and Invariant Theory Dedicated to the 75th Birthday of E. B. Vinberg, Togliatti, Russia (2012), pp. 24–25.

  8. D. Y. Eliseev and A. N. Panov, “Tangent cones to Schubert varieties for A n of lower rank,” Zap. Nauchn. Semin. POMI, 394, 218–225 (2011); see also arXiv: math.RT/1109.0399.

    Google Scholar 

  9. J. Humphreys, Reflection Groups and Coxeter Groups, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1992).

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. M. V. Ignatyev, “The Bruhat–Chevalley order on involutions in the hyperoctahedral group and combinatorics of B-orbit closures,” Zap. Nauchn. Semin. POMI (to appear); see also arXiv: math.RT/1112.2624.

  11. M. V. Ignatyev, “Combinatorics of B-orbits and the Bruhat–Chevalley order on involutions,” Transformation Groups, 17, No. 3, 747–780 (2012), see also arXiv: math.RT/1101.2189.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  12. F. Incitti, “Bruhat order on the involutions of classical Weyl groups,” Ph.D. Thesis, Dipartimento di Matematika “Guido Castelnuovo”, Università di Roma “La Sapienza” (2003).

  13. A. A. Kirillov, “Unitary representations of nilpotent Lie groups,” Russ. Math. Surveys, 17, 53–110 (1962).

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  14. A. A. Kirillov, “Lectures on the orbit method,” Grad. Studies Math., AMS, 64 (2004).

  15. B. Kostant and S. Kumar, “The nil-Hecke ring and cohomology of G/P for a Kac–Moody group G∗,” Adv. Math., 62, 187–237 (1986).

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  16. B. Kostant and S. Kumar, “T-equivariant K-theory of generalized flag varieties, ” J. Diff. Geom., 32, 549–603 (1990).

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  17. S. Kumar, “The nil-Hecke ring and singularities of Schubert varieties,” Invent. Math., 123, 471–506 (1996).

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  18. W. A. Stein et al., Sage Mathematics Software (Version 4.6.1). The Sage Development Team (2011), available at http://www.sagemath.org.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to D. Yu. Eliseev or M. V. Ignatyev.

Additional information

To dear Professor Nikolai Vavilov with gratitude and admiration

Translated from Zapiski Nauchnykh Seminarov POMI, Vol. 414, 2013, pp. 82–105.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Eliseev, D.Y., Ignatyev, M.V. Kostant–Kumar Polynomials and Tangent Cones to Schubert Varieties for Involutions in A n , F 4, and G 2 . J Math Sci 199, 289–301 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10958-014-1856-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10958-014-1856-5

Keywords

Navigation